Assess Plan Do Review Resource 1: Types of Evaluation – which type of approach should I use? There are a number of different types of evaluation, the most.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Impact Assessment
Advertisements

Research Methods and Proposal Writing
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
Action Research Martin Dyke Richard Harris Jo Wright.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Research Methods and Proposal Writing
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Instructional Design Alaa Alkhamis.
The Internist as Quality Advocate Application of QI Tools Kim Tartaglia, MD Fall 2010.
Semester 2: Lecture 9 Analyzing Qualitative Data: Evaluation Research Prepared by: Dr. Lloyd Waller ©
Evaluation Paradigms & Techniques IS 588 Spring 2008 Dr. D. Bilal.
Setting the Stage: Workshop Framing and Crosscutting Issues Simon Hearn, ODI Evaluation Methods for Large-Scale, Complex, Multi- National Global Health.
EVALUATION APPROACHES Heather Aquilina 24 March 2015.
Schoolmate: A partnership approach to evaluating out of schools services Clíona Murphy Children’s Research Centre, TCD.
Identify a Health Problem Qualitative Quantitative Develop Program -theory -objectives -format -content Determine Evaluation -design -sampling -measures.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Dr Alison Carter – global leader in coaching programme evaluation Dr Penny Tamkin – experienced in organisation based research providing insight into whole.
Improvement Model and PDSA Cycles. Organ Donation The Service Improvement Model provides a framework to test, implement and sustain change ideas to overcome.
Program Assessment. Before you get started Need to determine if the program can be evaluated or should be evaluated. Is the answer already available?
Evaluation: from Objectives to Outcomes Janet Myers, PhD MPH AIDS Education and Training Centers National Evaluation Center
The challenge of evidence-based policy Mediation and Alternative Dispute Resolution – Outcomes and Impacts Swansea University 14 th February 2013 Professor.
Instructional Design Ryan Glidden. Instructional Design The process of planning, creating, and developing instructional or educational resources.
MicroLoan Foundation: Creating balanced staff incentives Daniella Hawkins, Social Performance Manager.
Are we there yet? Evaluating your graduation SiMR.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
Hints and tips for evaluating programmes and providing evidence for long-term sustainability A Practitioners Perspective Mark Sanderson Suffolk Fire &
Evaluation Nicola Bowtell. Some myths about evaluation 2Presentation title - edit in Header and Footer always involves extensive questionnaires means.
Applied Methodologies in PHI Session 5: Evaluation Kath Roberts (NOO/EMPHO)
Applied Methodologies in PHI Session 5: Evaluation Kath Roberts (NOO/EMPHO)
Guidance for Analyses of Pilot Interventions European Workplace and Alcohol Berlin, 9 November 2012 Jon Dawson.
How to evaluate the impact of CPD? 28 th April 2016.
Source: Patton, p1.. Program Evaluation: The systematic use of empirical information to assess and improve programs or policies.
Balanced Scorecard Process Writing Outcome Objectives and Measures.
Publisher to insert cover image here Chapter 9
Evaluation and Assessment
Rebecca McQuaid Evaluation 101 …a focus on Programs Rebecca McQuaid
Part 1: Program Evaluation: What is it?
Agcas Scotland Knowing your outcomes
Project Title BACKGROUND RESULTS AIM METHODS SOLUTIONS CONCLUSIONS
Evaluating Better Care Together
Evaluating your Repository
Mathematics Assessment (Math 321 & Math 334)
Project snapshot Adolescents and Agency and Engaging Men and Boys Learning Clusters New Delhi, India October 2017.
Conducting Efficacy Trials
Model for Improvement & data collection
Business Environment
Business Environment
Business Environment
Business Environment
Evaluation of Career Planning Services
Monitoring and Evaluation of Postharvest Training Projects
Evaluating health promotion programs
Assess Plan Do Review Resource 1. Resources
Resource 1. Evaluation Planning Template
Evaluation Paradigms & Techniques
Type and impact of HTA-related scientific advice given during development The variability in HTA organisations and methodologies that are utilised in HTA.
Module 8- Stages in the Evaluation Process
An ideal assessment programme
REAL (working with Singizi) Presentation to NSA 3rd/4th August
Research Methods and Proposal Writing
Regulated Health Professions Network Evaluation Framework
Evaluation – Building a Logic Model?
Balanced Scorecard Process Writing Outcome Objectives and Measures
Recurrent Care Change Project Key Points about Evaluation
Outcomes and how to measure them
Planning for Evaluation: An Introduction to Logic Models
M & E Plans and Frameworks
How will you know what you’re proposing is successful?
Improving project delivery – Working paper
Week #3 Recap: Needs Assessments
Presentation transcript:

Assess Plan Do Review Resource 1: Types of Evaluation – which type of approach should I use? There are a number of different types of evaluation, the most widely used are formative, Process and summative (outcome) evaluation. The following information provides you with a guide to the types pf evaluation, when they are used and the types of approaches and data collection methods that are associated with them. (Roberts, Cavill and Rutter 2009) Formative A type of process evaluation that assesses how the intervention / programme can be improved as it is being implemented Takes place before the project starts and throughout pilot phase to inform implementation. Shows what worked well and why, and identify challenges to capture lessons learned (continually improving) Utilises evaluation theory e.g. Theory-of-Change; Realist Evaluation, Experience-Based Design, Critical Path etc. Helps to assess needs; clarify theory-of-change; to identify areas for shared learning and improvement Qualitative methods: Literature Review; Interviews; Focus Groups; Observation; Diaries; Questionnaires Service Improvement methods: Stakeholder Analysis; Logic Modelling; PDSA Cycles; Rapid Evaluation Cycles Process Assesses implementation and delivery of the initiative, and whether this was carried out as planned Takes place throughout the project implementation and delivery phase. Demonstrates to stakeholders that project Objectives are being met Qualitative methods: Interviews; Focus Groups; Questionnaires Quantitative methods: Metrics, Benchmarking, quantifiable Performance, Financial, Service Usage data Service Improvement methods: PDSA Cycles; Rapid Evaluation Cycles Summative Was the project successful? Has the met its predefined aims and objectives? Looks at the Outcomes (i.e. measures the changes that have occurred as a result of the programme) and/or Impact (i.e. the longer, deeper, systemic changes). Demonstrates to stakeholders if project aims were met. Can be Experimental (e.g. randomised controlled trial), Quasi-Experimental e.g. comparing before and after or use service Improvement methods: PDSA Cycles; Rapid Evaluation Cycles http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx http://www.civicpartnerships.org/#!quantitative--qualitative-eval-methods/c1bel http://www.institute.nhs.uk/research_and_evaluation/general/useful_resources.html