Basic examples of setting simulations: A REAL CASE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. 2 Prepared by : Eng.Yasir Mohammed Bashar Interference calculations.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1196r1 Submission Data Rate and Spectrum Requirements for IEEE aj (45 GHz) Date: Authors: Haiming Wang (SEU)Slide.
Principle of Monte-Carlo in a SEAMCAT environment European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal - SEAMCAT Manager (ECO) June 2012
Realizing Green ICT Dream with TTA Statistical Analysis for Out-Of-band Emission level of IMT UE LIM, Euntaek CJK IMT 28 Xi’an (西安),
Overview of Systems in SEAMCAT European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal - SEAMCAT Manager (ECO) June 2012
Basic functionality: Antenna Pattern Antenna positioning Reports and debug mode European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO) 05 June 2012.
Modeling of Unwanted and Blocking Interference Modes European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal/ Marc Le Devendec 05 October 2010 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS.
SEAMCAT modeling system-level EMC Analysis
Propagation loss models Lab 4 Engr. Mehran Mamonai.
Summary of Path Loss in Propagation
NSMA Conference Interference Temperature Round Table May 18, 2004 Les Wilding Cingular Wireless 5565 Glenridge Connector Atlanta, GA
STEP 5: A REAL CASE European Communications Office Stella Lyubchenko October 2010 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade 19 DK-1366 Copenhagen Denmark.
+50dBm TX TPO: 100Watts (+50dBm) Start with a Transmitter.
Modelling of Emission and Blocking mask European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO) October 2010 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade.
Setting Emission and Blocking masks European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO) June 2012 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade 19.
Satellite Microwave MMG Rashed Sr. Lecturer, Dept. of ETE Daffodil International University.
Introduction to SEAMCAT Example of MCA study
Quick start in SEAMCAT European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO) December 2009 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade 19 DK-1366 Copenhagen.
Basic examples of setting simulations European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO) October 2010 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade.
Basic functionality: coverage/simulation radius European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO) 05 June 2012 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs) Submission Title: Link Budget for m Date Submitted: 5 March 2012.
A new challenge – creating a regulatory environment for implementing geo-location databases for White Space Devices (WSD) Andy Gowans Date (26 th January.
[Qualcomm, Ericsson, Nokia Networks, Huawei,…]
RF Propagation No. 1  Seattle Pacific University Basic RF Transmission Concepts.
[Qualcomm, Ericsson, Nokia Networks, Huawei,…]
Modeling of Unwanted and Blocking Interference Modes European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal 05 October 2010 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE.
Coexistence in heterogeneous networks Discuss the interference issue
On-line tools and reporting an error European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal - SEAMCAT Manager (ECO) June 2012
Contributions to SE43 Group – 11 th Meeting SE43(11)65 – Reference spatial geometries between WSDs and DTT- Rxs for the calculation of the maximum permitted.
Overview of CDMA – OFDMA European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal - SEAMCAT Manager (ECO) 03 June 2014
SE43 10th meeting5th-7th July 2011© IRT – Schuberth Study on a) maximum transmit power for TVWS devices b) available amount of TVWS in Bavaria/Germany.
Event Processing Plugin Interface - DEMO European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal - SEAMCAT Manager (ECO) 20 November 2013
Overview of CDMA – OFDMA European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal - SEAMCAT Manager (ECO) 27 November 2012
Spectrum Policy Technological Solutions for Policy Problems Allen Petrin ©2003 all rights reserved 1 System Architecture for a Dynamic-Spectrum.
Numericals.
Basic examples of setting simulations European Communications Office Stella Lyubchenko (ECO) June 2013 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade.
1 OFDMA Module Usage within Seamcat. Summary 2  Using generic or OFDMA model when addressing compatibility/sharing studies?  Pointing out differences.
Optimisation of Radio Spectrum Usage
Noise Figure vs. IP3 Skip Crilly CTO, Cellular Specialties, Inc.
Setting Emission and Blocking masks
Workshop Terminology.
Modelling of Emission and Blocking mask
Propagation model: Built-in and plug-in
Basic functionality: Antenna (Pattern, positioning, Gain)
Introduction to SEAMCAT
Introduction to SEAMCAT
Radio Coverage Prediction in Picocell Indoor Networks
Extensions, System Outline and Correlation Modes and
Setting Emission and Blocking masks
Basic functionality: Importing/Exporting Libraries
A study on the coexistence between Direct Air to Ground Communication (DA2GC) and Radars in the 5 GHz band Peter Trommelen, Rob van Heijster,
LRTC 3.4 – 3.8 GHz Ericsson input PT1 XO 29 – 31/
How to install a propagation model plug-in
Propagation model: Built-in and plug-in
Frequency Assignment Planning
Evaluation Model for LTE-Advanced
Basic examples of setting simulations: A REAL CASE
Basic functionality: Importing/Exporting Libraries
Setting Emission and Blocking masks
Concept of Power Control in Cellular Communication Channels
How to evolve regulation with technologies for the effective spectrum management Doriana Guiducci, Peter Faris, José Carrascosa – European Communications.
5G Micro Cell Deployment in Coexistence with Fixed Service
Why 20 MHz Channelization in HTSG?
Frequency Assignment Planning
Modeling of Unwanted and Blocking Interference Modes
Submission Title: Link Budget for m
European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO)
Basic examples of setting simulations
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Month Year May 2016
Why 20 MHz Channelization in HTSG?
Presentation transcript:

Basic examples of setting simulations: A REAL CASE European Communications Office Stella Lyubchenko 11-12 June 2013 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade 19 DK-1366 Copenhagen Denmark Telephone: + 45 33 89 63 00 Telefax: + 45 33 89 63 30 E-mail: eco@eco.cept.org Web Site: http://www.cept.org/eco Jukka Rakkolainen/ERO

Illustration of coverage and simulation radius in SEAMCAT Victim Link Receiver (VLR) (Origin of simulation) Interfering Link Transmitter (ILT) (Origin of interfering coverage) Victim Link Transmitter (VLT) victim dRSS Victim iRSS Victim link Coverage radius Interfering Link Receiver (ILR) Interfering link Simulation radius Wanted Receiver

Distance between the ILT and the VLR (simulation radius) In this case Victim Link and Interfering Link operate at 1000 MHz, therefore simulation radius is define as follows: Jukka Rakkolainen/ERO

Distance between the ILT and the VLR (simulation radius) The It is located between 1 km and 10 km; iRSS unwanted = Pe + Ge + Gr – L; In this example if It located between 1 km and 10 km then iRSS unwanted will be in the range between -59.5 dBm and -39.5 dBm

Victim Link Transmitter (VLT) (coverage radius) - User-defined radius; - Noise-limited network; - Trafic-limited network

VLT - coverage radius The dRSS for a receiver located at the edge of the coverage area is calculated in the following way: dRSS=Pe+Ge+Gr-L if when dRSS = -47.5 dBm

Calculation of simulation radius (Uniform density mode) Within the simulation radius following number of active transmitters can be located uniformly: For a single It iRSS Unwanted = - 24.5 dBm For 10 active It iRSS Unwanted = - 34.5 dBm

Calculation of simulation radius (”none” mode) In the “none” mode it is also possible to define Uniform density of transmitters by using the Uniform polar distance For the single transmitter with Rsimulation = 0.178 km iRSS Unwanted = - 24.5 dBm

Protection distance Calculations of iRSS Unwanted will be done only if location of It satisfied to the following condition:

Power control Victim Link and Interfering operate at 1000 MHz. Distance between the Victim and Interfering transmitter is 1 km.

iRSS Unwanted= 33(dBm)+11+9-(32.5+10log(1)+20log(1000)) = -39.5dBm Power control if power control is not activated then: iRSS Unwanted= 33(dBm)+11+9-(32.5+10log(1)+20log(1000)) = -39.5dBm

Power control dRSS Wanted Receiver= 33(dBm)+11+11-(32.5+10log(1)+20log(1000)) = -37.5dBm 1

Power control 2 -50dBm (threshold) + 3 · Step (5dB) > –37.5dBm > -50dBm (threshold) + 2 · Step (5dB) The gain of Power control (git PC) = 10 dB then iRSSunwanted = -39.5dBm – git PC = -49.5 dBm

–37.5dBm > -70dB (threshold) + 20 (dynamic range) Power control 3 –37.5dBm > -70dB (threshold) + 20 (dynamic range) iRSS Unwanted = -39.5dBm – git PC = -59.5dBm

Multiple Interferers generation (Option 1) Add Duplicate Delete Colocation of the interferers

Multiple Interferers generation (Option 2) Generate Multiple interfering link

Multiple Interferers generation (Option 3)

Thank you - Any Questions?

Examples from ECC Reports 185 and 201

Calculations in 2483.5 – 2500 MHz band between healthcare facility MBANS (VLR) and LTE UL (ILT)

Victim characteristics Interferer’s characteristics Calculations in 2483.5 – 2500 MHz band between healthcare facility MBANS (VLR) and LTE UL (ILT) Victim characteristics Units MBANS Receiver bandwidth MHz 3 Receiver noise figure dB 10 Receiver antenna height m 1.5 Receiver antenna gain dBi Operating frequency 2498.5 N, receiver thermal noise dBm -109.1 ACS 25 Noise Floor -99.1 I/N objective Interferer’s characteristics   LTE UL e.i.r.p 23 Bandwidth ACLR -30 Wall attenuation Antenna height Minimum path loss 87.25 See workspace

Positioning between MBANS (VLR) and LTE UL (ILT) Postioning: Interfering Tx fixed with respect to the victim receiver No protection distance Propagation model Free space, no variation Result: Distance of ILT to VLR derived when P_interference = 0.1 %

Calculation with SEAMCAT on some examples of interference assessment for broadcasting service

Calculation of IP in the presence of noise only Pmed = -76.55 dBm, σ=5.5 dB DTT receiver height: 10 m DTT receiver gain: 0 dBi No external interference is introduced Equivalent noise power is -106.148 dBm Interference criterion is C/N = 20 dB Propagation model: Extended Hata rural Question What is the initial IP ?

Adjacent channel simulations (scenario outline) Size of broadcast pixel 100 m x 100 m Operating frequency for WSD (IT) 600 MHz 8 MHz DTT receiver (VR) 608, 616, 624 MHz DTT receive antenna height 10 m DTT receiver antenna gain 0 dBi WSD antenna height WSD E.I.R.P 20 dBm Emed at coverage edge 56.21 dBµV/m  P = -76.55 dBm, σ=5.5 dB Propagation model Extended Hata, rural

Adjacent channel simulations (SEAMCAT Victim link) Distance between Vr and It: 20 m Protection criteria: PRco = 20 dB 1st channel = 30 dB 2nd channel = 40 dB 3rd channel = 50 dB

Adjacent channel simulations (example of results) Interferer frequency Victim frequency R (distance between Vr and interferer) IP, % 600 MHz 608 MHz 0.02 km 97.37% 616 MHz 67.42% 624 MHz 19.54 %