Christoph Schraff Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
13 th SRNWP / 28 th EWGLAM Meeting Zürich, 9 – 12 Oct current status long-term strategy mid-term strategy some ongoing.
Advertisements

COSMO General Meeting Zürich, Sept Stefan Klink, Klaus Stephan and Christoph Schraff and Daniel.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss The Latent Heat Nudging Scheme of COSMO EWGLAM/SRNWP Meeting,
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre On the Value of.
Status of PP KENDA COSMO General Meeting, Sibiu, 2 – 5 Sept Status Report PP KENDA Christoph Schraff Deutscher Wetterdienst,
Francesca Marcucci, Lucio Torrisi with the contribution of Valeria Montesarchio, ISMAR-CNR CNMCA, National Meteorological Center,Italy First experiments.
WWOSC 2014 Assimilation of 3D radar reflectivity with an Ensemble Kalman Filter on a convection-permitting scale WWOSC 2014 Theresa Bick 1,2,* Silke Trömel.
Status of WG1 and Science Plan Issues COSMO General Meeting, Sibiu, 2 – 5 Sept Status of WG1 Science Plan Issues Christoph.
Introduction to KENDA KENDA Mini-Workshop., Munich, 28 Feb Introduction to KENDA as COSMO Priority Project Christoph Schraff.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Statistical Characteristics of High- Resolution COSMO.
WWOSC 2014, Aug 16 – 21, Montreal 1 Impact of initial ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model.
ISDA 2014, Feb 24 – 28, Munich 1 Impact of ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model Florian.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High-resolution data assimilation in COSMO: Status and.
Stephanie Guedj Florence Rabier Vincent Guidard Benjamin Ménétrier Observation error estimation in a convective-scale NWP system.
COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept Dependance of bias on initial time of forecasts 1 WG1 Overview
Radar in aLMo Assimilation of Radar Information in the Alpine Model of MeteoSwiss Daniel Leuenberger and Andrea Rossa MeteoSwiss.
Requirements from KENDA on the verification NetCDF feedback files: -produced by analysis system (LETKF) and ‘stat’ utility ((to.
Outline Background Highlights of NCAR’s R&D efforts A proposed 5-year plan for CWB Final remarks.
Nudging Radial Velocity, OPERA, LHN for COSMO-EU COSMO GM, Sibiu, 2 September Recent developments at DWD
KENDA & WG1 Overview COSMO GM, Rome, 6 September Deutscher Wetterdienst, D Offenbach, Germany.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz First Experience with KENDA at MeteoSwiss Daniel Leuenberger,
Data Assimilation for Very Short-Range Forecasting in COSMO WMO WS on Use of NWP for Nowcasting, Boulder, 24 – 26 Oct
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept KENDA Contributions / input.
GPS GPS derived integrated water vapor in aLMo: impact study with COST 716 near real time data Jean-Marie Bettems, MeteoSwiss Guergana Guerova, IAP, University.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Vertical localization issues in LETKF Breogan Gomez, Andreas Rhodin, Hendrik Reich.
Assimilating satellite cloud information with an Ensemble Kalman Filter at the convective scale Annika Schomburg, Christoph Schraff, Hendrik Reich, Roland.
Status of PP KENDA COSMO General Meeting, Sibiu, 2 – 5 Sept Status Report PP KENDA Christoph Schraff Deutscher Wetterdienst,
Deutscher Wetterdienst Fuzzy and standard verification for COSMO-EU and COSMO-DE Ulrich Damrath (with contributions by Ulrich Pflüger) COSMO GM Rome 2011.
Implementation and Testing of 3DEnVAR and 4DEnVAR Algorithms within the ARPS Data Assimilation Framework Chengsi Liu, Ming Xue, and Rong Kong Center for.
General Meeting Moscow, 6-10 September 2010 High-Resolution verification for Temperature ( in northern Italy) Maria Stefania Tesini COSMO General Meeting.
Page 1 Developments in regional DA Oct 2007 © Crown copyright 2007 Mark Naylor, Bruce Macpherson, Richard Renshaw, Gareth Dow Data Assimilation and Ensembles,
Overview of WG5 activities and Conditional Verification Project Adriano Raspanti - WG5 Bucharest, September 2006.
Developments in KENDA, WG1, and Science Plan Issues COSMO General Meeting, Eretria GR, 8 – 11 Sept Developments in KENDA,
Status of the NWP-System & based on COSMO managed by ARPA-SIM COSMO I77 kmBCs from IFSNudgingCINECA COSMO I22.8 kmBCs from COSMO I7 Interpolated from COSMO.
Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Use of Feedback Files for Verification at DWD Ulrich Pflüger Deutscher.
Assimilating Cloudy Infrared Brightness Temperatures in High-Resolution Numerical Models Using Ensemble Data Assimilation Jason A. Otkin and Rebecca Cintineo.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Experiments at MeteoSwiss : TERRA / aerosols Flake Jean-Marie.
Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.
© Crown copyright Met Office Review topic – Impact of High-Resolution Data Assimilation Bruce Macpherson, Christoph Schraff, Claude Fischer EWGLAM, 2009.
Slide 1 Investigations on alternative interpretations of AMVs Kirsti Salonen and Niels Bormann 12 th International Winds Workshop, 19 th June 2014.
UERRA WP2 A Hybrid Ensemble Nudging / Ensemble Kalman Filter Approach for Regional Reanalysis Jan Keller 1,2, Liselotte Bach 1,3, Christian Ohlwein 1,3.
© Crown copyright Met Office Mismatching Perturbations at the Lateral Boundaries in Limited-Area Ensemble Forecasting Jean-François Caron … or why limited-area.
Introducing the Lokal-Modell LME at the German Weather Service
Global and regional impact studies at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)
Recent data assimilation activities at the Hungarian Meteorological Service Gergely Bölöni, Edit Adamcsek, Alena Trojáková, László Szabó ALADIN WS /
Studies with COSMO-DE on basic aspects in the convective scale:
Progress in development of HARMONIE 3D-Var and 4D-Var Contributions from Magnus Lindskog, Roger Randriamampianina, Ulf Andrae, Ole Vignes, Carlos Geijo,
Christoph Schraff Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany
BACY = Basic Cycling A COSMO Data Assimilation Testbed for Research and Development Roland Potthast, Hendrik Reich, Christoph Schraff, Klaus.
Arpae Hydro-Meteo-Climate Service, Bologna, Italy
Recent developments in Latent Heat Nudging at DWD
Recent work using Satellite winds at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)
Daniel Leuenberger1, Christian Keil2 and George Craig2
EUMETSAT fellow day, 17 March 2014, Darmstadt
Winter storm forecast at 1-12 h range
Stéphane Laroche Judy St-James Iriola Mati Réal Sarrazin
Vertical localization issues in LETKF
COSMO General Meeting 2009 WG5 Parallel Session 7 September 2009
FSOI adapted for used with 4D-EnVar
Lidia Cucurull, NCEP/JCSDA
Conditional verification of all COSMO countries: first results
PP Kenda : Status Report christoph.
COSMO-DE-EPS Susanne Theis, Christoph Gebhardt, Michael Buchhold,
Thomas Gastaldo, Virginia Poli, Chiara Marsigli
Item Taking into account radiosonde position in verification
Comparison of different combinations of ensemble-based and variational data assimilation approaches for deterministic NWP Mark Buehner Data Assimilation.
Christoph Gebhardt, Zied Ben Bouallègue, Michael Buchhold
Project Team: Mark Buehner Cecilien Charette Bin He Peter Houtekamer
Some Verification Highlights and Issues in Precipitation Verification
Latest Results on Variational Soil Moisture Initialisation
Presentation transcript:

Christoph Schraff Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany 22.07.2018 KENDA operationalisation & status Christoph Schraff Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany Contributions / input by: Hendrik Reich, Andreas Rhodin, Roland Potthast, Klaus Stephan, Ulrich Blahak, Michael Bender, Elisabeth Bauernschubert, Axel Hutt, … (DWD) Daniel Leuenberger, Alexander Haefele (MeteoSwiss); Sylvain Robert (ETH) Chiara Marsigli, Virginia Poli, Tiziana Paccagnella, Thomas Gastaldo (ARPA-SIM) Lucio Torrisi, Francesca Marcucci, Valerio Cardinali (COMET) Mikhail Tsyrulnikov, Dmitri Gayfulin (HMC)

KENDA operationalisation & status KENDA-O overview PP KENDA-O : Km-Scale Ensemble-Based Data Assimilation for the use of High-Resolution Observations (Sept. 2015 – Aug. 2020) Task 1: further development of LETKF scheme (work towards operationalization: additive covariance inflation) limiter to soil moisture perturbations AMDAR bias correction, RTPS, AMDAR RH Task 2: extended use of observations Mode-S aircraft (afternoon or tomorrow) GPS slant total delay (afternoon) Task 3: lower boundary: soil moisture analysis using satellite soil moisture data Task 4: adaptation to ICON-LAM, hybrid methods / particle filters

operational use of KENDA MeteoSwiss: KENDA operational for EPS since 19 May 2016 (x = 2.2 km) KENDA for det. COSMO-1: 2018 (T,qv in PBL still worse, some problems  slides) DWD: KENDA operational for det. + EPS since 21 March 2017 (x = 2.8 km) ARPAE-SIMC: KENDA operational for determ. forecast (Italy) since May 2017, for EPS soon (2.2 km) COMET: KENDA code adapted to include (Italy) required capabilities of COMET system and run in a parallel suite (x = 10 km) (still slightly worse than COMET code)

KENDA-LETKF pre-operational setup KENDA at DWD: KENDA-LETKF pre-operational setup  KENDA: 4D-LETKF + LHN (latent heat nudging for assimilation of radar precip) benchmark: operational Nudging + LHN operational EPS (40 mem.)  K: Kalman Gain for ensemble mean (unperturbed) 1 hour 1 hour (pre-) operational settings ( Schraff et al. 2016, QJRMS) : adaptive horizontal localisation (keep # obs constant, 50 km ≤ s ≈ std dev ≤ 100 km) adaptive mutliplicative covariance inflation (obs-f.g. statistics) + RTPP (p = 0.75) explicit soil moisture perturbations conventional obs types only (radiosonde, aircraft, wind profiler, synop)

pre-operational KENDA suite at DWD in summer 2016: effect of soil moisture perturbations (SMP) 24 Aug. 2016 soil moisture layer 5, diff. betw. 2 mem. (1,8) T2m at noon, diff. betw. 2 mem. (1,8) 200 100 -100 10 5 -5 -10 standard soil moisture perturb.:  T2m deviations of individual ensemble members unrealistically large in some situations 100 50 -50 10 5 -5 -10 test: soil moisture perturbations reduced by 50 % :  T2m deviations realistic  implement limiter to spread of soil moisture index (SMI) and assess impact on LETKF (spread)

description of new setup with limiter for soil moisture perturbations current setup: soil moisture perturbations:  = 0.072 SMI / day modifications for parallel suite: no explicit SM perturbations added where spread(SMI) > 0.15  “soft limiter” for SMP depth weight of perturbations explicit soil temperature (T_SO) perturbations:  = 0.48 K / day

soft limiter of soil moisture perturbations: impact on a sunny day (23 June 2016) spread of soil moisture index (14 UTC) soil level 2 : 1 – 3 cm soil level 5 : 27 – 81 cm original (Exp 10396) with SMP limiter (Exp 10416) soft limiter: SMI spread limited to ~ 0.15 SMI

soft limiter of soil moisture perturbations: impact on a sunny day (23 June 2016) spread of soil temperature soil layer 1: 0 – 1 cm afternoon (14 UTC) night (0 UTC) original (Exp 10396) with SMP limiter (Exp 10416) T_SO spread decreased mostly at daytime

soft limiter of soil moisture perturbations: impact on a sunny day (23 June 2016) spread of 2-m temperature afternoon (14 UTC) mid-level cloud (12 UTC) Meteosat (12 UTC) original (Exp 10396) with SMP limiter (Exp 10416) T_2M spread decreased mainly in sunny areas

soft limiter of soil moisture perturbations: impact on spread of T2M, day by day spread of 2-m temperature, time series of 0-UTC runs 26 May – 27 June 2016 afternoon (14 UTC) sunny day – 25 % reduction 5 – 25 % 1 – 25 June 2017 many sunny days reduction 10 – 35 % T_2M spread reduction larger, due to sunny days, drier soil

soft limiter of soil moisture perturbations: impact on spread of T2M, day by day spread of 2-m temperature, time series of 0-UTC runs 26 May – 27 June 2016 night (2 UTC) reduction ≤ 10 % 1 – 25 June 2017 reduction 5 – 18 % T_2M spread reduction larger (as for soil temperature, effect from daytime?)

soft limiter of soil moisture perturbations: impact on spread, surface verification spread 0-UTC runs 26 May – 27 June 2016 original SMP limiter 1 – 25 June 2017 parallel suite: spread more strongly reduced, but still larger than in old period

why is the reduction of spread of T2M larger than in previous test? relative difference [%] of domain-averaged soil moisture in deterministic run (on 22 June 2017/16) (SM2017 – SM2016)/SM2016  soil is drier in 2017 period

/(SMS_new_2017 + SMS_new_2016)*2 why is the reduction of spread of T2M larger than in previous test? scaled differences [%] of domain-averaged spread of soil moisture (SMS) on 22 June 2017 (“2017” test) resp. 22 June 2016 (“2016” test) (SMS_2017 – SMS_2016) /(SMS_new_2017 + SMS_new_2016)*2 2017 2016 (SMS_old – SMS_new) /(SMS_new_2017 + SMS_new_2016)*2 SMS limiter results in larger spread reduction in 2017 “old” setting: operational “new” setting: with soft limiter  spread larger in 2017, particularly in old setting 14

reduction of [%] of rmse impact of SMP limiter on scores, deterministic: surface verification SMP limiter vs. original T 2M RH2M ps 26 May – 27 June 2016 reduction of [%] of rmse T 2M RH2M ps 1 – 25 June 2017 forecast lead time [h] parallel suite: still neutral (slightly better for RH2M in first 4 hours)

(averaged over lead times & initial times) impact of SMP limiter on scores, deterministic: radiosonde verification 26 May – 27 June 2016 T RH wind speed wind direct. 1 – 25 June 2017 pressure [hPa] T RH wind speed wind direct. reduction [%] of rmse (averaged over lead times & initial times) parallel suite: neutral

impact of SMP limiter on scores, deterministic: precipitation against radar 0-UTC runs 12-UTC runs original SMP limiter 26 May – 2 July 2016 1-hrly precip FSS ( 30 km ) 1 mm/h 1 – 12 June 2017 parallel suite: no improvement , neutral

impact of SMP limiter on scores, EPS: surface verification (1 – 25 June 2017) spread T 2M RH2M ps original SMP limiter RMSE CRPS reduction [%] of CRPS

impact of SMP limiter on scores, EPS: radiosonde verification (1 – 25 June 2017) reduction [%] of CRPS orig with SM limiter

impact of SMP limiter on scores, EPS: radiosonde verification (1 – 25 June 2017) reduction [%] of CRPS orig with SM limiter

impact of SMP limiter on scores, EPS: radiosonde verification (1 – 25 June 2017) reduction [%] of CRPS orig with SM limiter

Brier Score decomposition: impact of SMP limiter on scores, EPS: precip / radar verif. (26 May – 12 July 2016) 0-UTC runs slightly better reliability (except high threshold) + better resolution (not susceptible to calibration!) lead time [h] 1 mm/h 0.1 mm/h 5 mm/h the lower the better the higher the better reliability: average agreement betw. fcst & obs val.; related to (cond.) bias original SMP limiter Brier Score decomposition:  resolution  reliability 0.1 1 5 10 15 threshold [mm/h] resolution: ability of forecast to separate one type of outcome from another

impact of soft SMP limiter: summary impact of reduced soil moisture perturbations on scores: T_2M spread strongly reduced in sunny days as required T_2M + RH_2M spread moderately reduced in general in June 2017 more than in June 2016, because in 2017: more sunny days original soil moisture perturbations larger drier soil deterministic scores: neutral EPS: slightly (more) reduced (bias) errors (upper-air T, surface pressure), slightly improved resolution for precip hypothesis: due to introduction of additive covariance inflation (in February), reduced soil moisture perturbations can be afforded or are even beneficial  soft limiter to soil moisture perturbations operational since early July

Task 1, tests for refinements: bias correction for AMDAR global bias correction (BC) for AMDAR depends on: individual aircraft flight phase time: online bias correction (time scale ~ 30 days (?)) tests (2 weeks): use BC values from global system online BC in KENDA, starting from global values  impact similar to 1), due to large time scale (which should be even larger than for global system, due to less data) online BC in KENDA, starting from zero  little impact, due to large time scale online BC in KENDA would require very large time scale or could become statistically ‘unstable’, would require very long experiments caveat: AMDAR obs biased towards global ICON system

bias correction for AMDAR Task 1, tests: bias correction for AMDAR forecast verification (26 May – 10 June 2016) wind dir. RH wind dir. wind speed ps T wind speed RH2M T2M TD2M change in RMSE [%] positive impact from bias-correction

bias correction for AMDAR Task 1, tests: bias correction for AMDAR 26 May – 10 June 2016 BC-AMDAR vs. ref 0-UTC runs 6-UTC runs 1-hrly precip FSS (30 km) improvement 1 mm/h 12-UTC runs 18-UTC runs mean / 5% / 95% confidence interval (bootstrapping) AMDAR bias correction: mixed impact

Task 1, tests for refinements: AMDAR RH data : very small, neutral impact Relaxation To Prior Spread (RTPS): replacing: adaptive multiplicative covariance inflation (based on obs – fg statistics) Relaxation To Prior Perturbations (RTPP)

Task 1, tests: RTPS RH T forecast verification (26 May – 10 June 2016) wind dir. RH wind dir. wind speed ps T wind speed RH2M T2M TD2M change in RMSE [%] slightly negative / neutral impact

Task 1, tests: RTPS 0-UTC runs 12-UTC runs 0.1 mm/h 1 mm/h 26 May – 10 June 2016 0-UTC runs 12-UTC runs Ref RTPS 0.1 mm/h 1-hrly precip FSS ( 30 km ) 1 mm/h RTPS: clear long-lasting positive impact on 0- / 12-UTC runs

Task 1, tests: RTPS 6-UTC runs 18-UTC runs 0.1 mm/h 1 mm/h 26 May – 10 June 2016 6-UTC runs 18-UTC runs Ref RTPS 0.1 mm/h 1-hrly precip FSS ( 30 km ) 1 mm/h RTPS: negative impact on 6- / 18-UTC runs for 1 mm/h

Task 2: Extended use of observations: ongoing Progress in KENDA-O: Task 2: Extended use of observations: ongoing radar radial winds: DA exp., promising results radar reflectivity: DA sensitivity tests, results mostly preliminary:  ARPAE-SIMC (≤ 4 radars): 1h / 30’/ 15’ cycling, temporal thinning, RTPS, addit. infl.  DWD: warm bubbles, remapping of Z for Gaussianity, 1.1km, 2-moment microphys. GPS slant total delay: technical work incl. monitoring, in V5.04d, new DA exp. running (old exp: benefit on precip, elsewhere mixed (negative at low levels)) SEVIRI WV: many (mostly clear-sky) sensitivity DA tests, inconclusive, no benefit yet SEVIRI cloud top height: no resources T2M, RH2M: delayed (resources at MCH in 2018) Mode-S aircraft : DA exp., promising results Raman lidar (T-, q- profiles): quality of Payerne obs improved, DA being set up AMSU, ATMS, IASI clear-sky radiances: no resources 3 new projects at DWD ( WG1): SEVIRI VIS, lightning, (nowcast) objects

Task 2, extended use of observations: Mode-S aircraft derived from radar data from air- traffic control, processed + provided by KNMI wind vector + temperature, T derived from Mach number every 4 sec compared to AMDAR: >10 x more data no humidity, larger T error from: Lange and Janjic, MWR 2016

Task 2, extended use of observations: Mode-S aircraft bug fixes in COSMO V5.04d experiment 26 May – 10 June 2016 (‘E19’) best results with thinning (40 % active) Mode-S dominate above 800 hPa number of active obs a-posteriori Desroziers statistics from DA experiment for estimation of obs errors: unexpected large Mode-S wind errors data processing corrected by KNMI since 15 May 2017, re-processed historical data on request new exp. ‘E22’ with re-processed data: Mode-S wind obs errors similar to AMDAR (but specified obs error variance still large)

Task 2, extended use of observations: Mode-S aircraft radiosonde verif. for DA cycle (26 May – 10 June 2016) positive impact from Mode-S, enhanced by corrected data

Task 2, extended use of observations: Mode-S aircraft Mode-S aircraft : forecast verification (26 May – 10 June 2016) wind dir. RH wind dir. wind speed ps T wind speed RH2M T2M TD2M change in RMSE [%] positive impact from Mode-S throughout

Task 2, extended use of observations: Mode-S aircraft 26 May – 10 June 2016 0-UTC runs 12-UTC runs Ref Mode-S (E19) Mode-S (E22) 0.1 mm/h 1-hrly precip FSS ( 30 km ) 1 mm/h Mode-S: clear long-lasting positive impact

trial in parallel suite Task 2, extended use of observations: Mode-S aircraft 1 – 28 Aug. 2017 trial in parallel suite 1 – 20 Aug. 2017 , 0-UTC runs RH ps 0.1 mm/h T RH2M 1 mm/h wind speed T2M change in RMSE [%] Aug. 2017: much smaller positive impact than in 2016 convective period ! Why? weather? data quality? data cut-off time? (the last 15 min of Mode-S obs not available in time)

Task 2, extended use of observations: Mode-S aircraft trial in parallel suite data availability at cut-off time = 15 min ! AMDAR obs valid -29 to -15 min AMDAR obs valid -14 to -0 min 70 % available Mode-S obs valid -29 to -15 min 97 % available 95 % available Mode-S obs valid -14 to -0 min 0 % available

Task 4.1: KENDA for ICON-LAM (incl. EnVar) MEC-based LETKF for ICON-LAM: ready to be tested (e.g. grid pt. assignment) (with COSMO obs operators) except for (hydrostatic) balancing step(s) & exclusion of obs near lateral BC full 4-D LETKF for ICON-LAM: implementing part of DACE code, incl. COSMO + global obs operators in ICON,  first working version Nov. 2017 thereafter: complement global obs operators by functionality of COSMO operators  needed for EnVar (TL + adjoint of obs operators, incl. radar etc.) first tests LETKF with ICON-LAM planned for spring 2018 (Hollborn)

Task 4.2: Particle Filter (PF) methods (to account for non-Gaussianity) hybrid ETKPF (Sylvain Robert (ETH) et al., study finished): 1-week DA with PF for conv. obs in COSMO: f.g. (+1h) slightly improved over LETKF studying several algorithms for adaptive choice for weight of EnKF and PF in analysis (idea: use PF where useful, fall back on EnKF where Gaussian or PF does not work well) QJRMS: “A local ensemble transform Kalman particle filter for convective scale DA” EnVar PF-Var global TEMP verif, 2 – 24 May.2016 hybrid PF-Var: using PF ensemble in EnVar for deterministic analysis:  forecasts only slightly worse than operational EnVar with ensemble B from LETKF (promising!) Local adaptive PF (Roland Potthast et al., ongoing): work with global ICON (improved resampling to create new members) PF runs stably in 1-month tests scores still about 20% worse than LETKF

Task 2: Extended use of observations Progress in KENDA-O: Task 2: Extended use of observations GNSS slant total delay (STD, Michael Bender) experiments: positive impact on precip so far, mixed otherwise (negative at low levels) STD observation operator in COSMO V5.04d AutoAlert implemented (for automatic QC of each station & product, bías correction files, monitoring of station coord., visualisation, … ) plans: 2017 - 2018: refinement of DA, impact experiments, make STD technically ready for operational use, passive monitoring (converter ASCII (NetCDF) to BUFR  NetCDF : reader in COSMO) 2018: operational introduction of STD in KENDA

Task 2, extended use of observations: GNSS Slant Total Delay (STD) Monitoring of STD obs from GFZ with new ‘EPOS-8’ processing bias: (rather) small relative std. dev. (std.dev./mean-abs-value): does not increase with decreasing elevation STD data quality does not decrease with decreasing elevation (  7°)

Task 2, extended use of observations: GNSS Slant Total Delay (STD) Local Ensemble Transform KF  obs location & localisation of STD’s / ZTD’s

Task 2, extended use of observations: GNSS Slant Total Delay (STD) for specific humidity analysis increments: analysis increment for a single (STD / ZTD) obs  a number : c

Task 2, extended use of observations: GNSS Slant Total Delay (STD) analysis increment for temperature analysis increments: for a single (STD / ZTD) obs  a number : c

Task 2, extended use of observations: GNSS Slant Total Delay (STD) analysis increment for pressure analysis increments: for a single (STD / ZTD) obs  a number : c

Task 2, extended use of observations: GNSS Slant Total Delay (STD) analysis increments pressure temperature specific humidity approx. optimal localisation scale ? optimal to treat STD/ZTD obs as if located approx. here (?) possible implementation of individual obs re-location: HT available in COSMO: approximate roughly & store in ‘fof’ feedback file (‘plevel’, ‘plev_width’) Pf implicitly available in LETKF: use model columns above station from ensemble to compute variance (neglecting horizontal variability of variances)

Task 2: Extended use of observations

Task 2: Extended use of observations Screen-level obs RH2M (+ T2M) : tests at MeteoSwiss in 2018 10-m wind : new criteria (dep on. roughness length + d2zoro/(dx2dy2)) for station selection of 10-m wind in COSMO V5.04d Ground-based remote sensing (T + qv prof.: Raman lidar, MW radiometer) MeteoSwiss: improved quality of temperature obs from Payerne Raman lidar setting up DA of 0.5-hourly lidar qv + T as TEMP bulletin

Task 2: Extended use of observations SEVIRI radiances direct use of all-sky (cloudy) SEVIRI WV + IR window radiances (Axel Hutt) reproduce method of Harnisch et al. 2016, QJ, for cloud-dep. obs errors + bias correction technical work (upgrade to V5.04d, RTTOV-12, BACY, …) sensitivity experiments with use clear-sky WV channels: data selection (clear-sky; high orography), obs operator (effective radius related to qc, qi), obs error, bias correction, thinning, …  results mostly a bit inconclusive, bias correction is needed, overall impact of clear-sky obs neutral or negative LMU: new PostDoc Josef Schröttle use of NWC-SAF cloud top height (CTH) product: currently no resources (outside KENDA-O:) direct use of all-sky (cloudy) SEVIRI VIS/NIR radiances Lilo Bach at DWD since ~ July (work together with Leonard Scheck, LMU)