Figure Legend: From: Comparing integration rules in visual search

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure Legend: From: Human grasp point selection
Advertisements

From: What limits performance in the amblyopic visual system: Seeing signals in noise with an amblyopic brain Journal of Vision. 2008;8(4):1. doi: /8.4.1.
From: Complex interactions between spatial, orientation, and motion cues for biological motion perception across visual space Journal of Vision. 2013;13(2):8.
From: Attentive and pre-attentive aspects of figural processing
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
From: Development of a Rat Schematic Eye From In Vivo Biometry and the Correction of Lateral Magnification in SD-OCT Imaging Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci..
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(3):24. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(7):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2003;3(11):7. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(12):7. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Visual illusions based on single-field contrast asynchronies
From: Color signals in the primary visual cortex of marmosets
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):3. doi: /4.9.3 Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
From: What are the units of storage in visual working memory?
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(9):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Does print size matter for reading
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(16):13. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The natural statistics of blur
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: An escape from crowding
From: Noise masking of White's illusion exposes the weakness of current spatial filtering models of lightness perception Journal of Vision. 2015;15(14):1.
From: RenderToolbox3: MATLAB tools that facilitate physically based stimulus rendering for vision research Journal of Vision. 2014;14(2):6. doi: /
From: Does spatial invariance result from insensitivity to change?
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Surface color perception and equivalent illumination models
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(6):4. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(6):14. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Contour extracting networks in early extrastriate cortex
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(5):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(12):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Rat performance on visual detection task modeled with divisive normalization and adaptive decision thresholds Journal of Vision. 2011;11(9):1. doi: /
Figure Legend: From: Latitude and longitude vertical disparities
From: The vertical horopter is not adaptable, but it may be adaptive
From: Motion processing with two eyes in three dimensions
From: Probing visual consciousness: Rivalry between eyes and images
From: Linear–nonlinear models of the red–green chromatic pathway
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(1):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(10):5. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: What's color got to do with it
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(15):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility
Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
Figure Legend: From: Measuring visual clutter
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Four types of ensemble coding in data visualizations
Figure Legend: From: Spatial structure of contextual modulation
Figure Legend: From: The absolute threshold of cone vision
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2014;14(8):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(12):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(5):2. doi: /6.5.2 Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(3):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Neural bandwidth of veridical perception across the visual field
Visual Search and Attention
Presentation transcript:

Figure Legend: From: Comparing integration rules in visual search Journal of Vision. 2002;2(8):3. doi:10.1167/2.8.3 Figure Legend: Representation of the Signed-Max model. The big horizontally oriented panel shows the two detectors tuned to opposite orientations with respect to vertical, as a function of the angle of a stimulus. The detectors for CCW and CW orientations are represented by dashed red and continuous blue lines, respectively. The small oriented gratings along the abscissa show the orientation range spanned by these detectors, with the vertical orientation in green and a possible target orientation in dark gray. Because we do not have vertical targets, the two detectors produce responses of different strengths to a tilted target. The mean response strengths of the two detectors are marked by horizontal lines that project to the vertical panel on the right, where the response of the CCW detector to the target is represented by a dashed red line, that of the CW detector by a continuous blue line, and the overlapping mean response of the two detectors to the distractor(s) by a dotted green line. The small vertical panel on the right shows the variability of these mean responses. The response probability distributions are centered at the output response of the respective detectors and have noise (σ) from internal and, in our experiment, external sources. This figure shows the effect of a CW-oriented stimulus, but the same rationale holds for a CCW target. Date of download: 11/10/2017 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2017. All rights reserved.