Peer Editing Rhetorical Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Revising and Editing TRANSFORMING YOUR PAPER FOR YOUR AUDIENCE COPYRIGHT LISA MCNEILLEY, 2010.
Advertisements

6+1 Traits of Writing. Welcome to Writing Class! September 13, 2011  Objective: Students will define, compare, and contrast the 6 Traits of Writing.
Peer Editing Remember to check each paper thoroughly.
GA Writing Assessment 5 th Grade – March 2, minutes Use #2 pencil Writing booklet provided.
Revising and Editing Your Research Paper. Self-Revision In the revision step, focus on the following questions and strategies:  Assignment requirements:
AP Prompt #2: Prose Prompt. The FREE RESPONSE prompt (almost) ALWAYS asks… …what it contributes the meaning of the work as a whole …how it illuminates.
Presented by: Kelly Tsai
1)Read through and mark-up text. 2)After you've finished editing the paper, tell the writer what you as a reader are finding in the text. Writer listens-
TAKS Writing Rubric
Category 5 Above standards 4 Meets standards 3 Meets standards but needs work 2 Approaching standards 1 Below standards 0 Introduction/ Thesis Engaging.
How to Write an Excellent AP English Language and Composition Essay
 Reading Quiz  Peer Critiques  Evaluating Peer Critiques.
© 2015 The College Board The Redesigned SAT Essay Writing Oakland Schools.
The 6+1 Traits of Writing Your guide to earning an “A” in Ms. Love’s class and meeting our BIG GOAL…
An Introduction. “An AP course in English Language and Composition engages students in becoming skilled readers of prose written in a variety of rhetorical.
+ Week 6: Analysis of the Drafting Process ENGL 1301 Mrs. Edlin.
Georgia High School Writing Test (GHSWT). Introduction: Scoring Information2 Weighting of Domains Weighting means that the scores in some writing domains.
After Reading KEY TRAITS Writing Workshop Editorial...continued 1.IDEAS Identifies the issue clearly Presents a clear, logical claim in a thesis statement.
2 nd Draft Peer Review …Stuff’s gettin’ serious now!
Persuasive Essay What We Know…..
DPS • English Copyright © 2017 mrshawke.com
How to Write an Argumentative Essay
The Thesis Statement.
How to Write an Argumentative Essay
How To Write a Rhetorical Analysis
Explanatory/Informative Writing
Writer’s Workshop The Compare/Contrast Argument
Diction Syntax Punctuation tone
Personal Narrative/ College Essay
Rhetorical Analysis Essay
Writing Workshop: Courage & heroism
Reworking your ideas in the best way possible.
Analyzing a text using SOAPSTone
Text analysis Letter from Birmingham Jail
March 21 SSR Quick Write – What would the world be like if paper and other paper products were no longer available? Score Essays.
How to transform my outline to an ‘A’wesome essay!!
Intro to Rhetorical Analysis
FOCUS: IDEAS, ORGANIZATION
PURPOSE/FOCUS/ORGANIZATION
6+1 Traits of Writing Creative Writing.
Overview: Rhetorical Analysis Essay
Writing a Paragraph.
Warm Up 10/21 Just answer this one question today: what is the difference between editing and revising?
PURPOSE/FOCUS/ORGANIZATION
Writing a Research Paper (Cont.)
• provides a meaningful thesis that is responsive to the writing task.
English Week 2 – Monday, June 4.
Writing: Rhetoric and Relevance
Critical Analysis Analyzing a Text.
COMMUNICATION STUDIES ONE
Welcome to 11AP English Language and Composition
Editing vs Proofreading
Modified by Pamela Fox Original Created by D. Herring
RHETORICAL ANALYSIS.
Composition and Rhetoric I Lesson 1
How To Write a Rhetorical Analysis
What it is and how to write one
Informative Essay.
Essay.
COMMUNICATION STUDIES ONE
GEE’S Writing RULES.
Parts of an Essay Ms. Ruttgaizer.
Parts of an Essay.
The Thesis Statement.
The Writing Process: Drafting/Revising/Editing
ACT English – Rhetorical Strategies Review
INFORMATIVE ESSAY RUBRIC
Tips for AP Exam!.
Editing and Revising Lesson #12.
“The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allen Poe
Presentation transcript:

Peer Editing Rhetorical Analysis Information taken in part from Stanford University

Name of paper author: Name of Peer reviewer: Paper title: Please label a blank piece of notebook paper with the following information: Name of paper author: Name of Peer reviewer: Paper title:

Thesis 1. Is the thesis easily identifiable? If you cannot find the thesis, you need to let the author know. If you’ve found one (may be split into two sentences), is it a good thesis? How could it be improved in terms of argument or writing? Where is it in the paper? At the beginning of the introduction? At the end of the introduction? Is this an effective choice?

Introduction Strategies. 2. Does the introduction make you want to keep reading? Why or why not? Is there a distinct writer’s voice that is engaging? Is it a fairly traditional opening? Is it relatively clear and free from errors? How would you characterize the writing strategies used in the introduction? Is the name of the author and title of the excerpt included? Does it address Speaker, Occasion, Audience, and Purpose?

Introduction: Follow-through. 3. Having read the rest of the paper, did you find that the introduction gave you a good idea of what the author actually addressed in the rest of the paper? If not, what is the main point that the author really makes? Did the introduction give you a clear focus as to where the paper was going?

Introduction & Conclusion. 4. Think about the relationship between the introduction and conclusion. Does the conclusion work simply as a summary or a reiteration/rephrasing of the introduction? Does the author use other writing strategies in his/her conclusion? Is it a successful conclusion in that it offers closure to the paper while emphasizing the main thesis strongly one last time?

Development of Ideas. 5. Are the main points of the paper sufficiently developed? Does the paper bring up any interesting points that you would like to see developed further? Do you find any spots where the paper goes off on a tangent or addresses peripheral/irrelevant material? Are there any spots where the author relies too heavily on generalization?

Organization of Argument. 6. Is the argument organized effectively? Do the ideas follow each other in a logical, understandable way? Are there any places that are confusing? Are the strategies listed in the prompt found in the content of the essay? Are the rhetorical strategies discussed in the essay in the order they are mentioned in the thesis?

Transitions. 7. How are the transitions between paragraphs? Mark with * on the paper one transition that worked really well and write out below why you thought it was successful. Mark with an x on the paper one transition that is less polished and write out below why it doesn't work as well.   * X

Paragraphing. 8. Think about the paragraphs themselves for a moment. Does the author use topic sentences? Is that a successful decision? Are the paragraphs more or less cohesive -- i.e. do they focus on/develop one idea? Are any paragraphs too long or too short for easy reading?

Style I. 9. Is the point of view consistent throughout the paper? Does the author use precise, vivid language? Is there unnecessary repetition? Conversely, does the author use repetition deliberately for rhetorical effect? Is that successful? Give examples as applicable.

Style II. 10. Does s/he vary sentence structure? Are there too many short, choppy sentences, or ones that are overly complex and need to be broken up? How do the sentences flow into one another? Do you find any places where it seems that author deliberately has manipulated the organization of his/her sentences to enhance this sense of flow?

Syntax I. 11. Write out below one sentence that you really liked and why you liked it.

Syntax II. 12. Write out below one sentence that you thought could have used improvement and why.

Grammar & Punctuation. 13. Are there any grammatical/mechanical errors (including problems with punctuation)? Are there any consistent problems with diction, usage, or words misused that you can point out to the author?

Treatment of Primary Text. 14. Did the author describe the text effectively? Was it reproduced effectively within the paper? Did the concrete details match and showcase the claims? Was there at anytime too much “retelling?” Are there any aspects of the text that could be analyzed further to contribute to the impact of the argument? Was there something you found stylistically compelling that the author failed to mention?

Free-write 15. Free-write general comments to the author, reflecting on the paper and your experience of reading it.