Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):22. doi: / Figure Legend:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From: Chess players' eye movements reveal rapid recognition of complex visual patterns: Evidence from a chess-related visual search task Journal of Vision.
Advertisements

From: Human perception of subresolution fineness of dense textures based on image intensity statistics Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):8. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(3):28. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):14. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: A unified Bayesian observer analysis for set size and cueing effects on perceptual decisions and saccades Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):27. doi: /
From: Complex interactions between spatial, orientation, and motion cues for biological motion perception across visual space Journal of Vision. 2013;13(2):8.
From: System gamma as a function of image- and monitor-dynamic range
From: Attentive and pre-attentive aspects of figural processing
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Holistic integration of gaze cues in visual face and body perception: Evidence from the composite design Journal of Vision. 2017;17(1):24. doi: /
From: Sandwich masking eliminates both visual awareness of faces and face-specific brain activity through a feedforward mechanism Journal of Vision. 2011;11(7):3.
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(12):7. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(7):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Why the long face? The importance of vertical image structure for biological “barcodes” underlying face recognition Journal of Vision. 2014;14(8):25.
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):3. doi: /4.9.3 Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(13):27. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Does print size matter for reading
Date of download: 10/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Figure Legend: From: A moving-barber-pole illusion
From: ERP P1-N1 changes associated with Vernier perceptual learning and its location specificity and transfer Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):19. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Event-related potentials reveal an early advantage for luminance contours in the processing of objects Journal of Vision. 2011;11(7):1. doi: /
Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images
Date of download: 11/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Spatial attention alleviates temporal crowding, but neither temporal nor spatial uncertainty are necessary for the emergence of temporal crowding.
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(16):13. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations Journal of.
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The attenuation surface for contrast sensitivity has the form of a witch's hat within the central visual field Journal of Vision. 2012;12(11):23.
Figure Legend: From: Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video
From: How the unstable eye sees a stable and moving world
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(3):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Gating of remote effects on lightness
From: Perception of light source distance from shading patterns
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(6):4. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Contour extracting networks in early extrastriate cortex
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(1):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The vertical horopter is not adaptable, but it may be adaptive
From: Probing visual consciousness: Rivalry between eyes and images
From: Expertise with multisensory events eliminates the effect of biological motion rotation on audiovisual synchrony perception Journal of Vision. 2010;10(5):2.
From: Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion Journal of Vision.
From: Size-induced distortions in perceptual maps of visual space
From: Variability of eye movements when viewing dynamic natural scenes
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(10):5. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The perceptual basis of common photographic practice
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):1. doi: /4.9.1.
From: Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility
Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(8):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(8):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Four types of ensemble coding in data visualizations
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(3):28. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The fine structure of multifocal ERG topographies
Journal of Vision. 2014;14(8):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):15. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(5):2. doi: /6.5.2 Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Analysis of human vergence dynamics
From: Motion-induced blindness and microsaccades: Cause and effect
Presentation transcript:

From: Discrimination of locomotion direction in impoverished displays of walkers by macaque monkeys Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):22. doi:10.1167/10.4.22 Figure Legend: Generalization performance for the lower and upper body parts of the humanoid locomotions. (A, B) Performances for the forward–backward and view task for each monkey (M1, M2, and M3), respectively. (Left) Performance for the trained full-body movies, (middle) generalization performance for the lower body displays, (right) generalization performance for the upper body displays. (C) Snapshots of the displays. Same conventions as in Figure 4. Generalization performance was calculated on approximately 40 trials per body configuration (i.e., lower or upper) per condition (see also movie: “ movie_fig5_parts.mov”). Date of download: 11/10/2017 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2017. All rights reserved.