Star-Massive Black Holes Encounters

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
White Dwarf Stars Low mass stars are unable to reach high enough temperatures to ignite elements heavier than carbon in their core become white dwarfs.
Advertisements

Shocks Jets and Active Galaxies By Drew Brumm. Shocks Strong Shocks Shocks in accretion –Compact objects –Supernova explosions Accretion of binary systems.
Who are the usual suspects? Type I Supernovae No fusion in white dwarf, star is supported only by electron degeneracy pressure. This sets max mass for.
Accretion Processes in GRBs Andrew King Theoretical Astrophysics Group, University of Leicester, UK Venice 2006.
Neutron Stars and Black Holes Please press “1” to test your transmitter.
Gamma-Ray bursts from binary neutron star mergers Roland Oechslin MPA Garching, SFB/TR 7 SFB/TR7 Albert Einstein‘s Century, Paris,
Mass transfer in a binary system
Neutron Stars and Black Holes
Jets from stellar tidal disruptions by supermassive black holes Dimitrios Giannios Princeton University HEPRO3, Barcelona, June 30.
Probing Dormant Massive Black Hole Binaries at Galactic Nuclei Fukun Liu Astronomy Department & KIAA, Peking University, Beijing, China Probing Strong.
AST101 The Evolution of Galaxies. Virgo Cluster Collisions of Galaxies Outside of Clusters (the field), most galaxies are spiral or irregular In dense.
Active Galactic Nuclei Astronomy 315 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 19.
QUASARS Monsters of the ancient Universe Professor Jill Bechtold Steward Observatory Tucson Amateur Astronomers, Dec. 6, 2002.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 21 Galaxy Evolution.
Neutron Stars and Black Holes PHYS390: Astrophysics Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 18.
The Ultra-luminous X-Ray Sources Near the Center of M82 NTHU 10/18/2007 Yi-Jung Yang.
The general theory of relativity is our most accurate description of gravitation Published by Einstein in 1915, this is a theory of gravity A massive object.
Multi-Messenger Astronomy of Tidal Stellar Pablo Laguna Center for Relativistic Astrophysics School of Physics Georgia Tech, Atlanta, USA Amaldi 11, Gwangju,
Neutron Stars and Black Holes Chapter 14. Formation of Neutron Stars Compact objects more massive than the Chandrasekhar Limit (1.4 M sun ) collapse beyond.
Stellar Disruptions of Super Massive Black Holes Ron Caplan March 7, 2003.
Black holes: do they exist?
 Galaxies with extremely violent energy release in their nuclei  Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)  Up to many thousand times more luminous than the entire.
Do black holes really exist? Dr Marek Kukula, Royal Observatory Greenwich.
Our goals for learning How did Hubble prove galaxies lie beyond our galaxy? How do we observe the life histories of galaxies? How did galaxies form? Why.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 21 Galaxy Evolution.
Do flares in Sagittarius A* reflect the last stage of tidal capture? Andrej Čadež 1, Massimo Calvani 2, Andreja Gomboc 1, Uroš Kostić 1 1 University of.
Dec. 6, Review: >8Msun stars become Type II SNe As nuclear burning proceeds to, finally, burning Silicon (Si) into iron (Fe), catastrophe looms.
Death of Stars III Physics 113 Goderya Chapter(s): 14 Learning Outcomes:
Intro screen.
Galaxies with Active Nuclei Chapter 14:. Active Galaxies Galaxies with extremely violent energy release in their nuclei (pl. of nucleus).  “active galactic.
Earth & Space Science March 2015
9. Evolution of Massive Stars: Supernovae. Evolution up to supernovae: the nuclear burning sequence; the iron catastrophe. Supernovae: photodisintigration;
Progenitor stars of supernovae Poonam Chandra Royal Military College of Canada.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Clicker Questions Chapter 14 The Milky Way Galaxy.
Globular Clusters. A globular cluster is an almost spherical conglomeration of 100,000 to 1,000,000 stars of different masses that have practically.
Death of sun-like Massive star death Elemental my dear Watson Novas Neutron Stars Black holes $ 200 $ 200$200 $ 200 $ 200 $400 $ 400$400 $ 400$400.
Magneto-hydrodynamic Simulations of Collapsars Shin-ichiro Fujimoto (Kumamoto National College of Technology), Collaborators: Kei Kotake(NAOJ), Sho-ichi.
Chapter 21 Galaxy Evolution Looking Back Through Time Our goals for learning How do we observe the life histories of galaxies? How did galaxies.
Einstein 2005 July 21, 2005 Relativistic Dynamical Calculations of Merging Black Hole-Neutron Star Binaries Joshua Faber (NSF AAPF Fellow, UIUC) Stu Shapiro.
HOW TO DETECT A BLACK HOLE Effects on matter/light outside the horizon –gravitational attraction of other bodies –“dark star” with mass distinguish from.
“Globular” Clusters: M15: A globular cluster containing about 1 million (old) stars. distance = 10,000 pc radius  25 pc “turn-off age”  12 billion years.
Tidal Disruption Events
Supernovas Neutron Stars and Black Holes
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
TDE in the XMM-Newton slew survey
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Neutron Stars and Black Holes
黎卓 HB Perets, JC Lombardi Jr, SR Milcarek Jr JUNO会议,南京,2016/4/17-18
Stellar Evolution Chapters 16, 17 & 18.
Virgo cluster survey with MXT
Rebecca Surman Union College
Fermi Bubble Z.G.,Xiong.
Relativistic cross sections of tidal disruption events
Chapter 21 Galaxy Evolution
Neutron Stars and Black Holes
Neutron Stars and Black Holes
Evolution of massive binary black holes (BBHs)
No BH at the GC and Supernova Explosion Driven by Magnetic Molopoles
White Dwarf Stars Low mass stars are unable to reach high enough temperatures to ignite elements heavier than carbon in their core become white dwarfs.
Paola Rodriguez Hidalgo High Energy Astrophysics
White Dwarf Stars Low mass stars are unable to reach high enough temperatures to ignite elements heavier than carbon in their core become white dwarfs.
Evolution of the Solar System
The Death of a Star.
Note that the following lectures include animations and PowerPoint effects such as fly ins and transitions that require you to be in PowerPoint's Slide.
AGN: Quasars By: Jay Hooper.
Galaxies With Active Nuclei
Black Holes Chapter 14.
Galaxies With Active Nuclei
Doubly Dead Stars A binary system eventually ends as two compact objects Usually nothing else happens If very close (neutron stars or black holes) more.
The Death of a Star.
Presentation transcript:

Star-Massive Black Holes Encounters J.-P.Luminet Observatoire de Paris (LUTH) Tidal Disruption Events Esa, Madrid 2012

Supermassive black holes (M > 106 MS) in active galactic nuclei quasars radiogalaxies Supermassive black holes (M > 106 MS) in active galactic nuclei Seyfert 2

Massive black holes (M > 106 MS) in quiescent galactic nuclei Sagittarius A* 2,7 106 MS < M < 3,5  106 MS)

Intermediate mass black holes (103 < M < 106 MS) in globular clusters M15 4000 MS G1/M31 20 000 MS

The « octopus » model for AGN Luminet (1986)

BH’s gravitational radius Characteristic distances Accretion radius Collision radius Hills limit 108 MO Ablation radius Tidal radius BH’s gravitational radius 6

Tidal field = relative acceleration between elements of matter Newtonian tidal field Tidal field = relative acceleration between elements of matter tidal potential tidal tensor deviation tensor

(planet-satellite couple in circular orbit) • For incompressible homogeneous bodies • static field (planet-satellite couple in circular orbit) Edouard Roche Roche limit (1847)

• incompressible bodies in dynamical field (asteroid-black hole encounter in parabolic orbit) Luminet & Carter (1986) Kostic et al. (2009) Cigar-like regime Disk-like regime 0.16 RT ≤ Rp ≤ RT Rp ≤ 0.16 RT

Luminet et al. 1982-1986 : « affine » model • compressible bodies in dynamical field (star-black hole encounter in parabolic orbit) Luminet et al. 1982-1986 : « affine » model Non-disruptive regime Oscillating Riemann ellipsoid => variable star ?

From equilibrium to stellar disruption Compare : timescale of varying tidal field / internal timescale of the star Far from the tidal radius : Star adjusts its equilibium configuration Close to and inside the tidal radius : Pionneer work : Hills, 1975 ; Frank & Rees, 1976 Strongly dynamical tidal field => Star cannot respond

the penetration factor Parabolic orbit Crucial parameter : the penetration factor Carter & Luminet (Nature, 1982) Tidal radius Black hole RP RT

Slight penetration (b ~ 1) in the tidal radius Disruption process in the ellipsoidal model (Luminet & Carter, 1986) « cigar-like » configuration after leaving the tidal radius

Disruption process reproduced by hydrodynamical simulations Slight penetration in the tidal radius Disruption process reproduced by hydrodynamical simulations Ejected matter « cigar-like » configuration after leaving the tidal radius « S-like » configuration at the periastron

Lidskii & Ozernoy (1979), Rees (1988) Accretion of stellar debris (50%)  Tidal Flares Lidskii & Ozernoy (1979), Rees (1988) Tidal radius Massive black hole

UV flare in NGC 4252 (Renzini et al. 1995) X-ray flare in RXJ 1242-11 (Komossa & Greiner, 1999) UV flare in NGC 4252 (Renzini et al. 1995)

Giant X-UV luminous flares Detection (ROSAT, Chandra, Galex…) of X-UV flares from (non active) galactic nuclei

X-UV-optical luminous flares Detection (Chandra, Galex, Pan-starrs…) of flares from (non active) galactic nuclei (Komossa et al., Saxton et al. , Esquej et al., Gezari et al., etc.) « Relativistic » Tidal Flares Detection (Swift) of hard-X flares (Lx ~1047 ergs) (Zauderer et al. 2011, Cenko et al. 2012) Relativistic jets from tidal ejecta ?

(Carter & Luminet, Nature, 1982) The Pancake Effect (Carter & Luminet, Nature, 1982) Fixed compressive principal direction of the tidal tensor in the « vertical » direction ==> For deep penetration ( > 3)

The « Rolling Mill » Effect Cartoon version fixed compressive point after periastron But relativistc velocity at periastron => almost instantenous flattening

Disruption process in the ellipsoidal model (Luminet & Carter, 1986) Deep penetration (b > 3) in the tidal radius Disruption process in the ellipsoidal model (Luminet & Carter, 1986)

Explosive stellar disruption ? Compression and heating strongly dependent from the penetration factor Maximum values for an ideal gas with polytropic index 5/3 : Conditions required for explosive thermonuclear reactions

Detonation of metals (C, N, O, …) by radiative proton captures (Luminet & Pichon 1989) Helium detonation by triple alpha (Pichon 1985)

Tidally induced supernovae? Luminet, 1986 Rosswog et al., 2008 A special type of GRB ? Carter, 1992 Lu et al. 2008; Gao et al. 2011

The pancake triangle (solar type stars) Star enters the Black hole Black hole enters the star 107 K 108 K 109 K log ( No disruption log(M•/M*)

Shock waves in stellar pancakes (Brassart & Luminet, 2008-2010)

Problematics Stellar pancakes calculated in the affine model (Luminet et al. 1983- 1989) ==> Elliptical deformations of the star • Stellar pancakes calculated by 3D hydro (Bicknell & Gingold 1983; Laguna et al. 1993; Fulbright 1996) ==> SPH method (uses artificial viscosity to simulate shock waves) N.B. : Generalized affine model (Ivanov et al. 2001-2003)

Due to shock waves occuring during the phase of vertical direction ?? Disagreement : compression of the stellar core less than in the affine model: max ~ 1.5 for  < 10 max ~ const for  > 10 Due to shock waves occuring during the phase of vertical direction ?? Or bad treatment (SPH) of shock waves ?

New Hydrodynamical Model Euler eqs. + Godunov methods 1D approximation valid from the tidal radius to periastron Principal axes of the tidal tensor

 = 7 velocity Phase1: collapse Tidal radius periastron max.compression Phase1: collapse

 = 7 velocity Phase 2: bounce max.compression Subsonic expansion Subsonic collapse Supersonic collapse Subsonic expansion

collapse Shock  = 7 density (after bounce) Tidal radius periastron max.compression and bounce Shock (after bounce)

 = 7 temperature shock

= 15 shock 1 (before bounce) velocity shock 2 (after bounce)

 = 15 shock 1 (before bounce) density shock 2 (after bounce)

maximum central density maximum central temperature

Shock-driven maximum temperature  = 10 Shock-driven maximum temperature

Number of disruption events: Wang & Merritt (2004), Tal (2005) BH binaries : Chen et al (2009) UV/X/gamma-ray flares

Modelisation of Gamma-Ray Bursts jet Long GRB Short GRB 41

• g-ray transients Swift J1644+57 and Swift J2058+05 (Zauderer 2011, Cenko 2012) interpreted as a relativistic outflow from transient accretion onto a 106 Ms black hole • GRB 060614 (long ~100 s) without SN remnant : disruption of a WD by an intermediate mass BH ? (Lu et al. 2008) • A new class of g-ray bursts from stellar disruptions by IMBH ? (Gao et al., 2010)  From a total of 328 Swift GRBs with accurate measured durations and without SN association, 25 GRBs satisfying the criteria for GRB060614-type bursts…

Relativistic tidal field Luminet & Marck, 1985 E = specific total energy L = specific angular momentum for parabolic orbits : E = 1

Precession effect : self-crossing orbit

Double point inside the tidal radius: Luminet & Marck, 1985

Double point inside the tidal radius Brassart & Luminet, 2011 Double point inside the tidal radius Several compressions

Multi-pancake effect and X/ bursts • Multi-peak structure and timescales compatible with GRB 970815 (and others ?)

Recent hydro models … • 3D simulations coupling hydrodynamics and nuclear network (Guillochon et al., 2011): Confirm the occurrence of tidally induced supernovae • Red giants / BH interactions (Mac Leod et al., 2012): Tidal stripping of atmosphere • White dwarfs / IM BH strong encounters (Rosswog et al. 2010, Hass et al. 2012): Confirm nuclear ignition (e.g. helium detonation)

Supermassive BH > 108 MS Analogy with stellar collisions Around a 109 MS black hole, the typical collisional velocities are > 5000 km/s within a distance 0.1 pc from the black hole b = vcoll/v* crushing factor b = RT/Rp Massive BH (104 - 108 MS) Supermassive BH > 108 MS Glob. Clusters, GN, Seyfert Quasars, Giant elliptical …

 : disruption /  : pancake effect High velocity head-on collisions, polytropes 5/3 Barnes, 2003 Makino, 1999

The End