Optimized design for an sLHC Silicon tracker

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Ann Van Lysebetten CO 2 cooling experience in the LHCb Vertex Locator Vertex 2007 Lake Placid 24/09/2007.
Advertisements

24 June 2010 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) CO 2 Cooling for PXD/SVD IDM Meeting.
Technical Board, 12 July 2005Børge Svane Nielsen, NBI1 Status of the FMD Børge Svane Nielsen Niels Bohr Institute.
ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
Layer 0 Grounding Requirement in terms of noise performance Grounding/Shielding studies with L0 prototype Summary Kazu Hanagaki / Fermilab.
1 Integration issues of FPCCD VTX Yasuhiro Sugimoto May 22,
IEEE Dresden, Wim de Boer, Univ. Karlsruhe An optimized tracker design using CO2 cooling Outline: 1.Requirements for sLHC trackers (massless.
The AMS-02 detector is based on a large acceptance (~0.5 m²sr) and high sensitivity spectrometer composed by a super-conducting magnet (0.8 T), cooled.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
GTK WG Meeting April 5 th 2011 Update on Microchannel Cooling - Paolo Petagna 1/15 PH-DT Update on Microchannel Cooling J. Daguin (CERN PH/DT) A. Mapelli.
CO2 cooling pressure drop measurements R. Bates, R. French, G. Viehhauser, S. McMahon.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
CO 2 return pressure drop budget and pipes from PP2 to tracker Georg Viehhauser.
CMS FPIX Cooling Prototype Phase One Estimate and Conceptual Design R. L. Schmitt 10/28/2009.
SVX4 chip 4 SVX4 chips hybrid 4 chips hybridSilicon sensors Front side Back side Hybrid data with calibration charge injection for some channels IEEE Nuclear.
D. Lissauer, BNL. 1 ATLAS ID Upgrade Scope R&D Plans for ATLAS Tracker First thoughts on Schedule and Cost.
1 CO 2 cooling of an endplate with Timepix readout Bart Verlaat, Nikhef LCTPC collaboration meeting DESY, 22 September
27 January 2010 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) Belle II SVD Mechanics and Cooling DEPFET Meeting Prag.
26 April 2013 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) Belle II SVD Overview.
1 VI Single-wall Beam Pipe tests M.OlceseJ.Thadome (with the help of beam pipe group and Michel Bosteels’ cooling group) TMB July 18th 2002.
20 th June 20111Enrico Da Riva, V. Rao Project Request and Geometry constraints June 20 th 2011 Bdg 298 Enrico Da Riva,Vinod Singh Rao CFD GTK.
Jochen Ebert, Uni Karlsruhe1 Powering via cooling pipes very first results.
VG1 i T i March 9, 2006 W. O. Miller ATLAS Silicon Tracker Upgrade Upgrade Stave Study Topics Current Analysis Tasks –Stave Stiffness, ability to resist.
W. Karpinski, Nov CMS Electronics week CMS Microstrip Tracker grounding & shielding of the CMS Tracker R. Hammarstrom (CERN EP/CMT) & W. Karpinski.
LHCb VELO Meeting LHCb VELO Cooling System Bart Verlaat (NIKHEF) 25 February 2003.
CMS FPIX Cooling System Studies Joe Howell, Fermilab for the FPIX Upgrade Mechanical Working Group CMS Upgrade Workshop April 27,
26 May 2010Hans Postema - CERN Status and plan for the development and construction of CO2 Cooling System for Pixel Upgrade 1.
LHCb-VELO Microchannel fracture safety system and evaporator concept 26 June 2015 Bart Verlaat 1.
LHC CMS Detector Upgrade Project FPIX Cooling Update Stefan Grünendahl, Fermilab For the FPIX Mechanical Group, 29 January 2015 Stefan Grünendahl,
1 VI Single-wall Beam Pipe Option: status and plans M.Olcese TMB June 6th 2002.
- Performance Studies & Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Stefan Koestner (University Zurich) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker Collaboration IT -
Compilation of Dis-/Advantages of DC-DC Conversion Schemes Power Task Force Meeting December 16 th, 2008 Katja Klein 1. Physikalisches Institut B RWTH.
Cooling System Solutions
CO2 cooling in CMS General overview 30 July 20101Hans Postema - CERN.
Update on Micro Channel Cooling Collaboration Meeting , G. Nüßle.
Report on testing Snake2 u-channel. P. Jalocha & J. Buytaert. 8 June 2015.
CO 2 Controlling a 2-phase CO2 loop using a 2-phase accumulator
CO2 Cooling For the CMS Pixel detector 11 November 20081Hans Postema & Antti Onnela.
A New Inner-Layer Silicon Micro- Strip Detector for D0 Alice Bean for the D0 Collaboration University of Kansas CIPANP Puerto Rico.
Aachen Status Report: CO 2 Cooling for the CMS Tracker at SLHC Lutz Feld, Waclaw Karpinski, Jennifer Merz and Michael Wlochal RWTH Aachen University, 1.
10 September 2010 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) Belle II SVD Upgrade, Mechanics and Cooling OEPG/FAKT Meeting 2010.
Technical Design for the Mu3e Detector Dirk Wiedner on behalf of Mu3e February Dirk Wiedner PSI 2/15.
Origami and Cooling 24th September 2012 C. Irmler (HEPHY Vienna) Joint PXD and SVD Meeting Göttingen.
CMS TK II cooling Brainstorming P. Tropea (update after meeting on June 13 th with Duccio, Antti, Hans, Jerome, Paolo, Bart) 20 June 2016.
7 February 2012 Annekathrin Frankenberger (HEPHY Vienna) Open CO 2 Cooling System at the beam test Belle II SVD-PXD Meeting.
MVD COOLING STATUS-PAST AND UPDATES PIXEL COOLING PROJECT: -STUDIES and TEST on MATERIALS (Carbon Foam) -THERMAL FEM ANALYSES and TEST on DISKS and STAVES.
CMS Upgrade CERN April 27, 2010 W. Bertl PSI Power & Cooling: Design Status of BPIX.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker final integration and commissioning Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Université de Genève on behalf of the Atlas SCT collaboration.
Noise & Grounding Andrei Nomerotski (U.Oxford) 17 July 2007.
SVD Electronics Constraints
2016/12/6 Yasuhiro R&D status of a gas-compressor based 2-phase CO2 cooling system for FPCCD vertex detector 2016/12/6 Yasuhiro Sugimoto.
For the CMS Pixel detector
Design of the thermosiphon Test Facilities 2nd Thermosiphon Workshop
ARAC/H/F Air-cooled water chillers, free-cooling chillers and heat pumps Range: kW.
IBL Overview Darren Leung ~ 8/15/2013 ~ UW B305.
Micro-channel Cooling
Hybrid Pixel R&D and Interconnect Technologies
For the CMS Pixel detector
Aachen Status Report: CO2 Cooling for the CMS Tracker
Microfluidic devices for thermal management
CFD-Team Weekly Meeting - 8th March 2012
Aachen Status Report: CO2 Cooling for the CMS Tracker at SLHC
FP420 Detector Cooling Thermal Considerations
SIT AND FTD DESIGN FOR ILD
Re-circulating CO2 Test System
Recirculating CO2 System
Compilation of Dis-/Advantages of DC-DC Conversion Schemes
VELO Thermal Control System
Aachen Status Report: CO2 Cooling for the CMS Tracker
For the CMS Pixel detector
Presentation transcript:

Optimized design for an sLHC Silicon tracker Outline: Requirements for sLHC trackers (massless and zero leakage currents) Reduce material budget by combining cooling pipe mechanical support current leads into single tube 3. Research needed

Sufficient signal, but need efficient cooling to avoid large Charge collection efficiency vs fluence for irradiated micro-strip detectors Sufficient signal, but need efficient cooling to avoid large leakage currents (-30 0C) CO2 efficient to -45 0C Casse, Liverpool, RD50

Material budget NOT BY SENSOR Material budget strongly driven by Large Power Dissipation, and need for Efficient Cooling (~33kW) Large Current requirements (~20kA) NOT BY SENSOR

Material budget

Eta-distribution

Possible solution Combine functionality of Powerleads Cooling tubes Mechanical support

„Novel“ connection scheme Connections between readout strip and chip are routed in an additional metal layer on the sensor  No Pitch Adapter necessary! Readout chips are directly bump bonded to the sensor ”No” Hybrid necessary! Supply lines for chips are provided by small Kapton glued (Maybe even with routing on sensor to sensor) Influence of 2nd Metal Layer: Increased capacitance and resistance of each sensor channel  Noise scales with capacitance Crosstalk caused by capacitive coupling between routing line and strips Thx Thomas Bergauer

1. How could a module look like? Basic ideas 1. How could a module look like? Optical fiber Cooling pipes = support =current leads Control lines on kapton Trigger Strixels connected via double metal layer to readout CFC with high thermal conductivity between sensor and hybrid to a) avoid heating of sensor by hybrid b) efficient heat transfer to cooling c) support for FR4 flex hybrid CFC CO2 Note: no thermal stresses, since module moves with cooling tube HV Si Hybrid CFC

Service Electronics, Trigger Lamp shape layers Service Electronics, Trigger Efficient CO2 cooling allows long cooling tubes. If bent in “lamp” shape with all connections and service in corners-> minimal material budget

Advantages of CO2 cooling 1. CO2 has large latent heat of evaporation 2. Non-toxic, non-flammable, industrial standard 3. Liquid at room temperature 300 liquid/vapour phase from -50 to +31 0C (for p=7 to 73 bar) If rupture disc breaks-> CO2 SNOW, not liquid! (as fire extinguisher)

CMS Multistage Cooling System

CMS cooling system in USC55 zone CV P. Tropea

2. How thick cooling pipes needed for 130 bar? Basic ideas 2. How thick cooling pipes needed for 130 bar? P = 1968x thickness/Diameter = 328 bar for Al (D=6 mm , thick 1mm) =328 bar for Al (D=1 mm, thick 160 um) =196 bar for Al (D=5mm, thick 500 um) P = pressure Bar da = outer diameterr in mm sv = wall thickness in mm vN = welding factor = 1,0 σ zul = elasticity, N/mm2 (110 for Al and Cu/Ni, 140 for steel , 33 annealed soft Cu) 2a. What is radiation thickness of Al tube with D=6mm, 1mm thick? Smeared on 10x10 cm sensor: 0.35% X0 To be compared with 2 Si sensors of 300 um: 0.7% X0 Al cooling tubes themselves do not add much to material budget! Or even Cu/Ni cooling tubes (easier to handle) could be acceptable (2.2% X0). Also smaller tube sizes possible.

+V V+Δ V 0 - Δ V 0 V Basic ideas 3. Can one use cooling pipes as current leads? 40 APV6 hybrids = 100 A Voltage drop in 2m Al tube of 6mm, 1mm thick=0.3V for 100 A BUT voltage drops cancel out if return line has same properties!!! V+Δ V +V 0 - Δ V 0 V

+V -V Basic ideas 4. Possible to integrate with present services? The cooling loops have to have inlet and outlet on the same side, but the current has to flow in the same direction (to get voltage drop compensation). This can be achieved by connecting manifolds of a given sector on one side to +V and the other side to ground. The current is indicated by the red arrows.

Si Basic ideas 5. Overall stability? Tubes should probably be mounted on two half shells or rings of CFC with holes for screwing the modules on the pipes (on both sides of half shell) Si cooling pipes

What happens if one module fails? Use programmable solid state fuse on each module (standard in space electronics) Measures current in each module and can switch on/off modules independently To keep same current in each current lead, bypass resistor could be switched on, if one module has to be switched off. SSF R

Front-end readout and control

Conclusion sofar 5 mm tubes seem to match SIMULTANEOUSLY very well requirements of: Cooling tube with small amount of material and high pressure allowed Current lead with good cooling and small voltage drop (also cancels) Mechanically strong enough to help in support structure

LHC-b cooling scheme Great features: no active elements like heaters or valves inside detector standard CO2 pumps standard primary chiller Temperature of whole system controlled by only ONE parameter: the vapor pressure in accumulator (increased by heater, decreased by chiller)

Required cooling power Cooling: assume 10W/module (now 3W). (Can get more current by voltage converter near patch panel) From patch panel: 2 m cooling tube = 40 modules =400 W = 400 J/s = 1.8 g/s evaporates. (Liquid enthalpy 223 J/g at 220 K, 700 kPa) Volume of 4mm ID tube = 3.14 x 4^2 x2000 mm^3 = 100 cm^3 = Pump: 10 m^3/h = 10000l/h = 3l/s = 3000 cm^3/s Assuming at most 60% evaporates. Then single line: 3g/s cools 40x0.1x0.1= 0.4 m2 Need 200 m2 = (200/0.4)x3g/s=1500g/s =1.3 l/s= 1.3x3600 l/h = 4700 l /h = 5 m3/h (This corresponds to 200/0.4 x 400 W = 200 kW cooling power)

CO2 cooling power Input Mixture Average mixture critical properties Carbon Dioxide, CO2 : 1.00000000 Average mixture critical properties critical compressibility : 0.274 critical density : 10.650 kgmol/m3 critical pressure : 7380.000 kPa critical temperature : 304.100 K normal freezing point : 216.600 K Mixture properties at 220 K and 700 kPa material phase is 0.00 mole % vapor vapor density : 0.425 kgmole/m3 liquid density : 25.972 kgmole/m3 vapor enthalpy : 5444.364 kJ/kgmol l iquid enthalpy : -9846.740 kJ/kgmol vapor heat capacity : 37.428 kJ/kgmol-K liquid heat capacity : 80.522 kJ/kgmol-K feed molecular weight : 44.010 kg/kgmol vapor molecular weight : 44.010 kg/kgmol liquid molecular weight : 44.010 kg/kgmol 1kgmol=44 g Density=25.97x44=1.14g/cm^3

CO2 cooling power Alternative estimate: Cooling power = massflow x Enthalpy Max Enthalpy at -50°C = 9846.740 kJ/kgmol =224 J/g Power = massflow x 224 J/g Power of 100 kW = 100000 J/s requires a mass flow of 100000/224 = 446 g/s = 446/1.14 cm 3 /s = 391 cm 3 /s = 1.4 m 3 /h Or by 60% evaporation: 2.3 m3/h Or by 200 kW: 5 m 3 /h

CO2 pumps LEWA Herbert Ott GmbH Leonberg, Germany, Pumps up to 100 000 l/h available. (used for gas bottle filling, CO2 liquifying (no cooling needed, just pressure) We need about 1000 l/h, i.e. a small pump (ca. 4 kEuro, including perfect membrane and leakage monitoring (used in health and food industry)

Research program Design and check flow of CO2 in various tubes and compare with theoretical estimates (help from CERN’s cryolab ? T. Niinikoski interested) Check cooling and powering of realistic modules Lamp shape feasible? How can new scheme be integrated in present CMS detector and using same services?