Climate Change Technical Advisor

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ongoing discussions on the formulation of National Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) and their possible inclusion as market mechanisms in a post-2012.
Advertisements

SDM Strategy SDM Joint Coordination Workshop
Ann Gordon Ministry of Natural Resources and the Environment Belmopan Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions in the post 2012.
Ideas on NAMA development and implementation Carolyn Neufeld KfW Carbon Fund.
Climate Change Diplomacy Climate Change Diplomacy From Cancun to Durban February 28th, 2011.
The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) Rationale and Lessons learnt Artur Runge-Metzger Head of International Climate Negotiations, European Commission.
UNFCCC Secretariat SDM programme CDM‘s contribution to global climate action; its sucesses and further contribution Fatima-Zahra Taibi, UNFCCC secretariat.
Regional Programms Climate Change Mitigation Alexandra Soezer Carbon Technical Advisor Bonn, March 24 th 2012.
1 Katherine Sierra Vice President, Sustainable Development Network The World Bank April 14, 2008 Proposed Climate Investment Funds (CIFs) Recap.
UNFCCC Workshop on the Use of the Guidelines for the Preparation of National Communications from non- Annex I Parties Programmes Containing Measures to.
Reporting on SD co-benefits using the new CDFM SD Tool and opportunities for monitoring to enhance the profile of CDM projects and CER price: what the.
Kyoto Protocol and Beyond
Common recommendations and next steps for improving local delivery of climate finance Bangkok, October 31, 2012.
CDM National Authorities : an Example Prepared for the National Workshop on Capacity Development for Clean Development Mechanism (CD4CDM) March 2003,
CTCN ORIGINS 2 COP 15 (Copenhagen): agreement to establish a “Technology Mechanism” COP 16 (Cancun): Technology Mechanism further elaborated (TEC and.
Of NAMAs and NAPs - Vositha Wijenayake Outreach and Advocacy Coordinator CANSA.
Technology Transfer Activities under the UNFCCC by Ms. Christine Zumkeller.
Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAS) Globally An overview Niklas Höhne 16/01/2014.
Robust institutional arrangements for national mitigation efforts Karen Holm Olsen & Miriam Hinostroza Low Carbon Development Programme UNEP DTU Partnership.
FAO NAMA learning tool to support NAMA preparation in agriculture
TEEB Training Session 3: From Concepts to Action.
1 Overcoming Challenges in Preparation and Implementation of NAMAs Kigali, 17 th August 2015 African Regional Workshop on NAMAs.
UNFCCC Secretariat From PoA to NAMAs - Co-existence (opportunities and challenges) Perumal Arumugam Regional Workshop on CDM and NAMAs for Latin America.
UNFCCC Secretariat Utilizing the existing CDM institutional arrangements for NAMAs Perumal Arumugam Regional Workshop on CDM and NAMAs for Latin America.
CDM Project Cycle & Project Design Document Project Design Document First Extended & Regional Workshops CD4CDM Project Siem Reap, Cambodia March.
Ivory Coast: Elaborating a strategy to put in place NAMAs at the national level Prepared by: Richemond Informal English Translation of presentation prepared.
1 International negotiations on post 2012 regime: general framework and the key questions Ruta Bubniene, Programme officer Reporting, Data and Analysis.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
Regional perspectives under the Clean Development Mechanism Jose Domingos Gonzalez Miguez, Ministry of Science and Technology, Brazil.
1 Marcela Main S. UNFCCC secretariat Bali Road Map: a new negotiation process.
Guidelines for non-Annex I National Communications Implications for Assessment of Impacts of, and Adaptation to Climate Change Asia-Pacific Regional Workshop.
Team Leader, Technology Policy and Strategy, UNFCCC Mr Andrew Higham THE CANCUN AGREEMENTS, THE TECHNOLOGY MECHANISM AND TECHNOLOGY NEEDS ASSESSMENTS UNFCCC.
UNFCCC secretariat From CDM to NAMAs – Synergies between CDM and NAMAs Perumal Arumugam Latin American Carbon Forum, Bogota (03 – 05 Sep 2014)
Transfer of Technology Consultative Process Wanna Tanunchaiwatana Manager, Technology Climate Change Secretariat (UNFCCC) Asia and the Pacific Regional.
KfW Carbon Fund From PoA to NAMA Barcelona 31th of May 2011.
REDD+ negotiations and key milestones from Cancun to Durban Geneva, 9 May 2011 Clea Paz-Rivera, UN-REDD Secretariat.
Standards Development for Climate Change  Consensus reached between UNFCCC & ISO that internationally accepted standards will be promoted globally  Include.
Capacity Development for the CDM (CD4CDM) First National Workshop - SURINAM Host Country Institutional Issues Miriam Hinostroza UNEP.
NAMAs in the Context of National Sustainable Development Karen Holm Olsen Brainstorming session, 9 April 2013, AM (CET) UNFCCC coordinated.
A Brief History of REDD + Regional REDD+ Coordination Unit Tigray Regional State,Mekelle Sep 3 & 4/2015 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST NATIONAL REDD+
Accessing the Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency (CBIT)
Presentation title Enhancing synergies towards climate action and sustainable development on the ground GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Da Nang, Vietnam,
Presentation title 9. Defining a country-specific NAP process: rapid stocktaking using a sample NAP process to identify building blocks, workstreams and.
UNEP/Global Mechanism support for UNCCD reporting
Institutional Strengthening Support
Presenting carbonn Cities Climate Registry
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
Presentation title 5. Overview of the process to formulate and implement NAPs: process, 2 objectives, guidelines, the NAP-SDG iFrame, upcoming SBI assessment.
GEF & UNFCCC Cooperation: COP 17 Action Items
CBIT Coordination Meeting Copenhagen, Denmark April 18, 2017
GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.
Global Coordination Platform
Cambodia National Work Plan
Emily Chessin Representative of Regional Specialist
NAMA Database & Annual Status Report on NAMAs
Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency
Global Coordination Platform
GEF & UNFCCC Cooperation: COP 17 Action Items
Panel Discussion on Supporting NDC Implementation Through Market and Non-Market Based Approaches: Carbon Pricing and More 6 September 2016 Kazuhisa KOAKUTSU.
Presentation title Africa Carbon Forum 13 April, 2018 Nairobi
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Japan-Caribbean Climate Change Partnership
Presentation title Enhancing the roles of the NAMA registry Asia Pacific and Eastern Europe Regional Workshop on Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions.
The Green Climate Fund and environmental and social safeguards
GCF business model.
INTERNATIONAL FORUM «GREEN BRIDGE» PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM
Designing Accreditation and Verification Systems
UNFCCC Needs-based Finance (NBF) Project
Synergies between NDCs & SDGs; Integration into National Planning
The Technology Mechanism of the UNFCCC
Presentation transcript:

Climate Change Technical Advisor Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) as Vehicle to Implement NDCs Drivers, Needs & Opportunities Alexandra Soezer Climate Change Technical Advisor UNDP LECB Programme NAMA Training June 16th -17th , 2016 St. Vincent

Outline Learning from the CDM Introduction to NAMAs NAMA success factors and guiding questions

Learning from the CDM

What is CDM and NAMA What is CDM Assist Parties not included in Annex I to the Convention in achieving sustainable development and in contributing to the ultimate objective of the Convention, and to assist Parties included in Annex I in achieving compliance with their quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under Article 3 of the Kyoto Protocol. emission reductions are real, measurable and verifiable, and additional to any that would occur in the absence of the project activity; What is NAMA : Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions by developing country Parties in the context of sustainable development, supported and enabled by technology, financing and capacity building, in a measurable,reportable and verifiable manner "aimed at achieving a deviation in emissions relative to business-as-usual emissions in 2020.“ CDM and NAMAs have 3 key features in common: The CDM mechanism and NAMAs shall reduce emissions that are measureable, real and verifyable. Both shall contribute to sustainable development and Both shall provide technical and financial support for the implementation of mitigation actions. The key difference between the CDM and NAMAs is that the CDM was designed as a mechanism that allowed Annex 1 countries to achieve Compliance with their emission reduction targets while NAMAs shall support developing countries to deviate from business as usual and transform their economies.

CDM Experience to Develop NAMA Governance Structure Accounting Structure (centralized system, registry) Methodological standards – Comparable quality and fungible Ensure Environmental Integrity MRV provision and consistent MRV requirements Transparency and Independence. Participatory approach (local/global stake holder) QA/QC procedures on data quality We can build on key features from the CDM to design robust NAMAs – in particular the MRV provisions and consistent MRV requirements, the participatory approach through local and global stakeholders and an accounting standards that includes registries at the UNFCCC.

Steppingstone – from PoA to NAMA Support implementation of Policy /Programme measure. Elements such as Definition of Eligibility criteria Project identification and inclusion Programme finance Setting boundaries MRV process Management structure Cross sectoral projects (urban built) Design and Implementation elements of PoAs (concept of CPA , Sampling approaches, data quality issues) Elements from the PoA design that looked at sectoral programmes rather than individual CDM projects and was embedded in national Development strategies, are highly relevant for the preparation of a NAMA that can also attract private sector: I n particular the elibitility criteria for inclusion of new projects, project identification and inclusion process, MRV process, and the management structure.

CDM MRV System Is internationally accepted Has a fully operational assessment apparatus Has accreditation system for third party validators/verifiers Has registry for issuing and tracking credits Is used across the world as the source of rules for mitigation activities Enjoys a unique political legitimacy Under the CDM a wealth of GHG baseline and monitoring methodologies were developed that can be easily also applied for NAMAs, increasing focus is put on simplified methodology approaches with default values and standardized baselines. These features are highly relevant for NAMAs too. All UNDP supported NAMAs use existing approved CDM methodologies and standardized baselines which makes the MRV of NAMAs simpler and cheaper while Ensuring transparency and comparability.

Introduction to NAMAs

NAMA Concept Creation The Bali Action Plan at 13th Conference of Parties (COP) to the Kyoto Protocol (2007) decided that: Nationally appropriate mitigation actions (NAMAs) are to be undertaken by developing country Parties in the context of sustainable development, supported and enabled by technology, financing and capacity building, in a measurable, reportable and verifiable (MRV) manner.

Further key decisions regarding NAMAs Copenhagen Accord (2009) Introduced the term “supported NAMA” to refer to NAMAs seeking international support for their implementation Stated that supported NAMAs should be subject to internationally agreed MRV standards Cancun Agreement (2010) “developing country Parties will take nationally appropriate mitigation actions…aimed at achieving a deviation in emissions relative to ‘business as usual’ emissions in 2020”, but that “developed country Parties shall provide enhanced financial, technological and capacity building support for the preparation and implementation of nationally appropriate mitigation actions of developing country Parties”

NAMAs Objective of NAMAs Sectoral Approaches Strategies Programs Projects Aligned with country’s national development plans & strategies Achieve GHG emission reductions Sustainable development impact Monitored, reported and verified (MRV) Government coordinated, but involves private sector, civil society organizations, academia, etc. Although there is no universally accepted definition or rules for what a NAMA is, overtime NAMAs have evolved and have incorporated many elements of the CDM, including sectoral approaches, strategies, programs and projects. NAMAs include a few main elements: They are to be aligned with a country’s national development plans and strategies They are to contribute to the mitigation of GHG emissions The impact of a NAMA should be measureable, reportable and verifiable. And finally NAMAs are usually coordinated by the lead sector ministry, but should involve private sector, civil society, academia and other relevant organizations that should contribute to NAMA development and implementation.

NAMA registry UNFCCC launched in 2012 an online NAMA registry to record NAMAs seeking international support and facilitate matching of finance, technology and capacity development

NAMAs within a country’s development strategy and the UNFCCC process Strategic level   Operational level Tactical level Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action Determined Contributions Low Carbon Development Strategies It is important to situate NAMAs within a country’s broader national development objectives. The figure shows how strategy, tactics and operation can be linked: long-term strategies are designed to become overarching national low-emission frameworks which guide the preparation of progressively ambitious NDCs, and translate them into concrete implementable measures (NAMAs) in order to achieve this target. The iterative NDC process should lead the country to achieve its long term vision of low emissions development. Source: NAMA guidebook 2016

Status of NAMAs Globally Caribbean?? When we take a look at how NAMAs have progressed over the last few years we see that there has been substantial growth in NAMAs. As of 2015 there were 151 NAMAs worldwide. 140 are still under development and 11 are currently under implementation. When you look at the breakdown of NAMAs across the world, the majority of them have been undertaken by countries in Latin America, followed by Africa and the Middle East, Asia and finally Europe. It’s interesting to note that there is almost no presence of the Caribbean in this global snapshot. From my understanding only Costa Rica and Dominican Republic have submitted NAMAs to the UNFCCC, but they are often grouped with Latin America. Over the course of this workshop I am looking forward to exploring and learning why this is the case Source: Tilburg et al., 2015, “Status Report on Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions Mid-year update 2015.”

Country Needs: Preparing & Implementing NAMAs As this figure shows, developing and implementing a NAMA requires the involvement of many stakeholders from the national government to development partners, the private sector and civil society. Sometimes developing countries do not have the resources required to either develop or implement a NAMA and this is where international support will play a major role. Source: KPMG, 2011

Country Needs: Preparing & Implementing NAMAs Political Enabling environment for investment Institutional Guidance and staff capacity to prepare NAMAs NAMA coordination and managing authorities Outreach activities and liaising with donors & investors Established public private dialogue & promotion of public-private partnerships Technical National Technical Implementing Entity established MRV system in place, operational and well maintained NAMA progress and results regularly reported Financial Effective allocation of funds Promoting investment opportunities Promoting public finance mechanisms to catalyze private investment flows. Capacity Building Technology Finance NAMA By providing capacity building, technology or financing support, development partners can support country’s in preparing and implementing a NAMA. This support can assist a country’s various stakeholders in carrying out the many roles required to implement a NAMA. These roles can be broken down into a few main categories including political roles, institutional roles, technical roles and financial roles. From the political perspective, the government needs to develop an enabling environment to facilitate the investment in NAMAs. From an institutional perspective, the government needs to have the staff capacity to prepare a NAM and guidance on how to go about doing this. From a technical perspective, it needs to have the capacity, financing and technology available to establish, implement and maintain an MRV system And from a financial perspective it needs to be able to attract public international finance in order to bring in larger scale private sector investment

NAMA success factors and guiding questions

Challenges / Success Factors NAMA Preparation Identify a ‘Champion’ to drive the NAMA development process Stakeholder engagement (continuous, transparent, inclusive) Political commitment to meet mitigation & development targets Identify lead institutions/ministries to coordinate and ensure continued buy-in Promote local technical capacity - to ensure lasting technical support during NAMA and MRV system preparation Identify a national financial institution - to manage large amounts of funds for effective allocation of financial resources Put the private sector center stage – engage in dialogues, encourage policy frameworks to facilitate investment in ventures under the NAMA framework

Guiding Questions – NAMA Preparation Is a leading institution identified that will drive the NAMA preparation process? Is the proposed NAMA a political priority, having full support from the key Ministries, and is aligned to national policies (INDCs)? Is there financial commitment for the future implementation of the NAMA? Does a national FI exist that will effectively allocate national and international financial resources and transparently monitor the financial support obtained? Is an institution identified that will lead the MRV of GHG ERs and SD impacts? Can the private sector get engaged in a dialogue and is there interest to invest in potential NAMA ventures?

Summary NAMAs are a tool that can help countries achieve reach their mitigation targets and longer-term national development objectives Opportunities for J-CCCP and other development partners to support the Caribbean region in preparing and implementing NAMAs In summary NAMAs can provide an opportunity to help country’s reach their mitigation goals and in turn their longer-term national development objectives and low-emission development strategies. I look forward to learning from you about how NAMAs might serve as a tool to help your country reach its mitigation goals and national development objectives and I am excited to explore how the JCCCP and other development partners can support the region in meeting mitigation targets and objectives. Thank you.

Thank you! Alexandra Soezer Climate Change Technical Advisor UNDP LECB Programme Alexandra.soezer@undp.org