Two-way ANOVA problems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topic 12: Multiple Linear Regression
Advertisements

FACTORIAL ANOVA Overview of Factorial ANOVA Factorial Designs Types of Effects Assumptions Analyzing the Variance Regression Equation Fixed and Random.
Topic 32: Two-Way Mixed Effects Model. Outline Two-way mixed models Three-way mixed models.
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) ANOVA methods are widely used for comparing 2 or more population means from populations that are approximately normal in distribution.
1 Chapter 4 Experiments with Blocking Factors The Randomized Complete Block Design Nuisance factor: a design factor that probably has an effect.
Chapter 4 Randomized Blocks, Latin Squares, and Related Designs
Popcorn!!!. Data Set Popcorn Oil amt. Batch Yield plain little large 8.2 gourmet little large 8.6 plain lots large 10.4 gourmet lots large 9.2 plain little.
Analgesic study with three treatments crossed with gender.
Fixed effects analysis in a Two–way ANOVA. Problem 5.6 ANOVA Effect Tests Source DF Sum of Squares F Ratio Prob > F Phos. Type *
Analgesic study with three treatments crossed with gender.
Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs
Basics of ANOVA Why ANOVA Assumptions used in ANOVA Various forms of ANOVA Simple ANOVA tables Interpretation of values in the table Exercises.
Basics of ANOVA Why ANOVA Assumptions used in ANOVA
1 Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs Basic Definitions and Principles Study the effects of two or more factors. Factorial designs Crossed:
13-1 Designing Engineering Experiments Every experiment involves a sequence of activities: Conjecture – the original hypothesis that motivates the.
13 Design and Analysis of Single-Factor Experiments:
Two-Way Analysis of Variance STAT E-150 Statistical Methods.
5-1 Introduction 5-2 Inference on the Means of Two Populations, Variances Known Assumptions.
Basics of ANOVA Why ANOVA Assumptions used in ANOVA Various forms of ANOVA Simple ANOVA tables Interpretation of values in the table Exercises.
Design of Engineering Experiments Part 4 – Introduction to Factorials
Correlation and Regression Used when we are interested in the relationship between two variables. NOT the differences between means or medians of different.
5-5 Inference on the Ratio of Variances of Two Normal Populations The F Distribution We wish to test the hypotheses: The development of a test procedure.
Web example squares-means-marginal-means-vs.html.
DOX 6E Montgomery1 Design of Engineering Experiments Part 9 – Experiments with Random Factors Text reference, Chapter 13, Pg. 484 Previous chapters have.
Problem 3.26, when assumptions are violated 1. Estimates of terms: We can estimate the mean response for Failure Time for problem 3.26 from the data by.
1 The Two-Factor Mixed Model Two factors, factorial experiment, factor A fixed, factor B random (Section 13-3, pg. 495) The model parameters are NID random.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 14 Comparing Groups: Analysis of Variance Methods Section 14.3 Two-Way ANOVA.
Linear Models Two-Way ANOVA. LM ANOVA 2 2 Example -- Background Bacteria -- effect of temperature (10 o C & 15 o C) and relative humidity (20%, 40%, 60%,
1 Experimental Statistics Spring week 6 Chapter 15: Factorial Models (15.5)
IE241: Introduction to Design of Experiments. Last term we talked about testing the difference between two independent means. For means from a normal.
1 1 Slide The Simple Linear Regression Model n Simple Linear Regression Model y =  0 +  1 x +  n Simple Linear Regression Equation E( y ) =  0 + 
Experimental Statistics - week 9
ANOVA Overview of Major Designs. Between or Within Subjects Between-subjects (completely randomized) designs –Subjects are nested within treatment conditions.
Significance Tests for Regression Analysis. A. Testing the Significance of Regression Models The first important significance test is for the regression.
Fixed effects analysis in a Two–way ANOVA. Problem 5.6 Layout.
1 Experimental Statistics - week 8 Chapter 17: Mixed Models Chapter 18: Repeated Measures.
1 Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture #10 Testing the Statistical Significance of Factor Effects.
What we give up to do Exploratory Designs 1. Hicks Tire Wear Example data 2.
Two-Way ANOVA Interactions. What we will cover Two-way ANOVA: Family of ANOVA tests More examples in R Looking at interaction plots How to interpret the.
Design and Analysis of Experiments
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA)
Two- Factor ANOVA Kij=1 (11.1)
Factorial Experiments
Repeated Measures Univariate Analysis.
Multiple comparisons
Applied Business Statistics, 7th ed. by Ken Black
Comparing Three or More Means
Chapter 10: Analysis of Variance: Comparing More Than Two Means
Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs
5-5 Inference on the Ratio of Variances of Two Normal Populations
...Relax... 9/21/2018 ST3131, Lecture 3 ST5213 Semester II, 2000/2001
BIBD and Adjusted Sums of Squares
Repeated Measures Univariate Analysis.
Analgesic study with three treatments crossed with gender.
Three way ANOVA If there was One way then and Two way, then you knew that there had to be………
Example Problem 3.24 Complete analysis.
Linear Regression.
Review of Hypothesis Testing
Two Factor ANOVA with 1 Unit per Treatment
Two Factor ANOVA with 1 Unit per Treatment
Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
The Randomized Complete Block Design
Factorial ANOVA 2 or More IVs.
ANOVA Analysis of Variance.
Latin and Graeco-Latin Squares
One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Repeated Measures meets Latin Squares
STATISTICS INFORMED DECISIONS USING DATA
Problem 3.26, when assumptions are violated
Two-way ANOVA problems
Presentation transcript:

Two-way ANOVA problems Fixed effects analysis in a Two–way ANOVA

Problem 5.6 Layout

Crossing and Nesting, Balanced Phosphor Type and Glass Type (the main effects) are crossed For example, Phosphor Type 1 means the same thing regardless of Glass Type Since main effects are crossed we can check for interaction Experimental units are nested within combinations of Phosphor Type and Glass Type Experimental unit 1 for one combination of Phosphor Type and Glass Type does not mean the same thing as Experimental unit 1 for a different combination of Phosphor Type and Glass Type Since there are three observations for each cell the design is balanced

Fixed and Random effects Suppose we ran the experiment again. Phosphor type and Glass type would mean the same thing in another run of the experiment so we call them Fixed Effects in the Model. The experimental units are not the same, so we call them Random Effects in the Model.

Linear Model

Parameters and hypotheses

Expected mean squares- EMS

Problem 5.6 ANOVA Effect Tests Source DF Sum of Squares F Ratio Prob > F Phos. Type 2 933.33 8.8421 0.0044* Glass Type 1 14450.0 273.78 <.0001* Phos. Type*Glass Type 2 133.333 1.2632 0.3178

Test and do interaction plot, then look at main effects. F-test and plot of interaction. (F-test and plot of cell means) If not significant, go on to test Main Effects.

Interaction Plot

Phosphorous Type

Tukey HSD Level Least Sq Mean 2 A 273.33333 1 B 260.00000 Levels not connected by same letter are significantly different.

Glass Effect Plot

Residuals and Normality Plot

Residuals by Predicted

Problem 5.10 Layout

Crossed and Nested Temperature and Glass are crossed Can check for Interaction Experimental units are Nested within Treatment combinations There are three observations per cell so the design is balanced

Linear Model

Problem 5.10 Source DF Sum of Squares F Ratio Prob > F Glass Type 2 150864.5 206.3706 <.0001* Temp. 2 1970334.5 2695.259 <.0001* Glass *Temp. 4 290551.7 198.7257 <.0001* Error 18 2418330.1

Interaction Plot

LS Means Table (usually put in appendix) Level Least Sq Mean Std Error 1, 100 572.6667 11.038093 1, 125 1087.3333 11.038093 1, 150 1386.0000 11.038093 2, 100 553.0000 11.038093 2, 125 1035.0000 11.038093 2, 150 1313.0000 11.038093 3, 100 573.3333 11.038093 3, 125 1054.6667 11.038093 3, 150 886.6667 11.038093

Now this is slick… Level Least Sq Mean 1, 150 A 1386.0000 2, 150 B 1313.0000 1, 125 C 1087.3333 3, 125 C 1054.6667 2, 125 C 1035.0000 3, 150 D 886.6667 3, 100 E 573.3333 1, 100 E 572.6667 2, 100 E 553.0000 Levels not connected by same letter are significantly different.

Residuals by Predicted

Residual Plot and Normality Plot

Normality test Shapiro-Wilk W Test W Prob<W 0.966954 0.5237 0.966954 0.5237 Note: Ho = The data is from the Normal distribution. Small p-values reject Ho.