Model Team Presentations – Science Goals, Model Capabilities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ozone in the Troposphere: Air Quality, Chemical Weather and Climate Oliver Wild Centre for Atmospheric Science, Cambridge Dept. of Environmental Science,
Advertisements

MOPITT CO Louisa Emmons, David Edwards Atmospheric Chemistry Division Earth & Sun Systems Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Simulating isoprene oxidation in GFDL AM3 model Jingqiu Mao (NOAA GFDL), Larry Horowitz (GFDL), Vaishali Naik (GFDL), Meiyun Lin (GFDL), Arlene Fiore (Columbia.
J. E. Williams, ACCRI, The Impact of ACARE reductions in Future Aircraft NOx Emissions on the Composition and Oxidizing Capacity of the Troposphere.
Using old numerical techniques with a new climate-science approach, a paper from UC Irvine has created a solid, quantitative link between measurements.
Examining the oxidative capacity of the troposphere in the remote tropical Western Pacific Julie Nicely 23 October 2014 University of Maryland Ross Salawitch,
Seasonal Variations in the Mixing Layer in the UTLS Dave MacKenzie University of Toronto GEOS-Chem Meeting April 2009.
Interannual variations in global OH radicals over the period in GEOS-Chem, and preliminary comparisons to other models I. Bey 1, S. Koumoutsaris.
CAM-chem model evaluation of the emissions and distributions of VSLS using TOGA VOC observations from CONTRAST and TORERO (in the lower and free troposphere.
The Sensitivity of Aerosol Sulfate to Changes in Nitrogen Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds Ariel F. Stein Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.
Sensitivity of Methane Lifetime to Sulfate Geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) Giovanni Pitari V. Aquila,
Simulation Experiments for GEO-CAPE Regional Air Quality GEO-CAPE Workshop September 22, 2009 Peter Zoogman, Daniel J. Jacob, Kelly Chance, Lin Zhang,
Effect of NO x emission controls on the long-range transport of ozone air pollution and human mortality J. Jason West, Vaishali Naik, Larry W. Horowitz,
The effect of pyro-convective fires on the global troposphere: comparison of TOMCAT modelled fields with observations from ICARTT Sarah Monks Outline:
Figure (a-c). Latitude-height distribution of monthly mean ozone flux for the months of (a) January, (b) April and (c) July averaged over years 2000 to.
Hemispheric transport of ozone pollution and the nonlinearities GMI meeting UC Irvine March 17, 2008 Shiliang Wu, Harvard Bryan Duncan, NASA / GSFC Arlene.
BAe-146 GV Global Hawk CAST flight planning and analysis using NAME- Jan-Feb 2013 Neil Harris, Michal Filus, Matt Ashfold, Alistair Manning and John Pyle.
Vertical transport of chemical compounds from the surface to the UT/LS: What do we learn from SEAC 4 RS? Qing Liang 1 & Thomas Hanisco 2, Steve Wofsy 3,
Status of MOZART-2 Larry W. Horowitz GFDL/NOAA MOZART Workshop November 29, 2001.
How accurately we can infer isoprene emissions from HCHO column measurements made from space depends mainly on the retrieval errors and uncertainties in.
OsloCTM2  3D global chemical transport model  Standard tropospheric chemistry/stratospheric chemistry or both. Gas phase chemistry + essential heteorogenous.
UCI 4 Jan h Quick Look at the NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Mission: Profiling and Model-Measurement Analysis Michael Prather & the ATom.
LA and HOLLYWOOD sign from UCIrvine 7 Mar h Downtown Los Angeles Air pollution began as a local problem.
Overview of ATom mission objectives
Overview of ATom mission objectives
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
NASA Atmospheric Tomography Mission:
Meteorological drivers of surface ozone biases in the Southeast US
GMI Capabilities Sarah Strode, Jose Rodriguez, Steve Steenrod, Junhua Liu, Susan Strahan, Eric Nielsen.
A proposal for multi-model decadal hindcast simulations
Atmospheric Processes and Composition:
Workshop on Air Quality Data Analysis and Interpretation
Linking regional air pollution with global chemistry and climate:
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT: CONCENTRATIONS AND FLUXES
Towards IPCC AR6: Open questions in chemistry-climate coupling
ATom data management plan:
A New Tropopause Definition for Use in Chemistry-Transport Models
ATom GRIPs project (M. Prather, Mar16) – NEW SLIDES (M. Prather Jul12)
Influence of climate change on U. S
Ozone pollution (events) in the GFDL AM3 chemistry-climate model
The First Global Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon
Sensitivity of continental boundary layer chemistry to a new isoprene oxidation mechanism Jingqiu Mao (Harvard), Fabien Paulot (Caltech), Daniel Jacob.
Methane Global Warming Potential (GWP)
Peter Zoogman, Daniel Jacob
Characteristics of Urban Ozone Formation During CAREBEIJING-2007 Experiment Zhen Liu 04/21/09.
Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT EXPERIMENT – NORTH AMERICA (INTEX-NA)
Randall Martin Aaron Van Donkelaar Daniel Jacob Dorian Abbot
The Double Dividend of Methane Control
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
Chemistry-Climate Modelling: Impacts of climate change on tropospheric chemical composition David Stevenson Institute of Atmospheric and Environmental.
North American Hydrocarbon Emissions Measured from Space
Extratropical stratoshere-troposphere exchange in a 20-km-mesh AGCM
SELECTED RESULTS OF MODELING WITH THE CMAQ PLUME-IN-GRID APPROACH
Transpacific satellite and aircraft observations of Asian pollution: An Integration of MOPITT and TRACE-P Colette L. Heald, Daniel J. Jacob, Arlene M.
FIRST GEOS-CHEM USERS’ MEETING June
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
Intercontinental Transport, Hemispheric Pollution,
Linking Ozone Pollution and Climate Change:
SCALE ISSUES IN MODELING INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT
Asian outflow and chemical evolution of ozone and nitrogen oxides over the Pacific Mathew Evans, Daniel Jacob, Harvard Group, TRACE-P Science Team et al.
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting
Harvard University and NASA/GFSC
Questions for consideration
SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS OF OZONE PRECURSORS FROM GOME
Effects of global change on U.S. ozone air quality
MEASUREMENT OF TROPOSPHERIC COMPOSITION FROM SPACE IS DIFFICULT!
Hartmut Bösch and Sarah Dance
Measurement Needs for AQ Models
Description and Public Release of WACCM3
Presentation transcript:

Model Team Presentations – Science Goals, Model Capabilities ATom 1st Science Team Meeting 22-24 Jul 2015 Model Team Presentations – Science Goals, Model Capabilities Global Chemical Models – Global modeling, Representativeness, and Integrated Products (GRIPs) Michael Prather (UC Irvine CTM) Sarah Strode & Jose Rodriguez (NASA GEOS-CCM & GEOS-CCM) Jean-Francois Lamarque (NCAR CESM/CAM5) Arlene Fiore & Lee Murray* (GEOS-Chem & GFDL AM3) Flight Forecasts & Back Trajectory Footprints Eric Ray (NOAA/CIRES & FLEXPART)

It’s a wild and crazy world out there: Atmospheric Rivers (from the ECMWF T319 forecast model) 16 Jan2005 In the real world it may be even crazier (fine grained) (from NOAA ESRL) 15 Jul 2010

? It’s a wild and crazy world out there: Rivers of CH4 Loss (UCI CTM run w/ECMWF T319 forecast) 16 Jan2005 In the real world it may be even crazier ?

There is a lot of structure and variability in key species NOx (snapshots on the 720 hPa surface) NOx Probability Distributions vary considerably between Pacific & Atlantic basins

Joint Probability Distributions = excellent model diagnostic O3 vs. CO (courtesy of TRACE-P 2001 ) CTM Hindcast following flight tracks looks OK

? Why do we care about Representativeness? need to develop and test the Chemistry-Climate Models Chemical climatology for region does not match ?

From the models we take a single day (~16 Aug) simulations with 4-D gridded quantities: (I=longitude grid, J=latitude grid, K = layer 0-13 km, N = species index) Basic Cell Data: 1    Air in each cell (moles) 2   Strat-trop tracer (e90, O3, or PV) Derived Products (mole fraction / day) 20 L-CH4 (OH+CH4, scaled to 1800 ppb) 21  P-O3 (HO2/RO2 + NO only) 22 L-O3 (O1d+H2O, OH+O3, HO2+O3 only) 23 O3(24h) – O3(00h), true dO3/dt 24 J(O1D) (/day) 25 J(NO2) (/day) 26 SULF = sulfate formation (OH+SO2) 28 SOAF = SOA formation (OH + VOCs) Initialized Tracer Species: (all in mole fraction) 3    O3           4    NOx = NO+NO2 5   HONO2        6   HO2NO2 7   C2H3NO5 = PAN 8   RONO2   (if any)      9   H2O2      10   CH3OOH       11   HCHO        12  C2H5OOH     13  CH3CHO  = acetaldehyde 14  C3H6O = acetone 15  CO 16   C2H6       17   Alkane (>C2)  18  Alkene       19  C5H8 = Isoprene  For UCI T319, an ATom slice of 60S-60N x 0-12km has 27x 212 = 5724 air parcels

From the models we take a single day (~16 Aug) simulations with 4-D gridded quantities: (I=longitude grid, J=latitude grid, K = layer 0-13 km, N = species index) UCI CTM capabilities: UCI trop chemistry (ASAD) 30+ species UCI strat chemistry (Linoz) ECMWF forecasts (3 hr avg) at resolution of 60 km lat-long (T319) and ~0.5 km vertical (L=1:28 for 0-12+ km) only for Yr 2005 Cy36 ECMWF OpenIFS data (2005-2014, expect 2015– generated by U. Oslo collaboration with Isaksen, Sovde, Myhre resolution T159L60 Cy38r1 (1.1°) Do not expect hindcast capability within 9-month window of data release.

high NOx in winter, low NOx low sun, low reactivity in tropics UCI: 60S-60N x 0-12km x 1°(@180W) Jan16 sorted by NOx (to be switched to Aug 16) Frequency of NOx (sorted by abundance with 10 bins per decade) plotted as air mass (Peta-moles) in the 1° wide tomographic slice with the range of NOx. For UCI here, all NOx falls between 2 and 400 ppt, most lies in 30-100 ppt range, a second peak at 4 ppt. high NOx in winter, low sun, low reactivity low NOx in tropics

UCI: 60S-60N x 0-12km x 1°(@180W) Jan16 sorted by NOx (to be switched to Aug 16) Reactivities – PO3, LO3, LCH4 (in Mega-moles/day) – plotted as a function of NOx. Y-axis shows the amount of Mmoles/day in that bin (10-bins per decade in NOx ppt). PO3 peaks at high-NOx air masses. The low-NOx (4 ppt) is important for L-CH4 & L-O3. LCH4 x 2 (Mmol/d)

PO3 is almost linear in NOx, only slightly sensitive to H2O2. UCI: 60S-60N x 0-12km x 1°(@180W) Jan16 sorted by NOx (to be switched to Aug 16) Reactivities – linearity with NOx. Recalculate reactivity with 1.1*NOx and scale the increase in reactivity (x10), plot again. PO3(lin-NOx) = [PO3(1.1*NOx) – PO3(std NOx)] x 10 and plot vs PO3(std NOx) (Also done for H2O2, but ignore the ‘+’s here.) PO3 is almost linear in NOx, only slightly sensitive to H2O2.

LCH4 has some response to NOx @ hi-NOx, much less sensitive to H2O2. UCI: 60S-60N x 0-12km x 1°(@180W) Jan16 sorted by NOx (to be switched to Aug 16) Reactivities – linearity with NOx. Recalculate reactivity with 1.1*NOx and scale the increase in reactivity (x10), plot again. PO3(lin-NOx) = [PO3(1.1*NOx) – PO3(std NOx)] x 10 and plot vs PO3(std NOx) (Also done for H2O2, but ignore the ‘+’s here.) LCH4 has some response to NOx @ hi-NOx, much less sensitive to H2O2.

UCI: 24S-24N x 2-8km x 1°(@180W) Jan16 sorted by H2O2 H2O2 sorted in smaller tropical domain: 0.1 to 2 ppb, interesting shape

UCI: 24S-24N x 2-8km x 1°(@180W) Jan16 sorted by H2O2 H2O2 sorted in smaller tropical domain: 0.1 to 2 ppb, interesting shape Reactivities have similar pattern, PO3 shifted to lower H2O2 (higher NOx).

AIR: global vs tropical Pacific Joint PDFs all for UCI CTM for global (60-60, 0-12km) vs tropical Pacific (20-20, 0-12km) Example of NOx vs. CO, plotting relative amount of total in log-log pixels AIR: global vs tropical Pacific ½ - 12km ½ - 12km

shows up when weighted by PO3 ! Joint PDFs : global (60-60, 0-12km, 0°-360°) vs tropical Pacific (20-20, 0-12km, 140°-220°) Example of NOx vs CO, plotting relative amount of total in log-log pixels overflow, >1,000 ppb shows up when weighted by PO3 ! PO3: global vs tropical Pacific ½ - 12km ½ - 12km

L-O3: global vs tropical Pacific Joint PDFs for global (60-60, 0-12km) vs tropical Pacific (20-20, 0-12km, 140°-220°) Example of NOx x CO, plotting relative amount of total in log-log pixels L-O3: global vs tropical Pacific ½ - 12km ½ - 12km

L-CH4: global vs tropical Pacific Joint PDFs for global (60-60, 0-12km) vs tropical Pacific (20-20, 0-12km, 140°-220°) Example of NOx x CO, plotting relative amount of total in log-log pixels L-CH4: global vs tropical Pacific ½ - 12km ½ - 12km 0.78 ppb/day 1.01 ppb/day

Joint PDFs: (20S-20N x 140°-220° x 0-13 km) GEOS-CHem (Murray) vs. UCI CTM << AIR >> << P-O3 >>

Joint PDFs: (20S-20N x 140°-220° x 0-13 km) GEOS-CHem vs. UCI CTM << AIR >> << L-CH4 >>