Treating Patients with hepatitis C Genotype 1 using Viekira Pak in the Real World – An Australian Nursing Perspective Saroja Nazareth, Vincenzo Fragomeli.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Edited by Morris Sherman MD BCh PhD FRCP(C) Associate Professor of Medicine University of Toronto Protease Inhibitors in Chronic Hepatitis C: An Update.
Advertisements

Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir and Dasabuvir + RBV in GT1 SAPPHIRE-II.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir and Dasabuvir + RBV in GT1 TURQUOISE-II Phase 3 Treatment.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study 3D (Paritaprevir-Ritonavir-Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir) +/- RBV in GT1b PEARL-II Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Andreone.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study 3D (Paritaprevir-Ritonavir-Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir) + RBV in GT1 SAPPHIRE-II Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Zeuzem.
Compensated Cirrhosis
OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV Placebo Randomisation** 3 : 1 Double blind years Chronic HCV genotype 1 HCV RNA ≥ 10,000 IU/ml Failure to pre-treatment with.
OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV OBV/PTV/r + DSV Randomisation* 1 : 1 Open label years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1b Prior failure to PEG-IFN + RBV HCV.
No prior therapy with PI
OBV/PTV/r Open label years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1b Treatment-naïve or failure to PEG-IFN + RBV HCV RNA > 10,000 IU/ml Without or with cirrhosis*
SOF/VEL 400/100 mg qd N = 75 W24 SOF/VEL > 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 to 6 Naïve or treatment-experienced No prior treatment with NS5A or.
 Treatment regimens –Co-formulated ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/rironavir (r) : 25/150/100 mg QD = 2 tablets –Dasabuvir (DSV) : 250 mg BID –RBV.
No randomization N = 59 W12W24 Arm B : compensated cirrhosis N = 31 N = 29 Arm C : compensated cirrhosis Arm A : No cirrhosis AGATE-II Study: OBV/PTV/r.
Asselah T. AASLD 2015, Abs. 714 Randomisation 1:1 Open-label years HCV genotype 4 HCV RNA ≥ 1,000 IU/ml Naïve or pre-treated with PEG-IFN + RBV (Part.
OBV/PTV/r + DSV Open label Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Treatment-naïve HCV RNA > 1,000 IU/ml Chronic kidney disease with eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m 2.
 Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), with 95% CI, next observation carried backward DCV + SOF + RBV Randomised* 1:1 Open-label ALLY-3+ study: DCV.
SAPPHIRE-I Feld JJ. NEJM 2014;370: SAPPHIRE-I Study: ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir + ribavirin for genotype 1  Treatment regimens.
 Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), by ITT OBV/PTV/r + DSV + SOF +RBV Open-label W24 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV Genotype 1 Prior failure on DAA-regimen.
Dore G. J Hepatol 2016; 64:19-28 MALACHITE TVR + PEG-IFN + RBV Randomisation Open-label years HCV genotype 1 HCV RNA > 10,000 IU/ml Naïve (MALACHITE-I)
No cirrhosis or compensated cirrhosis * No HBV or HIV coinfection
Genotype 1 HCV infection Stable immunosuppressive therapy
Phase 3 Treatment Experienced
Design Randomisation* 1 : 1 Open-label W8 W12
ARV-trial.com RUBY-II Study: ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir for HCV genotype 1a or 4 with severe renal impairment Design Open label W12.
Epclusa® sofosbuvir/velpatasvir
Phase 3 Treatment Experienced
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in GT 3 and Cirrhosis POLARIS-3
Design Randomisation * 1 : 1 Open-label W16 W24 > 18 years
Design Randomisation 1 : 1 Double-blind W8 W12
No HBV or HIV co-infection
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
TOPAZ-II Study: OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV for genotype 1
C-ISLE study: EBR/GZR + SOF + RBV in genotype 3 and cirrhosis
Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir in Genotype 3 ALLY-3 Study
Design No randomisation Open-label W12 W years HCV genotype 1
> 18 years Chronic HCV infection Compensated cirrhosis **
ARV-trial.com C-CREST study, Part B: uprifosbuvir (MK-3682)/GZR/ruzasvir (MK-8408) fixed-dose combination + RBV for genotypes 1, 2 and 3 - Phase II Randomisation.
GEODE-II Study: OBV/PTV/r + DSV + low dose RBV in genotype 1a
GARNET Study: OBV/PTV/r + DSV 8 weeks in genotype 1b
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
No cirrhosis or compensated cirrhosis** No HBV or HIV co-infection
Design Randomisation* 1 : 1 Open-label W12
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Failure to achieve SVR on No HBV or HIV co-infection
Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir and Dasabuvir in GT1b TURQUOISE-III
ARV-trial.com RUBY-I Study, cohort 2: ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir + RBV for HCV genotype 1 with renal impairment Design Open label W12.
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2
C-BREEZE-2 Study: ruzasvir + uprifosbuvir for 12 weeks in genotype 1-6
LEAGUE-1 study: daclatasvir + SMV + RBV for genotype 1
Elbasvir + Grazoprevir + Ribavirin in PI-experienced HCV GT1 C-SALVAGE
No HBV or HIV co-infection
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Elbasvir + Grazoprevir +/- Ribavirin in Treatment-Naïve HCV GT 2, 4, 5, or 6 C-SCAPE Brown A, et al. EASL 2015; Abstract P0771.
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Ombitasvir + Paritaprevir + Ritonavir +/- Ribavirin in HCV GT4 PEARL-I
ARV-trial.com IMPACT Study: SMV + DCV + SOF in HCV genotype 1 with decompensated liver disease Design Open label ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype.
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2
LEPTON Study: SOF/VEL + GS-9857 genotype 1 or 3 Phase II
Phase 2b Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced
ARV-trial.com TURQUOISE-I Study: ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir + ribavirin for HCV in HIV co-infected patients Randomisation 1 : 1 Open-label.
A Real Life Study on Treatment of Egyptian Patients with HCV Genotype IV with Simeprevir and Sofosbuvir Prof.dr.Abdel fattah hanno Dr. Doaa al wazzan.
MAGELLAN-3 Study: GLE/PIB + SOF + RBV in patients who failed GLE/PIB
ARV-trial.com C-CREST study, Part B: uprifosbuvir (MK-3682)/GZR/ruzasvir (MK-8408) fixed-dose combination + RBV for genotypes 1, 2 and 3 - Phase II Randomisation.
No HBV or HIV co-infection
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Elbasvir-Grazoprevir + Sofosbuvir in Treatment-Naïve HCV Genotype 1 or 3 C-SWIFT Poordad F, et al. EASL 2015; Abstract O006.
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
ARV-trial.com CORAL-I study cohorts 3 to 6: OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV in transplant recipients and genotype 1 or 4 Design W12 W24 No randomisation Open-label.
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2
Presentation transcript:

Treating Patients with hepatitis C Genotype 1 using Viekira Pak in the Real World – An Australian Nursing Perspective Saroja Nazareth, Vincenzo Fragomeli on behalf of Australian Liver Nurses

Hepatitis C is a Global Problem Global prevalence of 2-3%: >185 million people worldwide have been infected with HCV 130–170 million are chronically infected 350,000 deaths occur each year as a result of HCV-related cirrhosis and liver cancer 7 Messina JP et al, Hepatology, 2015; 61: 77-87.

Study Background Viekira Pak (paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir, dasabuvir +/- ribavirin) was first the interferon-free (DAA) compassionate program introduced in Australia for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. This was a Special Access Scheme (SAS) for genotype 1 patients. Patients treated in “Liver Clinics” throughout Australia

VIEKIRA PAK – Mode of Action Ribavirin (RBV) is a synthetic nucleoside analogue that shows in vitro activity against some RNA and DNA viruses. Paritaprevir (PTV) Transport and release HCV Receptor binding and endocytosis Fusion and uncoating (+) RNA Replication, virion assembly and egress RNA replication Translation and polyprotein processing GOLGI ER 3. MID-/LATE LIFECYCLE INHIBITION NS5A inhibitor Ombitasvir (OBV) 1. EARLY INHIBITION NS3/4A protease inhibitor 2. MID-LIFECYCLE INHIBITION non-nucleoside NS5B polymerase inhibitor Ritonavir is not active against HCV and is a pharmacokinetic enhancer that increases peak and trough plasma drug concentrations of paritaprevir and overall drug exposure (i.e. area under the curve) Dasabuvir (DSV)

VIEKIRA PAK+/- RBV + RBV (BD) RBV 200mg OR 600mg Example 1200mg RBV dose (600mg BD) for patient ≥ 75kg

Indication and Treatment Regimen in Australia In Australia, VIEKIRA PAK is indicated for the treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C infection, including patients with compensated cirrhosis. NOT Child Pugh B or C or HCV G 4 Duration of therapy and addition of ribavirin are dependent on patient population. VIEKIRA PAK-RBV is recommended in patients with an unknown Gt1 subtype or with mixed Gt1 infection. Patient Population Treatment Duration Ribavirin Dosage Genotype 1b, without cirrhosis VIEKIRA PAK 12 weeks N/A Genotype 1a, without cirrhosis VIEKIRA PAK-RBV* <75 kg = 1000 mg ≥ 75kg = 1200 mg Ribavirin taken in two doses, morning & evening Genotype 1, with cirrhosis VIEKIRA PAK-RBV 12 weeks† *VIEKIRA PAK without ribavirin for treatment-naïve patients with genotype 1a infection without cirrhosis † 24 weeks for patients with genotype 1a-infection with cirrhosis who have had a previous null response to pegIFN/RBV Reference: VIEKIRA PAK-RBV Australian Approved Product information. AbbVie Pty Ltd

Efficacy in Non-Cirrhotic Patients – Clinical Trial Results Trial name Sapphire-I1 Sapphire-II2 Pearl-III4 Pearl-II3 Pearl-IV4 Treatment Naïve Experienced Genotype Gt1 Gt1b Gt1a 96% 95% 98% 96% 96% 97% 100% 99% 97% 100% 97% 90% SVR12 (%) 473 322 151 297 173 123 210 209 88 91 100 205 Overall GT1a GT1b Overall GT1a GT1b VP-RBV VP VP-RBV VP VP-RBV VP VIEKIRA PAK-RBV VIEKIRA PAK-RBV Reference : 1 Feld JJ, et al. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1594–1603. 2 Zeuzem S, et al. N Engl J Med 2014; 370(17):1604–14. 3 Andreone P, et al. Gastroenterol 2014;147:359–65. 4 Ferenci P, et al. N Engl J Med 2014;370(21):1983–92. 7

Efficacy in Patients with Compensated Cirrhosis (n=380) 12 weeks 24 weeks Gt1a Gt1b 59 64 14 15 52 56 13 13 11 11 40 50 10 10 39 42 nN 22 22 14 14 18 18 10 10 6 7 25 25 3 3 20 20 SVR12 (%) 12 weeks recommended for most patients with cirrhosis 24 weeks recommended for cirrhotic patients with GT1a and prior null response to pegIFN/RBV Reference: Poordad F et al. N Engl J Med 2014:370;1973−82.

German Hepatitis C Registry: PrOD or PrO ± RBV for GT 1 and 4, respectively Hinrichsen and colleagues reported their experience with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r + dasabuvir + RBV in the German Hepatitis C Registry. In this non-interventional, prospective cohort study (254 study sites), genotype 1 patients received ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r + dasabuvir + RBV and genotype 4 patient received ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r + RBV. The choice of treatment and regimen duration was at the physician’s discretion. The percentage of patients who received label-recommended regimens included: Genotype 1: 86% (no cirrhosis/cirrhosis: 88%/78%). Genotype 4: 94% (no cirrhosis/cirrhosis: 94%/92%). Results The overall SVR12 rate was 99%, with no difference among genotype. In general, patients who treated according to the treatment guideline recommendations achieved higher SVR12 rates. SVR12 rates did not differ across various subgroups. The overall relapse rate was 1.1% (6/558). The regimens were well tolerated with 2.3% of patients discontinuing therapy due to adverse events. Hinrichsen, H et al. EASL 2016 Abstract GS07

Study Rationale/Objectives Determine safety of Viekira Pak in real world population Determine efficacy of Viekira Pak in real world population Assess Drug-Drug Interactions (DDI’s) Assess patient compliance and adherence Discuss implications for nursing practice

Study Method 140 patients 8 Liver Clinics throughout Australia 12 months study period October 2014 to September 2015 Data collected via two page data collection sheet

Baseline Characteristics n=140 n(%) Age, mean (years) 56 Male 91 (65.0) Weight, mean (kgs) 84.8 Caucasian 133 (95.0) Genotype 1a 90 (64.3) Treatment Naïve 71 (50.7) Prior Null Response (Interferon) 26 (18.6) Cirrhosis (F4) 109 (77.9) History of Decompensation 10 (7.1)

Results 95% n= 133 achieved SVR12 = PCR not detected 12 weeks post treatment Seven patients (5.0%) did not achieve an SVR12. One patient (0.7%) experienced virological failure on treatment One patient (0.7%) relapsed after completing treatment One patient (0.7%) was lost to follow-up Four patients (2.9%) discontinued prematurely

Treatment Outcome by Prior Treatment Experience

Treatment Outcome by Genotype

Treatment Outcome by Fibrosis

Adverse Events 126 (90%) patients reported adverse events Mainly mild to moderate in nature Fatigue Nausea Headaches Bilirubin elevation 47.9% Grade 4 hyperbilirubinaemia - 3 patients (2.1%)

Serious Adverse Events n(%)   All patients n=140 No cirrhosis n=32 Compensated Cirrhosis n=99 History of decompensation n=10 Hyperbilirubinaemia 4(2.9) 0(0) 3(3.0) 1(10.0) Decompensation 3(2.1) 2(2.0) Anaemia and transfusion 2(1.4) 1(3.1) 1(1.0) Dehydration 1(0.7) Lithium Toxicity (possible drug-drug interaction) Suicidal Ideation Other 7(5.0) 2(6.3) 4(4.0) Total 19(13.6) 3(9.4) 13(13.1) 3(30.0)

Premature Discontinuation (n=6) Two patients (1.4%) discontinued at week 3 and week 6 due to an infection and decompensation respectively, however they both achieved an SVR12. Two (1.4%) ceased due to hyperbilirubinaemia at week 1 and week 6 respectively Wk 6 = PCR detected - SVR 12 achieved Two (1.4%) ceased due to unrelated pre-existing medical conditions at week 1 and 3 respectively (lung disease and abdominal pain)

On Treatment Virological Failure Baseline Characteristics Caucasian male, 56 years of age, BMI 26.2 Viral Characteristics Genotype 1a, baseline viral load 4,190,000IU/mL Fibrosis Stage Cirrhosis, FibroScan 15.4kPa, no history of decompensation Medical History Diabetes mellitus, anxiety, depression Prior Treatment Partial response Baseline Pathology Results AFP 15kIU/L, ALT 71U/L, AST 31U/L, Albumin 38g/L, Bilirubin 41umol/L, Platelets 84x10^9/L, INR 1.2 Treatment Duration Allocated 24 weeks, ceased at week 10 due to virological failure at week 8 Viral load 240,000iu/ml week 4 then 5,000,000iu/ml at week 8 Compliance and Adherence 100% self-reported dosing 100% appointment attendance

Post Treatment Relapse Baseline Characteristics Aboriginal male, 44 years of age, BMI 33.0 Viral Characteristics Genotype 1a, baseline viral load 820,000IU/mL Fibrosis Stage Cirrhosis, FibroScan 34.3kPa, no history of decompensation Medical History Diabetes mellitus, haemophilia, hypertension Prior Treatment Null response Baseline Pathology Results AFP 10kIU/L, ALT 197U/L, AST 123U/L, Albumin 39g/L, Bilirubin 37umol/L, Platelets 79x10^9/L, INR 1.2 Treatment Duration Allocated 24 weeks Compliance and Adherence 100% self-reported dosing 100% appointment attendance

Other Findings Majority of clinic visits were conducted by Liver nurses Average of 5 clinic visits from week 1 to week 12 post treatment 85% appointment attendance 85% reported 100% compliance to Viekira Pak No patient deaths Retrospectively, Liver Nurses reported a reduction in consultation time in comparison to interferon based therapies (15 minutes)

Conclusions SVR rate 95% = Real world data! Viekera Pak was safe and well tolerated in this sample of complex patients who were ineligible/intolerant to interferon based therapies SAE’s were reported in 13.6% of patients Good compliance and adherence rates were reported despite BD dosing Drug Drug Interactions (DDI’s) require ongoing vigilance Liver Clinic nurses reported decreased # of clinic visits and consultation time Reduced frequency of monitoring requirements for majority of patients Study supports the treatment of HCV patients through a Nursing Model of Care Implications for enhancing clinic capacity in a resource poor HCV environment

Acknowledgements: 140 patients who participated in this study Australian Liver nurses for their collaboration- Royal Perth, John Hunter, Royal Prince Alfred, St Vincent’s (NSW), Royal Adelaide, Monash Health, Flinders Medical Centre Journal of Hepatology

Thank you!