Forecasting river transmission loss in the Lower Namoi Regulated River

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Line Efficiency     Percentage Month Today’s Date
Advertisements

Temperature and Flow Dynamics of the Klamath River Technical Memorandum 7 Leon Basdekas Mike Deas Watercourse Engineering, Inc nd Street, Suite B.
Northwest River Forecast Center Seasonal Volume Forecasts Using Ensemble Streamflow Prediction for the 2011 Water Year Steve King, Hydrologist
Klamath Basin Water Distribution Model Workshop. OUTLINE Brief Description of Water Distribution Models Model Setups Examples of networks and inputs Demand.
The water climate balance of the soil is the sum of the amount of water that gets in and out of a given area in a given time period. The input of water.
Water Supply and Demand in the Okanagan and Similkameen River Basins Brian Guy, Ph.D., P.Geo. National Practice Leader, Environmental Science September.
1 Upper Basin Snowpack as of 3/26/2014
Sandeep Bisht Assistant Director Basin planning
A hierarchical model for Hydrologically Effective Rainfall and Soil Moisture Deficit Jenny Lannon Statistician, WRc Based on PhD work at the University.
Mahkameh Zarekarizi, Hamid Moradkhani,
“Estimated” Corn Field Drying
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
A spatio-temporal assessment of the impact of climate change on hydrological refugia in Eastern Australia using the Budyko water balance framework Luke.
Drought Security Assessments
Learning objectives To understand the water balance
The 6 steps of data collection:
Analyzing patterns in the phenomena
Q1 Jan Feb Mar ENTER TEXT HERE Notes
Comparative Statistics September 2017

Project timeline # 3 Step # 3 is about x, y and z # 2
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
Comparative Statistics June 2017

Focus of analysis – reason for using PRECIS RCM
Nuffield Free-Standing Mathematics Activities Music Festival
Mammoth Caves National Park, Kentucky
2017 Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Predictability of Indian monsoon rainfall variability
Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Bell Ringer CNN Student News You will need your notebooks
Andy Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier
CORPUS CHRISTI CATHOLIC COLLEGE – GEOGRAPHY DEPARTMENT
Free PPT Diagrams : ALLPPT.com

Step 3 Step 2 Step 1 Put your text here Put your text here
Calendar Year 2009 Insure Oklahoma Total & Projected Enrollment
MONTH CYCLE BEGINS CYCLE ENDS DUE TO FINANCE JUL /2/2015
Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Hydrology CIVL341.
HOW TO DRAW CLIMATE GRAPHS
©G Dear 2008 – Not to be sold/Free to use
Electricity Cost and Use – FY 2016 and FY 2017
A Climate Study of Daily Temperature Change From the Previous Day

Science CnD Business Model Results
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Operations Management Dr. Ron Lembke
Case study 3: SEASONAL ARIMA MODEL
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
Operations Management Dr. Ron Lembke
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Free PPT Diagrams : ALLPPT.com

Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Objective - To make a line graph.
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Project timeline # 3 Step # 3 is about x, y and z # 2
TIMELINE NAME OF PROJECT Today 2016 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Presentation transcript:

Forecasting river transmission loss in the Lower Namoi Regulated River Place your logo here Forecasting river transmission loss in the Lower Namoi Regulated River Dr Priyantha Jayakody and Michael Wrathall BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Introduction Transmission losses are a function of complex hydrological regimes. They are difficult to predict reliably – there is often a poor correlation between predictors and loss. There are few studies reporting work on transmission loss prediction in regulated river systems in northern NSW. Reliable prediction of transmission loss is important for resource managers to assess The ability to allocate and deliver water during dry periods Manage the ‘cost’ of water delivery Long-term planning BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Introduction Transmission losses are reflected in Actual Unaccounted Differences (AUD). AUDs are the difference between known inflows, measured extractions and outflows for the river system between flow measurement locations. They comprise: Measurement errors Ungauged diversions Net seepage to/from groundwater Channel evaporation (evapotranspiration) 2013/14 example BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Introduction Study area BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 Split Rock Dam Keepit Dam BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Introduction The Namoi regulated river in NSW experiences highly variable transmission losses. Current water management practice in the Lower Namoi is to allocate an extra 30% of water for delivery – to allow for losses. When general security water accounts receive an incremental increase, an extra 30% is set aside to deliver this additional water. However, this 30% loss provision is an average value and highly variable in real time. It becomes highly problematic when actual losses are greater than the 30% budget and water delivery is affected. BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Main Objective The main objective of the study is to create a regression function to reliably forecast loss from selected predictors. Specific objectives Investigate the most suitable hydrological predictors for loss associated with the Lower Namoi River. Determine significance of predictors using statistical methods. Develop and validate a regression equation. BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

For the period from Jan 2005 to Dec 2016. Reach about 200 km long. Percentage losses Monthly AUDs were calculated for the upper river section of the Lower Namoi River. For the period from Jan 2005 to Dec 2016. Reach about 200 km long. A regression model for the reach was developed. AUD =input-output- extraction + tributary inflows Keepit to Narrabri BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Percentage losses Monthly % loss = Mean loss + anomaly AUDs were converted into percentages. Monthly average loss percentages and respective anomalies were calculated. A regression equation was developed to predict monthly anomalies. Monthly % loss = Mean loss + anomaly BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Predictors Tributary inflows Groundwater levels – 15 bores Peel inflow Maules Creek Groundwater levels – 15 bores Rainfall (Gunnedah)- monthly and three month averages Temperature Soil moisture content Antecedent losses – current month and previous three months Maules RF Peel BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Anomaly next month = {aX1+bX2+cX3+dX4………….} Methods R software was used for the analysis Many models trialled with different combinations of predictors STEP function used to select the best model STEP use AIC (Akaike Information Criterion ) AIC estimates the quality of models relative to each other Data was scaled before using Anomaly next month = {aX1+bX2+cX3+dX4………….} Model selection=step(lm(AnamolyD1~ Loss3AFW + AnamolyAFW + LossD0neg + LossD0 + AnamolyD0 + AnamolyD1 + AnaAFW + GW6 + GW7 + GW9 + GW11 + GW12 + GW13 + GW14 + GW15 + RF24 + RF202 + RF24A3 + RF202A3 + Loss3ABW + SMC + GSHS + PEEL + Mauls + MaxTemp + 0,data=x)) BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Results and discussion Monthly prediction  Predictors Coefficient Water levels of GW030129 0.83 Water levels of GW036187 -1.1 PEEL river inflow -0.217 Maules 6 month Total -0.197 Scaled R2 is 0.50 for calibration and 0.45 for validation BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Results and discussion How to use this equation Convert into categorical information Three loss levels Low (<30%) Medium (30% to 45%) High (>45%) Month Observed Predicted Feb-05 L Mar-05 Apr-05 H May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05 Sep-05 Oct-05 M Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Prediction Calibration Validation Success 71% 69% M - L or L- M 21% 29% H- L or L H 8% 2% SS All data 0.16 0.27 SS High loss 0.44 0.64 BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Results and discussion Monthly prediction Model Success Model extreme failure Scaled BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Loss outlook Due to medium flows in Mauls creek, medium groundwater levels, and declining Peel inflow next month transmission losses are predicted to be medium. Medium Next month Loss levels BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

Conclusions From 20 predictors, four (4) have been found that can satisfactorily describe the behavior of losses in the Lower Namoi River. Groundwater levels and tributary flows correlated well with losses. The regression equation is able to satisfactorily forecast losses. Next step Develop the regression equation for three month forecasting. BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

THANK YOU Main contributors to this work: Dr Priyantha Jayakody |Hydrologist Michael Wrathall | Manager Knowledge Coordination Dr Shahadat Chowdhury | Senior Hydrologist Neeraj Maini |Hydrologist Rowan Murray | Water Resource Analyst THANK YOU BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY Narrabri Gauge Narrabri Gauge BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY