Tribes and Yucca Mountain: Native American Forum on Nuclear Issues

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Advertisements

Office of National Transportation Update
Presented to: National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference Presented by: Corinne Macaluso, Transportation Specialist Office of National Transportation.
Challenges in LLW Management: a Local Government Perspective Fred Barker, Executive Director, NuLeAF SAFESPUR FORUM 29 April 2009.
ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES ORDINANCE. What the discussion should include: 4 Adequate Public Facilities Ordinances (APFO) allow local governments to deny.
1 Washington Invasive Species Council Recreation and Conservation Office Purple Loosestrife.
Update on Yucca Mountain and Transportation Impacts on Native American Communities Bob Halstead Office of the Governor Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects.
Objectives Overview of the Inter Tribal Emergency Response Commission (ITERC) and its programs Overview of grant opportunities and the grant process.
School-Community Relations. Learning Outcomes (School-Community Relations) Students are able to: Students are able to: Explain the meaning of meaningful.
The Yucca Mountain Site The U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. throws out the EPA's 10,000 year radiation standard for Yucca Mountain,
California Wetlands: Update on new state definition and policy development California Native Plant Society Fall Conservation Symposium September 10, 2011.
Nuclear Waste and Indian Country Mr. Ian Zabarte Moapa Band of Paiutes Department of Environmental Protection.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Environmental Assessment in Newfoundland & Labrador Environmental Assessment in Federations: Current Dynamics and Emerging Issues Conference Current Dynamics.
Strengthening Sustainable Agriculture Programming with American Indian Producers in the West A Professional Development Program… Funded by Western Sustainable.
FY 2010 Tribal Budget Priorities & National Budget Meeting Pacific Region Sacramento, California.
Association on American Indian Affairs Juvenile Justice Reform and the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) Prepared by Jack F. Trope, Executive.
Hazardous Materials Transportation Act of 1975 By: Charley Copp.
Productive SB 18 Consultation Michelle LaPena, Esq. LaPena Law Corporation 2001 N Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA (916)
TURTLE MT BAND OF CHIPPEWA Ray Reed – Brownfield Coordinator EPA-TRP.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Consulting with Idaho Tribes in Planning Transportation Development 14 th Annual NW Tribal Transportation Symposium Patti Raino, ITD.
Office of National Transportation Update Presented to: Spent Fuel Project Office Presented by: Gary Lanthrum, Director Office of National Transportation.
Community Based Participatory Research: Considerations for IRBs Puneet Chawla Sahota, Ph.D. Post-doctoral Fellow, National Congress of American Indians.
Drinking Water Source Protection Ministry of the Environment Source Protection Programs Branch March 2010.
Lumbee Federal Recognition Termination Policy of the 1950s In the 1950s, the U.S. government decided that the best way to deal with all Indian tribes.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Tribal Voices a tale of 3 mines GSA National Conference November 2015 Kendra Zamzow, PhD, CSP2 Ann Maest, PhD, Buka Environmental.
Healthy Homes Initiative: Developing Competencies January 22 – 23, 2004 Baltimore, MD CAPT Patrick O. Bohan, USPHS (Ret)
Citizens, Society, and the State AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT.
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
IT Service Transition – purpose and processes
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Case Study Ethnographic Research
MTA in the Age of Big Data: Transforming the Wealth of MTA Data into Accessible, Meaningful, Visual, Interactive Information A Presentation to The New.
Preliminary Recommendations to the Tribal/Interior Budget Council
Monitoring the State of Conservation of World Heritage Properties
System Planning To Programming
Nuclear Risk Management For Native Communities
The Path Forward for WIPP: A State and Local Perspective
Module 19a: Water Quality Certification
WILMOT COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PILOT PROJECT
Tribes Served by the BIA Western Region
NRC’s Decision Process: Judging The Safety Of A Proposed Repository
Making America Great Again
Resilient Water Governance A conceptual basis for discussion…
Tribal Inventory Project
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
Building Across Boundaries: Developing Energy Projects On Or Near Tribal Lands And Resources Laura Abram Director, Government & Public Affairs First Solar.
Making America Great Again
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
WATER POLICY And Management in AlabamA
The Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519 (1978)
D-Lab Fall 2004.
Introduction to the Workshop
Overview of 2019 Non-BIA Federal Register Notice
IS YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT PREPARED
APUSH: SEVEN COURSE THEMES
Cooperative Federalism 2
2nd NUCLEAR REGULATORY INFORMATION CONFERENCE 16 – 18 May 2018
Introduction to Successful Quarterly Reporting
Björn Hasselgren, PhD “Shaping the Future of Core Network Corridors”
Transport Industry Safety Group - A regulators perspective
Tribal Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee (TRMTC)
Implementation Projects
Overview of 2020 Non-BIA Federal Register Notice
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
Fitness Check of EU Freshwater Policy
Consular Diplomacy in Mexico
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Case Study Ethnographic Research
Presentation transcript:

Tribes and Yucca Mountain: Native American Forum on Nuclear Issues Fred Dilger PhD Black Mountain Research (702) 290-6990 blackmountainresearch@gmail.com April 10, 2008

DOE History of Tribal Interaction-Yucca Mt. Yucca Mountain: Extensive history of social-cultural studies No interaction on transportation Unsuccessful effort began in 1993 and ended in 1995 DOE tribal policy was a very good start Restarted again in 2004-DOE invites tribes to TEC meeting Shape future interaction between DOE and other Tribes Tribes identify themselves as affected by DOE differently than DOE defines affected tribes

DOE History of Tribal Interaction: Transportation Bannock-Shoshone tribe explored efforts to regulate shipments of nuclear material originating at the Idaho National Laboratory Mirrored contemporaneous State of Idaho efforts to regulate the same shipments using air-quality laws Never pressed in court-but had significant impact

DOE History of Tribal Interaction: Waste Isolation Pilot Plant DOE concluded that the best way to avoid trouble was to avoid tribes Won’t work for Yucca Mt.

Current Yucca Mt Interactions with Tribes Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) Appropriate format for most tribes because most tribes will be most affected by transportation, but…. “We’ve invited tribes that may or may not be affected. It will be interesting for them to learn about the program.” (Jay Jones, DOE)

Yucca Mt Groundwater

Potentially Affected Nevada Tribes Identified by DOE Wells Band Te-Moak Pahrump Paiute Tribe Timbisha-Shoshone Las Vegas Paiute Tribe Moapa Band of Paiutes Elko Band Pyramid Lake Tribe

Institutional Issues for Tribes Which tribes are affected, how severely they will be affected, and when they will be affected cannot be completely known until routes are identified Tribes (as a group) should consider how they wish to interact with DOE Representative group? How often? Reports? Different meetings for Tribes-Tribes as stakeholders or Tribes as Regulators What steps to take?

A Possible Action Plan Tribes should press Bureau of the Interior (BOI) for a protocol that permits rapid designation of affected status DOE should be urged to create a method to ensure funds are available following designation Impacted tribes should receive “affected” designation Tribes should determine their legal authority over shipments Craft a plan to build tribal capacity, influence

Tips for Building Capacity Develop a process for inter-tribal collaboration Focus on issues that tribes can influence Understand what authority tribes may be able to exert Earn a place at the table: Comments Research Useful insight

Urgent Business The DOE’s request for Cooperating Status means that the Caliente rail corridor is not guaranteed The STB has a history of meaningful tribal interaction Tongue River DM&E If tribes want to participate, they must inform the Surface Transportation Board (STB) in writing-10 copies to both STB and DOE-that they wish to do so by April 21st

Conclusion Affected status is the key for tribes Tribes must channel their resources to focus on the critical issues A key issue will be to decide what parts of the DOE program to watch