Consultant for Alcon. AMO, Bausch and Lomb

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Comparison of Distance Image Quality with Accommodating and Multifocal Aspheric Presbyopia-Correcting IOLs John F. Doane, M.D., F.A.C.S. Discover Vision.
Advertisements

Lens Implants – Comparison, Options and Benefits
Dr H. Razmjoo Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Multifocal IOLs
Goals of Cataract Surgery Provide a Full Range of Vision Minimize Dependence on Glasses Including Reading Glasses and Bifocals Improve Lifestyle Activities.
Diffractive Multifocal IOL Prof. Dr. Daniel H. Scorsetti
Straylight (disability glare) results in case of a diffractive multifocal IOL design with apodization pattern adjusted to reduce glare. Ruth Lapid-Gortzak.
R. Lehmann, MD ASCRS 2008 Clinically Relevant Advantages in the Functional Performance of the AcrySof ® IQ IOL Robert P. Lehmann, MD, FACS Lehmann Eye.
Visual outcome & subjective visual symptoms of the Tecnis ZM900 multifocal intraocular lens in Asian eyes Dr Colin S.H. Tan MBBS, MMed (Ophth), FRCSEd.
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses & Contrast Sensitivity
A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Evaluation of Patients with Contralateral Implantation of Two Aspheric Acrylic Intraocular Lenses R. Cionni, MD.
Myoung Joon Kim, MD Len Zheleznyak, MS2
Unilateral Implantation of Presbyopic Correcting IOLs – A Comparison of ReZoom, ReSTOR, Crystalens 5.0, and Crystalens HD Frank A. Bucci, Jr, MD Bucci.
Eltutar, Kadir; Akcetin, Tulay A.; Ozcelik, N. Demet Istanbul Education and Research Hospital Department of Ophthalmology The authors state that they have.
Ruth Lapid-Gortzak MD PhD 1,2, Jan Willem van der Linden BOpt 2, and Ivanka J. van der Meulen MD 1,2 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Center,
Disclosure of finanacial interest * Author has no financial interest in this paper. ** Author's research is partially funded by Imperial Medical Technologies.
Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens G. Rubiolini M.D. Italy Disclosure of finanacial interest Author's research is partially funded.
1 Clinical Performance of the Crystalens® AO Guy M. Kezirian, MD, FACS.
Retrospective Comparison of 3177 Eyes Implanted with Presbyopic IOLs Carlos Buznego MD Elizabeth A. Davis MD, FACS Guy M. Kezirian MD, FACS William B.
Functional Vision With Apodized Diffractive Aspheric Multifocal IOL With +3.0 D Add Jonathan M. Davidorf, MD Los Angeles, CA ASCRS Annual Symposium March,
Zeiss user group meeting 18 th July 2015 Anil Arora.
Bausch & Lomb 217A Excimer Laser Overview Why It Is Unmatched!
Bret Fisher, MD The Eye Center of North Florida Panama City, FL
1 Cataract Surgery Stephen G. Slade MD, FACS. 2 Financial Disclosure Alcon, AMO, B&L Consultant, Clarity, NuLens, RVO, Technolas 2 This presentation represents.
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon.
Unilateral multifocal lens implantation in patients with a contralateral monofocal or phakic eye is a viable presbyopic correction option Robert J. Cionni,
Neeti Parikh, MD Fuxiang Zhang, MD Department of Ophthalmology Henry Ford Hospital A Comparison Of Patient Satisfaction With Modified Monovision Versus.
A Fellow Eye Comparison of Aberrations, Modulation Transfer Function and Contrast Sensitivity After AcrySof IQ and AcrySof Natural IOL Implantation. Mayank.
Clinical and simulation outcomes of a multifocal intraocular lens with rotational asymmetry and two different levels of near addition Jorge Alió, MD,PhD.
Use of Multifocal IOLs in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Helga P. Sandoval, MD, MSCR 1 Reid B. Murphy, MD, 1 Luis E. Fernández de Castro,
P91: Clinical Performance of Phakic Angle-Supported Investigational IOL in Prospective Global Trials, ASCRS 2010, Boston P91: Clinical performance of phakic.
Highlights of the 2008 ASCRS member practice style survey David Leaming MD Survey Sponsors ( *Financial Disclosure ) Alcon Surgical AMO Bausch & Lomb.
Preoperative and Postoperative Glarometer Measurements in Patients Having Cataract Extraction with Placement of Posterior Chamber and Accommodating IOLs.
LONG TERM OUTCOMES OF RESTOR IOL IMPLANTATION Lori Dao, Orkun Muftuoglu, V. Vinod Mootha, Steven M. Verity, R. Wayne Bowman, H. Dwight Cavanagh, James.
Department of Ophthalmology Rudolf Foundation Clinic Vienna Head: Prof. Dr. Susanne Binder YEWHI-Study - A Comparison Between Blue Light Filtering and.
Binocular Defocus Curve of Apodized Diffractive Multifocal IOL in Asian-Indian Eyes Dr.A. Shetty; Dr. M. K. Kummelil; Dr. S.Nagappa Cataract and Refractive.
DGII 2008 Comparison of Aspheric ReSTOR and Tecnis multifocal IOL Dongho Lee MD, PhD Yonsei eye center, Seoul, South Korea No Financial Interest.
AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL. Aspheric IOL AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® 2 AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL SN6AD3 Add Power: +4 D Spectacle Plane: 3.2 D Range:
Controversies about binocular function and patient satisfaction after induced conventional monovision in case of bilateral intraocular lens implantation.
Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences
S. Lee/M.Kim 2010 M. Kim 1, H. Lee 1, S. Lee 1,, S.D. Lee 1 1 ASA-Vision Clinics Seoul Comparative Analysis Preliminary Results of.
AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Apodized Diffractive IOL. What is the AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® IOL? The AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® IOL incorporates an apodized diffractive optic.
Comparative Study of the Aspheric Akreos Adapt AO IOL Versus the Spherical Akreos Adapt IOL Maghizh Anandan Martin Leyland.
Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.
Refractive Outcomes with Advanced Wavefront-Guided LASIK William Trattler, MD Charles Reilly, MD Consultant to the USAF SG for Refractive Surgery Lackland.
Comparison of 2 Models of Aspheric Diffractive Multifocal IOL
Investigation of Multifocal Toric IOLs to Compensate for Corneal Astigmatism and to Provide Near, Intermediate, and Distance Vision José L. Rincón, MD.
Preliminary Results after Cataract Surgery with the Aspheric Acrysof ReSTOR IOL to Correct Presbyopia Meeting of the ASCRS Chicago 8-10 February 2007 R.M.M.A.
Warren Hill, MD, FACS East Valley Ophthalmology 5620 E. Broadway Road
Inadvertent Insertion of an Opposite- Side Tecnis ZM900 Multifocal IOL Wilson Takashi Hida, M.D. Celso Takashi Nakano; Jonathan Lake;
Toric IOLs: wavefront aberrometry and quality of life Mencucci Rita Giordano Cristina, Stiko Ermelinda, Miranda Paolo, Eleonora Favuzza, Ugo Menchini Authors.
INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) BASIC MONOFOCAL LENS ASTIGMATISM CORRECTING LENS CRYSTALENS AO TRULIGN TORIC TECNIS MULTIFOCALRESTOR METHOD OF CATARACT SURGERY.
Multifocal lenses analysis with OQAS system Dr Alfredo Castillo Hospital Quirón Madrid ASCRS Chicago.
"Mix and Match" approach implantation
Kavita Gala David Spalton Mayank Nanavaty St Thomas’ Hospital , London
J. E. “Jay” McDonald, II M.D. McDonald Eye Associates Fayetteville, Arkansas Financial disclosure: Bausch and Lomb – Consultant; Addition.
Postoperative Refraction and Patient Satisfaction after Bilateral Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Robert Cionni, MD Financial.
Multi focal IOL.
Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
Intraocular Lens.
Dr Gareth James ASPC lead on Audit
Portishead Medical Group Patient Information Evening
Evaluation of Akreos AO micro-incision IOL, implantation in 350 eyes :
Thomas Kohnen, MD Department of Ophthalmology
Comparison of vision with an accommodating IOL versus a multifocal IOL
David T. Vroman, MD Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology
Dr Haralabos Eleftheriadis, M.D Ultralase Clinic Bristol UK
Visual Outcomes and Satisfaction with Toric IOL Versus Monofocal IOL
Long-Term Quantitative Analysis of Posterior Capsule Opacification After Implantation of Dual-Optic Accommodating IOLs Andrea Galvis, MD 1 , 3 Ivan.
Comparative Global Literature Review of Visual and Optical Quality of Refractive, Diffractive, and Hybrid IOL Designs James P. McCulley, MD Department.
Consultant Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth
Presentation transcript:

Consultant for Alcon. AMO, Bausch and Lomb ReSTOR vs ReSTOR Aspheric: a questionnaire based lifestyle study Richard Packard London England ASCRS San Francisco 2009 Consultant for Alcon. AMO, Bausch and Lomb

Introduction In 2006 we conducted a study, reported previously, with a specially designed questionnaire of patients implanted with the Acrysof ReSTOR SN60D3 lens. This had been sent to 50 patients at least 12 months post-op - 40 responded fully. This year we repeated the exercise with patients implanted with the aspheric ReSTOR SN6AD3 lens. We got 15 responses from 25 patients more than 1 year out from surgery.

Anatomy of the Apodized Diffractive Aspheric Technology on the ReSTOR SA6AD3

The following question were asked Score your distance vision in good and poor light Score your near vision in good and poor light Do you use glasses used for reading? Do you use a computer? Do you use glasses for computer work? Do you drive regularly? Score your driving during the day and at night Are glare and haloes an issue when night driving? Do you play cards? Do you use glasses to play cards? Would you recommend this lens to friends and family? Only the important differences will be highlighted

Distance and near UCVA in good and poor light (score 0-7 where 7 is highest) Standard ReSTOR Aspheric ReSTOR

Driving day and night - range 0-7 Standard ReSTOR Aspheric ReSTOR

Glare and haloes night driving Standard ReSTOR Aspheric ReSTOR No patient spontaneously mentioned any night time visual disturbances No patient does not drive at night

In conclusion Although patients willingness to recommend the lens to friends and family was similar between the groups Standard ReSTOR Aspheric ReSTOR The theoretical improvement in mesopic vision and lessening of haloes and glare of the aspheric ReSTOR seems to exist for patients in their world

Thank you