Explorative Analysis of the Implications and Compliance of the Protection of Personal Information (POPI) Act in a Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Institution:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Equality and Human Rights Agenda and the Possible Implications for Regulation David Darton, Director of Foresight, Equality and Human Rights Commission.
Advertisements

Identity Management In A Federated Environment Identity Protection and Management Conference Presented by Samuel P. Jenkins, Director Defense Privacy and.
Introduction to the APPs and the OAIC’s regulatory approach Presented by: Este Darin-Cooper Director, Regulation and Strategy May 2015.
The UK Statistics and Registrations Services Act Tanvi Desai Data Manager LSE Research Laboratory Research Laboratory IASSIST Tampere.
Code of Conduct for Mobile Money Providers 6 November 2014 All material © GSMA The policy advocacy and regulatory work of the GSMA Mobile Money team.
LOCAL GOVERNANCE IN THE 21 ST CENTURY: FRAUD, CORRUPTION AND ETHICS (THE UGANDA EXPERIENCE) PAPER PRESENTED AT TRAINING WORKSHOP HELD AT DOCKLANDS HOTEL.
Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) Dr. Hans Born Senior Fellow, 1 November 2005, Geneva 1. SSG:
Your cybersecurity breach will happen! Here’s what to do to mitigate your risk Thursday, 25 September 2014.
Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) Component Three US Department of Justice/OPDAT (Office of Overseas Prosecutorial Development, Assistance and Training)
HIPAA PRIVACY AND SECURITY AWARENESS.
“What’s Ethics Got To Do With It” Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Gary Kent Head Governance Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
EU Data Protection IT Governance view Ger O’Mahony 12 th October 2011.
1 Information Sharing Environment (ISE) Privacy Guidelines Jane Horvath Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer.
Data Protection Act AS Module Heathcote Ch. 12.
Medical Law and Ethics, Third Edition Bonnie F. Fremgen Copyright ©2009 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.
A REPORT ON GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 1999 SUMMIT RESOLUTIONS : 26 TH MARCH 2003 A review and revision of legislation COMBATING CORRUPTION A review.
New Pensions Act Developments: What you need to know Yvonne White & Jerry Moriarty The Pensions Board 18 April, 2007.
PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA. OECD GUIDELINES: BASIC PRINCIPLES OF NATIONAL APPLICATION Collection Limitation Principle There should be limits to the collection.
Ethics enhancing Local Government Accountability IMFO CONFERENCE 06 October 2015, Emperors’ Palace Presenter : Manfred Moses : ESAAG & Office of the Accountant-General,
Data Ethics Levette Williams Associate Superintendent Technology Services Brad Bryant, State Superintendent of Schools “We will lead the nation in improving.
31 October The African Policing Civilian Oversight Forum (APCOF) is a network of state and civil society African practitioners active in policing.
Information Security TechLink Seminar, 17 April 2013 James Knapton, Information Compliance Officer, Registrary’s Office.
Introduction to the Australian Privacy Principles & the OAIC’s regulatory approach Privacy Awareness Week 2016.
The Health Information Protection Act. What is the Health Information Protection Act (HIPA)? HIPA is legislation that speaks to access to, and protection.
Protection of Personal Information Act An Analysis on the impact.
Monique Jefferson & Nadine Mather
By: Ms Peterlia Ramutsheli
BRIEFING BY THE NATIONAL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
Portfolio Committee on Police DNA National Forensics Oversight and Ethics Board 23 November 2016.
Chapter 9 Ethics and Professional Practice in IT
(Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services)
Privacy principles Individual written policies
Strategic Communications Training Freedom of Information X State MDA
OVERVIEW OF THE ASMAL REPORT
EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT, No 55, 1998 (EEA)
Dining with Diabetes IRB Training 2017.
General Data Protection Regulation
Data protection issues in regulatory investigations
General Data Protection Regulations Preparing for the upcoming changes in data protection law David Jones & Angharad Williams.
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON SPORT AND RECREATION ON
Data Protection Legislation
GDPR support January GDPR support January 2018.
Research Ethics Matthew Billington
Notifiable data breaches Roundtable
GDPR - Individual’s Rights
Refuah Community Health Collaborative (RCHC) PPS
Implications of the PoPI Act for the higher education sector
Learning Lab Workshop: Protecting Human Rights through PSIRA’s Code of Conduct 13 November 2017 Margaret Gichanga: Research and Development Unit
G.D.P.R General Data Protection Regulations
The Public Sector Equality Duty
The GDPR & Schools - An Introduction -
General Data Protection Regulation
Faculty’s Role in Accommodating Disabilities
Data Protection principles
Data Protection What’s new about The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) May 2018? Call Kerry on Or .
GDPR - New Data Protection Regulation
CIGFARO CONFERENCE 9 OCTOBER 2018.
Gem Complete Health Services
The Elements of appropriate Internal Controls
IAPP TRUSTe SYMPOSIUM 9-11 JUNE 2004
The Public Sector Equality Duty
Purpose & Overview of the Office of Health Standards Compliance
PRIVACY PRESENTATION TO THE SPRING 2013 CONFERENCE BY HANK MOORLAG
Portfolio Committee on Police DNA National Forensics Oversight and Ethics Board 23 November 2016.
MAC Input on Section 4.9 Review
Getting Ready For GDPR Simon Marks Director
Presentation transcript:

Explorative Analysis of the Implications and Compliance of the Protection of Personal Information (POPI) Act in a Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Institution: Are we there Yet? 26 October 2017 Nelson Masindi & Matseliso Palesa Molapo Department of Institutional Research and Business Intelligence

Presentation overview Objectives Background What is the POPI Act Non-compliance to POPI Act Pre POPI Act: Practices of accessing information Compliance to the Act Institutional Risks of access to personal Information Recommendations

Objective This presentation seeks to explore how the university is fairing in implementing the Protection of Personal Information (POPI) Act with possible recommendations. Provide a platform for discussion of how other institutions are doing in implementing the Act

Background As a public and Open Distance Learning (ODL) institution the University of South Africa (Unisa) provides access to more than 380,000 students per year who come from diverse backgrounds in Africa and beyond. As a comprehensive distance education the values of the institutions espouses the values of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa [4], particularly human integrity, the achievement of equality and social justice (Access to Information Manual 2006). The introduction of the POPI Act has forced universities and other like institutions to reconsider their policies and practices in personal information management and access and how they have been conducting business.

What is the POPI Act The Protection of Personal Information (POPI) Act was passed in the National Assembly of the Republic of South Africa and enacted on 26 November 2013 and its purpose is to prevent the unauthorised disclosure of personal information. It is there to ensure that all South African institutions conduct themselves in a responsible manner when collecting, processing, storing and sharing of anyone’s personal information by holding them accountable should they abuse or compromise anyone’s personal information in any way.

What is the POPI Act It is founded on Section 14 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, which provides that everyone has the right to privacy. Academic institutions now have a legal obligation to ensure that the personal information about students and staff is sufficiently managed and protected. They can only disclose this information with the consent of the individuals. While the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) provides for access to information, POPI cautions against dissemination of personal information without the consent of the affected individuals. The system of government in South Africa before 27 April 1994, amongst others, resulted in a secretive and unresponsive culture in public and private bodies which often led to an abuse of power and human rights violations The right of access to any information held by a public or private body may be limited to the extent that the limitations are reasonable and justifiable in an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom as contemplated in section 36 of the Constitution

Non-compliance to POPI? Institutions that do not comply with the POPI Act face possible prison terms and fines of up to R10-million; further financial losses due to legal proceedings, and damage to the reputation of the institution The office of the regulator has been established and will be in effect 2018 .

Pre POPI Act: Access to Information Internal staff could access information from different points, although it had some advantage to the University, there were some information security concerns. Internal academics and regional centre staff could access personal student information using their credentials to logging into the systems without any clearance from the department head or managers. Although there were concerns with the risk associated with access to personal student information regarding security and trust there is a Policy on Data Protection, which guide staff and remind them about their role on usage of such information.

Pre POPI Act: Access to Information External requests to access institutional data were handled more carefully and were only processed when the required A form is received and permission is granted by the UNISA legal department to submit the information. The information was granted in aggregated format without any personal identifiable features

Institutional Risks of access to personal Information

Compliance to the Act Establishment of the New Directorate: Institutional Information The role of the Directorate: Institutional Information is to monitor business processes and ensure compliance with the legislation, understanding of the requirements by business owners, and to provide amendments to business processes, thereby enshrining the fundamental rights of privacy within Unisa business practice. Perform Personal Information Risk Assessment of Data Subjects Implement Safeguards/ Action Plans to address risks identified Conduct POPI Act Awareness and Training Investigation and resolution of reported privacy related breaches Provide advices and guidance on POPI Act related enquiries

Requirements to accessing personal Information Any member of staff who, during the course of their official duties, requires access to personal student information must apply for permission to access. Applications must include the following: Reasons why an applicant believe should have access to “Function 195”. A letter of motivation from line manager (at least at the level of a Deputy Director). For instance, it is now more complicate for a lecturer to get her/his student information and it takes much longer because he/she has to complete a form, motivate for wanting such information, get signature/ approval from the line manager then send to the office of Registrar/ Deputy Registrar for approval. If the application is approved

Compliance to the Act The university revoked all staff members’ access to personal student information on what is called “Function 195”. Access is now limited to designate departments managing student and staff data within the university to protect both the confidentiality and integrity of the information.

RECOMMENDATIONS Establishing institutional policy/strategy that will govern the implementation of the Act. Establishing a central unit for the management of institutional databases. Educating and training staff on the ethics of information security. Incorporating POPI into the day-to-day operations of an institution. Engagement with institutional stakeholders in the implementation of the Act. Removal/minimising of unnecessary requirements for personal information on institutional templates.

Recommendations Minimising/limiting access points of personal information. Aligning job function and access to personal information. Entering into contractual agreements with service providers to ensure adherence to POPI. Destroying used personal data after a period of five years

Central Data/Information Management Unit Recommendations Align job funtion to information access Central Data/Information Management Unit Align job function to information access Reduce amount of information collected Closing many access point of information Provide information security awareness training Reduced staff access to information Contractual agreements with service provider who process information on behalf of the institution adhere to POPI Act

Are We there Yet? Is the Institution ready for the kick-start the POPI Act regulatory processes in 2018?