Test Slant Well Project Permit Amendment (Coastal Commission Agenda Item Tu 15a) Date: Oct. 6, 2015 Presented by CAW at the Oct. 6, 2015, California Coastal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District 1 11.Consider Proposed Agreement with California American Water Regarding Management and Operation of Aquifer.
Advertisements

Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program Regional Board, Coalitions, and Landowner/Operators “What is this program about and where is it going?”
Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit Overview of Requirements, Recommended Changes, and Assistance Needed March 12, 2009.
Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project - Presentation to Monterey Co. Water Resources Agency June 25, 2012.
Community GPU Forums California Native Plant Society, Monterey Bay Chapter Carmel Valley Association Citizens for Responsible Growth Coalition to Protect.
1 SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE: SANTA CLARA LAFCO’s EXPERIENCE August 31, 2007 CALAFCO CONFERENCE Sacramento.
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) Regulations - Update Meg Collins Colorado Livestock Association & Landon Gates Colorado Farm Bureau Water.
Bob Evans, Director Lexington Field Office Office of Surface Mining Reclamation & Enforcement.
Monterey Rate Application Satellite Systems May 13, 2008.
Policy Position Statement.  Ground Water Replenishment (GWR) - by Monterey Regional Pollution Control Agency (MRWPCA) and Monterey Peninsula Water Management.
Brooten Area Water Use June 19, Brooten – Initial Conflict Study Area.
Review of Subsurface Seawater Intakes DEIR, Monterey Desal Project DRAFT Presentation to Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority 23 June 2015.
Permits to Take Water: What you need to know.
Development of Sediment Quality Objectives for California Bays and Estuaries Overview and Meeting Objectives Steven Bay Southern California Coastal Water.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Region 10 Regional Response Team Northwest Area Committee Seattle, WA February 12, 2014 EFSEC.
Jim Heitzman General Manager Marina Coast Water District
Evolution of Judicial Specialization in Environmental Law – United States Asian Judges Symposium Manila, Philippines July 2010.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Jim Luce, EFSEC Chair Port Of Vancouver Presentation Vancouver, WA June 27, 2013 EFSEC These Slides.
Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District 1 Confirm Scope of Work and Description for MPWMD ASR Project Item 13 April 18, 2005 Regular Meeting Staff.
Technical Workshops on Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project A July 26 & 27, 2012.
Presentation to the HELLENIC MEDITERRANEAN PANEL HELLENIC MEDITERRANEAN PANEL (Athens, Greece - 23 October 2008)On US DISCHARGE STANDARDS -The NPDES Program-
CALIFORNIA LAW OF SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER
1 Update Ocean Desalination Feasibility Studies Karl Seckel Assistant General Manager.
South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination (SOCOD) Project Dana Point/Doheny Beach, California November 2010 Status.
Drakes Estero Point Reyes National Seashore. History of DBOC permit violations In February 2012, the California Coastal Commission advised DBOC that.
Ag Land Trust (formerly Monterey County Agricultural and Historic Land Conservancy) August 12, 2011 California Coastal Commission.
Sonoma Valley Groundwater Management Planning. 2 Presentation Overview SCWA/USGS Groundwater Study Stakeholder Assessment Groundwater Management Work.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Draft Cease and Desist Order Community Leader Workshop March 28, 2008.
Since November letters or comments have been submitted from: Natural Resource Defense Council Suja Lowenthal, Long Beach City Councilmember 2 nd District.
MARCH 13, 2014 CCC HEARING SOUTH BAY SUBSTATION RELOCATION PROJECT (SDG&E) CDP #E ; Th11b.
California Coastal Commission Appeal A-1-MEN (Wernette) De Novo Hearing.
Bay Club Marina Reconstruction Coastal Commission Hearing December 15, 2010; Agenda Item W16b These materials have been provided to the Coastal Commission.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Situation Assessment Jay Jasperse, Sonoma County Water Agency Gina Bartlett, Center for Collaborative Policy January.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Flow Standard Amendment to New York’s Water Quality Standards Regulations Scott J. Stoner Chief, Standards.
I TEM T U 15 A – CDP N UMBERS A-3-MRA A1 & A1 Located at the CEMEX Facility City of Marina Monterey County C ALIFORNIA C OASTAL C OMMISSION.
Date: November 12, 2014 Presented by CAW at the California Coastal Commission hearing T E S T S L A N T W E L L P R O J E C T.
Item W16a February 8, 2012 CCC Hearing A-6-OCN (Altman) 1823 South Pacific Street City of Oceanside.
GBLWMP-SLUP Integration Meeting February 4-5, 2010 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board.
Date: December 17, 2014 Presented by CAW at the California State Lands Commission hearing T E S T S L A N T W E L L P R O J E C T.
May 14, Planning Commission Planning Commission May 14, 2015.
Proposed Ordinance for Temporary Moratorium on Medical Cannabis Activities within Unincorporated Orange Count y Health Services Department Board of County.
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 12-14,
Proposed Zone RR Here’s a map of the City’s preferential parking zones, with 4th Street and adjacent. The residents petitioned as they were concerned with.
Central Valley Flood Protection Plan Senate Bill 5 Amendments
PowerButte: Solar Overlay Replacement with PowerButte Guide
December 2016.
Large scale development groundwater balance
California Coastal Commission Appeal No. A-4-MAL
Amendment to the Cooperative Agreement with Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District for Upper Temescal Valley Salt and Nutrient Management Plan Jayne.
Erosion Hazard Near Sensitive Waterbodies
Summit County Council Public Hearing September 28, 2016
Arsenic Acceptable Ambient Level Revision
Linden County Water District
Zone 7 And WaterFix March 7, 2018
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
PROPOSITION November Water Bond Act
2018 Kern County Water Summit
FISCAL YEAR Discussion on Mid-Year Budget Adjustment:
Brackish Water Desalination Project
Delta Water Supply Project
Kindergarten Student Entrance Profile
NOTIFICATIONS OF TIME EXTENSIONS
Salt/Nutrient Management Plans
Charles Case Hunton & Williams LLP (919)
Salt and Nutrient Management Plans
A Brief History of Regional Water Supply Plans and Projects
Status after Second Year of Work Implementing the Recommendations of the Santa Cruz Water Supply Advisory Committee Joint Meeting Santa Cruz City Council.
California Water Commission
Presentation transcript:

Test Slant Well Project Permit Amendment (Coastal Commission Agenda Item Tu 15a) Date: Oct. 6, 2015 Presented by CAW at the Oct. 6, 2015, California Coastal Commission hearing

Cal-Am Concurs with Staff Cal-Am fully supports the Commission’s Staff Report, recommended actions and findings Cal-Am also agrees with all of the expert conclusions of the Commission’s independent hydrogeologist

Court Fully Upheld Test Slant Well CDPs Commission unanimously approved the CDPs for this temporary scientific test project project in Nov. 2014 Two lawsuits challenged the Commission’s approval Santa Cruz Superior Court fully upheld the Commission's approval and its CEQA review of the Project The Court fully rejected each of the opponent’s claims The Court found the Project would not result in groundwater impacts

Approved Project Goals Gather important data re: geologic, hydrogeologic, and water quality characteristics in the underlying aquifers Key to determining the feasibility of slant wells for water production in the area of the Monterey Bay Subsurface intakes are the preferred method of seawater intake by coastal regulators Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary requires that the feasibility of such intakes be investigated Subsurface intakes require research to establish a location with ample water supply and acceptable water quality that will not impact inland groundwater supplies

Test Well Construction and Operation Monitoring well data showed that regional groundwater levels declined in Spring 2015, prior to Project pumping Major construction completed in Feb. 2015; finishing work and initial tests occurred in March 2015, and pumping began in April and continued until June 5, 2015 From April to June, water levels continued the downward trend at MW-4 and approached a 1.5 foot decline Pumping stopped on June 5 to comply with Special Condition 11 Based on data from when the test well was both on and off, the Hydrogeologic Working Group determined that the test well may have contributed (if at all) to at most a ¼ foot drop at MW-4 This is less than groundwater modeling projected

Regional Groundwater Trends HWG determined that downward trends in water levels were due to factors other than the test slant well Since June 5, MW-4 continues to decline in response to regional groundwater pumping inland “These seasonal declines are not a result of the cone of depression from one or a few wells, but rather a cumulative decline in groundwater levels and groundwater storage from tens to hundreds of pumping wells. . .” HWG Letter to Charles Lester (July 23, 2015)

Proposed CDP Amendment is Narrow The proposed CDP amendment does not re-open the Commission’s prior findings concerning the Project as a whole The amendment is narrowly focused on a single condition To ensure that the condition governing groundwater monitoring is protective and can be practically implemented given observed changes in regional groundwater levels

Amendment to Special Condition 11 Intent of Special Condition 11 was to establish a performance standard to ensure that test well would not cause water level decreases or salinity increases greater than modeling results In order for these performance standards to work in practice, they must be applied against regional trends in water levels and salinity not caused by the test well The amendment would retain previously approved numerical standards, but would compare monitoring results to observed regional trends The Commission’s independent hydrogeologist confirmed that in the proposed language for Special Condition 11, “the threshold values and monitoring approach are appropriate for preventing impacts to agricultural groundwater”

Opponent Claims are Not Supported Monitoring well data shows no measurable effects from the test well outside 2,500 feet Data shows no effect in 400 Foot Aquifer Data confirms test slant well pumps water from Dune Sand and 180 Foot Aquifers – both intruded with seawater in capture zone Expert analysis confirms that Special Condition 11’s standards will protect groundwater and that no adverse impacts will occur

Broad Community Support Surfrider Foundation Sierra Club Salinas Valley Water Coalition Planning and Conservation League Foundation Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency Monterey Peninsula Water Management District Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority Monterey County Water Resources Agency Monterey County Farm Bureau LandWatch Monterey County County of Monterey Coalition of Peninsula Businesses CPUC Office of Ratepayer Advocates City of Pacific Grove California American Water All support the test slant well at the CEMEX site (Signatories to CPUC Settlement)

Recommendation Cal-Am respectfully requests that the Commission approve the permit amendment and adopt the findings in the Staff Report