Power Save Delivery for 11ay

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Scheduled Trigger frames July 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1161r0 September 2014 Eric Wong et al (Apple)Slide 1 Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms Date: Authors:
Unifying QoS Control and BSR A-Control for Buffer Status Report
Channel Width Selection Within TXOP
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: March 2008 March 2008
Flow control for EDMG devices
PHY-CCA Indication doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
EDMG Capability and Operation Element Channel Indications
Enhanced SLS BF flow for efficient AP-STA access in dense environment
High Level MAC Concept for WUR
WUR coexistence with existing power save mode
Flow control for EDMG devices
Beamforming for mmWave Distribution Networks
DLS Power Save Delivery Mechanism
Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms
How to collect STAs’ Tx demands for UL MU
Advanced MU-MIMO acknowledgement and PS flow
Protocol and frames for TDD link maintenance
EDMG BlockAck Retransmission
Scheduling for mmWave Distribution Networks
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
Overview of ba Power Management in D0.4
PHY-CCA Indication doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
Efficient TDD slot schedule mechanism
Follow UP of Unifying Queue Size Report
Comment resolution on BSR CID 8426
Asymmetric beamforming training procedure enhancements
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
Scheduling for mmWave Distribution Networks
Overview of ba Power Management in D0.4
Overview of ba Power Management in D0.4
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
WUR Action Frame Format Follow up
UL OFDMA-based Random Access Parameter Set (RAPS) element
Some Power-save changes in e Draft
EDMG Segmentation and Reassembly
Ack/BA for mmWave Distribution Networks
Wake Up Response mode to WUR frame
Comment resolution on BSR CID 8426
WUR Action Frame Format Follow up
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: March 2008 March 2008
Data transmission detail in WUR mode
Overview of ba Power Management in D0.4
Discussion on CR for CID 5066
Consideration of EDCA for WUR Signal
WUR Action Frame Format
Comment resolution on BSR CID 8426
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
802.11ba Architecture Discussion
Follow UP of Unifying Queue Size Report
Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework
Comment resolution on CID 20175
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
PHY-CCA Indication doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
TD Control field with Response indication in WUR frame
Scheduled Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Protocol and frames for TDD link maintenance
Overview of ba Power Management in D0.4
Channel Width Selection Within TXOP
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Peer Traffic Indication enhancements
SM Power Save for 11ay Date: Authors: August 2017
Multi-WID Addressed WUR Frame
WUR with conventional power save
Enhancement of Low Power Medium Access STAs
Multi-link power save operation
Presentation transcript:

Power Save Delivery for 11ay September 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-17/1417r0 Sep2017 Power Save Delivery for 11ay Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone email Oren Kedem Intel   oren.kedem@intel.com Cheng Chen cheng.chen@intel.com Carlos Cordeiro carlos.cordeiro@intel.com Solomon Trainin Qualcomm strainin@qti.qualcomm.com Intel Corporation Intel Corporation

Motivation and Purpose Sep2017 doc.: IEEE 802.11-17/1417r0 Sep2017 Motivation and Purpose QoS traffic like Voice/Video requires short periodic service. (Typical use case for Voice Traffic is 20-50KB every 20ms). Spec should allow STA to support Voice/Video while maintain power save. 11ac addressed this use case with U-APSD mechanism that is commonly supported by most of Wi-Fi chip vendors. 11ay should enable the STA to save power while delivering Voice/Video traffic. Contribution is a proposal for a suggested improvement on existed 11ad Triggered Unscheduled Power Save mechanism to address the above Intel Corporation Intel Corporation

11ad Power Save Mechanisms Sep2017 11ad Power Save Mechanisms Scheduled Power Save STA and PCP/AP communicate a Wakeup Schedule of cycling between awake BIs and doze BIs. Enable PS cycles in granularity of BIs (>100ms) hence is not suitable for short time doze states. Unscheduled Power Save STA informs the PCP/AP on entering and exiting PS by completing a successful frame exchange with the “Power Management” subfield in the Frame Control field. Involved with major overhead to communicate PS transitions, hence not suitable for short time Doze states. Scheduled Allocations PCP/AP allocate dedicated SP for STA QoS traffic. SP Allocation is not always guaranteed. Not suitable for CBAP Only (most AP’s link access scheme). Above 11ad PS mechanisms are not suitable for STA PS while delivering QoS Traffic. Intel Corporation

Sep2017 doc.: IEEE 802.11-17/1417r0 Sep2017 11ac U-APSD Overview STA designates one or more of its ACs to be trigger-enabled ACs (i.e. U-APSD, Unscheduled-Automatic Power Save Delivery). STA may configure the AP to use U-APSD Via Association procedure or alternatively by sending an ADDTS request per AC. STA using U-APSD shall have the Power Management bit in the frame control field set to 1 for buffering to take place at the AP. STA send unicast QoS-Data/Null frames while in PS-mode which triggers the AP to send the STA its BU. AP sends the BU to STA immediately after the Trigger frame STA must remain awake as long as data is still available. Intel Corporation Intel Corporation

Sep2017 U-APSD Link Access The Max SP Length subfield indicates the maximum number of BUs the STA is prepared to receive during any SP triggered by the STA. AP is required to send to the STA all the BU on the respective Triggered Enabled AC, per the Maximum BU the STA is able to receive in every SP Intel Corporation

11ad Triggered Unscheduled PS Sep2017 doc.: IEEE 802.11-17/1417r0 Sep2017 11ad Triggered Unscheduled PS 11ad supports the Triggered Unscheduled Power Save A STA that has used unscheduled power save to enter Power Save may acquire TXOP and grant the AP/PCP a Reverse Direction. The AP/PCP use the offered RDG to transmit the BUs to the STA. While in this scheme, STA resides in Power Save state. Hence there is no Power Save transition overheads (i.e. sending frame with PM=0). 11ay can utilize Triggered Unscheduled the same as U-APSD Trigger frame and enable 11ay to save power while delivering VOIP traffic Intel Corporation Intel Corporation

Sep2017 U-APSD QoS Info Field MAX SP Length allow limited options to indicated the maximum MPDUs QoS-Info field doesn’t provide the EDMG flow control needs hence 11ay is required to define new IE. Intel Corporation

Triggered Unscheduled PS vs. U-APSD Sep2017 doc.: IEEE 802.11-17/1417r0 Sep2017 Triggered Unscheduled PS vs. U-APSD In order to support power Save mode while delivering QoS traffic, PCP/AP should negotiate on the serviced AC. 11ay 11ac AC and buffering definition New “Triggered Unscheduled Parameters IE” U-APSD “QoS Info field” is not suitable for 11ay flow control needs Negotiation Agreement Association Req/Rsp and PSC Req/Rsp Association Req/Rsp or ADDTS Req/Rsp Triggering Method Triggered Unscheduled PS procedure as STA trigger frame Any QoS-Data or Qos-Null for every Max SP length frame Intel Corporation Intel Corporation

11ay - QoS Triggered Unscheduled IE Sep2017 11ay - QoS Triggered Unscheduled IE QoS Triggered Unscheduled IE   Element ID Length QoS-TU Parameters QoS-TU Max MPDU Size Octets : 1 2 QoS-TU Parameters field   B0 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 QoS-TU Max A-MPDU Length Exponent AC_VO Flag AC_VI Flag AC_BK Flag AC_BE Flag Bits : 4 1 QoS-TU ACs Flag subfields indicate that the corresponding AC is QoS Triggered Unscheduled enabled QoS-TU Max A-MPDU Length Exponent subfield indicates the maximum A-MPDU size of buffered BUs the STA is prepared to receive during QoS Unscheduled PS triggered by the STA. QoS-TU Max MPDU Size subfield indicates the maximum number of buffered BUs (MPDUs) the STA is prepared to receive during QoS Unscheduled PS triggered by the STA. Intel Corporation

Proposed Flow - Negotiation phase Sep2017 Proposed Flow - Negotiation phase Intel Corporation

Proposed Flow – Data Delivery Sep2017 Proposed Flow – Data Delivery Intel Corporation

Sep2017 Straw poll Do you agree to incorporate the changes in “11-17-1416-00-00ay-Power Save Delivery for 11ay.docx” (U-APSD extension for EDMG) into the draft? ”? Intel Corporation

Sep2017 Backup Intel Corporation