Chapter 16 Special Education for Gifted Students

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Education 101 Special Education: A SERVICE, NOT A PLACE John Payne Office of Exceptional Children SC State Department of Education.
Advertisements

Overview of Serving Students with Disabilities under the IDEA School Counselor Summer Institute June 24, 2014 Olympia, WA Scott Michael Raub OSPI Special.
Understanding the IEP Process
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Section 1 Demographic Information Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
1 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) Implementation Training Spring/Summer 2005.
Students in Private School Placed by Their Parents Developed by Contra Costa SELPA
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Surrogate Parent Training
Procedural Safeguards Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
1 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS. 2 Texas Education Agency provides Notice of Procedural Safeguards Rights of Parents of Students with Disabilities Download this.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
You will frequently use at the CED POLICIES. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) The ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in employment,
Introduction to Section 504 Produced by: WI FACETS* © 2007 WI FACETS *Produced with private funds.
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT. 11/10/05 22 Parent Involvement2 A parent is… (300.30)  Natural or adoptive parent of a child  A foster parent  A guardian but.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Las Cruces Public Schools Technical Assistance Training Department of Learning, Teaching and Research.
The process of assessment: the role of the teacher Chapter 1 ~~~~~
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
GIEP January Writing GIEPs is a Balancing Act! Balancing… District Philosophy and State Regulations District Resources and Program Costs Free Appropriate.
Getting Oriented to Exceptionality and Special Education There is no single accepted theory of normal development, so relatively few definite statements.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Edward G. Rendell, Governor ▪ Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak, Secretary of Educationwww.pde.state.pa.us Chapter 16 1 Chapter 16 Overview with 2008 Updates March.
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT ©PACER Center, Inc., 2005.
CHAPTER 16 Regulations Covering the Education of Gifted Students August 25,2009.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Gifted Identification Janice Estabrook, Lancaster-Lebanon IU 13.
Gifted Liaison Meeting N  E  I  U  19. Writing GIEPs is a Balancing Act! Balancing… District Philosophy and State Mandates District Resources and.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
Chapter 16 Highlights A presentation for Octorara School District March 30, 2010.
+ Compliance Monitoring Results Octorara School District 2009.
SPECIAL EDUCATION BASICS Adrienne Volenik Education Rights Clinic University of Richmond School of Law
Alone we can do so little, together we can do so much. Helen Keller.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
INFORMATION SESSION: GIFTED EDUCATION IN GVSD Great Valley School April 5,
The Evaluation and Re-evaluation Process Guidelines for Parents Karen Finigan, Director of Special Education & Michelle Giovanola, Lead School Psychologist.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Chapter 16 Special Education for Gifted Students, Basic Education Circular, and Legal Decisions January 11 & 12, 2007.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Tanya Morret October 26,  Background and History  Intent of Chapter 16  Forms and Timelines  Resources  Question and Answer.
Welcome to Parent’s Rights SEPAC Meeting September 26, 2016.
Section 504 training.
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Procedural Safeguards
The Special Education Process
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Chapter 16 Overview with 2008 Updates
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Santa Barbara County SELPA Parentally Placed Students in Private School Training & Meaningful Consultation for Private School Representatives and Parent.
Teaching Students With Exceptionalities
Teaching Students With Exceptionalities
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Implementation Manual Revisions
IEP Basics for Parents and Families
Resolving Issues ADR, Due Process and CDE Complaints
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
New Enrollment and Transfer Students
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 16 Special Education for Gifted Students This can be used alone as a way of pointing out new things. Could also be used in conjunction with the chap. 14 & 16 side by side. Also, if time permits, chap 16 regulations can be used with it.

Clarification from Preamble Delete gifted education from Chapters 14 & 342 Draw a clear distinction between gifted education as required by PA and special education for students with disabilities as required by Federal law Continue to include gifted in Departmental tracking systems Hear and investigate complaints All of the above information is from the preamble.

Preamble (continued) Only certified school psychologists can administer tests and evaluation materials to determine giftedness Reevaluations no longer required every 2 years Eliminating the requirement to reevaluate gifted students every 2 years should help in reducing paperwork.

Gifted Education SDI to meet the needs of a gifted student that is – Conducted in an instructional setting Provided in an instructional or skill area Provided at no cost to the parents Provided under the authority of a SD Provided by an agency Individualized Reasonably calculated to yield meaningful educational benefit and progress Provided in conformity with a GIEP Similar to FAPE, however that term is only used for students with disabilities (IDEA). Meaningful educational benefit and progress – accomplishment of or significant progress toward the GIEP annual goals. Agency defined as IU, SD, AVTS, state operated program or facility or other public or private organization providing educational services to gifted students or students thought to be gifted.

New acronyms GMDT Gifted multidisciplinary team GMDE Gifted multidisciplinary evaluation GIEP Gifted Individualized Education Program GWR Gifted Written Report

Dual diagnosis For students with dual diagnosis it is not necessary to: conduct separate screenings and evaluations develop separate IEPs use separate procedural safeguards procedures Follow Chapter 14 requirements to develop an IEP that includes gifted Students determined to be eligible for special education and needing gifted education, the processes followed under chapters 14 & 342 fully address the students’ needs related to disability as well as that for gifted status

Definition of Mentally Gifted Outstanding intellectual and creative ability the development of which requires specially designed programs or support services, or both, not ordinarily provided in the regular education program This definition no longer includes IQ – it has been moved to define mentally gifted student

Definition of Mentally Gifted (continued) An IQ of 130 or higher (may not be based on IQ alone) Multiple criteria includes: Achievement test scores Acquisition and retention rates Demonstrated achievement, performance or expertise in one or more academic areas High level thinking skills, academic creativity, leadership skills, academic interest areas, communication skills, foreign language aptitude or technology expertise Evidence that intervening factors are not masking gifted abilities Again emphasizes that IQ alone is not sufficient and multiple criteria must be used. Multiple criteria include: A year or more above grade ach. level in one or more subjects An observed or measured rate of acquisition/retention of new academic content or skills that reflect gifted ability Demonstrated achievement, performance or expertise in one or more academic areas as evidenced by excellence of product, portfolio or research, as well as criterion-referenced team judgment Early and measured use of high level thinking skills, academic creativity, leadership skills, academic interest areas, communication skills, foreign language aptitude or technology expertise Documented, observed, validated or assessed evidence that intervening factors such as ESL, LD, physical impairment, ED, gender or race bias, or socio/cultural deprivation are not masking gifted abilities

Screening and Evaluation SD must adopt and use a system for identifying all students within the district who are thought to be gifted. Public awareness activities must be designed to reach parents of students in the public schools and the parents of school-age children not enrolled in the public schools. This is the same as Chapter 14, but the earlier version (Sept) had changed it to “enrolled” students. Ensure that procedures include those students who are not enrolled in the SD

GMDE Team includes parent(s), current teacher(s), school psychologist, persons familiar with student’s educational performance and/or cultural background, and persons familiar with evaluation techniques Referrals can be made by parent(s) or teachers Parental requests for evaluation must be in writing and are limited to one per school term Written report (GWR) requires names and positions but not signatures GIEP team members are: parent(s), certified school psychologist, persons familiar with students education experience and performance, one or more of the student’s current teachers, persons trained in the appropriate evaluation techniques and, when possible, persons familiar with the students cultural background. School term is defined as the period of time elapsing between the opening of public schools in the fall and the closing of public schools in the spring of the following year (i.e. September to June) Parents can not request an evaluation more than once per school year (this is especially important regarding requests made for another initial evaluation following a determination that the student was not gifted). Signatures are NOT required

GMDE - Reevaluations Not required every two years Required before changing educational placement or upon recommendation by GIEP team There is no required time for conducting reevaluations.

GIEP Team shall include parent(s), student (if parents choose to have student participate), district representative, the student’s current teacher(s), other individuals at discretion of parent or SD Notification to parents and others for attendance at GIEP meeting must be at least 10 calendar days in advance of the meeting Annual goals must be written but do not have to be measurable Short-term learning outcomes are measurable and should lead to annual goal Signatures are not required Teacher or teachers involved in the GIEP could be teacher of gifted students or regular ed teacher (preamble p. 3) District representative (not LEA rep) – serve as chairperson of GIEP team, knowledgeable about availability of district resources and authorized by the district to commit those resources. Chapter 342 requires that parents be notified “early enough to ensure the opportunity to attend”.

GIEP - Implementation Within 10 school days or at start of school year if it was developed less than 30 calendar days before the last day of scheduled classes If parents give consent (NORA) in person at GIEP meeting, the GIEP can not be implemented for at least 5 calendar days. This allows the parents the opportunity to revoke consent if they change their minds. Notice must be presented to the parents in person at the conclusion of the GIEP conference or by certified mail within 5 calendar days after the completion of the GIEP conference. The parent shall have 10 calendar days to respond to NORA sent by mail or 5 calendar days to respond to notice presented in person at the conclusion of a GIEP conference. If the parents receive the notice in person and approve the recommended assignment within 5 calendar days, the school district may not implement the GIEP for at least 5 calendar days, to give the parents an opportunity to notify the district within the 5 day period of a decision to revoke the previous approval of the recommended assignment.

Caseload and Class size Caseload - maximum of 75 students Class size - maximum of twenty students

Mediation Impartial mediator may be requested to assist parents and school district in resolving dispute issues Mediation may not be used to deny or delay a party’s right to a due process hearing Mediation agreement enforceable by the Department of Education

Impartial Due Process Pre-hearing conference is not required Parents request should be in writing May be filed concerning the identification, evaluation or educational placement, or the provision of gifted education for a student who is gifted or thought to be gifted A relatively high percentage of pre-hearing conferences in the past were unable to solve differences, with the parties electing to proceed to due process proceeding anyway. (preamble)

Impartial Due Process (continued) Parents may be represented by legal counsel and accompanied and advised by individuals with knowledge or training with respect to students who are gifted. Hearing shall be held within 30 calendar days after request Hearing officer’s decision shall be issued within 45-days after hearing request Screening and evaluation issues were covered in previous trainer notes. Impartial due process: There was concern regarding who would be representing parents at a hearing and their level of expertise with the legal process. This wording ensures legal representation, but doesn’t preclude having others in attendance.

Impartial Due Process (continued) Hearing is open to public unless otherwise requested The hearing officer’s decision may be appealed to a three-member appeal panel The decision of the appeal panel may be appealed to a court

End