Elm Creek Watershed TMDL E. coli TMDL – Review of Preliminary Findings

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The World Water Quality Assessment Large-scale water quality modeling Hot spots and causes of water pollution.
Advertisements

ALLEN BERTHOLD TEXAS WATER RESOURCES INSTITUTE Water Quality and Copano Bay Watershed Efforts.
Ann D Hirekatur Project Manager State of Lake Wisconsin Meeting July 13, 2013 Wisconsin River Basin Water Quality Improvement Project.
O Adopted in 1972, the CWA is known mostly to the public by its mandate for “swimmable and fishable” waterways. o With the CWA, states evaluate all of.
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
Leona River Potential Loads and Sources for Bacteria and Nitrates Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research Stephenville, Texas June 4, 2013.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
7:00 pmWelcome and introductions 7:05pmHLWD planning overview Plan update process 7:25 pmStakeholder involvement Watershed problems 7:40 pmPublic comment.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Paso del Norte Watershed Council Meeting January 18, 2013 Chris Canavan, NMED.
Center for Watershed Protection Illicit Sewage Discharges in the Chesapeake Bay 2012 Chesapeake Bay Stormwater Retreat Lori Lilly Watershed Ecologist/Planner.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
TMDL – Fecal coliform Frank Henning UGA Watershed Extension Agent.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Chowan River TMDL Development Raccoon/Sappony Area 09/8/04.
TMDL – Fecal coliform Frank Henning UGA Watershed Extension Agent.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
Brent Mason, Mackenzie Consoer, Rebekah Perkins BBE 5543 November 8, 2011.
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Blackwater River Area October 25, 2004.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
Lower Big Blue Watershed Draft Escherichia coli (E. coli) TMDL Stakeholder Meeting May 7, 2014.
Floyds Fork Bacteria TMDL Andrea M. Fredenburg Kentucky Division of Water TMDL Section November 28, 2012.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Welcome! Medicine Lake Excess Nutrients TMDL Project Steering Committee Meeting #5 May 14, 2009 Photo by: Terrie Christian—President,
Chowan River TMDL Development Tidewater Area 08/26/04.
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination 6/4/20161 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination.
Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013.
Staci Goodwin Senior TMDL Project Manager Office of Water Quality
Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen Total Mass Daily Load Development for the Atascosa River Jessica L. Watts.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Nottoway River Area October 28, 2004.
Critique of North Branch of Sunrise River TMDL Nate Topie and Taylor Hoffman.
Shingle Creek Chloride TMDL Abby Morrisette and Josh Kuhn 9/10/11.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Tidewater Area October 20, 2004.
Adem.alabama.gov Tombigbee Basin Up-date July 29, 2015 Mark Sport.
Chowan River TMDL Development Blackwater Area 09/07/04.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
Chowan River TMDL Development Nottoway Area 08/31/04.
Impacts of Livestock Waste on Surface Water Quality By the North Dakota Department of Health Division of Water Quality For the Livestock Manure Nutrient.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
Improving Austin Streams: An Implementation Plan for Total Maximum Daily Load Allocations in 4 Austin Watersheds Chris Herrington, PE Manager, Water Resource.
Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDL for Four Mile Run
Mulberry River Watershed
Stormwater Management and MS4 Compliance
Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs): An Overview of TMDLs in Texas
Modeling Support for Attoyac Bayou Watershed– SELECT
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
Summit County MS4.
Total Maximum Daily Loads Development for Holdens Creek and Tributaries, and Pettit Branch Public Meeting March 26, 2008.
Total Maximum Daily Load Program
Breaking barriers between city & water leaders
Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs): An Overview of TMDLs in Texas
Henrico County Stream Assessment / Watershed Management Program
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
Mulberry River Watershed Management Plan
Watershed Management Plan Citizens Advisory Committee April 18, 2011
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs): An Overview of TMDLs in Texas
Presentation transcript:

Elm Creek Watershed TMDL E. coli TMDL – Review of Preliminary Findings Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Technical Advisory Committee Meeting June 12. 2013

Outline of Presentation Review of E. coli Standards Overview of monitoring data Review preliminary load duration curves, allocations for 3 of 4 listed reaches (excluding Elm Creek mainstem) Review/feedback on key assumptions in source identification

Bacteria Impairments Main issue is human ingestion of bacteria typically found in digestive tract of warm-blooded animals, causing sickness and even death Most streams and rivers in MN designated by law to support full or partial body contact recreation.

E. Coli Bacteria Standard Standard applies between April 1 and October 1 Reach impaired if one or more monthly geomean values exceed 126 organisms/100 ml OR More than 10% of all samples during a month can exceed 1260 organisms /100 ml

Overview of Bacteria Data by Impaired Reach

Steps in Developing Load Duration Curve (LDC) Develop flow duration curve (FDC) for 10-year period of record at bottom of impaired reach Multiply flows in FDC by standard of 126 cfu/100 ml to get load duration curve Use median value in each of 5 flow regimes to develop allowable load (“loading capacity” or LC) Subtract 5% of LC as explicit Margin of Safety (MOS)

Developing Allocations Allocate remaining load (after MOS) among: Permitted wastewater dischargers Construction and Industrial stormwater Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) Non-permitted sources (i.e. all areas not draining through a permitted MS4 stormwater conveyance system)

Developing Allocations (con’t) Allocations made proportionate to area in contributing watershed No waste load allocation = not permitted to discharge MnDOT and Hennepin County road ROW Assigned as part of WLA if within 2010 urbanized area Assigned as part of LA if outside 2010 urbanized area

Load Duration Curve (LDC) for Diamond Creek E. coli

Proposed boundary conditions for Diamond Creek E. coli allocations

Diamond Creek Allocation Table (E. coli)

Percent Reductions Needed To Reach Standard-Diamond Creek Note: Table corrected after 6-12-13 TAC meeting

Load Duration Curve (LDC) for Rush Creek Mainstem E. coli

Rush Creek Mainstem Allocation Table (E. coli)

Percent Reductions Needed To Reach Standard-Rush Cr. Mainstem Note: Table corrected after 6-12-13 TAC meeting

Load Duration Curve (LDC) for Rush Creek-South Fk. E. coli

Rush Creek-South Fk. Allocation Table (E. coli)

Percent Reductions Needed To Reach Standard-Rush Cr. –South Fk. Note: Table corrected after 6-12-13 TAC meeting

Source Assessment Purpose – To identify potential sources of elevated bacteria concentrations Detailed monitoring data provides basis for identifying priority areas of watershed Components Exceedances by season and flow regime Source Inventory

Exceedances by Flow Regime (Diamond Creek)

Source Inventory Basic approach developed for Southeast MN bacteria TMDL (MPCA 2002) Purpose: To compare number of bacteria generated by major known sources in the project area Known sources include: Livestock (manure application, feedlots, pastures) Septic Systems Wildlife Urban Stormwater Runoff

Livestock Data

Key assumptions (Source Inventory) (con’t) Livestock – GIS analysis to determine number/type of livestock in pastures/feedlots within 300’ of streams Assume 25% available from pastures/feedlots within 300’, 5% if more than 300’ Manure spreading Define livestock confinement period (4 months/year?) Assume manure produced is spread on cropland, no incorporation Same availability assumptions as for pasture/feedlots

Key assumptions (Source Inventory) (con’t) Septic Systems – Use population estimates based for un-sewered areas based on 2010 census, assume 50% available Assume 0% available from populations served by sanitary sewer/WWTP

Key assumptions (Source Inventory) (con’t) Wildlife – Assume 30 deer/sq. mile, 20 geese/sq. mi. based on TRPD and MDNR wildlife manager estimates, 100% delivery Urban Stormwater – Assume 0.58 dogs per household, 0.73 cats per household in urban areas, 10% delivery

Final Product (Source Inventory) Tables and/or charts for each subwatershed showing “bacteria for delivery”