Bigyani Das and Phil Durbin Adnet Systems Inc./GSFC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 United States of America National Report on Surface- Based Ozone Research Seventh WMO/UNEP Ozone Research Managers Meeting Geneva, Switzerland
Advertisements

Sentinel-4 and -5 Status and Level-2 Products
Observing U.S. urban NO x emissions from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) satellite retrievals Zifeng Lu, David G. Streets Decision and Information Sciences.
Centro de Investigaciones en Láseres y Aplicaciones (LASER RESEARCH CENTER AND APPLICATIONS ) (CITEFA-CONICET) Buenos Aires - Argentina Collaboration between.
Ozone and UV Radiation Observational Activities in Turkey Serpil YAĞAN Climatology Division Research Department Turkish State Meteorological Service WMO/UNEP.
Variability of Total Column Ozone During JAN JUN 2011: Consistency Among Four Independent Multi-year Data Records E.W. Chiou ADNET Systems Inc.,
Slide 1 Atmospheric Chemistry User Workshop, 20th & 21st January 2004, ESTEC EUMETSAT Satellite Application Facility on Ozone Monitoring
Retrievals of Stratospheric Ozone Density Profiles from Odin/OSIRIS Limb-Scatter Measurements C.S. Haley York University S.V. Petelina University of Saskatchewan.
1 Surface nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) rd GEOS-Chem USERS ` MEETING, Harvard University.
Spatial and Temporal Variability in OMI NO 2 Observations and NO x Emissions Inventories in Eastern Texas Elena McDonald-Buller, Gary McGaughey, Yosuke.
Validation of OMI UV products: results of two ground UV measurement campaigns in Austria P. Weihs 1, M. Blumthaler 2, H. E. Rieder 1,3,*, A. Kreuter 2,
PARIS-IR U of T FTS TAO Figure 1. The experimental setup for the mini-MANTRA FTS intercomparison campaign. The University of Toronto’s Balloon-Borne Fourier.
A. Bracher, L. N. Lamsal, M. Weber, J. P. Burrows University of Bremen, FB 1, Institute of Environmental Physics, P O Box , D Bremen, Germany.
Latest results on the comparison between OMI and ground-based data at two European sites (Rome and Villeneuve d’Ascq) Virginie Buchard, Colette Brogniez,
Surface UV from TOMS/OMI measurements N. Krotkov 1, J. Herman 2, P.K. Bhartia 2, A. Tanskanen 3, A. Arola 4 1.Goddard Earth Sciences and Technology (GEST)
Next Generation Air Monitoring: An Overview of US EPA Activities National Air Quality Conference RTP, NC February 12, 2014 Tim Watkins US EPA/Office of.
A four year record of Aerosol Absorption measurements from OMI near UV observations Omar Torres Department of Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Hampton.
The first decade OMI Near UV aerosol observations: An A-train algorithm Assessment of AOD and SSA The long-term OMAERUV record Omar Torres, Changwoo Ahn,
OMI Validation Status Mark Kroon - KNMI (on behalf of the OMI validation team) OMI Science Team Meeting Helsinki, 23 June 2008.
Regional Report on Ozone Observation Ozone Observation [ RA-II: Asia ] Regional Report on Ozone Observation Ozone Observation [ RA-II: Asia ] Hidehiko.
OMI ST, June 26, 2008 Krueger, AJ, “Sighting of El Chichon Sulfur Dioxide Clouds with the Nimbus 7 Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer”, Science, :
About the status and outlook for OMI Surface UV product OMI Science Team Meeting Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008 Antti Arola.
Know these wavelengths of light Ultraviolet nm Visible light nm Infrared light above 750nm.
ARM Data Overview Chuck Long Jim Mather Tom Ackerman.
Measuring UV aerosol absorption. Why is aerosol UV absorption important ? Change in boundary layer ozone mixing ratios as a result of direct aerosol forcing.
Calibration of a Yankee Environmental Systems UltraViolet Rotating Shadow Band Radiometer at Mauna Loa Hawaii Presented at the 10 th International Pyrheliometer.
1 NOAA-UPRM COOP Program in Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology, Department of Physics, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez, Mayagüez, PR Yaítza.
Validation of the OMI Surface UV product OMI Science Team Meeting #11 De Bilt, June 20-23, 2006 Aapo Tanskanen.
Comparison of OMI NO 2 with Ground-based Direct Sun Measurements at NASA GSFC and JPL Table Mountain during Summer 2007 George H. Mount & Elena Spinei.
UNCERTAINTY IN THE TOTAL OZONE DATA: IMPLICATIONS FOR UV RECONSTRUCTIONS Janusz W. Krzyścin Institute of Geophysics Polish Academy of Sciences MCM X COST.
AMFIC kick-off meeting Dimitris Balis & MariLiza Koukouli Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Validation of OMI total ozone using ground-based Brewer observations ESA Atmospheric Science Conference, 8-12 May 2006, Frascati, Italy Dimitris Balis.
Intercomparison of Ground-based Column Ozone Measurements with Aura Satellite Retrievals over Richland, WA during INTEX-B/IONS-06 Wan Ching Jacquie Hui.
A Long Term Data Record of the Ozone Vertical Distribution IN43B-1150 by Richard McPeters 1, Stacey Frith 2, and Val Soika 3 1) NASA GSFC
Evaluation of OMI total column ozone with four different algorithms SAO OE, NASA TOMS, KNMI OE/DOAS Juseon Bak 1, Jae H. Kim 1, Xiong Liu 2 1 Pusan National.
Accessing Air Quality Lessons on MY NASA DATA
Chemical Condition and Surface Ozone in Urban Cities of Texas During the Last Decade: Observational Evidence from OMI, CAMS, and Model Analysis Yunsoo.
OMI Validation using the Pandora Spectrometer System Jay Herman, Nader Abuhassan, Alexander Cede 1.Validation of OMI satellite data for Ozone is fairly.
Henk Eskes, ERS-ENVISAT symposium 2004 Retrieval, validation and assimilation of SCIAMACHY ozone columns Henk Eskes, Ronald van der A, Ellen Brinksma,
Proposed Instrument for Deployment at Climate Reference Network (CRN) Sites: Multi-Filter Rotating Shadowband Radiometer (MFRSR) The MFRSR measures solar.
BROADBAND INSTRUMENTS ENEA/Univ. of Valencia TypeModelMeasurementSpectral interval FOVAcquisition PyranometerCMP21Global SW↓ irradiance nm180°30.
OMI Total Column Ozone compared with the Suomi NPP OMPS Mapper OMI Science Team Meeting, De Bilt, Netherlands 31 August – 2 September, 2015 Richard McPeters.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Number of expected scans and percentage of processed scans for all four instruments.
Page 1 OMI ST Meeting #11, KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands, June 2006 Validation of OMI trace gas products Main contributors (this work): Michel Van.
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
590 years of Data: the US Dobson Station network reevaluated
Calibration of a Yankee Environmental Systems
Daytime variations of AOD and PM2
Contact: Daily comparisons and Climatology
LNOx Influence on Upper Tropospheric Ozone Mike Newchurch1, Lihua Wang1, Arastoo Biazar1, Williams Koshak2, Xiong Liu3 1Univ. of Alabama in Huntsville,
Definition of SCIAMACHY Diagnostic Data Set
Statistical Methods for Model Evaluation – Moving Beyond the Comparison of Matched Observations and Output for Model Grid Cells Kristen M. Foley1, Jenise.
Validation of the OMI Surface UV Data
GSICS Research Working Group UV Subgroup Report
Stelios Kazadzis A. Bais, A. Arola OMI science team meeting
Quadrennial Ozone Symposium
DETERMINATION OF PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION
Surface UV from TOMS/OMI measurements
Zhong Liu1,2, Dana Ostrenga1,3, William Teng1,4, and Steven Kempler1
Overview of the AATSR Validation Programme
The Successor of the TOU
A European Brewer Network
2018 STCE Annual Meeting Surface UV radiation.
OZONE Monitoring Network
Monitoring and assimilation of SCIAMACHY data at ECMWF
Figure 11-1.
Ozone Comparison between Pandora #34, the Dobson #061, OMI, and OMPS at Boulder Colorado for the period December 2013 – June J. Herman, R Evans,
Figure Overview.
Race Questions: Question 1
Cloud trends from GOME, SCIAMACHY and OMI
Presentation transcript:

Bigyani Das and Phil Durbin Adnet Systems Inc./GSFC Comparison of Column Ozone from OMI with Ground-based Measurements at Three USA Sites Bigyani Das and Phil Durbin Adnet Systems Inc./GSFC OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008

OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008 Overview Question: How do OMI ozone column data compare with ground-based instruments? Answer: OMI data does compare well Method: 3 USA Sites – Houston, Bondville, Raleigh Ground-based Instruments USDA (UV network) NOAA-EPA (NewBrew) Results: Daily Column Ozone, Monthly Averages, Bias – All Sky Conditions, Year 2007 (All), 2005-2007 (Bondville & Raleigh versus USDA) Average Bias (%) Table for 2007 [ Bias =1/n ∑(OMI-GB)/GB * 100 ] USDA-TOMS USDA-DOAS NewBrew-TOMS NewBrew-DOAS Houston 3.49 3.45 -1.06 -1.03 Bondville 0.31 0.93 0.62 1.27 Raleigh 4.0 4.18 -4.38 -4.20 OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008

Ground Based Instruments USDA UV-B Monitoring and Research Program (UV-MFRSR) – Ultraviolet Multifilter Rotating Shadow-band Radiometer NewBrew - NOAA-EPA Brewer UV and Ozone network (Brewer MkIV Spectrophotometer) Measurement Sites Houston, TX (Lat: 29.718 N, Lon: 95.341 W) Bondville, IL (Lat: 40.053 N, Lon: 88.372 W) Raleigh, NC (Lat: 35.728 N, Lon: 78.68 W) OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008

Houston – Lat: 29.718(N), Lon: 95.341(W) OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008

Bondville, IL – Lat: 40.053 (N), Lon: 88.372(W) OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008

Raleigh, NC - Lat: 35.728(N), Lon: 78.68(W) OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008

OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008 Bias Comparison OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008

OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008 Bias Comparison: 2005-2007 OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008

OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008 Summary Daily Column Ozone values show good agreement with ground-based measurements The bias values are site dependent Maximum bias and average bias have different characteristics. Maximum bias is less with NewBrew data than USDA data at all 3 sites. Maximum bias is more at Bondville and Houston than Raleigh when compared with USDA– Reason ? OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.