UMTS Call Drop Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications Evolution of TD-SCDMA China Communications Standards Association (CCSA) Chicago, May 29th to 2nd June,
Advertisements

Handoffs in CDMA. CDMA vs. AMPS/TDMA Handoffs Handoff Phases.
Layer 3 Messaging and Call Procedures
LTE-A Carrier Aggregation
Kampala, Uganda, 23 June 2014 ITU-T Recommendation E.807: “Definitions and associated measurement methods of user-centric parameters for call handling.
1 Channel Assignment Strategies Handoff (Handover) Process Handoff: Changing physical radio channels of network connections involved in a call,
Radio Network Tuning and Optimization for Universal
Performance analysis of Enhanced Uplink in UMTS network Jukka Pihonen Supervisor: Prof. Riku Jäntti Instructor: Laura Koskela, M.Sc
1 S Post–graduated Course in Radio Communication, H. Yin Handover Control in CDMA Radio Networks Hongying Yin Feb. 11 th 2003 Helsinki University.
Channel Switching Capability Impacting features Channel Switching
Receiver-driven Layered Multicast S. McCanne, V. Jacobsen and M. Vetterli SIGCOMM 1996.
Overview.  UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunication System) the third generation mobile communication systems.
Capacity and Load Sharing in Dual-Mode Mobile Networks
ECE 5221 Personal Communication Systems Prepared by: Dr. Ivica Kostanic Lecture 24 – Basics of 3G – UMTS (4) Spring 2011.
Interview and drive test tips
August 21, Mobile Computing COE 446 IS-95 Tarek Sheltami KFUPM CCSE COE Principles of Wireless Networks.
PHYSICAL LAYER. 6.2 Transport Channels and their Mapping to the Physical Channels.
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt Using TEMS Investigation.
Idle Mode and Common Channel Behavior
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt H igh S peed D ownlink P acket A ccess Naren Mohan
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt HANDOVER Overview.
1© Nokia Siemens NetworksSeminaariesitelmä / Jukka Valtanen / Transport Formats in UMTS Radio Network Controller’s Software Implementation Seminaariesitelmä.
Cellular Networks Why use cellular networks? What mobile radio services where provided before cellular? Use multiple low-power transmitters (100 W or less),
RNO Wind Part I.
06/09/2005Master's Thesis Seminar - Jesse Kruus 1 Analyzing and Developing Base Load for WCDMA Base Station Automated Testing System Thesis written at.
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt POWER CONTROL UMTS Seminar.
1 © 2006 Nokia pullola_ ppt / Extending Base Station Active Radio Link Set for Improved Uplink Scheduling Esa-Pekka Pullola Supervisor:
Business Id © NetHawk All rights reserved. Confidential April 2005NetHawk NetHawk Quality of Service products Markus Ahokangas, MSc Product.
A Study of Non Real Time Radio Bearer Packet Data Performance in UMTS Radio Access Network Seema Gyanwali Supervisor: Professor Sven Gustav Häggman Instructor:
TCS 316 High Speed Information Networks UMTS Handover by Nasir Faruk Mobile Week 13 May, /04/ :14:46.
Section 6 Wideband CDMA Radio Network Planning. Radio Network Planning A radio network planning consists of three phases: 1.Network Dimensioning (using.
Rev PA1 WCDMA RAN PM - Supplemental Information 3/3/20051 WCDMA RAN PM Supplemental Information.
Handover -The Process of Changing cells during a call is called handover -MS & BTS perform measurements -MS measures signal strength and quality on its.
A Bandwidth Scheduling Algorithm Based on Minimum Interference Traffic in Mesh Mode Xu-Yajing, Li-ZhiTao, Zhong-XiuFang and Xu-HuiMin International Conference.
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt Capacity Management in WCDMA.
Maximum Value.
2G Vs 3G Drive TEST with tems
1 Wireless Networks Lecture 21 WCDMA (Part I) Dr. Ghalib A. Shah.
Signaling Flow of WCDMA Advanced Radio Interfaces ZTE University.
TEMS Parameter. Module Objectives On completion of the module one should be clear about the parameters required during drive test what does it mean and.
DAS Impact on LTE Network and UE IBTUF VIII Austin TX, Jan-2014
Guide of Genex Assistant for LTE
DS200 EEPROM PROGRAMMING.
Content Layer3 Message Analysis.
Long Term Evolution (LTE) and System Architecture Evolution (SAE)
Month Year doc: IEEE /xxxxr0
Cellular Networks Wireless Transmission Cellular Concept
Project CA project T00087 oss KPI justification - Appendix CA Project
Celcom LTE CA Project_OSS
Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS)
4G_CA project_OSS Justification
Drive Testing Basics 2013 March
LTE Mobility LTE Mobility.
Chapter 3: Wireless WANs and MANs
Configuring EtherChannels and Switch Troubleshooting
Hauwei hcs in dual band netwrok
Intra LTE Handover.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CA combinations are divided into intra-band (contiguous and non-contiguous) and inter-band. Aggregated carriers can be adjacent or non-adjacent.
CMC Unit V PRESENTATION BY VIDYA SAGAR.
5G Micro Cell Deployment in Coexistence with Fixed Service
Lecture 22 WCDMA (Part II) Dr. Ghalib A. Shah
Wireless Communications: System Design
Network-Health Report
Optimisation of Softer Handover in UMTS Network
Lecture 23 WCDMA (Part III) Dr. Ghalib A. Shah
An Introduction to CDMA Air Interface: IS-95A
GSM Radio Network Optimization. Absolute Radio Frequency Channel Number (ARFCN)  GSM 900 F U (n) = n MHz F D (n) = Fu(n) + 45 MHz Where: 1.
Radio Link Layer tuning in HSPA Evolution Laura Kneckt Supervisor : Professor Jyri Hämäläinen Instructor: M. Sc. Stefan Wager.
Cellular Telephone Networks
Cellular Systems.
Presentation transcript:

UMTS Call Drop Analysis ZTE University

Content Definition of Call Drop Reasons of Call Drop Analysis of Call Drop Parameters of Call Drop Case of Call Drop

Type of Call Drop Definition Call termination not through the normal hang up process, that is dropped calls. Tow types of call drop definition: Definition of drive test indicators Definition of network management indicators

Definition of Drive Test Indicators The definition of drive test: Call drop rate= Number of call drop times/Number of call setup success times Number of call setup success times+1:After the Alerting message is received

Definition of Drive Test Indicators Number of call drop times+1:(Air interface signaling at the UE side) The Connect ACK message is not received but the System Information message is received. After the Connect ACK message is received, RRC Release message received and the reasons is Not Normal. After the Connect ACK message is received, any of the CC Disconnect, CC Release, CC Release Complete message received and the reasons is Not Normal.

Definition of Drive Test Indicators number of call setup success times+1

UE Voluntarily Initiated Signaling Release

Definitions of Network Management Indicators The definition of the network management: CSRabrelTriggedByRNC+1:(Iu interface signaling at the RNC side) When the RNC send the Iu Release Request or RAB Release Request message to the CN.

Definitions of Network Management Indicators

Counters of Call Drop Reasons Release Type Counter Reason Iu Release C301230315 Iu connection release request by UTRAN for CS domain in cell, Repeated Integrity Checking Failure C301230316 Release due to UE generated signalling connection release C301230317 Radio Connection With UE Lost C301230318 Iu connection release request by UTRAN for CS domain in cell, timer TRELOCoverall expiry C301230319 Failure in the Radio Interface Procedure C301230320 O&M Intervention C301230321 Release due to Overload Control C301230322 Unspecified Failure C301230323 UTRAN Generated Reason

Counters of Call Drop Reasons Release Type Counter Reason RAB release C301230361 RAB release number request by UTRAN in cell for CS domain,RAB pre-empted C301230362 RAB release number request by UTRAN in cell for CS domain,Release due to UTRAN in cell Generated Reason C301230363 RAB release number request by UTRAN in cell for CS domain,Iu UP Failure C301230364 RAB release number request by UTRAN in cell for CS domain,Release due to Overload Control C301230365 RAB release number request by UTRAN in cell for CS domain,Unspecified Failure

Content Definition of Call Drop Reasons of Call Drop Analysis of Call Drop Parameters of Call Drop Case of Call Drop

Call Drop Reasons Poor Coverage Unconfigured Neighbor Cell Handover Interference PSC Confliction Engineering Error

Poor Coverage Service Type Requirement of RSCP (dBm) Requirement of Ec/Io (dB) AMR12.2K -105 -13 CS64K -100 -11 PS384K -95 -10 HSDPA -90 -8 RSCP and Ec/Io threshold for different services

Poor Coverage The decision whether it is problem of uplink or downlink poor coverage is based on the power of dedicated channel before call drop. UL Poor Coverage: TX power reaches the maximum UL BLER is poor NodeB report “RL failure” DL Poor Coverage: DL BLER is poor Scanner: If the RSCP and Ec/Io of the cell with the best coverage are poor, you can infer that the coverage is poor.

Unconfigured Neighboring Cell Missed neighbor cell. Removal of key neighbor cells caused by combination of macro diversity. Untimely update of the external cell information.

Unconfigured Neighboring Cell

Measurement Report (1A event) Active Set Update Complete Handover The handover process is incomplete Radio Environment becoming bad, UE can not receive the “Active Set Update” UE RNC Measurement Report (1A event) Active Set Update Active Set Update Complete

Handover Ping-pong Handover In a short time, UE send different Report for delete or add cell A UE RNC Measurement Report (1B event, Delete cell A) Active Set Update (Delete cellA) Measurement Report (1A event, Add cell A) Active Set Update (Add cell A)

Interference Reasons for Pilot Pollution: Cross-cell coverage of high Node-B Node-B in ring layout Signal distortion caused by street effect or strong reflection

Interference Judgment of DL interference: Reason of DL interference: CPICH RSCP of the active set is large than -85dBm Ec/Io is lower than -13dB Reason of DL interference: Pilot pollution Unconfigured neighboring cell The downlink interference is mainly caused by the Pilot Pollution or Unconfigured Neighboring Cells. The typical feature of downlink interference call drop is that the RNC sends the Active Set Update message to the UE but the UE cannot receive it. As a result, RL Failure call drop occurs.

Interference Judgment of UL interference: Reason of UL interference: The average RTWP of an idle cell exceeds -100dBm The max RTWP is around -90dBm Reason of UL interference: Intra-RAT interferences Inter-RAT interferences. The downlink interference is mainly caused by the Pilot Pollution or Unconfigured Neighboring Cells. The typical feature of downlink interference call drop is that the RNC sends the Active Set Update message to the UE but the UE cannot receive it. As a result, RL Failure call drop occurs.

UL interference = -93(dBm) Case-Interference UL interference = -93(dBm)

Case-Interference In this case, the signal of the UE cannot be received by the uplink. The value of UL interference in the SIB7 is -93 dBm. It indicates that the uplink RTWP is high. Then, you can infer that the call drop is caused by uplink interference. At the same time, you can verify the interference using the RTWP statistics of the OMC.

PSC Confliction When analyzing such call drop, check Cell ID in the call drop signaling besides PSCs because the neighbor relation is identified by Cell ID.

PSC Confliction Cell A and Cell B are configured as neighbor cell for each other. Cell C and Cell B are not configured as neighbor cells for each other. Cell A and Cell C have the same PSC.

PSC Confliction Cell A is the neighbor cell of Cell B. Cell D is the neighbor cell of Cell C. Cell A and Cell D have the same PSC.

PSC Confliction Cell B and Cell D are not configured as neighbor cell for each other. Cell A is the neighbor cell of Cell B. Cell E is the neighbor cell of Cell D. Cell A and Cell E have the same PSC.

Engineering Error Call drops caused by engineering error: Reversely-connected antenna An excessive VSWR Multi-band antenna problem Leakage of signals from indoor distribution system Call drop caused by unsteady transmission

Case-Engineering Error

Content Definition of Call Drop Reasons of Call Drop Analysis of Call Drop Parameters of Call Drop Case of Call Drop

Common Analysis Methods for Call Drop Analyzing Call Drops by DT Analyzing Call Drops by Traffic Statistics

Analyzing Call Drops by DT Call drop data Call drop spots Stability of the primary serving cell RSCP and Ec/Io of the primary serving cell Reproducing of problems with DT

Analyzing Call Drops by Traffic Statistics The commonly used KPI analysis method is the TOP cell method, which means the top cells will be screened out according to certain index, then these top cells are optimized and then the top cells are selected again. After several repetitions, the related KPI can be speedily converged.

Multi-Dimension Analysis Multi-dimension analysis is carried out from different perspectives. For the call drop problem, not only the call drop itself, but also related factors such as access handover traffic statistics time RTWP

Multi-Dimension Analysis Cell ID Cell Name CS Call Drop Rate [%] Number of Successful CS RAB establishment Total Abnormal Release Abnormal Iu Released Number, by Cause Repeated Integrity Checking Failure Radio Connection With UE Lost TRELOCoverall expiry Failure in the Radio Interface Procedure Unspecified Failure UTRAN Generated Reason Abnormal RAB Released Number, by Cause Release due to UTRAN in cell Generated Reason Iu UP Failure CS Traffic [Erl] PS Traffic [Kbyte] HSDPA RLC Throughput [Mbps] Max Cell Freq RTWP [dBm] Average Cell Freq RTWP [dBm] Max Cell Freq Tcp [dBm] Average Cell Freq Tcp [dBm] Max HSDPA users in cell Average HSDPA users in cell Max HSUPA users in cell Average HSUPA users in cell

Trend Analysis

Accident Analysis Check the equipment alarm and system log of this period to find out hardware problems; Check the transmission of this period; Check whether the upgrade or cell blocking is performed during this period; Check whether there is an occasion with abrupt high traffic requirements such as a concert, game, or exhibition.

Ranking Analysis Ranking analysis Ranking analysis is carried out through classifying data into top N and bottom N data from a large amount of data. Index Reason of failure for Handover Failure times Percent(%) 1 Failure when getting the decision of handover from database 2 Timeout for setup of service channel in handover 3 Failure for decision of NodeB hard handover 4 Failure when build the service channel 5 Timeout for waiting for the handover of UE complete 10 Other errors 3104 9.24 12 Basic channel switch, cannot find appointed frequency 13 Basic channel switch, failed to allocate the resource 14 Basic channel switch, failed to setup channel board 21 Not enough resource for channel 22 OVSF code is not engough 24 Timeout for handover of UE 29966 89.16 25 The frequency is configured in the neighbouring cell list 26 Overload for power allocation of the frequency for the service cell 27 There is no idle channel in service cell 29 There is not suitable frequency in service cell 30 Different reason of failure for several service cells 32 Can not find UE 416 1.24 34 Abnormal release in CN 9 0.09

Cause-and-Effect Analysis For a certain effect, the cause-and-effect analysis is performed to locate the causes that may result in the effect and to determine the influence of the causes. For example, the call congestion of a cell may be caused by insufficient capacity of the hardware, of the downlink, or of the uplink.

Content Definition of Call Drop Reasons of Call Drop Analysis of Call Drop Parameters of Call Drop Case of Call Drop

Optimization Methods for Call Drop Engineer optimization: Directional angle, downtilt, position of Antenna, type of Antenna, Transmit power of BS, position of BS, new BS. Radio parameter optimization: Time to Trigger, CIO, threshold of enabling/disabling Compression Mode, Maximum transmit power of DL RL, Threshold of Inter-frequency and Inter-system.

Time To Trigger Abbreviated Name TrigTime[MAX_INTRA_MEAS_EVENT] Description This parameter indicates the time difference between having detected the event generation and reporting the event. Only when the event generation is detected and still meets all requirements of event triggering after Time to trigger, the event can be triggered and reported. The larger the value is, the stricter the judgment is for the event to be triggered. The parameter should be set according to the actual requirements. Sometimes, if it is set too large, the quality of calls may decrease. Range and Step (0, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 160, 200, 240,320, 640, 1280, 2560, 5000)ms Default Value UE Event Report Parameters for CPICH Ec/No: [200,640,320,320,200,200, 320]ms UE Event Report Parameters for CPICH RSCP: [200,200,200,200,200,200,200]ms Detected Set Measurement Parameters for CPICH Ec/No: [200]ms Detected Set Measurement Parameters for CPICH RSCP: [200]ms Time To Trigger (TTT) refers to the interval between the detection and reporting of events (1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D). The setting of TTT has an impact on the promptness of handovers.

Cell Individual Offset Abbreviated Name CellIndivOffset Description An offset is allocated for each cell being monitored. The offset can be positive or negative. Before the UE judges whether an event occurs, adds the offset to the measurement result. If the PCPICH uses a positive offset, the UE sends the measurement report just like PCPICH is x dB better than the actual case. Or, if the PCPICH uses a negative offset, the PCPICH report is limited. When the cell individual offset is used, the corresponding cell is possibly (at least temporarily) the target cell of the handover or removed from the active set. Range and Step OMCR: [-10, 10] dB, step 0.5 RNC: D=(P+10)*2, [0, 40] Default Value 0dB A higher value of this parameter results in easier soft handovers, more UEs in the soft handover state, and more used resources. A lower value results in more difficult handovers. The CIO has an impact on the non-best cell. In detail, the CIO is effective for 1a events in neighboring cells and effective for 1b events in cells to be deleted.

Threshold of Enabling/Disabling Compression Mode Abbreviated Name ThreshUsedFreq[MAX_INTER_MEAS_EVENT] Description This parameter indicates the absolute threshold that is required to be configured for event 2b/2d/2f (used when judging the quality of the currently used frequency. Range and Step CPICH RSCP: [-115, -25] dBm, step 1dBm CPICH Ec/No: [-24, 0] dB, step 1dB Default Value UE Inter-frequency Event Report Parameters for CPICH Ec/No: [-24,-13, -24,-13,-24,-8]dB UE Inter-frequency Event Report Parameters for CPICH RSCP: [-115,-95,-115,-95,-115,-80]dBm The compression mode is used in inter-frequency and inter-system handovers. The compression mode is enabled before the handover. Currently, the compression mode is enabled by the 2D event and disabled by the 2F event. The measurement can be RSCP or Ec/Io. By default, the RSCP is currently used.

Maximum Downlink Transmit Power of Radio Link Abbreviated Name MaxDlDpchPwr Description This parameter indicates the maximum downlink DPCH transmission power. When performing the downlink inner loop power control, the new transmission power must be smaller than or equal to the configured DPCH Maximum DL Power. If the newly computed transmission power is larger than the configured DPCH Maximum DL Power, make it equal to the configured DPCH Maximum DL Power. Range and Step [-35, 15] dB, step 0.1 dB If call drop occurs frequently in a cell due to coverage problem, increase the maximum downlink transmit power of services. However, a user in the edge area may consume great transmit power, which affects other users and reduces the downlink capacity of the system. If users fail to access a cell due to heavy traffic, consider changing the value of this parameter to a smaller value.

Maximum Downlink Transmit Power of Radio Link Conversational DL 3.4kbps Signaling(AM): 0 dB Conversational DL 13.6kbps Signaling:0dB Conversational DL WAMR 6.60~23.85kbps: 0dB Conversational DL 64kbps (PS Conversational Video): 3dB Conversational DL NAMR 4.75~12.2kbps: 0dB Conversational DL CS 28.8kbps: -6dB Conversational DL CS 32kbps: -4dB Conversational DL CS 64kbps: 3dB Streaming DL CS 14.4kbps: -7dB Streaming DL CS 28.8kbps: -6dB Streaming DL CS 57.6kbps: -4dB Streaming DL CS 64kbps: 3dB Streaming DL PS 16kbps:-4dB Streaming DL PS64kbps: 1dB Streaming DL PS384kbps: 4dB Streaming DL PS128kbps: 2dB Interactive DL PS 8kbps:-8dB Interactive DL PS 16kbps:-4dB Interactive DL PS64kbps: 1dB Interactive DL PS384kbps: 4dB Interactive DL PS128kbps: 2dB Background DL PS 8kbps:-8dB Background DL PS 16kbps:-4dB Background DL PS64kbps: 1dB Background DL PS384kbps: 4dB Background DL PS128kbps: 2dB

Maximum Downlink Transmit Power of Radio Link Streaming DL CS64kbps: 3dB Interactive DL PS 1.2Mbps: 4dB Interactive DL PS 3.65Mbps: 4dB Interactive DL PS 7.2Mbps: 4dB Interactive DL PS 10.1Mbps: 4dB Interactive DL PS 14.0Mbps: 4dB Background DL PS 1.2Mbps: 4dB Background DL PS 3.65Mbps: 4dB Background DL PS 7.2Mbps: 4dB Background DL PS 10.1Mbps: 4dB Background DL PS 14.0Mbps: 4dB Streaming DL PS 1.2Mbps: 4dB Streaming DL PS 3.65Mbps: 4dB Streaming DL PS 7.2Mbps: 4dB Streaming DL PS 10.1Mbps: 4dB Streaming DL PS 14.0Mbps: 4dB Interactive DL PS 17.6Mbps: 4dB Interactive DL PS 21.096Mbps: 4dB Background DL PS 17.6Mbps: 4dB Background DL PS 21.096Mbps: 4dB Streaming DL PS 17.6Mbps: 4dB Streaming DL PS 21.096Mbps: 4dB

Threshold of Inter-system handover Abbreviated Name Thresh[MAX_RAT_MEAS_EVENT] Description This parameter indicates the absolute threshold of the UTRAN cell quality that UE uses to judge event 3a. The range and unit of the parameter relate to the measurement quantity of UTRAN system. Range and Step CPICH RSCP: [-115, -25] dBm, step 1dBm CPICH Ec/No: [-24, 0] dB, step 1dB Default Value UE Event Report Parameters for Own System CPICH Ec/No: [-6,-24,-24,-24] UE Event Report Parameters for Own System CPICH RSCP: [-95,-115,-115,-115] When the measured value of inter-system neighboring cell signal exceeds the specified threshold, handover is triggered. If you set this parameter to a small value, handover is triggered ahead of time. If you set this parameter to a great value, handover is delayed.

Timer and Counter Related to Call Drop Name Description Value Range Default Value T312 Connected T312 of connection mode, that is, the time when the UE waits for L1 synchronization indicator when the special physical channel is set up (1..15)s 1s N312 Connected N312 of connection mode, that is, the number of synchronization indicators that the UE should receive continuously from L1 before the special channel is set up successfully (1, 2, 4, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000) 1 T313 Waiting time after the DPCCH channel set up in CELL_DCH mode loses synchronization (0..15)s 3s N313 Maximum number of lost synchronization indicators that the UE receives continuously from the L1 (1, 2, 4, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200) 20 T314 Time of cell update, existing in T314-related radio bearer when wireless connection fails (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20)s 4s T315 Time of cell update, existing in T315-related radio bearer when wireless connection fails (0,10, 30, 60, 180, 600, 1200, 1800)s 30s N315 Maximum number of synchronization indicators that the UE receives continuously from L1 in T313 activated state T309 Waiting time after initiating requests to access other RATs, such as GSM (1..8)s

Content Definition of Call Drop Reasons of Call Drop Analysis of Call Drop Parameters of Call Drop Case of Call Drop

Neighboring Relation Adjustment Reason High call drop rate caused by improper neighbor list configuration Description The call drop rate of the TRI135W-1 cell corresponding to RNC1 in Libya is always around 3%, and no hardware alarm is generated. The cell coverage is mainly on the sea.

Neighboring Relation Adjustment

Neighboring Relation Adjustment After the neighbor relation is adjusted, the CS call drop rate of TRI135W-1 decreases from 3% to 1.3%.

Unconfigured Neighboring Cell 9 74

Unconfigured Neighboring Cell Main parameters: Cells in the system Troubleshooting process: The cell with SC 9 is in the detection set and cannot be added to the active set when the quality of the serving cell with SC 74 is extremely poor. This is a typical unconfigured neighboring cell. Solution: Adjust the neighbor relation: Add the cell with SC 9 to the neighbor list of the cell with SC 74. Result: In the same test, the cell with SC 9 is in the active set of the serving cell with SC 74. When the signal cell with SC 9 is strong enough, the UE hands over from the serving cell to the cell with SC 9.

Unconfigured Neighboring Cell 9 74 9 74

Soft Handover Parameter Optimization Reason: Low handover success rate because of improper soft handover parameter configuration Description: The success rate of the handover from sector 1 (SC 436) of the Shuqian Lu site to sector 2 (SC 434) of the Meihuacun hotel is low. This area is within the Shuqian Lu section. Main parameters: Soft handover 1a/1b event handover threshold, trigger time

Soft Handover Parameter Optimization The signal quality of the Shuqian Lu section is poor and unstable because there are overpasses in this section, Because the comparative threshold decision algorithm is used, a cell with poor signal quality may be added to the active set if the 1a threshold is excessively high. If the RNC sends the ActiveSet Update Command message to instruct the UE to enter this cell, the soft handover may fail because the radio link cannot be set up due to poor and unstable signal quality of this cell.

Soft Handover Parameter Optimization Adjust the 1a/1b event handover threshold and trigger time of cell 436. Lower the 1a event handover threshold and shorten the trigger time to ensure that the cells with good signal quality can firstly enter the active set. Raise the 1b event handover threshold and extend the trigger time so that the cells are not deleted too early due to drastic signal deterioration.

Soft Handover Parameter Optimization Result After the parameter optimization, cell 434 of the BS-1 (Meihuacun hotel site) can be added to the active set quickly and is not deleted too early. According to the drive test result from more than 100 times of handover tests, the success rate of the handover between the BS-2 (Shuqian Lu site) and the BS-1 (Meihuacun hotel site) increases greatly.

Data Configuration Optimization in 2G/3G Handover Reason Call drop because of incorrect data configuration Description When the 2G/3G handover tests are performed at the boundary of the 3G network, the handover from the 3G network to the 2G network succeeds in the west to east direction, but the handover fails in the east to west direction. Main parameters BSC ID, LAC, NCC, and BCCH of the 2G neighboring cell 3G 2G fail

Data Configuration Optimization in 2G/3G Handover Troubleshooting process Because the handover from 3G network to 2G network fails, you should firstly check whether 2G neighboring cells are configured. If all 2G neighboring cells are configured, go to the next step. Record whether the 2G Sagem UE starts the compression mode when the signal quality of a 3G UE is lower than the threshold for starting the compression mode, and record the CI of the 2G cell where the compression mode is started. You can find that the UE starts the compression mode after the preceding step is performed. The signaling is as follows:

Data Configuration Optimization in 2G/3G Handover However, after the UE starts the compression mode, the repositioning fails. The signaling is as follows: And the cause of the repositioning failure is as follows: According to the preceding signaling analysis, you can infer that the UE does not recognize the BSC of the 2G cell during the 3G-to-2G handover. In this case, the failure may be caused by unconfigured BSC ID or LAC.

Data Configuration Optimization in 2G/3G Handover Solution: Check the BSC and LAC of the target 2G cell on the CN. You can find that the LAC is not configured. Then, reconfigure the LACs of all 2G neighboring cells on the CN. Result: After the data is configured again, all 3G-to-2G handovers succeed. Suggestion for similar problems: In the 3G-to-2G handover, the BSC ID, LAC, NCC, and BCCH of 2G neighboring cells must be configured in the 2G neighboring cell database of the OMCR and on the CN.

Call Drop Case-Handover

Call Drop Case-Handover Delete Cell 51 and Cell 53

Call Drop Case-Handover Report e1A to add cell 51 and Cell 53 into Active Set after 0.4 second

Call Drop Case-Handover Report e1a to add cell 51,64,53,52 to Active Set

Call Drop Case-Handover

Call Drop Case-Handover Continue report e1a to add stronger cells to Active Set But UE cannot receive the AcitiveUpdate message because the poor signal of the cells in ActiveSet.

Call Drop Case-Handover

Call Drop Case-Handover Call Drop Happened