Paul Scherrer Institut

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 6: Source Specification
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
-1- IAEA-ICTP Workshop on Nuclear Reaction Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies ICTP – Trieste, Italy, May 2008 Gas-Cooled Reactors – International.
Nuclear Reactor Theory, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Reactor Model: One-Group That was for the bare slab reactor. What about more general.
EMERALD1: A Systematic Study of Cross Section Library Based Discrepancies in LWR Criticality Calculations Jaakko Leppänen Technical Research Centre of.
Total Monte Carlo and related applications of the TALYS code system Arjan Koning NRG Petten, the Netherlands Technical Meeting on Neutron Cross- Section.
Case Monte Carlo Simulations 4/17/2008. Toolbox MCNP5 – the grunt work Polimi – low energy stuff Matlab – post processing.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Fission 1/ v 235 U thermal cross sections  fission  584 b. 
Logo. ﴿قَالُواْ سُبْحَانَكَ لاَعِلْمَ لَنَا إِلاَّ مَاعَلَّمْتَنَا إِنَّكَ أَنتَ الْعَلِيمُ الْحَكِيمُ﴾ بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
1 How accurately can we calculate neutrons slowing down in water J-Ch Sublet, D. E. Cullen*, R. E. MacFarlane** CEA Cadarache, DEN/DER/SPRC, Saint.
An Overview of What’s New in SCALE 5 S. M. Bowman, D. F. Hollenbach, M. D. DeHart, B. T. Rearden, I. C. Gauld, and S. Goluoglu Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Future usage of quasi-infinite depleted uranium target (BURAN) for benchmark studies Pavel Tichý Future usage of quasi-infinite depleted uranium target.
Simulations of Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS) Aleksander Polanski Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia. The Andrzej Soltan Institute for.
Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott DESPEC/HISPEC Coll. Meeting, 15th-16th of June 2005-Valencia.
Measurements and calculations of the neutron spectrum in different irradiation channels of the TRIGA Mark II reactor, Slovenia R. Jaćimović 1, A. Trkov.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholz-Gemeinschaft Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Nuclear Data Library for Advanced Systems – Fusion Devices (FENDL-3)
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Systematic studies of neutrons produced in the Pb/U assembly irradiated by relativistic protons and deuterons. Vladimír Wagner Nuclear physics institute.
AERB Safety Research Institute 1 TIC Benchmark Analysis Subrata Bera Safety Research Institute (SRI) Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) Kalpakkam –
ThEC13, Geneva, 28th-31st Oct., 2013 C. H. Pyeon, Kyoto Univ. 1 Cheolho Pyeon Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, Japan
Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.
6-1 Lesson 6 Objectives Beginning Chapter 2: Energy Beginning Chapter 2: Energy Derivation of Multigroup Energy treatment Derivation of Multigroup Energy.
Benchmarks for Data Testing of Iron China Nuclear Data Center(CNDC) China Institute of Atomic Energy(CIAE) P.O.Box ,Beijing , P.R.China.
Nuclear Reactors, BAU, 1st Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
Re-analysis of the RRR/SEG Experiments Andrew Hummel Idaho National Laboratory SG39 Meeting NEA Paris, December 4, 2015.
MASSIMO (Measurements in Adapted Spectra of Spectral Indices and Material Oscillations): A Proposed Experimental Campaign at the NRAD Reactor.
Workshop On Nuclear Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies, ICTP , A. Borella1 Monte Carlo methods.
Update on sensitivity coefficient precise computations E. Ivanov WPEC/Sg. 39 Meeting December 4, , Rue Pierre et Marie Curie, France.
ANITA workshop, Uppsala, december 2008 ANITA neutron source Monte Carlo simulations and comparison with experimental data Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics.
UCN Source at the NCSU PULSTAR Reactor Bernard Wehring and Albert Young North Carolina State University International Workshop on Neutron-Antineutron Transition.
Presentation for WPEC/SG39 meeting, 2015 Nov.30 th to Dec. 4 th Paris, France 1/20 A Stress Test on 235 U(n, f) in adjustment with HCI and HMI benchmarks.
Monte-Carlo calculations in reactor design G.B. Bruna FRAMATOME-ANP.
Fick’s Law The exact interpretation of neutron transport in heterogeneous domains is so complex. Assumptions and approximations. Simplified approaches.
Comparison of deterministic and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis including SAD/SED Ivo Kodeli, SG39 Meeting, NEA, Dec. 4, 2015.
KIT – The cooperation of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology Evaluation.
9 th session of the AER Working Group “f “ - Spent Fuel Transmutations Simulations of experimental “ADS” Mitja Majerle, Gael de Cargouet Nuclear Physics.
1© Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd Energy release in fission and fusion Nuclear binding energy Nuclear fission Nuclear fusion.
Criticality of Nuclear reactors and Geometric Buckling
E. Mendoza, D.Cano-Ott Nuclear Innovation Unit (CIEMAT)
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
M-C simulation of reactor e flux;
INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Equation of Continuity
Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Reactor anti-neutrinos and neutrinos
Study on Neutronics of plutonium and Minor Actinides Transmutation in Accelerator Driven System Reactor By Amer Ahmed Abdullah Al-Qaaod Ph.D student Physics.
Reactor As Neutrino Source
Scattering Reactions Scattering reactions - the incident particle collides with the target nucleus Elastic scattering – a collision between a particle.
Beginning Chapter 2: Energy Derivation of Multigroup Energy treatment
of the Muse-4 Experiments with the JEF-2.2 and JEFF-3.1 libraries
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation A
CHEM 312: Lecture 19 Forensics in Nuclear Applications
D J Coates, G T Parks Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK Safety Considerations for the Design of Thorium Fueled ADS Reactors ThorEA.
7/21/2018 Analysis and quantification of modelling errors introduced in the deterministic calculational path applied to a mini-core problem SAIP 2015 conference.
M-C simulation of reactor e flux;
AMSTRAMGRAM AMélioration de la Section Thermique de capture l’Américium 241 par Mesure intéGRAle dans MINERVE P. Leconte CEA (SPRC/LEPh) A. Gruel, B.
Overview of Serpent related activities at HZDR E. Fridman
September, 23Th -27Th San Diego - CA
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation B
for collaboration “Energy plus transmutation”
How precisely do we know the antineutrino source spectrum from a nuclear reactor? Klaus Schreckenbach (TU München) Klaus Schreckenbach.
Jordan University of Science and Technology
JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH
Pebble Bed Reactors for Once Trough Nuclear Transmutation
Sensitivity analysis in burnup calculations with Monte Carlo
Safety Demonstration of Advanced Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants
Performed experiments Nuclotron – set up ENERGY PLUS TRANSMUTATION
Design of A New Wide-dynamic-range Neutron Spectrometer for BNCT with Liquid Moderator and Absorber S. Tamaki1, I. Murata1 1. Division of Electrical,
Setting of various source Part II
Presentation transcript:

Paul Scherrer Institut Check number of particles for SERPENT/MCNP results Stefan Radman, Mathieu Hursin, Gregory Perret PROTEUS FDWR-II (HCLWR) program summary for SG-39; Status of Re-analysis for Core 7, 8, void coefficient PSI, 4. September 2018

Outline Reminder of FDWR Experiments at PROTEUS Summary of PSI experimental data contribution to SG39 Selected results Infinitely dilute cross sections Kinf sensitivity coefficients Reactivity sensitivity coefficients Conclusion and outlook PSI, 04.09.2018

FDWR-II – Experimental Configurations FDWR Phase II From 1985 to 1990 in PROTEUS reactor PROTEUS is a driven system whose test zone contains the FDWR lattices UO2/PuO2 pellets with 11% PuO2 Pu(8/9/0/1/2): 1%, 64%, 23%, 8%, 4% Fuel diameter: 8.46mm Fuel total height: 84 cm 2 axial blankets: Udep. 0.224w% 235U 28-cm high each Several moderation conditions Two triangular pitches Different moderators (water, downterm, air) PSI, PSI, 04.09.2018 Seite 3

FDWR-II – Measurement types K∞ measurements Using axial and radial bucklings Using compensation methods with auto-rod and a 252Cf source Reactivity effects Void volume Moderator volume Absorber rods PSI, PSI, 4. September 2018 Seite 5

FDWR-II – Measurement types Spectral index measurements (core 7) F5/F9 ~0.91 F1/F9 ~ 1.68 F8/F9 ~1.14e-2 C2/F9 ~ 1.12 C8/F9 ~7.8e-2 Typical uncertainties F5: 1.8%, F8: 1.9%, F9:1.5%, C8: 1.8% Reaction rate radial and axial traverses Here update with core 7 information Add C/E for a few interesting spectral ratio (teaser) PSI, PSI, 4. September 2018 Seite 6

Data package provided to SG39 members C/E for kinf of Core 7 and 8 Data provided Pincell geometry Fuel composition C and E values Calculation: MCNP and pincell models Preferred measurement: cell method b/c smaller uncertainty Sensitivity coefficients generated from pincell models MCNP6.1.1 & JEFF-3.1.1 Uncertainties are provided Infinitely diluted cross sections are provided Sensitivity coefficients tables according to SG33 format Data Location Kinf values, C/Es and uncertainties Section 3 Sensitivity coefficients graphs Core7.tar.gz Core8.tar.gz Sensitivity coefficients tables Core7_SC_MCNP.txt Core8_SC_MCNP.txt Infinitely diluted cross sections File J311.dat PSI, 04.09.2018

Infinitely Dilute Cross Sections 20 MeV homogeneous source in infinite pure graphite medium MCNPX-2.4 & JEFF-3.1.1 library. 106 neutrons histories The reaction rates and flux were tallied in the 33-energy group structure The cross sections and associated relative uncertainties (1 standard deviation) for the isotopes and reactions of the WPEC Subgroup 33 U-238 Capture PSI, 04.09.2018

K-Sensitivity Coefficients comparison Monte Carlo sensitivity coefficients MCNP and SERPENT Iterated Fission Probability 10 latent generations Plot done with Emeric Dupont scripts. SC Comparison Good agreement (i.e. within 1 standard deviation) sensitivity over 0.01% per % per unit lethargy. Issue related to poor statistics with elastic and inelastic cross sections. Uncertainty of MCNP solution looks underestimated. PSI, 04.09.2018

Void reactivity Sensitivity Coefficients Sensitivity coefficients of void reactivity Computed with EGPT Using kinf SC C/E can be inferred from kinf results. PSI, 04.09.2018

Outlook of Re-analysis work at PSI Master student currently working on HCLWR re-analysis(~ 3-4 months) Development of a 3D models Enhanced S/U analysis with comparison between codes (MCNP, SERPENT, TSUNAMI) and methods (GPT) Look at non-kinf measurements (Spectral indices, power traverse) Formatting of results according to specifications of SG39 Feedbacks on Data Delivery Was it used? Is it useful in terms of data assimilation? What should be the next responses to be looked at? PSI, 04.09.2018

PSI, 04.09.2018