Mattia Agnetti – INTERACT Programme Secretariat

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Commission européenne The European Social Fund Investing in your Future.
Advertisements

Territorial cohesion: what scales for policy intervention? Bruxelles Jean Peyrony DG REGIO, Unit C2 (Urban development, territorial cohesion)
Regions for Economic Change | LMP Workshop 3C When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform How can INTERACT.
The political framework
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
Christina Skantze. Baltic Sea Strategy initiative – why? New political context for cooperation – EU-enlargement, integration Underline priorities and.
Claudia ZiosiSzeged, 16 April ALSO Strand Conference B Szeged, HUngary 16, 17 April 2006.
Delegation of the European Commission Romania preparing for EU membership European Structural and Cohesion Funds.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Event – date, place About INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG IVC Joint Technical Secretariat Iruma Kravale, The.
Territorial Cooperation – adding value to the Danube Region Ivana Lazic, INTERACT Point Vienna 9 July 2010 | Novi Sad.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
Policy coordination process in AttractSEE project and Spatial Plan of Republic of Serbia Jelena Miljković, Siniša Trkulja Republic Agency for Spatial Planning,
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
The cohesion policy of the European Union Pelle Anita University of Szeged Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
An overview The EU Strategy for the Danube Region in the programming of ESIF for : state of play and next steps.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
European Union | European Regional Development Fund From INTERREG IVC to Interreg Europe Info day in Tullamore Akos Szabo| Project Officer Interreg Europe.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 Interregional Cooperation and the Lisbon and Gothenburg Agendas “GROW” Brussels, 18 October 2007 Territorial Co-operation.
The Future of Transnational Cooperation in Central Europe ( ) Claudia Pamperl JTS INTERRREG IIIC East.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND RECOMMEND Final Event, 11 September 2014, Varna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Jason Martinez.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Event – date, place About INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG IVC Joint Technical Secretariat.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden A Community Initiative concerning Transnational co-operation on spatial.
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
European Territorial Cooperation SAWP meeting, 9 July
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
Transnacionalno teritorialno sodelovanje Program Jugovzhodna Evropa Margarita Jančič, MOP,DEZI Novo mesto,17. april 2008.
Result Orientation in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Annual Meeting, Luxemburg, 15 September 2015 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser, Joint Secretariat.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Stakeholder Workshop Brussels – 5 February 2014 INTERREG EUROPE Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer INTERREG IVC.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
AlpCity AlpCity Final Conference Prà Catinat, 16 October 2006 Ivan Curzolo - JTS Alpine Space Programme.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
Evaluation of Structural Fund Programmes – the Swedish experience Implementation of the mid term evaluation - lessons for the future Maria Eriksson NUTEK.
The EU Water Initiative and the EU ACP Facility New Instruments to promote sustainable development of water resources and affordable access Antonio Garcia-Fragio.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
Towards INTERACT II Georg Schadt, Managing Authority INTERACT International Conference Venice 16 th June 2006.
SEE Programme 2007 – 2013 Experiences in the Danube Region and next steps toward Danube Programme DRS Joint PA7 SG, PA8 SG and PA9 SG Meeting Bratislava,
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity in programming period
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND CLUE final conference, 24 September 2014, Turin EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Johanna.
SLOVENE EXPERIENCES New Territorial Cooperation : new scenarios and opportunities International Conference Venice, Italy Bojan Suvorov,
Interreg Europe Elena Ferrario
ATLANTIC STRATEGY and EU Cohesion Policy
PRIORITIES FOR THE FUTURE
Financing possibilities for implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: different solutions INTERACT Point Turku 14.
Venue: WIIW, Vienna Andrea Mervar, EIZ
International Relations Sector and IR-ECO Group
Programme of the Government of the Republic of Bulgaria (draft)
Macro-regional strategies Rapporteur: Etele Baráth Dr
The European Social Fund
The Instrument for Pre–accession Assistance
The role of Territorial Cooperation in IWT and integrated planning
EUSDR Action Plan - Revision
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Territorial Co-operation
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
EU Cohesion Policy : legislative proposals
The SDGs in Flanders November 27, 2018.
Territorial Cooperation and Territorial Cohesion Results of the consultation on the consultation Input to TCUM seminar 25 September 2009 | Brussels.
ESF Conference: Summary of Key Learning's in Working Group 1: Implementing the YEI and the ESF to support the Youth Guarantee: developing partnerships.
From ‘Lisbon’ to Europe 2020: a new design of the reporting cycle and how to link it to the ESF ESF Evaluation Partnership Working Group on the ESF contribution.
Embedding Governance & Participation in the European Structural Funds
Financial Instruments
MATRIOSCA - AAP WS 3 – How to use an EGTC for integrated territorial development? Brussels, 19th June 2008 Tatjana RENER Republic of Slovenia Government.
NDPHS Work Plan for 2012 NDPHS 8th Partnership Annual Conference
SMATH project kick-off meeting
The approved ESPON 2013 Programme
Presentation transcript:

Mattia Agnetti – INTERACT Programme Secretariat Good governance of Programmes towards the New Objective 3 Current experience and challenges ahead Hi Mattia, I changed it back into blue. They will not see yellow from a distance. Tried, tested, failed!  Gianluca Mattia Agnetti – INTERACT Programme Secretariat

Phisical and financial progress of Programmes Table of contents 2006 State of Play Phisical and financial progress of Programmes Management, implementation and monitoring of Programmes Future Steps towards Objective 3

INTERREG Programmes currently operating 64 Cross Border Programmes In addition there are ESPON and INTERACT 13 Transnational Programmes 4 Interregional Programmes

Programmes’ effectiveness – achievement of objectives enhanced cross-border economic and social integration consolidated joint strategies for sustainable territorial development improved territorial integration across large groupings of European regions increased territorial integration with EU 10 and enhanced strategy towards candidate and neighbouring countries improvement of effectiveness of policies and instruments for regional development and cohesion 1- These main ojectives have been partially achieved. This is already flaged in the updates of the different Programmes’ Mid term Evaluations and more will be said with the ex post evaluation (if conducted). 2- The transnational cooperation is the most difficult to evaluate 3- the social capital intended also as creation of stable network and consolidation of relations has been strengthened by the interregional cooperation

Programmes’ effectiveness – physical progress participation levels generally satisfactory mostly well-balanced geographical participation throughout Europe domination of public authorities and under-representation of private sector and social partners evidence of new participants and new networks increase of genuine cross border projects during Programme life cycle

Programmes’ effectiveness – financial progress Problems incurred late start of programmes delays in establishing implementation structures incompatibility with external funding instruments low demand among potential applicants in early stages of programme implementation imbalances in funding across borders Actions taken intensification of programme promotion targeted project development support additional calls for projects reallocation of resources creation of task forces to address incompatible procedures

Programmes’ effectiveness – financial progress Cross Border Cooperation EUR 3 762 761 486 Level of decommittments 0.1% 2003 – 0.2% 2004 – 0.2% 2005 Transnational Cooperation EUR 1 413 538 382 Level of decommittments 0.5% 2003 – 0.8% 2004 – 0.7% 2005 Interregional Cooperation EUR 353 010 932 Level of decommittments 0.1% 2003 – 8.5% 2004 – 1.4% 2005

Programme effectiveness – Community Added Value political AV – high visibility of EU (IIIA), contribution to new concepts of regional integration and governance policy AV – innovative instrument to address policy problems institutional AV – creation of new institutions, networks and partnership, with potential for sustainability operational AV – stability of multi-annual programming; embedding of monitoring and evaluation learning AV – strong effects on exchanges of experience, knowledge and know-how; potential for individual and institutional learning

most programme management arrangements operate satisfactorily wide variation in management – related to national institutional structures, experience and type of programme main Management issues: need to clarify responsibilities, functions or relationships (MA, PA, JTS, intermediaries bodies) better coordination between organisations lack of legal framework

Programme implementation majority of implementation systems are working well project generation issues facilitating the formation of project partnerships improved application procedures providing support to applicants project appraisal and selection issues accelerated decision-making improved appraisal methods increased transparency Increased selectivity of high quality projects programme marketing issues improved information quality and accessibility targeted promotion communicating about projects

Programme monitoring monitoring has improved significantly but further development is needed monitoring issues: developing monitoring databases accommodation of INTERREG data requirements accessibility to stakeholders improving indicator sets definitions streamlining of indicators realistic targets communicating monitoring requirements to partners

national Strategic Reference Framework pursuant to Art. 25 and 26 State of play as of June 2006 new 5 draft Structural Funds Regulations following Council agreement of May 2006 community Strategic Guidelines on Cohesion Policy pursuant to Art. 23 and 24 national Strategic Reference Framework pursuant to Art. 25 and 26 preparation and approval of operational programmes pursuant to Art. 31 The CSG expected to be adopted in October 2006 NSRF to be transmitted to Ec within 5 five following the adoption of the CSG

European Territorial Cooperation cooperation will contribute to Growth and Jobs Agenda cooperation will contribute to economic and social integration of regions where there are wide territorial disparities cooperation will focus and concentrate on specific themes according to different Strands

Good Governance of Programmes towards Obj. 3 examples of challenges ahead generalisation of the Lead Partner Principle (Cross-Border Programmes) design of Multi-country programmes setting up European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation cooperation at the external borders of the EU (Coordination with IPA and ENPI)

Good Governance of Programmes towards Obj. 3 examples of challenges ahead building up a new generation of project ideas (e.g. Strategic projects) selection of Genuine Transnational Projects (links with Obj. 1 and 2 Plans) setting up in time effective Institutional arrangements involvement of new actors in programme and project planning

Thank you for your attention www.interact-eu.net INTERACT Programme Secretariat Franz-Josefs-Kai 27 1010 Vienna Tel. +43 1 533874731 Fax. +43 1 533874766 interact@interact-eu.net