Sarah K. Petty, Marian M. Morry, & Tamara A. Sucharyna Introduction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE EFFECTS OF TRAINING IN EFT COUPLE THERAPY Session 202--EFT Track The Process of Learning EFT Hanna Levenson, PhD Mira Svatovic, MA & Michelle Montagno,
Advertisements

Teen Health Perspective Results “Honestly, most issues are mental like anxiety, stress, worry, and over thinking. They do all not need to be treated with.
Contact: Online I am “We”: Contrast and assimilation effects in virtual environments Jesse Chandler, Sara Konrath & Norbert Schwarz.
Attraction and Flirtation in Young Adults’ and Middle-Aged Adults’ Opposite-Sex Friendships Erin E. Hirsch, Cierra A. Micke, and April Bleske-Rechek University.
Adolescent romantic relationships and substance abuse: The benefits of thinking it will last forever J. Claire Stephenson, David E. Szwedo, Joseph P. Allen.
ABSTRACT The current study identified the factors related to exercisers’ self-talk and exercise adherence. Hardy (2006) defined self-talk as “(a) verbalizations.
Face your Facebook Fears Take control of your profile privacy settings and use Facebook to communicate with students MOACAC Conference, 4/12/11 Presenters:
GOAL SETTING.
Realistic Mocked-Up Facebook Profiles Affect Peoples’ Cognitive Interpretations About Their Own Relationship Marian M. Morry, Tamara A. Sucharyna, & Sarah.
MADELEINE A. FUGÈRE, ALITA J. COUSINS, & STEPHANIE A. MACLAREN Presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Please contact Dr.
Women Control Male Romantic Partners to Pursue Extra Pair Partners INTRODUCTION MATE GUARDING AND MATE RETENTION Mate guarding controls with whom the female.
Consumer Markets and Consumer Buyer Behavior Copyright ©2014 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Building Responsible Relationships: Pairing, Commitment, & Marriage.
The impact of relationship social comparison interpretations on dating relationship quality over time Marian M. Morry, Tamara A. Sucharyna, Mason Legge.
Method (Cont’d) Introduction Effects of Alcohol on Sexual Decision Making Alcohol intoxication makes risky decisions and behaviors appear less risky to.
Social Networking Platforms and the Commodification of Identity CCTP Group Members.
Condom Use as it Relates to Partner Perception and Self-Efficacy Taryn D. Larribas, University of San Francisco Hypotheses It was hypothesized that condom.
* ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS Why date? What are characteristics that you look for that may lead you to date someone? Can you explain your expectations for dating?
Snap Judgments and Social Media: Forming Personality Perceptions on Twitter People form impressions of others quickly, and can do so with very little information.
Student’s name: Xiao Hu Plymouth University, UK Supervisor's name:
Why Archival Certification
Attachment style and condom use across and within dating relationships
The Relationship Between Instagram Photo Editing and Undergraduate College Women’s Body Dissatisfaction Madeline Wick, Cindy Miller-Perrin, & Jennifer.
Relationship-Contingencies and Mate Retention Behavior
Forgiving In the Moment
The Role of Optimal Distinctiveness and Homophily in Online Dating
Gal Slonim1 and Ori Kapara2,
Facebook, Friends and Faith -Trusting online friends
Cognitive APPROCH TO EATING DISRODER
Introduction Method Results Conclusions
The Disclosure of Virginity Status and Sexual Orientation
Christian Hahn, M.Sc. & Lorne Campbell, PhD
Chapter 2:.
CHAPTER 8 MOTIVATION.
Sarah Williams Anne Wilson Wilfrid Laurier University
Social Media Exploration
Romantic Relationships THEORIES
Kenny C. Chee & Marian M. Morry
Observer Participants
Get Power in the Relationship
Socioemotional Development in Adolescence
Participants & Procedure
Reproductive Health & Safety
Predicting Variations in Motivations for Romantic Kissing
Language, Religious Involvement and Risk Factors
To use or not to use? An exploration of cannabis use motives and constraints Dr Liz Temple
Faith, Identity, and Vocation: Longitudinal and Gender Effects
Teen Health Perspective Results
Introduction Results Methods Conclusions
Language, Religious Involvement and Risk Factors
Negotiating Adolescence: The Importance of Close Relationships for Dismissing Adolescents J. Claire Stephenson, Nell N. Manning, Dave E. Szwedo & Joseph.
Teen Health Perspective Results
Faith, Identity, and Vocation: Longitudinal and Gender Effects
Important Trends Resulting in Varying Work Patterns on Middle-aged Adults Changes in the global economy have produced job instability, forcing middle-age.
Digital Footprint By. Abby Christensen.
Faith, Identity, and Vocation: Longitudinal and Gender Effects
Faith, Identity, and Vocation: Longitudinal and Gender Effects
Sports Psychology UNIT IV Motivation.
Emily A. Davis & David E. Szwedo James Madison University Introduction
Developing Communication Styles & Refusal Skills
Historical figure name and status update
Intimacy Chapter 10.
Networking Workshop (2)
Tracy L. Tylka, Ph.D., FAED ohio state university
1.3 Personal Skills for Health & Wellness
Social Structure is all around you
What is Dating?.
Faith, Identity, and Vocation: Longitudinal and Gender Effects
Emotional Neglect from Parents Inability to Psychologically Separate
Faith, Identity, and Vocation: Longitudinal and Gender Effects
Presentation transcript:

“Let’s Make it Facebook Official”: Cognitions Related to Posting One’s Status on Facebook Sarah K. Petty, Marian M. Morry, & Tamara A. Sucharyna Introduction “Facebook official” refers to the posting of a romantically involved relationship status on one’s Facebook (FB) profile. Individuals in romantic relationships are often motivated to include aspects of their partner in their self-concepts (Aron et al.,1991), and this may translate to presenting the partner and the relationship on one’s Facebook profile. There are benefits to becoming FB official, such as increased social support (Li et al., 2015) However, individuals may be hesitant to display a romantically involved relationship status due to the fact that this action allows a large social network to publicly comment on, or privately judge the relationship. In this study we were interested in further exploring the FB relationship status. Results Discussion R1. Relationship status nondisclosure either by omission (not displaying a relationship status) or by overt means (displaying a “Single” status) is quite common. Despite the fact that all participants had been in a relationship for at least 6 months, many still maintained the “Single” status. Males predominantly chose not to display any relationship status or a “Single” status. R2. Individuals may choose to display relationship statuses as a way to inform a social network of a current romantic relationship. In contrast, others choose not to display any status due to the desire for privacy. These represent two opposing desires created by social media: to “tell-all” and to remain “tight lipped”. R3. Choosing the “It’s Complicated” status conveys deeply personal relationship information to a social network as it is often interpreted as meaning that there is trouble in the relationship or that there is a high degree of uncertainty about the relationship. R4. 43% of participants who displayed romantically involved statuses took it a step further by displaying a linked profile. This signifies the “highest level” of relationship status as it conveys the most relationship-related information that an individual can share with a social network through the relationship status function. R1. R2. Motivations to display a romantically involved relationship status Frequency Inform other potential partners that I am taken 43 Inform others that my partner is taken 37 It’s what my friends do 18 Gain social support 10 Pressure from partner 6 Other 28 Motivations to not display any relationship status Frequency I’m a private person 25 Nervous about what would happen on FB when we broke up 3 I didn’t feel that my relationship was stable enough 1 Other 12 R4. Research Questions R1. Do romantically involved individuals display romantically involved relationship statuses on Facebook? R2. What motivates the decision to display (or not display) a romantically involved Facebook relationship status? R3. What does the “It’s Complicated” relationship status mean? R4. How common is linking relationship statuses though Facebook? R3. What does the “It’s Complicated” relationship status mean? Frequency Undefined relationship status 79 Difficult time in relationship 51 Way to seek attention 19 45.5% of participants who linked their profiles had discussed this decision with their partner prior to linking profiles. Method Participants 130 participants (63 males, 67 females) M age = 20.8 years (SD = 4.95), 67.7% Caucasian/European 97.7% heterosexual In a dating relationship for at least 6 months Procedure Participants completed an on-line survey with questions relating to FB use and FB-related behaviors. Future Directions Are there gender differences in respect to the perceived importance of displaying a romantically involved relationship status when in a relationship? Are males or females more likely to initiate linking profiles on Facebook? Does the decision to display a “single” status, or not display any status on FB while in a relationship relate to reduced commitment, or increased attention to alternatives? Presented at the 2016 SPSP Conference, San Diego, CA. Questions or comments? Contact Sarah Petty at pettys@myumanitoba.ca