Eradication of HCV induced by DAAs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Adherence to HCV Therapy: Relation with Virologic Outcomes and Changes in Adherence Over Time Vincent Lo Re, MD, MSCE V. Teal, R. Localio, V. Amorosa,
Advertisements

Treatment-experienced HCV genotype 1 patients Bill Sievert Sally Bell.
Hcv infection and management in advanced liver disease
Management of Chronic Hepatitis C in 2013
The effect of improved HCV diagnosis and treatment on public health The effect of improved HCV diagnosis and treatment on public health P Mathurin Hôpital.
Modelled impact of antiviral therapy on the future burden of HCV disease in Scotland Testing/Treatment/Care Working Group, 11 th Sept 2007.
Abstract Results Objectives Results Conclusions Background Methods V-1637 Background-At the CORE center in Chicago, despite an on-site hepatitis clinic.
Liver fibrosis regression after anti HCV therapy and the rate of death, liver-related death, liver- related complications, and hospital.
Fatal and Non-fatal Hepatic Failure in HIV-infected versus HIV-uninfected Persons Enrolled in Kaiser Permanente California (KP), a Large Managed Care Organization.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir in Genotype 3 ALLY-3 Study Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced Nelson DR,
Journal Club – Hepa Visite Catharina Zeuzem
Trends in Treatment of Recurrent Hepatitis C After Liver Transplantation Kate Forgan-Smith KA Stuart 1,4, C Tallis 1,4 GA Macdonald 1,3,4, J Fawcett 2,3.
F. 정 회 훈 Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:46-52 Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Diabetic Patients and Risk Reduction Associated With Anti-Diabetic Therapy:
R. Papani, A. G. Duarte, Y-L. Lin, G. Sharma
J Browne, DA Edwards, KM Rhodes, DJ Brimicombe, RA Payne
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in GT 3 and Cirrhosis POLARIS-3
Design Randomisation * 1 : 1 Open-label W16 W24 > 18 years
- Higher SBP visit-to-visit variability (SBV) has been associated
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
National Hepatitis C Database
C-ISLE study: EBR/GZR + SOF + RBV in genotype 3 and cirrhosis
Diagnostics in hepatitis C: The end of response-guided therapy?
Effectiveness of Sofosbuvir in terms of sustained virological response at 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) BETWEEN treatment naïve AND treatment.
Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir in Genotype 3 ALLY-3 Study
Design Randomisation 1 : 1 Open-label W16 W24 > 18 years
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Haemophilia and the National Hepatitis C Database Irish Haemophilia Society Conference, Dunboyne, September 2016 Niamh Murphy & Dr Lelia Thornton.
CONCERTO-2 Study: SMV + PEG-IFNa-2a + RBV for genotype 1
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Insight into the history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection; a cohort study of women infected postpartum with contaminated anti-D immunoglobulin in Ireland.
The ADEMEX Trial Adequacy of PD in Mexico Reference
No cirrhosis or compensated cirrhosis** No HBV or HIV co-infection
Long-term impact of response to interferon-based therapy in patients with chronic HCV in relation to liver function, survival and cause of death Philip.
Creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min No HBV or HIV co-infection
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
HCV Studies Performed on New Iranian DAA Drugs
HCV & liver transplantation
Failure to achieve SVR on No HBV or HIV co-infection
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2017
A. Stepanov, A. Kruk, N. Polovinkina, A. Vinogradova
C-BREEZE-2 Study: ruzasvir + uprifosbuvir for 12 weeks in genotype 1-6
Clinical outcome after SVR: Veterans Affairs
Department of Veterans Affairs
LEAGUE-1 study: daclatasvir + SMV + RBV for genotype 1
Treating Hep C with Novel Agents
No HBV or HIV co-infection
Dorina Onoya1, Tembeka Sineke1, Alana Brennan1,2, Matt Fox1,2
What Does the Primary Care Physician Need to Know About Chronic Hepatitis C?
Design W12 Randomisation * Open-label
Risk of de novo Hepatocellular Carcinoma after HCV Treatment with Direct-Acting Antivirals Liver Cancer - DOI: / Fig. 1. Flowchart of included.
ARV-trial.com IMPACT Study: SMV + DCV + SOF in HCV genotype 1 with decompensated liver disease Design Open label ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype.
Annals of Internal Medicine • Vol. 167 No. 12 • 19 December 2017
Diagnostics in hepatitis C: The end of response-guided therapy?
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
LEPTON Study: SOF/VEL + GS-9857 genotype 1 or 3 Phase II
Clinical outcome after SVR: ANRS CO22 HEPATHER
Division of Viral Hepatitis, CDC
Study : LDV/SOF in genotype 5
Impact of Hepatitis C, HIV, or Both on Survival in Veterans in Care Before and After the Introduction of HAART (1996) SL Fultz, MD, MPH CH Chang, PhD AA.
What Does the Future Hold and What Will It Mean for Patients?
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Volume 73, Issue 8, Pages (April 2008)
CONCERTO-4 Study: SMV + PEG-IFNa-2b + RBV for genotype 1
Incidence of HCC after HCV treatment with DAAs: ERCHIVES
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Thiazolidinedione use is associated with better survival in hemodialysis patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes  Steven M. Brunelli, Ravi Thadhani,
Design Randomisation * 2 : 1 Double blind W12 W16 W24 W28
Survival benefits of DAA in patients with decompensated cirrhosis
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Presentation transcript:

Eradication of HCV induced by DAAs George N. Ioannou, BMBCh, MS, FAASLD Director Hepatology Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System Associate Professor of Medicine University of Washington SEATTLE Eradication of HCV induced by DAAs is associated with a 71% reduction in HCC risk George N. Ioannou, Pamela Green, Kristin Berry

Background Most HCV-infected patients will undergo antiviral treatment with DAAs  most will achieve SVR The impact of DAAs on HCC has become controversial

Aims Determine whether: DAA-induced SVR is associated with a reduced risk of developing (de novo) HCC. The reduction in HCC risk caused by DAA-induced SVR is different than the reduction cause by IFN-induced SVR Treatment with DAAs as compared to treatment with IFN is associated with HCC

Study Setting National Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System 167 medical centers around the country Largest integrated healthcare system in the USA Largest number of HCV-infected patients: n=174,000 (in 2013)  <60,000 in 2017 Largest number of patient with cirrhosis (n=60,553) and HCC (n=7670) in VA care in a single year.

Study Design Study Design: Retrospective Cohort Study Follow-up started: 180 days after the start-date of the (first) antiviral treatment Follow-up continued until: Development of HCC (Outcome, “event’) Censored: Death, Last f/u in the VA Follow-up extended to 6/15/2017

Study Design Analysis: Cox Proportional Hazards regression (survival analysis) Adjustment for potential confounders Exposure: a. SVR12 vs Treatment Failure b. Treatment with DAA vs Treatment with IFN Outcome: Development of new HCC >180 days after treatment Exclusions: missing SVR12, genotype HCC prior to antiviral Rx or within 180 days <180 days of follow-up

Started antiviral therapy Study Population Started antiviral therapy 1999-2015 N=62,354 IFN-only N=35,871 58% DAA+IFN N=4535 7% DAA-only N=21,948 35% Followed until 6/15/2017 Range of follow-up = 2-18 yrs Mean follow-up = 6.1 years Incident HCCs = 3271

Regimens Regimen N % Interferon 2,629 4.2 PEG 33,242 53.3   Regimen N % IFN ONLY 58% Interferon 2,629 4.2 PEG 33,242 53.3 DAA + IFN 7.3% Boceprevir+PEG 3,090 5.0 Telaprevir+PEG 479 0.8 Sofosbuvir+PEG 952 1.5 DAA ONLY 35% Sofosbuvir (±daclatasvir) 2,786 4.5 Sofosbuvir+Simeprevir 1,993 3.2 Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir 12,763 20.5 Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/ Ombitasvir/Dasabuvir 4,406 7.1

Patients with SVR had lower HCC incidence Patients with SVR had lower HCC incidence - both patients with and without cirrhosis SVR No Cirrhosis No SVR SVR Cirrhosis No SVR

SVR is associated with lower HCC risk Patients HCC HCC per 100 patient- years Crude Hazard Ratio Adjusted* Cirrhosis No 4463 851 3.25 1 Yes 6005 326 1.97 0.57 (0.49-0.65) 0.50 (0.43-0.59) No Cirrhosis 23,231 1778 0.87 28,655 316 0.24 0.29 (0.26-0.33) 0.32 (0.28-0.37) Adjusted for 21 confounders: decompensated cirrhosis, age, sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index , HCV genotype, HCV viral load, HIV co-infection, HBV co-infection, type 2 diabetes mellitus, alcohol use disorders, substance use disorder, platelet count, serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, serum albumin, serum AST/ALT ratio, blood INR and blood hemoglobin levels.

had lower HCC incidence irrespective of regimen: A. IFN only Patients with SVR had lower HCC incidence irrespective of regimen: - both patients with and without cirrhosis SVR No SVR SVR No SVR C. DAA only B. DAA+IFN SVR No Cirrhosis No SVR SVR Cirrhosis No SVR

DAA-induced SVR and reduction in HCC incidence No Cirrhosis, SVR No Cirrhosis, No SVR, Cirrhosis, SVR No Cirrhosis, No SVR

SVR is associated with lower HCC risk: All regimens Patients HCC HCC per 100 patient- years Crude Hazard Ratio Adjusted* Risk Reduction % IFN-only No 23,883 2348 1.07 1 Yes 11,988 303 0.28 0.25 0.32 68% DAA+IFN 1772 116 1.73 2763 59 0.6 0.34 0.48 52% DAA-only 2039 165 5.2 19,909 280 0.92 0.18 0.29 71% Adjusted for 22 confounders: cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, age, sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index , HCV genotype, HCV viral load, HIV co-infection, HBV co-infection, type 2 diabetes mellitus, alcohol use disorders, substance use disorder, platelet count, serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, serum albumin, serum AST/ALT ratio, blood INR and blood hemoglobin levels.

Antiviral Regimen is not associated with HCC: DAA versus IFN HCC per 100 Patient-yrs Crude Hazard Ratio Adjusted Cirrhosis IFN only 3.0 1 DAA+IFN 2.6 0.86 0.95 DAA only 3.6 1.23 0.97 NO 0.64 0.59 1.11 0.90 0.57 1.33 0.98 Analysis limited to 2009-2015 Secondary analysis limited to 2 yrs of follow-up

Limitations We studied only incidence not recurrence of HCC We did not include a “no treatment” control group. Instead, we used the “IFN” group as the control group for the “DAA” group 3. The association between SVR and reduced HCC risk may not be causative.

Conclusions DAA-induced SVR is associated with a 71% reduction in HCC risk Eradication of HCV is associated with similar reduction in HCC risk irrespective of regimen Eradication of HCV is associated with a similar reduction in HCC in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients Receipt of DAAs is not associated with increased HCC risk compared to receipt of IFN