Héctor Maldonado-Pérez Taylor Sehein Katia Chadaideh

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clostridium difficile Colitis or Dysbiosis. Symbiostasis/Dysbiosis.
Advertisements

Walter Lab: Gut microbiome and its interactions with metabolic disease
Quantitative Genetics
The Microbiome and Metagenomics
General Microbiology M122 TuesdayThursdayFriday Big 400 students lecture Biology/Microbiology majors (JR, SR) + nursing students (SO) GOAL: To gain some.
Discovery of new biomarkers as indicators of watershed health and water quality Anamaria Crisan & Mike Peabody.
H = -Σp i log 2 p i. SCOPI Each one of the many microbial communities has its own structure and ecosystem, depending on the body environment it exists.
713 Lecture 15 Host metagenomics. Progression of techniques Culture based –Use phenotypes and genotypes to ID Non-culture based, focused on 16S rDNA –Clone.
BIOSTATISTICS Lecture 2. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and creating methods.
The Human Micro-biome. What is the Human Microbiome Microbial communities exist in many places such as in the soil, in the ocean and in every plant and.
Statistical Analysis of Mouse Gut Microbiota Alex Tran Computer Systems Lab
1 Modelling and Simulation EMBL – Beyond Molecular Biology Physics Computational Biology Chemistry Medicine.
30 AUGUST 2012 | VOL 488 | NATURE R3 Jae Ryung Shin/Prof. Sang Youl Rhee.
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Pipeline for culture-independent studies of a microbiota. (A) DNA.
Soil Microbiome of Native and Invasive Marsh Grasses in Blackbird Creek, Delaware Lathadevi K.Chintapenta 1#, Gulnihal Ozbay 1#, Venu Kalavacharla 1* Figure.
A non-endoscopic device to sample the oesophageal microbiota: a case-control study  Daffolyn R Fels Elliott, MD, Alan W Walker, PhD, Maria O'Donovan, MD,
Omolola C. Betiku1,2. , Carl J. Yeoman2, T. Gibson Gaylord1, Suzanne L
Obesity and the Microbiota
Statistical Analysis of Mouse Gut Microbiota
Biostatistics?.
Systematic Characterization and Analysis of the Taxonomic Drivers of Functional Shifts in the Human Microbiome  Ohad Manor, Elhanan Borenstein  Cell Host.
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages e5 (April 2017)
Inflammatory phenotypes in patients with severe asthma are associated with distinct airway microbiology  Steven L. Taylor, BSc, Lex E.X. Leong, PhD, Jocelyn.
H = -Σpi log2 pi.
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Microbial community dissimilarity.
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Statistical Analysis of Mouse Gut Microbiota
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2017)
Genetic Determinants of the Gut Microbiome in UK Twins
Intervention effects on taxonomic and functional pathway diversity of the intestinal microbiome. Intervention effects on taxonomic and functional pathway.
Conducting a Microbiome Study
SIV-Induced Instability of the Chimpanzee Gut Microbiome
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Microbiome studies for microbial disease pathogenesis research
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 137, Issue 5, Pages e2 (November 2009)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Philip P. Ahern, Jeremiah J. Faith, Jeffrey I. Gordon  Immunity 
Microbes, Microbiota, and Colon Cancer
Obesity and the Microbiota
FIGURE 1 α-Diversity comparisons of gut microbiota from DM and MOM infants by age and antibiotic exposure. Using ... FIGURE 1 α-Diversity comparisons of.
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Presented by Jacob Miller
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Precision Microbiome Reconstitution Restores Bile Acid Mediated Resistance to Clostridium difficile By Janna Seto.
by T. W. Cullen, W. B. Schofield, N. A. Barry, E. E. Putnam, E. A
Fig. 6 Transmissibility of adiposity from humanized mice to germ-free recipients. Transmissibility of adiposity from humanized mice to germ-free recipients.
mtDNA genotypes correlate with gut microbiota composition.
The ND6P25L mtDNA mutation reduces gut microbiota diversity in C57BL/6J mice. The ND6P25L mtDNA mutation reduces gut microbiota diversity in C57BL/6J mice.
Gut Microbiome Studies
by Peter J. Turnbaugh, Vanessa K. Ridaura, Jeremiah J
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (February 2017)
Dynamic microbiome evolution in social bees
Acarbose reversibly changes the structure of the murine gut community.
Variations in beta and alpha diversity of gut microbiome bacterial communities in relation to presence of Blastocystis. Variations in beta and alpha diversity.
Fig. 5 Clustering of the distal gut microbiome, the C
Variations in beta and alpha diversity of gut microbiome eukaryotic communities explained by presence of Blastocystis. Variations in beta and alpha diversity.
Fig. 3 Postnatal assembly of the humanized gut microbiota.
Presentation transcript:

Héctor Maldonado-Pérez Taylor Sehein Katia Chadaideh

The ecosystem inside us The Microbiome = microbes, their genomes, and the habitat they are found The gut microbiome: The most diverse (over 100 trillion bacteria) Implicated in a range of metabolic processes The gut microbiome is a diverse, quickly-evolving, and responsive community -Implicated as a contributor to health and disease, and its major role is in metabolic functions -Acts as a commensal metabolic organ, which provides the host with abilities to break down energy sources that or own physiology can’t

Influences on Gut Microbial Composition Factors that have been found to affect the composition of the gut microbiome include environmental conditions (ie: birth mode, activity level), antibiotics usage, genetics and diet -Major dichotomy as of late has been the prevalent impact of either diet or host genetics as the predominant driving force

Main Driver: Diet or Genetics? In a previous paper by Turnbaugh, et al (2009) showed that switching from a low-fat, plant polysaccharide-rich diet to a high-fat, high-sugar "Western" diet shifted the structure of the microbiota within a single day, changed the representation of metabolic pathways in the microbiome, and altered microbiome gene expression. -Figure shows 16s rRNA sequences of germ free mice inoculated with human gut microbiota, beginning from 1 day post colonization, then -dpc == days post colonization with human microbiome -dpd = days post diet switch from a LFPP to a “Western” HFHS diet Turnbaugh et al. (2009)

Main Driver: Diet or Genetics? Goodrich, et al. (2014) provided evidence that host genetics is an alternative driver for gut microbial variation. Mammals exhibit marked interindividual variations in their gut microbiota, but it remained unclear if this is primarily driven by host genetics or by extrinsic factors like dietary intake. Goodrich et al. (2014)

Outline Part 1: Examining the effects of Diet vs Host Genotype Part 2: Evaluating Responsiveness to Diet Part 3: Assessing Memory associated with Past Diets Evaluation and Critiques Conclusions and Significance Part 1: Relative abundance of gut microbial OTUs under different diets, and between different inbred/outbred mouse strains Part 2: Oscillations from one type of diet to another and tracking relative abundance of microbial OTUs with each diet change (one mouse strain: c57BL6J) Part 3: Isolating microbial OTUs with signature increases or decreases that are amplified with each re-introduction of diet type

Part 1: Diet vs Host Genotype In order to determine the relative impacts of host diet and host genotypic variation on the microbiome, the first step of this study involved systematic testing of the relative impacts of dietary intake and host genetics on the gut microbiota, through the combined analysis of five inbred mouse strains, four transgenic lines, and a recently developed outbred mouse resource, the Diversity Outbred (DO) population

Part 1: Computational Methods Data generated by 16s rRNA Illumina Sequencing Analyses: Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) relative abundance Bray-Curtis dissimilarity-based principal coordinate analysis Seq Details: Illumina HiSeq platform (PCR clusters and fluorescence detection); analyzed on the Harvard Odyssey cluster using the QIIME (Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology) software package and custom Perl scripts (bioinformatic pipeline)- translates raw sequences, quality controls, assigns OTUs; LefSe was used to identify taxa associated with each experimental group- finds biomarkers between 2 or more groups using relative abundances Bray-Curtis dissimilarity: a statistic used to quantify the compositional dissimilarity between two different sites, based on counts at each site

Part 1: Diet drives gut microbial variance PCA- orthogonal transformation of the correlated diet and subsequently by genotype. Figure 1A provide a platform in which there are only 2 diets and multiple phenotype to evaluate, this allow the lustering network to be better understoof in terms of the process. Mice strains vary depending on their nature, here mice strains that are WT, and trangenic were dosed and from the supplemental data observed in the literature we see that there is no real difference in among strain but rather diet. PCoA- microbial community structure primarily determined by diet, secondary cluster is host genotype; accounts for 48% of variance; based on 16S count data Two groups of bacteria, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, consistent indicators of different diets (Firmicutes have greater relative abundance under a high fat diet) Repeated with transgenic and outbred mice with the same results

Part 2: Responsiveness to Shifts in Diet The next step was to determine the reversibility and reproducibility of changes in the microbiome in response to diet. To do this, they designed a second leg of this experiment, where daily fecal samples were collected from inbred C57BL/6J mice (n = 15) oscillating between LFPP and HFHS diets every 3 days. All animals were maintained on a LFPP diet in individual cages prior to the beginning of the experiment at 7 weeks of age. In total, they analyzed four groups, representing two sets of oscillating mice staggered by 3 days, and two control groups maintained on either a continuous LFPP or a continuous HFHS diet.

Part 2: Computational Methods Use of OTU relative abundance Analysis: Microbial Counts Trajectories Infinite Mixture Model Engine (MC-TIMME) modeling -To analyze the impact of these successive dietary shifts on the time-dependent responses of species-level microbial OTUs, they used a modified MC-TIMME algorithm to model temporal signatures using simple linear models with constant levels for each dietary regimen (LFPP and HFHS) and linear increases or decreases with dietary switches (oscillation number) -MC-TIMME is a Bayesian nonparametric hierarchical generative probability model that extrapolates latent variables that assign observed sets of counts to prototype signatures. For this study, they modified the MC-TIMME model so that it assigned each OTU to a prototype signature, which induces a clustering of OTUs into groups that share similar dynamics

Part 2: Diet drives reproducible microbial shifts

Part 3: Memory Associated with Past Diets Oscillation of number dependent or stable abundances for OTUs Determination of “microbial memory” -Given the rapid and reproducible microbial response to diet, they next wanted to test whether this phenomenon could be attributed fully to current dietary intake or whether there were lingering effects of past dietary history.

Part 3: Computational Methods Relative abundance of species-level OTUs Analysis: Normalization of specific OTU trends per 10k reads in individual mice Detailed plots are shown for representative figures were also constructed based on these data that display oscillation number dependent or stable abundances for OTUs in individual mice.

Part 3: Memory trends in specific OTUs Phylum Bacteroidetes: Phylum Firmicutes:

Part 3: Memory trends in specific OTUs Dashed red and blue lines represent median inferred signatures on the HFHS and LFPP diets respectively (widths of line segments are proportional to length of each dietary regimen for oscillator group); shading represents 95% credible intervals for estimates. Vertical axes represent model estimates of counts per 10K sequencing reads.

Part 3: Memory trends in specific OTUs

A Critical Appraisal No reported conflicts of interest Sources of funding: the NIH Brigham and Women’s General Mills Bell Institute This work was supported by the NIH, the Brigham and Women’s Department of Pathology and Center for Clinical and Translational Metagenomics, and the General Mills Bell Institute of Health and Nutrition, which funds doctorate and masters-level scientists in fields ranging from nutrition science to public health to food science to microbiology

Conclusions and Significance Dietary factors provide greatest impact on gut microbiome Reproducible Past-diet impacts Future directions: Functional significance of OTUs Public health implications Trends in obesity linked to microbiome Cross-cultural variation Increased Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio linked to increased adiposity in both mice and humans Yang, et al (2009)

References Carmody, Rachel N., et al. "Diet dominates host genotype in shaping the murine gut microbiota." Cell host & microbe 17.1 (2015): 72-84. Turnbaugh, Peter J., et al. "The effect of diet on the human gut microbiome: a metagenomic analysis in humanized gnotobiotic mice." Science translational medicine 1.6 (2009): 6ra14-6ra14. Goodrich, Julia K., et al. "Human genetics shape the gut microbiome." Cell. 159.4 (2014): 789-799. Yang, Xing, et al. "More than 9,000,000 unique genes in human gut bacterial community: estimating gene numbers inside a human body." PLoS One 4.6 (2009): e6074.