Publishing without tears.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to get published (in EJHG)?. Questions to ask Is your paper within the scope? Does the journal reach an appropriate audience? How easy is electronic.
Advertisements

How to Review a Paper How to Get your Work Published
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
Professor Ian Richards University of South Australia.
Bernard Appiah, B.Pharm, MDC, MS, DrPH AuthorAID Team Member Texas A&M University School of Public Health Writing.
Publishing Journal Articles Simon Hix Prof. of European & Comparative Politics LSE Government Department My experience How journals work Choosing a journal.
Publication Process Submitting and peer review. Overview Submit –Where to submit –How to submit Editor –Sends to Reviewers –Reads it themselves –Send.
Getting Your Article Published: The Mysteries of Peer-Review and the Decisions of Journals Howard Bauchner, MD, FAAP, FRCPCH Editor-in-Chief, ADC Professor.
Paper written! Now for the harder part: getting it published! Sue Silver, PhD Editor in Chief Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment Ecological Society.
Reviewing Papers: What Reviewers Look For Session 19 C507 Scientific Writing.
Presentation  Publication A few random thoughts.
Outline for Today  Walk through a 3 year proposal example  Received funding  Share experiences in writing journal articles  Discuss how to properly.
 What is a cover letter?  A cover letter is a formal letter that accompanies your resume.  It is used to introduce yourself to potential employers.
Publishing Research Papers Charles E. Dunlap, Ph.D. U.S. Civilian Research & Development Foundation Arlington, Virginia
Manuscript Writing and the Peer-Review Process
Publishing a Journal Article: An Overview of the Process Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University
Peer Review for Addiction Journals Robert L. Balster Editor-in-Chief Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
Publication Process Submitting and peer review. Overview Submit –Where to submit –How to submit Editor –Sends to Reviewers –Reads it themselves –Sends.
The Submission Process Jane Pritchard Learning and Teaching Advisor.
Journal of Interdisciplinary Topics (JIST) Whilst most undergraduate science programmes provide students with a project, through which they obtain some.
So you want to publish an article? The process of publishing scientific papers Williams lab meeting 14 Sept 2015.
Publishing Your Work Not a Question, But rather an Execution Who? Why? When? Where? How? รัตติกร ยิ้มนิรัญ สาขาวิชาฟิสิกส์ สำนักวิชา วิทยาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีสุรนารี
Thomas HeckeleiPublishing and Writing in Agricultural Economics 1 … 4 The review process  Overview  The author’s role  The referee’s role  The editor’s.
©2006 Richard Watson Todd Publishing in international refereed journals Richard Watson Todd.
Submitting Manuscripts to Journals: An Editor’s Perspective Michael K. Lindell Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center Texas A&M University.
Publishing in Measurement Journals Journals as People (Not Just Outlets), Publishing as a Process (Not Just an Event) Presentation for EDMS MSMS Steve.
How to Write Defne Apul and Jill Shalabi. Papers Summarized Johnson, T.M Tips on how to write a paper. J Am Acad Dermatol 59:6, Lee,
Software Engineering Experimentation Rules for Reviewing Papers Jeff Offutt See my editorials 17(3) and 17(4) in STVR
How to Satisfy Reviewer B and Other Thoughts on the Publication Process: Reviewers’ Perspectives Don Roy Past Editor, Marketing Management Journal.
AuthorAID Workshop on Research Writing Tanzania June 2010.
Responding to Reviewers. Rare to get an acceptance with no changes So two paths, rejection or revise and resubmit Rejection Revise and Resubmit.
FEMS Microbiology Ecology Getting Your Work Published Telling a Compelling Story Working with Editors and Reviewers Jim Prosser Chief Editor FEMS Microbiology.
Handling editors Tanita Casci Head of Research Policy @tanitacasci Research Quality Workshop COSE,
Technical Writing: An Editor’s Perspective Michael K. Lindell Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center Texas A&M University.
Pointers for Surviving the Editorial Process Peter B. Imrey, Ph.D. Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Case Western Reserve University.
How to write successfully for IATEFL Conference Selections Tania Pattison Conference Selections Editor IATEFL, Harrogate 2014.
How to get a paper published Derek Eamus Department of Environmental Sciences.
What’s Included in a Review Irving H. Zucker, Ph.D. University of Nebraska Medical Center A Primer for Potential Reviewers Experimental Biology 2014 San.
Abstract  An abstract is a concise summary of a larger project (a thesis, research report, performance, service project, etc.) that concisely describes.
Revising Your Paper Paul Lewis With thanks to Mark Weal.
How to Get Published: Surviving in the Academic World Stephen E. Condrey, Ph.D. Vice President, American Society for Public Administration Editor-in-Chief,
Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success
How to get a paper published in IEEE
LEVEL 5 SCOTTISH STUDIES HOW TO TYPE IT UP!
How does publication in psychological science work?
Journeys into journals: publishing for the new professional
Writing the Perfect Cover letter
Intensive Course in Research Writing
How to write successfully for IATEFL Conference Selections
Publishing a paper.
The peer review process
Writing your personal project report
It’s important to have one… sometimes...
Role of peer review in journal evaluation
How to Publish with IEEE
General Writing Concerns
Reading Culture Shock.
How to read a scientific paper
Reading Research Papers
BHS Methods in Behavioral Sciences I
«Организация процесса прохождения рукописей в Springer Nature»
Chapter 4 Summary.
Manuscripts and publishing
Strategi Memperbaiki dan Menyiapkan Naskah (Manuscript) Hasil Review
Launch And Information Session
Post-submission Outcomes The review black box Editorial rejection
Writing and Publishing
Writing an Effective Research Paper
Before you appeal, ask yourself:
Academic Writing – Week 9
Presentation transcript:

Publishing without tears. A rough guide to getting published in whatever journal you want, whenever you want. Chris Surridge, Chief Editor, Nature Plants c.surridge@nature.com

Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com

To communicate the world’s best and most important science to scientists across the world and to the wider community interested in science. Launch Issue 1869 Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com

Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com

What makes a Nature journal? Highly selective — only a fraction of submissions are published. High impact. Each journal is run by team of full-time, professional editors. Each journal is independent from each other journal — rejection from one doesn’t prejudice consideration by another. Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com

A quick overview of Altmetrics Altmetric score = automated algorithm. Represents weighted count of the attention given to an article. Weighted to reflect the relative reach of each type of source. I.e. the average newspaper story is more likely to bring attention to the research output than the average tweet.  *Adapted from www.support.altmetric.com 1272 Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com

The Publication Cycle Submit Revise Reject Decide Accept Referee Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com

Think of your reader They are your partner Three wishes Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com

Writing the paper Explain, don‘t hype. Show, don’t tell. Demonstrate, don’t assert. CONTEXT — What is the problem you are trying to solve? And WHY? FOCUS — What is the ONE most important thing a reader should take away from your work? SIGNIFICANCE — “So what?” If someone were to ask you this about your work, what is the answer? CLARITY — The figures should speak for themselves. Clarity in the figures and tables is more important than beauty. Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com

Think of your reader They are your partner Listen to the Editor Three wishes Think of your reader They are your partner Listen to the Editor They are not your enemy Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com

Submission The cover letter is your 10 minutes alone in a room with the editor. SHORT cover letters are best — try to distill the significance of your results into one short paragraph. Referee suggestions Who might have useful insights into your work? Please don't suggest former supervisors, recent (or current) collaborators, friends, or relatives.‏ Referee exclusions — Who would you rather didn’t referee your paper and why (3-4 individuals MAX).‏ Identify all related papers submitted elsewhere. Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com

Editorial process We aim to reach an initial decision within a week. We look for impact not impact factors. MOST papers are declined without review. At least one editor will read your paper thoroughly. Often several editors. Papers sent out to review will be seen by 2-4 referees. We make our decision based on content of the referees comments, not whether they think a paper belongs in the journal. We aim for 4-6 weeks for a decision after review. Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com

They are your first reader Three wishes Think of your reader They are your partner Listen to the Editor They are not your enemy Believe the Referees They are your first reader Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com

Responding to referees Thank the referees! Make it EASY for the referees to see that ALL their concerns have been addressed. Persuasion and diplomacy are essential. Criticism is not an insult, it’s an OPPORTUNITY! If an expert hasn’t understood the merits of your work, that’s a serious problem, wherever paper is published! Answer ALL the concerns of ALL referees. If further experiments are requested, revisions to text alone are UNLIKELY to be enough. Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com

Appeals What helps? What doesn’t help? We take appeals seriously but original submissions take priority Only a minority of appeals are successful What helps? Specific errors of fact or understanding by the editors or referees New data that addresses the major criticisms What doesn’t help? “Do you know who I AM!?!” “Referees don’t like my work, therefore they are biased!” “I know who the referee is. He’s a moron!” “We worked really hard on this paper!” Cosmetic revisions Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com

They are your first reader Three wishes Think of your reader They are your partner Listen to the Editor They are not your enemy Believe the Referees They are your first reader Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com

Thank you and questions Chris Surridge c.surridge@nature.com www.nature.com/nplants