Decentralization and Performance Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Segment Reporting, Decentralization, and the Balanced Scorecard
Advertisements

Financial and Managerial Accounting Wild, Shaw, and Chiappetta Fourth Edition Wild, Shaw, and Chiappetta Fourth Edition McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011.
DECENTRALIZATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION © itaesem/iStockphoto CHAPTER 10.
Evaluation of Investment Centers Managerial Accounting Prepared by Diane Tanner University of North Florida Chapter 24.
Chapter 22 Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations
Chapter 12 Decentralization and Performance Evaluation
Decentralization and Performance Evaluation
24 Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations Accounting 26e
Managerial Accounting by James Jiambalvo
McGraw-Hill /Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Decentralization.
Performance Evaluation and the Balanced Scorecard
Return on Investment and Residual Income Managerial Accounting Prepared by Diane Tanner University of North Florida Chapter 25.
16-1 Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. Financial Performance Evaluation and Transfer Pricing in the Decentralized Firm.
ROI, Residual Income, and Economic Value Added
Managerial Accounting by James Jiambalvo Chapter 10: Decentralization and Performance Evaluation Slides Prepared by: Scott Peterson Northern State University.
Managerial Accounting:
Prepared by Debby Bloom-Hill CMA, CFM
Financial performance measures and transfer pricing
Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations & TRANSFER PRICING.
1 Copyright © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of the Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western are trademarks used herein under.
©2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publically accessible website, in whole or in part.
Management and Cost Accounting, 6 th edition, ISBN © 2004 Colin Drury Management and Cost Accounting, 6 th edition, ISBN ©
Responsibility Accounting and Transfer Pricing
Copyright © 2008 Prentice Hall All rights reserved 12-1 Performance Evaluation and the Balanced Scorecard Chapter 12.
AC239 Unit 8 Chapter 24 Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations 23.
C Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
©2004 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Introduction to Management Accounting, 2/e Werner/Jones Chapter 09 Decentralization: Segmented Reporting.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Performance Evaluation Chapter 10 1.
Accounting 3020 Chapter 12 – Segment Reporting, Decentralization, and Balanced Scorecard.
Prepared by: C. Douglas Cloud Professor Emeritus of Accounting Pepperdine University © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned,
Chapter 24 Responsibility Accounting and Performance Evaluation
Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations 24.
Accounting 4310 Chapter 14 Business Unit Performance.
Chapter 23. Explain why and how companies decentralize.
Performance Evaluation
Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations Student Version.
AC239 Managerial Accounting Seminar 8 Jim Eads, CPA, MST, MSF Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations 1.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Introduction The dilemma for companies is to find tools that allow the evaluation of managers at all levels in the organization. How would the evaluation.
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved 1 Performance Evaluation and the Balanced Scorecard Chapter 12.
Performance Evaluation Chapter 15 Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
CHAPTER FIVE Responsibility Accounting and Transfer Pricing.
10-1 Division Performance Measurement Prepared by Douglas Cloud Pepperdine University Prepared by Douglas Cloud Pepperdine University 10.
Chapter 10 Decentralization Chapter 10: Decentralization.
Responsibility Accounting and Transfer Pricing Chapter Five Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
CORNERSTONES of Managerial Accounting, 5e. © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part,
Welcome Back Atef Abuelaish1. Welcome Back Time for Any Question Atef Abuelaish2.
Welcome Back Atef Abuelaish1. Welcome Back Time for Any Question Atef Abuelaish2.
Chapter 13 Financial performance measures for investment centres and reward systems.
Segment Reporting, and Decentralization
Responsibility Accounting and Performance Evaluation
Performance Measurement in Decentralized Organizations
Performance Measurement and Transfer Pricing
Division Performance Measurement
REWARDING BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
Performance Measurement in Decentralized Organizations
Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations
Responsibility Accounting
Performance Measurement in Decentralized Organizations
Decentralization May 27, 2009 Chapter 10: Decentralization.
Electronic Presentation by Douglas Cloud Pepperdine University
Power Notes Chapter 22 Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations Learning Objectives 1. Centralized and Decentralized Operations 2. Responsibility.
Decentralization and Performance Evaluation
Decentralization, Profitability and ROI
Power Notes Chapter M7 Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations Learning Objectives 1. Centralized and Decentralized Operations 2. Responsibility.
Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations
Financial and Managerial Accounting:
Presentation transcript:

Decentralization and Performance Evaluation

Presentation Outline The Concept of Decentralization Types of Responsibility Centers Evaluating Investment Centers with Return on Investment (ROI) The Balanced Scorecard Transfer Prices

I. The Concept of Decentralization Decentralization Defined Advantages/Disadvantages of Decentralization Two Reasons for Evaluating Subunit Performance Responsibility Accounting

A. Decentralization Defined Firms that grant substantial decision making authority to the managers of subunits are referred to as decentralized organizations. Most firms are neither totally centralized nor totally decentralized.

B. Advantages/Disadvantages of Decentralization Better information, leading to superior decisions. Faster response to changing circumstances. Increased motivation of managers Excellent training for future top level executives. Disadvantages Costly duplication of activities. Lack of goal congruence.

C. Two Reasons for Evaluating Subunit Performance Identification of successful areas of operation and areas in need of improvement. Influence over the behavior of managers. Note that it is quite possible to have a good manager and a bad subunit.

D. Responsibility Accounting Managers should only be held responsible for costs and revenues that they control. In a decentralized organization, costs and revenues are traced to the organizational level where they can be controlled. (See Illustration 12-3 on p. 421)

Types of Responsibility Centers Cost Centers Profit Centers Investment Centers

Cost Centers A cost center is a subunit that has responsibility for controlling costs but not for generating revenues. Most service departments (i.e., maintenance, computer) are classified as cost centers. Production departments may be cost centers when they simply provide components for another department. Cost centers are often controlled by comparing actual with budgeted or standard costs.

Profit Centers A profit center is a subunit that has responsibility of generating revenue and controlling costs. Profit center evaluation techniques include: Comparison of current year income with a target or budget. Relative performance evaluation compares the center with other similar profit centers.

Investment Centers An investment center is a subunit that is responsible for generating revenue, controlling costs, and investing in assets. An investment center is charged with earning income consistent with the amount of assets invested in the segment. Most divisions of a company can be treated as either profit centers or investment centers.

Evaluating Investment Centers with Return on Investment (ROI) The Components of ROI Measuring ROI Income and Invested Capital Problems with Using ROI Residual Income (RI) as an Alternative to ROI

The Components of ROI or x ROI has a distinct advantage over income as a measure of performance since it considers both income (the numerator) and investment (the denominator). ROI = Income Invested capital or ROI = Income Sales x Invested capital Profit Margin Investment Turnover The breakdown of the formula shows that managers can increase return by more profit and/or generating more sales for each investment dollar.

Measuring ROI Income and Invested Capital Investment center income will be measured using net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT). NOPAT should exclude nonoperating items such as interest expense and nonoperating gains and losses, net of the tax effect. ROI Invested Capital Invested capital is measured as total assets less noninterest bearing current liabilities. Noninterest bearing current liabilities are deducted from total assets because they are a free source of funds and reduce the cost of the investment in assets. See Illustration 12-4 on page 426

Problems with Using ROI Investment in assets is typically measured using historical cost. ROI becomes larger as assets become depreciated. This may result in managers taking unnecessary delays in updating equipment. Managers may turn down projects with positive net present values, simply because accepting the project results in a reduced ROI. In other words, projects may be turned down if they provide a return above the cost of capital but below the current ROI.

Residual Income (RI) as an Alternative to ROI Residual Income = NOPAT – Required Profit = NOPAT – Cost of Capital x Investment = NOPAT – Cost of Capital x (Total Assets – Non-interest Bearing Current Liabilities) Residual Income (RI) overcomes the underinvestment problem of ROI since any investment earning more than the cost of capital will increase residual income.

The Balanced Scorecard The Balanced Scorecard Approach The Balanced Scorecard Dimensions How Balance is Achieved

A. The Balance Scorecard Approach A problem with just assessing performance with financial measures is that such measures are backward looking. The balanced scorecard approach also focuses on what managers are currently doing to create future shareholder value.

The Balanced Scorecard Dimensions Financial Perspective Is company achieving financial goals? Customer Perspective Is company meeting customer expectations? Internal Process Is company improving critical internal processes? Strategy Learning and Growth Is company improving its ability to innovate?

How Balance is Achieved Performance is assessed across a balanced set of dimensions Quantitative measures (e.g., number of defects) are balanced with qualitative measures (e.g., rate of customer satisfaction). There is a balance of backward-looking and forward-looking measures.

Transfer Prices Transfer Price Defined Market Prices as the Maximum Variable Cost as the Minimum – Excess Capacity Exists Variable Cost Plus Lost Contribution Margin on Outside Sales as the Minimum – Excess Capacity Does Not Exist Transfer Pricing and Income Taxes in an International Context

A. Transfer Price Defined The price that is used to value internal transfers of goods and services within the same company is known as the transfer price.

Market Prices as the Maximum The transfer price should not exceed what the acquiring division would have to pay for a similar good and given set of conditions on the outside market. If the outside market is cheaper, the good should be acquired outside the organization.

Variable Cost as the Minimum – Excess Capacity Exists The supplying division should not set a transfer price that is lower than the variable cost of supplying the good and/or service to the requesting division. This may be less than the variable cost of serving an outside customer.

Variable Cost Plus Lost Contribution Margin on Outside Sales as the Minimum – Excess Capacity Does Not Exist The minimum transfer price will add a lost contribution margin on outside sales if the supplying division must turn away outside customers to provide the good and/or service to the requesting division.

Transfer Pricing and Income Taxes in an International Context When income tax rates between countries differ significantly, a supplier in a lower rate country will want to charge the purchasing division a higher transfer price to lower taxable income for the purchaser in the higher rate nation, and vice versa.

Summary Decentralization and Responsibility Accounting Cost, Profit, and Investment Centers ROI Residual Income Balanced Scorecard Transfer Pricing