The Effect of Key Organizational Attributes on Cancer Screening Rates

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Discussion of Cancer Screening: Between- vs. Within- Physician Differences Yuhua Bao, Ph.D., Sarah Fox,
Advertisements

Covariates of perceived colon cancer risk Jennifer Hay, Ph.D., Elliot Coups, Ph.D., & Jennifer Ford, Ph.D. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences.
Understanding Those Who Do and Do Not Plan to Get Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Costanza ME, White MJ, Stark JR, Stoddard AM, Avrunin JS, Luckmann.
Anxiety/Depression Diagnoses and Antidepressant Prescribing Patterns by Primary Care and Psychiatric Specialties, NAMCS Coauthors: Isabel Lagomasino,
Sex Differences in the Prevalence and Correlates of Colorectal Cancer Testing: Health Information National Trends Survey Sally W. Vernon 1, Amy.
¡Celebremos La Salud!: A cancer prevention program for Hispanic and non-Hispanic White women living in a rural area Silvia Tejeda, MPH Doctoral Candidate.
Cancer Prevention in Taiwan
® Introduction The Skinny on Obesity in Texas: BMI in Texas Family Medicine Clinics Kristin M. Yeung, Ramin Poursani, MD, Sandra K. Burge, PhD The University.
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
Knowledge, Cancer Fatalism and Spirituality as Predictors of Breast Cancer Screening Practices for African American and Caucasian Women Staci T. Anderson,
Heart Health Project University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine American Heart Association Pennsylvania State University Funded by the Robert Wood Johnson.
Preventive Health Care Use in Elderly Uterine Cancer Survivors Division of Health Policy and Management School of Public Health University of Minnesota.
Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening, attitudes and information preferences Joan M. Griffin, PhD Greta Friedemann-Sánchez, PhD Diana Burgess,
Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D.
Health Disparities and Multicultural Practice Clarence H. Braddock III, MD, MPH, FACP Associate Professor of Medicine Associate Dean, Medical Education.
Colorectal Cancer Screening in Appalachia PA: a pilot intervention project William Curry, MD, MS Dept of Family & Community Medicine M.S.Hershey Medical.
Internet educated patients, the patient-physician relationship, and cancer screening Yuliya Shneyderman.
Quality Measurement and Gender Differences in Managed Care Populations with Chronic Diseases Ann F. Chou Carol Weisman Arlene Bierman Sarah Hudson Scholle.
Module 2: Quality and Quality Measures The degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes.
Colorectal Cancer Survivorship in Greene County, Pennsylvania: Assessment and Provider Education Mary Ann Ealy, Marlene Shaw and Carolyn Wissenbach Background.
Put Prevention Into Practice. Understand the PPIP Program What is Put Prevention Into Practice (PPIP)? What is Put Prevention Into Practice (PPIP)? Why.
Physician Practice Style and Barriers to Referral: Los Angeles Women’s Health Study Danielle Rose Ash, PhD VA HSR&D/Greater Los Angeles Care System Co-Authors:
Trends in Cervical & Breast Cancer Screening Practices among Women in Rural & Urban Areas of the United States AcademyHealth 2008 Gender and Health Interest.
Assessing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Appalachia PA William Curry, MD, MS Mark Dignan, PhD Gene Lengerich, VMD Alan Adelman, MD, MS.
Medicaid and the 4 A’s: Use of 1115 Waivers and State Plan Amendments American Cancer Society Washington, Dc June 5, 2008 Erin Reidy
Strategies to Improve Clinical Practice Through Guidelines: Experience from Recent Studies Michael Cabana (UCSF) Rebecca Beyth (University of Florida)
Routine Preventive Care and Cancer Surveillance in Long-Term Survivors (LTS) of Colorectal Cancer: Results from NSABP Protocol LTS-01 Hiroko Kunitake MD.
Factors Predicting Stage of Adoption for Fecal Occult Blood Testing and Colonoscopy among Non-Adherent African Americans Hsiao-Lan Wang, PhD, RN, CMSRN,
Using Multiple Data Sources to Understand Variable Interventions Bruce E. Landon, M.D., M.B.A. Harvard Medical School AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting.
Improving Cancer Screening Among Low Income Women: a randomized controlled trial NCI R01 CA87776 Allen J. Dietrich, MD NAPCRG 2005 Annual Meeting October.
Effectiveness of Patient Navigation on Diagnostic Interval, Anxiety, and Satisfaction of Minority Women with Abnormal Mammograms: a Randomized Controlled.
Patterns of HPV vaccination among Latinos: Key factors for consideration Rachel A. Reimer, PhD Chair Department of Public Health Director MPH program Associate.
Arnold School of Public Health Health Services Policy and Management 1 Women’s Cancer Screening Services Utilization Versus Their Insurance Source Presenter:
CONCLUSIONS New Jersey’s Emergency Department HIV testing sites report higher seroprevalence than non-ED testing sites. Since University Hospital began.
Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines and Rates of Chlamydia Screening Allison Ursu, MD Ananda Sen, PhD Mack Ruffin, MD, MPH April 27, 2015 Department of.
Previous cancer screening behavior as predictor of colon cancer screening among women aged 50 and over Rafael Guerrero-Preston DrPH, MPH APHA 135th Annual.
How Do We Individualize Guidelines in an Era of Personalized Medicine? Douglas K. Owens, MD, MS VA Palo Alto Health Care System Stanford University, Stanford.
Aka STEEL VALLEY SENIORS SURVEY (SVSS)
What does the data tell us? Colorectal CANCER IN NEVADA
Insured Women Are More Likely to Receive Cancer Screenings Than Uninsured Women, 2016 Percent of women Notes: “Continuously insured” refers to adults.
Correlates of Smoking Cessation among Filipino-American Men
Primary Care: Improving Access in Alberta
Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines
Disparities in process and outcome measures among adults with persistent asthma David M. Mosen, PhD, MPH; Michael Schatz, MD, MS; Rachel Gold, PhD; Winston.
Longitudinal Evaluation of Physician Payment Reform and Team-Based Care on Chronic Disease Management and Prevention NAPCRG Annual Meeting, October 27,
Patient Navigation Process
A Quality improvement initiative
Research Questions Does integration of behavioral health and primary care services, compared to simple co-location, improve patient-centered outcomes in.
Ana Progovac, PhD1,2,3 Benjamin Lê Cook, PhD MPH 1,2
Prevalence of Obesity in Newark Adults 18 Years and Older: Using State and National Data Monifa Springer1, Pauline Thomas2, Kenneth O’Dowd3, Marsha McGowan1,
Influenza Information Needs of Primary Care Physicians
Benefit Type and Care Source in Relation to Mammography Screening and Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis among DoD Beneficiaries Janna Manjelievskaia1, Derek.
Claire Dye, MSPH Dawn Upchurch, PhD
Lung Cancer Screening: Do Individual Health Beliefs Matter?
Tara Kiran1,2, Alex Kopp2, Rick Glazier1,2
Repeat Colonoscopy Recommendations
University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Evaluation of a Spiritually-based Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Knowledge and Screening Among Church-attending African Americans and Whites.
Trends in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Maryland Residents Age 65 and Older Maryland Cancer Survey, Presented by: Carolyn Poppell, MS University.
SAMPLE – Preliminary Results
Colorectal Cancer Screening Education in The
Feeling Rushed? Does Late Start Time Predict Poor Quality Colonoscopy?
Bronx Community Health Dashboard: Prostate Cancer Last Updated: 1/19/2018 See last slide for more information about this project.
Insured all year Total (%) Number (in millions) Uninsured anytime (%)
What existing research and data can tell us
Adults with Health Problems Who Have an Excellent Patient Experience Report Greater Support to Help Manage Their Health Condition Percent of adults 18–64.
Adults with Health Problems Who Have an Excellent Patient Experience Are Most Likely to Be Well-Informed About Their Prescription Medications Percent of.
African American and Hispanic Females and the Need for Early Detection
Colorectal cancer survival disparities in California
Recent Incidences and Trends of the Top Cancers in Northeast Tennessee Appalachian Region Adekunle Oke1, Sylvester Orimaye2, Ndukwe Kalu1, Dr. Faustine.
Presentation transcript:

The Effect of Key Organizational Attributes on Cancer Screening Rates Eric Shaw, Bijal Balasubramanian, Alicja Piasecki, Pamela Ohman-Strickland, Jeanne Ferrante, A John Orzano, Benjamin Crabtree University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey – Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ Funded by: The National Cancer Institute R01 NCI CA11287 (PI: Crabtree)

Background Most assessments of cancer screening deficiencies have focused on patient factors (eg., payment sources, knowledge deficits, preferences/attitudes) physician factors (eg., verbal recommendations for screening, training, beliefs about test performance) Effect of organizational factors of primary care practices remains understudied

Recent advancements in understanding organizational factors: Interventions that focus on changing organizational care processes have the largest effects on prevention performance Stone, EG et al. Interventions that Increase Use of Adult Immunization and Cancer Screening Services: A Meta- Analysis. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136:641-651. Smaller practice size, greater autonomy over care delivery, and more clinical support influenced CRC screening Yano, EM et al. Practice Care Practice Organization Influences Colorectal Cancer Screening Performance. HSR 2007; 42:1130-1149 Gap in research on community-based primary care practice organizational factors and multiple cancer screening tests

Purpose of this Paper To evaluate the association between key organizational attributes of primary care practices and screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostate cancer

Theoretical Lens Cohen D et al. A Practice Change Model for Quality Improvement in Primary Care Practice. J Health Mgmt 2004; 49:3:155-168.

Methods Design: Cross sectional analysis using data from patient surveys, chart audit, and practice surveys from SCOPE Participants: Consecutive sample of ~30 patients, aged > 50, from 24 NJ family medicine practices Outcome Measures: Mammography (women ≥ 50 yrs, yearly) Pap smear (women 50-70 yrs, every 3 years) Prostate cancer screening (men 50-70 yrs, yearly) Colorectal cancer screening (men and women ≥ 50 yrs) FOBT (1 yr), flex sig (5 yr), colonoscopy (10 yr), or BE (5 yr)

Key Organizational Attributes Factor analysis of practice surveys resulted in 5 stable factors* Communication Teamwork Access to information Practice busyness/chaos History of change * Followed strategy used by: Ohman-Strickland PA, et al. Measuring Organizational Attributes of Primary Care Practices: Development of a New Instrument. HSR; 2007:1-17.

Analysis Hierarchical logistical regression adjusting for patient age, gender, race/ethnicity, comorbidity, presence of EMR Adjusts for the correlation of patients clustered within practices

Demographics Most practices were single specialty (family medicine) group practices owned by clinicians Mean patient age was 64 years (SD = 10) 61% female 69% white, 18% black, 9% Hispanic, 4% other 11 of 24 practices had EMRs

Results Cancer Screening Teamwork History of Change - mammography OR = 1.8 p = .04 - CRC screening OR = 1.9, p = .05 History of Change OR = 4.2, p = .008

Teamwork Communication Access to info History of change

Results Resources for Change Cancer Screening - Communication - History of change Cancer Screening - Access to info Level of chaos

Discussion Teamwork and history of change were important for increased CA screening rates Unpack dynamic interplay among practices’ “resources for change” Next steps: test this model using other datasets While patient and physician factors must not be ignored, interventions aimed at improving cancer screening rates should consider practice-level factors