Grid & Virtualization Working Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2006 Open Grid Forum GHPN-RG Status update co-chairss:Cees de Laat Dimitra Simeonidou GGF22, Boston, February 2008.
Advertisements

© 2006 Open Grid Forum JSDL 1.0: Parameter Sweeps OGF 23, June 2008, Barcelona, Spain.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Network Services Interface OGF30: Connection Services Guy Roberts, 27 th Oct 2010.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum Grid & Virtualization Working Group OGF21 gridvirt-wg 2007 Seattle, WA Erol Bozak, Chair SAP, Development Architect Wolfgang Reichert,
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Network Services Interface Introduction to NSI Guy Roberts.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum JSDL 1.0: Parameter Sweeps: Examples OGF 22, February 2008, Cambridge, MA.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum OGF19 Federated Identity Rule-based data management Wed 11:00 AM Mountain Laurel Thurs 11:00 AM Bellflower.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum JSDL-WG Session OGF27 – General Session 10:30-12:00, 14 October 2009 Banff, Canada.
©2010Open Grid Forum OGF28 OGSA-DMI Status Chairs: Mario Antonioletti, EPCC Stephen Crouch, Southampton Shahbaz Memon, FZJ Ravi Madduri, UoC.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum JSDL Session (CIM Job) OGF 21 - Seattle, 17 October 2007.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Joint Session on Information Modeling for Computing Resources OGF 20 - Manchester, 7 May 2007.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum JSDL-WG Session OGF21 – Activity schema session 17 October 2007 Seattle, U.S.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum 2 nd March 09 Enterprise Grid Requirements Research Group OGF25 EGR-RG Session Group.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum OGSA Next Steps Discussion Providing Value Beyond the Specifications.
Oct 15 th, 2009 OGF 27, Infrastructure Area: Status of FVGA-WG Status of Firewall Virtualization for Grid Applications - Working Group
© 2008 Open Grid Forum Resource Selection Services OGF22 – Boston, Feb
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Network Services Interface OGF29: Working Group Meeting Guy Roberts, 19 th Jun 2010.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum JSDL Optional Elements OGF 24 Singapore.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum Data/Compute Affinity Focus on Data Caching.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Grid Resource Allocation Agreement Protocol GRAAP-WG working session 2 Wenesday, 17 September, 2008 Singapore.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Joint Session on Information Modeling for Computing Resources (OGSA Modeling Activities) OGF 21 - Seattle, 16 October 2007.
© 2006, 2007 Open Grid Forum Michel Drescher, FujitsuOGF-20, Manchester, UK Andreas Savva, FujitsuOGF-21, Seattle, US (update) Extending JSDL 1.0 with.
1 ©2013 Open Grid Forum OGF Working Group Sessions Security Area – FEDSEC Jens Jensen, OGF Security Area.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum DCI Federation Protocol BoF Alexander Papaspyrou, TU Dortmund University Open Grid Forum March 15-18, 2010, Munich, Germany.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum Data Grid Management Systems: Standard API - community development Arun Jagatheesan, San Diego Supercomputer Center & iRODS.org.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Service Level Terms Andrew Grimshaw.
OGF DMNR BoF Dynamic Management of Network Resources Documents available at: Guy Roberts, John Vollbrecht.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Network Services Interface OGF 32, Salt Lake City Guy Roberts, Inder Monga, Tomohiro Kudoh 16 th July 2011.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum Enterprise Best (Community) Practices Workshop OGF 22 - Cambridge Nick Werstiuk February 25, 2007.
© 2010 Open Grid Forum OCCI Status Update Alexander Papaspyrou, Andy Edmonds, Thijs Metsch OGF31.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum FEDSEC-CG Andrew Grimshaw and Jens Jensen.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Network Services Interface OGF 33, Lyon Guy Roberts, Inder Monga, Tomohiro Kudoh 19 th Sept 2011.
© 2015 Open Grid Forum ETSI CSC activities Wolfgang Ziegler Area Director Applications, OGF Fraunhofer Institute SCAI Open Grid Forum 44, May 21-22, 2015.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum GridRPC Working Group 15 th Meeting GGF22, Cambridge, MA, USA, Feb
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Network Services Interface CS Errata Guy Roberts, Chin Guok, Tomohiro Kudoh 29 Sept 2015.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum OGSA-WG: EGA Reference Model GGF18 Sept. 12, 4-5:30pm, #159A-B.
Peter Ziu Northrop Grumman ACS-WG Grid Provisioning Appliance Concept GGF13, March 14, 2005
© 2006 Open Grid Forum NML Progres OGF 28, München.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum OGF Management Area Meeting OGF20 7 May, am-12:30pm Manchester, UK.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Grid Resource Allocation Agreement Protocol GRAAP-WG working session 1 Thursday, 5 March, 2009 Catania, Sicily.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum VOMSPROC WG OGF36, Chicago, IL, US.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum OGF20 Levels of the Grid Workflow Interoperability OGSA-WG F2F meeting Adrian Toth University of Miskolc NIIF 11 th May, 2007.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum 1 Application Contents Service (ACS) ACS-WG#1 Monday, September 11 10:30 am - 12:00 am (158A-B) ACS-WG#2 Wednesday, September 13.
© 2008 Open Grid Forum Production Grid Infrastructure WG State Model Discussions PGI Team.
OGSA Data Architecture WG Data Transfer Session Allen Luniewski, IBM Dave Berry, NESC.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum JSDL-WG Session OGF26 – General Session 11:00-12:30, 28 May 2009 Chapel Hill, NC.
Network Services Interface
SLIDES TITLE Your name Session Name, OGSA-WG #nn
Welcome and Introduction
RISGE-RG use case template
GridRPC Working Group 13th Meeting
Grid Resource Allocation Agreement Protocol
Service Virtualization via a Network Appliance….
OGF session PMA, Florence, 31 Jan 2017.
WS-Agreement Working Session
Sharing Topology Information
Network Services Interface
Network Services Interface Working Group
OGSA-Workflow OGSA-WG.
Information Model, JSDL and XQuery: A proposed solution
Network Measurements Working Group
WS Naming OGF 19 - Friday Center, NC.
Activity Delegation Kick Off
SAGA: Java Language Binding
Network Services Interface Working Group
Introduction to OGF Standards
SAGA: Java Language Binding
Grid & Virtualization Working Group
Proposed JSDL Extension: Parameter Sweeps
OGF 40 Grand BES/JSDL Andrew Grimshaw Genesis II/XSEDE
Presentation transcript:

Grid & Virtualization Working Group OGF21 gridvirt-wg Erol Bozak, Chair SAP, Development Architect Wolfgang Reichert, Co-Chair IBM, Senior Technical Staff Member October 2007 Seattle, WA

OGF IPR Policies Apply “I acknowledge that participation in this meeting is subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy.” Intellectual Property Notices Note Well: All statements related to the activities of the OGF and addressed to the OGF are subject to all provisions of Appendix B of GFD-C.1, which grants to the OGF and its participants certain licenses and rights in such statements. Such statements include verbal statements in OGF meetings, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to: the OGF plenary session, any OGF working group or portion thereof, the OGF Board of Directors, the GFSG, or any member thereof on behalf of the OGF, the ADCOM, or any member thereof on behalf of the ADCOM, any OGF mailing list, including any group list, or any other list functioning under OGF auspices, the OGF Editor or the document authoring and review process Statements made outside of a OGF meeting, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to an OGF activity, group or function, are not subject to these provisions. Excerpt from Appendix B of GFD-C.1: ”Where the OGF knows of rights, or claimed rights, the OGF secretariat shall attempt to obtain from the claimant of such rights, a written assurance that upon approval by the GFSG of the relevant OGF document(s), any party will be able to obtain the right to implement, use and distribute the technology or works when implementing, using or distributing technology based upon the specific specification(s) under openly specified, reasonable, non-discriminatory terms. The working group or research group proposing the use of the technology with respect to which the proprietary rights are claimed may assist the OGF secretariat in this effort. The results of this procedure shall not affect advancement of document, except that the GFSG may defer approval where a delay may facilitate the obtaining of such assurances. The results will, however, be recorded by the OGF Secretariat, and made available. The GFSG may also direct that a summary of the results be included in any GFD published containing the specification.” OGF Intellectual Property Policies are adapted from the IETF Intellectual Property Policies that support the Internet Standards Process. IPR Notices Note Well for OGF meetings 2

Agenda Goals, Milestones & Status Recap of Previous Sessions Refine One Selected Use Case Working Streams & Next Steps 3

Goals of the WG Verification that within existing Grid standards the specifications are neutral to virtualized systems and resources The request for “resources” may be satisfied either by “virtualized resources” or “physical resources” Is virtualization “transparent to the current Grid standards”? Explore how virtualization technologies can be exploited to better support Grid use cases Define the use cases / scenarios wherein the Grid infrastructure is seen interacting with system virtualization platforms and making use of its capabilities Exploit existing concepts and work, e.g. System Virtualization, Partitioning and Clustering (SVPC) – (DMTF) “Virtual Workspaces” (http://workspace.globus.org/papers/) 4

Goals of the WG Define the requirements to the Grid architecture for integration with system virtualization platforms Define profile(s) Align with existing standards: DMTF - System Virtualization, Partitioning and Clustering (SVPC) etc. 5

Milestones and Status √ Milestone 1 (OGF 19) Milestone 2 (OGF 20) √ Introduction of the workgroup Milestone 2 (OGF 20) Terminology definition Collection of use cases Determine relations to other OGF WGs and SDOs Milestone 3 (OGF 21) Requirements collection Determine relation to other standards First draft of a profile Milestone 4 (OGF 22) Augmented profile for broader (external) review (e.g. DMTF) ... √ 6

Recap: Virtualization Concept Virtual Machine Virtual Machine Hardware Application Application Expand or Contract Guest Systems Dynamic Virtual Resources Operating System Operating System … Hypervisor Dynamic Sharing Dynamic Virtual-to-Physical Allocation Hardware Hardware Host System Dynamic Physical Resources Expand or Contract Virtualization decouples presentation of resources to consumers (applications) from actual resources through a virtualization layer (Hypervisor) Several virtual machines (VMs) may run on a single physical host Each VM has its own installed operating system and applications 7

Recap: Virtualization Concept Virtual Machine Virtual Machine Virtual Machine Virtual Machine … … Sharing Aggregation Hardware Hardware Virtual Machine Virtual Machine Virtual Machine Virtual Machine … … Emulation Insulation Hardware Hardware 8

Recap: Key Capabilities of Virtualization Creation of virtual systems on-demand Specify the environment the application / jobs needs to run The environment of the allocating can be pre-configured an persisted as images that can be activated on creation (multiple times if necessary) Dynamic resizing Change the configuration of virtual system Isolation Applications / jobs can run isolated from each other Snapshotting Suspending the virtual system and persisting the state which can be reactivated again Migration Movement of virtual system among host systems (physical systems) 9

Recap: Scenario Examples „The Grid“ (Job / Execution Managers, Resource Managers etc.) does not only react on the „static“ configuration of the landscape  it may requests to create the proper environment for the applications / jobs The job manager may request that the application / job should run isolated because of security policies, to isolate the job malware etc. The application / job may require more resources to run  the Grid can dynamically adjust resource allocation (e.g. insulate more memory, CPU capacity, network bandwidth etc.) etc. 10

Recap: Use Cases Overview Virtualization use cases Power saving Planned maintenance Changing capacity requirements Changing capacity offering/availability Stateful cloning Protecting long running jobs from system failures Reproducing situations Metering of job resource consumption Resource consumption enforcement Protection against malware Ensuring Security Avoiding conflicts Emulating an environment for legacy jobs Virtualization capabilities Live migration Dynamic resizing Snapshotting Isolation Provisioning 11

Recap: Use Cases & Capabilities Create / Discover Image(s) Provision Virtual System(s) Configure Image(s) Deploy Virtual System(s) Migration System Virtualization Dynamic Re-sizing Manage Virtual System(s) Monitoring Snapshotting Decommission Virtual System(s) 12

Grid Components & Dependencies OGF Reference Model Enterprise Grid Components & Dependencies GC GC GC GC … Policies Accounting / Billing Logical GME Manage Grid Management Entity Grid Component Monitor Accounting / Billing Policies Manage GC GC Other GME GC GC … Monitor 13

Grid Management Entity OGF Reference Model Service Level Management Enterprise Accounting / Billing Policies Assigns / Provisions Grid Management Entity Reconciles Figure xiii expands on the role of the GME to emphasize its role in dynamically managing the life cycle and attributes of grid components as part of closed feedback loop SLM. The GME enables a grid component to deliver value by provisioning it or assigning/binding those grid components it depends upon to it (see also Figure xii). In the general or traditional sense the GME assigns resources (i.e. other grid components), which are then consumed (in some sense) by the grid component. Telemetry associated with the grid component usually allows metrics to be generated. These are then used as input by the GME, which reconciles them with its policies, as well as additional input (for example patch notifications from a vendor) before doing any necessary reassignment or re-provisioning. Resources (other GCs) Metrics Manage Monitor Consumed Grid Component Generates 14

OGF Reference Model Lifecycle of a Grid Component Provision Create / Discover Destroy Unconfigured Configure Unconfigure Provision Inactive Decommission Start Stop Active Manage 15

Refine Selected Use Cases Dynamically changing capacity requirements During runtime the job may require additional capacity (e.g. CPU capacity, Memory capacity, I/O bandwidth etc.). If the underlying physical system is able to serve the requirements more capacity for the job / virtual system can be provided locally on the same physical system. If the requirements can be better fulfilled on another physical system the virtual system might be migrated. Dynamically changing capacity offering / availability Capacity availability may change in the physical system (e.g. CPU capacity, Memory capacity, I/O bandwidth etc.) because of recently freed resources by the completed jobs. In these situations available capacity can be utilized for the running jobs. Additional resources might become available on another physical systems which can be utilized. Related virtualization capabilities Dynamic system resizing Live migration of virtual system during runtime 16

Remarks Two related use cases have been selected: Dynamic Resizing and Live Migration. Both are about dynamic resource availability and changing environments during the lifetime of an application. Any management capabilities and communication with the ComputerSystem should be handled by the GME. The GME needs to be virtualization aware and enabled. The application code should not have any “intelligence” or knowledge to manage dynamic environments. This is in accordance with the OGF Reference Model. It might be desired that the application is “virtualization friendly”. The application shall allocate resources only when needed and deallocate them if no longer needed. It shall not assume that any allocated resources are physical and dedicated. The Virtualization Platform GME is considered to be an CIM Object Manager, i.e. an implementation of CIM profiles and classes (like CIM_ComputerSystem). It is assumed that the application GME understands CIM to the extent it exploits system capabilities. It directly communicates with the respective CIM Object Manager(s). 17

Managing Hierarchy Enterprise Datacenter GME Application GME 1 1 Accounting & Billing Accounting & Billing Policies Policies * * Application GME Virtualization Platform GME According to CIM 1 1 MANAGE MONITOR MANAGE MONITOR * * Host System ComputerSystem (Virtual System) Application / Grid Component APPLICATION VIEW SERVER VIEW 18

Use Relationship Enterprise Datacenter GME Application GME 1..* Datacenter GME 1 USES Application GME Virtualization Platform GME According to CIM Host System ComputerSystem (Virtual System) 1 Application / Grid Component 1 USES OWNED BY VirtualSystemSettingData VirtualSystemManagementCapabilities ResourceAllocationSettingData:PROC 19 ResourceAllocationSettingData:MEM

Relation to CIM System Virtualization Profile Application / Grid Component Uses Virtual System ComputerSystem HostedBy Host System ComputerSystem CPU Pool CPUs CPUs CPUs Virtual CPUs AllocatedFromPool Memory Pool Mem Mem Mem Virtual Memory AllocatedFromPool 20

No direct communication between Application and Computer System Communication Paths Enterprise 1 COMMUNICATION 1..* Datacenter GME Query avail servers Query avail resources Notification when resource is changed Application GME 1 1..* Virtualization Platform GME According to CIM Query avail resources Query capabilities Change settings Request resources Host System ComputerSystem (Virtual System) Application / Grid Component VirtualSystemSettingData No direct communication between Application and Computer System VirtualSystemManagementCapabilities ResourceAllocationSettingData:PROC 21 ResourceAllocationSettingData:MEM

Policy Hierarchy Enterprise Application GME Business Policy Service Level End-to-end response time / overall throughput Max/min resource allocation (processor, memory, …) Business priority Security level Availability level 1 * Application GME Derived Policy Response time / throughput Max/min resource allocation (processor, memory, …) Relative priority / weight Security settings (isolation, encryption) Availability settings (HighAvailability, multipathing) 22

Workload Management Enterprise Datacenter GME Application GME COMMUNICATION Datacenter GME Enterprise Work- load Manager Business Policy Business priority 1 * Application GME Virtualization Platform GME Local Workload Manager Derived Policy Relative priority MONITOR Application / Grid Component Host System ComputerSystem (Virtual System) 23

Workload Management Enterprise Datacenter GME Application GME Load Balancer GRAM Enterprise Work- load Manager 1 * Application GME Virtualization Platform GME Dispatcher Local Workload Manager MONITOR Application / Grid Component Host System ComputerSystem (Virtual System) 24

Workstreams Workstream 1: High-level Use Cases Description & Alignment of Grid Reference Architecture in the Context of System Virtualization Define the requirements to the grid architecture for integration with system virtualization platforms Workstream 2: Refine the Resizing and Migration Use Case Define Interaction among the components in the architecture to create / discover, configure and start a Virtual System Describe relationship to SVPC Model Workstream 3: Refine the Provisioning Use Case Describe relationship to SVPC Model & OVF (Open Virtual Machine Format) 25

Appendix 26

Recap: Evolution of Server Virtualization 3rd Gen… Infrastructure-wide Virtualization 2006 + ... 2nd Generation Virtual Infrastructure Automation Aggregation Availability Optimization 1st Generation Single System Hypervisor-based Stack 2003-2006 Central Management Central Management 1999-2003 Enterprise-Class Virtualization Enterprise-Class Virtualization VM … HW VM … HW VM … HW Source: VMWare 27