S. Skakun1,2, J.-C. Roger1,2, E. Vermote2, C. Justice1, J. Masek3

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Image Registration  Mapping of Evolution. Registration Goals Assume the correspondences are known Find such f() and g() such that the images are best.
Advertisements

Lightning Imager and its Level 2 products Jochen Grandell Remote Sensing and Products Division.
Liang APEIS Capacity Building Workshop on Integrated Environmental Monitoring of Asia-Pacific Region September 2002, Beijing,, China Atmospheric.
MODIS Science Team Meeting - 18 – 20 May Routine Mapping of Land-surface Carbon, Water and Energy Fluxes at Field to Regional Scales by Fusing Multi-scale.
Data Merging and GIS Integration
The Next Three Weeks In this sequence we will cover end-to-end data collection and analysis for a practical application. The overall objective is to develop.
Introduction to Image Processing Grass Sky Tree ? ? Review.
HJ-1A/B CCD IMAGERY Geometric Distortions and Precise Geometric Correction Accuracy Analysis Changmiao Hu, Ping Tang
Automated Image Registration Using Morphological Region of Interest Feature Extraction Antonio Plaza University of Extremadura. Caceres, Spain Jacqueline.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
Introduction to Remote Sensing. Outline What is remote sensing? The electromagnetic spectrum (EMS) The four resolutions Image Classification Incorporation.
Scale Effect of Vegetation Index Based Thermal Sharpening: A Simulation Study Based on ASTER Data X.H. Chen a, Y. Yamaguchi a, J. Chen b, Y.S. Shi a a.
Digital Numbers The Remote Sensing world calls cell values are also called a digital number or DN. In most of the imagery we work with the DN represents.
Assessment of Regional Vegetation Productivity: Using NDVI Temporal Profile Metrics Background NOAA satellite AVHRR data archive NDVI temporal profile.
A New Subspace Approach for Supervised Hyperspectral Image Classification Jun Li 1,2, José M. Bioucas-Dias 2 and Antonio Plaza 1 1 Hyperspectral Computing.
A METHODOLOGY TO SELECT PHENOLOGICALLY SUITABLE LANDSAT SCENES FOR FOREST CHANGE DETECTION IGARSS 2011, Jul, 27, 2011 Do-Hyung Kim, Raghuram Narashiman,
IMAGE MOSAICING Summer School on Document Image Processing
National Mapping Division EROS Data Center U. S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Operation Systems (EROS) Data Center World Data.
Remotely Sensed Data EMP 580 Fall 2015 Dr. Jim Graham Materials from Sara Hanna.
The role of remote sensing in Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation.
Parameters Describing Earth Observing Remote Sensing Systems
May 16-18, 2005MultTemp 2005, Biloxi, MS1 Monitoring Change Through Hierarchical Segmentation of Remotely Sensed Image Data James C. Tilton Mail Code 606*
Abstract: Dryland river basins frequently support both irrigated agriculture and riparian vegetation and remote sensing methods are needed to monitor.
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA MRC RPC – 11 July 2007 Greg Easson, Ph.D. Robert Holt, Ph.D. A. K. M. Azad Hossain University.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Advanced Satellite Products to Better Understand I&M Data within the Context of the Larger.
Estimating Water Optical Properties, Water Depth and Bottom Albedo Using High Resolution Satellite Imagery for Coastal Habitat Mapping S. C. Liew #, P.
Compression and Analysis of Very Large Imagery Data Sets Using Spatial Statistics James A. Shine George Mason University and US Army Topographic Engineering.
Dec 15, 2004 AGUMolly E. Brown, PhD1 Inter-Sensor Validation of NDVI time series from AVHRR, SPOT-Vegetation, SeaWIFS, MODIS, and LandSAT ETM+ Molly E.
Understanding Glacier Characteristics in Rocky Mountains Using Remote Sensing Yang Qing.
Investigating the use of Deep Convective Clouds (DCCs) to monitor on-orbit performance of the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) using Lightning Imaging.
EG2234: Earth Observation Interactions - Land Dr Mark Cresswell.
2011 IEEE International Geoscience And Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS’11  July 24-29, 2011  Vancouver, C ANADA A synergy between SMOS & AQUARIUS: resampling.
An Examination of the Relation between Burn Severity and Forest Height Change in the Taylor Complex Fire using LIDAR data from ICESat/GLAS Andrew Maher.
Validation and comparison of Terra/MODIS active fire detections from INPE and UMd/NASA algorithms LBA Ecology Land Cover – 23 Jeffrey T. Morisette 1, Ivan.
Introduction GOES-R ABI will be the first GOES imaging instrument providing observations in both the visible and the near infrared spectral bands. Therefore.
2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) Aihua Li Yanchen Bo
Computer vision. Applications and Algorithms in CV Tutorial 3: Multi scale signal representation Pyramids DFT - Discrete Fourier transform.
CSCI 631 – Foundations of Computer Vision March 15, 2016 Ashwini Imran Image Stitching Link: singhashwini.mesinghashwini.me.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
IMAGE PIXELS OF RFI<0.2 ONLY
Temporal Classification and Change Detection
A Atmospheric Correction Update and ACIX Status
Automatically Collect Ground Control Points from Online Aerial Maps
University of Ioannina
HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DIFFERENT CROPS USING
ASTER image – one of the fastest changing places in the U.S. Where??
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
GOES-R Risk Reduction Research on Satellite-Derived Overshooting Tops
Multisource Imaging of Seasonal Dynamics in Land Surface Phenology: A Fusion Approach Using Landsat and Sentinel-2 Mark Friedl1, Eli Melaas1, Jordan Graesser1,
Prof. Nataliia Kussul, Space Research Institute NASU-SSAU
Remote Sensing What is Remote Sensing? Sample Images
By Yudhi Gunawan * and Tamás János **
Landsat Program The World’s Most Sophisticated Optical Observatories of the Earth The World’s Model for International Collaboration in Earth Observation.
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
Digital Numbers The Remote Sensing world calls cell values are also called a digital number or DN. In most of the imagery we work with the DN represents.
Paulo Gonçalves1 Hugo Carrão2 André Pinheiro2 Mário Caetano2
USGS Agency Update: CARD4L Production Roadmap
Presented by Ron Morfitt, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
Satellite Sensors – Historical Perspectives
EMP 580 Fall 2015 Dr. Jim Graham Materials from Sara Hanna
Satellite data Marco Puts
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
NOAA Objective Sea Surface Salinity Analysis P. Xie, Y. Xue, and A
Antonio Plaza University of Extremadura. Caceres, Spain
Introduction to Sensor Interpretation
Remote Sensing Landscape Changes Before and After King Fire 2014
Introduction to Sensor Interpretation
VALIDATION OF FINE RESOLUTION LAND-SURFACE ENERGY FLUXES DERIVED WITH COMBINED SENTINEL-2 AND SENTINEL-3 OBSERVATIONS IGARSS 2018 – Radoslaw.
Image Registration  Mapping of Evolution
Review and Importance CS 111.
Presentation transcript:

S. Skakun1,2, J.-C. Roger1,2, E. Vermote2, C. Justice1, J. Masek3 AUTOMATIC CO-REGISTRATION OF MULTI-TEMPORAL LANDSAT-8/OLI AND SENTINEL-2A/MSI IMAGES S. Skakun1,2, J.-C. Roger1,2, E. Vermote2, C. Justice1, J. Masek3 1 Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park MD 20742, USA 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Code 619, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 3 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Code 618, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA

IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Introduction Many applications in climate change and environmental and agricultural monitoring rely heavily on the exploitation of multi-temporal satellite imagery Combined use of freely available Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 images can offer high temporal frequency of about 1 image every 3–5 days globally Data should be consistent Including co-registration IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

Introduction: Sentinel-2A/MSI MSI = Multi-Spectral Instrument (Gascon et al. 2017) IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

Introduction: Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) instruments https://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Introduction Both sensor geolocation systems are designed to use ground control to improve the geolocation accuracy and repeatability (Storey et al. 2016) Sentinel-2A The Sentinel-2 geolocation will use a Global Reference Image (GRI) derived from orthorectified Sentinel-2 cloud-free images (Déchoz et al. 2015) Planned to be available at the end of 2017 Landsat-8 The Landsat-8 geolocation uses a global sample of ground control points (Storey et al., 2014) derived for each WRS-2 path/row of circa 2000 Global Land Survey (GLS) Landsat-7 imagery (Gutman et al., 2013). (Gascon et al. 2017) https://landsat.usgs.gov/global-land-surveys-gls IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

Landsat-8/Sentinel-2A Harmonization L8 30 m pixel Pixel value misalignment LC8 (center) and S2 (UL) Different UTM zones: L8 uses north zone even for southern hemisphere, while S2 uses south zones e.g. 20N from LC8 vs 20S from S2 Misregistration “estimate of the expected Sentinel-2 to Landsat-8 misregistration …. yields a 38 meter (2σ) expected registration accuracy between the sensors” [Storey et al., RSE, 2016] S2 tile boundary S2 10 m pixel IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

Landsat-8/Sentinel-2A Misregistration T20HNH – Sentinel-2A, band 08 (NIR), 10 m – Landsat-8, band5 (NIR), 30 m IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Methodology Automatic generation of control points (CPs). Phase-only correlation image matching method introduced by Guizar-Sicairos et al. (2008). It uses: a cross-correlation approach in the frequency domain by means of the Fourier transform and exploits a computationally efficient procedure based on nonlinear optimization and Discrete Fourier Transforms (DFTs) to detect sub-pixel shifts between reference and sensed images. Landsat-8 image S. Skakun, J.-C. Roger, E. F. Vermote, J. G. Masek, and C. O. Justice, “Automatic sub-pixel co-registration of Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager and Sentinel-2A Multi-Spectral Instrument images using phase correlation and machine learning based mapping,” Int. J. Digital Earth, 2017, doi:10.1080/17538947.2017.1304586. IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Methodology CPs filtering. A peak cross-correlation normalized magnitude is used for initial rejection of CPs. After that, a RANdom SAmple Consensus (RANSAC) algorithm (Fischler and Bolles 1981) is run for the linear transformation model to detect inliers and outliers Landsat-8 image S. Skakun, J.-C. Roger, E. F. Vermote, J. G. Masek, and C. O. Justice, “Automatic sub-pixel co-registration of Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager and Sentinel-2A Multi-Spectral Instrument images using phase correlation and machine learning based mapping,” Int. J. Digital Earth, 2017, doi:10.1080/17538947.2017.1304586. IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Methodology Transformation function. A transformation function F() is built to find correspondence between CPs in the reference image xr = (xr, yr) and points in the sensed image xs = (xs, ys): (xs, ys) = F(xr, yr). The following functions are evaluated: Polynomial Radial Basis Functions (RBFs) Gaussian Thin-plate splines (TPS) Random Forest (RF) regression Landsat-8 image S. Skakun, J.-C. Roger, E. F. Vermote, J. G. Masek, and C. O. Justice, “Automatic sub-pixel co-registration of Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager and Sentinel-2A Multi-Spectral Instrument images using phase correlation and machine learning based mapping,” Int. J. Digital Earth, 2017, doi:10.1080/17538947.2017.1304586. IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Data used Co-registration of 45 Landsat-8 to Sentinel-2A pairs and 37 Sentinel-2A to Sentinel-2A pairs were analyzed. IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Results IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Results IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Results IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Results Performance of different transformation functions when co-registering Landsat-8 to Sentinel-2A at 30 m IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Results Performance of different transformation functions when co-registering Sentinel-2A to Sentinel-2A at 10 m IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Results Without co-registration With co-registration T20HNH – Sentinel-2A, band 08 (NIR), 10 m – Landsat-8, band5 (NIR), 30 m IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Results A 30 m “chessboard” composed of alternating Landsat-8 (acquired on 20-Dec-2015) and Sentinel-2A (24-Dec-2015) images before (left) and after co-registration (right). IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

Sentinel-2A Multi-spectral Misregistration [Sentinel-2 Products Specification Document https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/ 247904/685211/Sentinel-2-Product-Specifications-Document] IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

Sentinel-2A Multi-spectral Misregistration S. Skakun, E. F. Vermote, J.-C. Roger, and C. O. Justice, “Multi -spectral misregistration of Sentinel -2A images: analysis and implications for potential applications ,” IEEE GRSL, 2017, (under review) A subset of Sentinel-2A true color image (combination of bands B4, B3, and B2) acquired on 13 June 2017 (a). Shift maps were estimated from different pairs of visible bands at 10 m spatial resolution using a phase correlation approach with a sliding window size nw=16 and step size ns=2: bands 3 and 2 (b); bands 4 and 3 (c); and bands 4 and 2 (d). IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

Sentinel-2A Multi-spectral Misregistration Example of cloud detection for Sentinel-2A/MSI images acquired over the US (tile 16TCK) on 15 June 2016 (a) and 21 May 2017 (d). True color images (combination of bands 4, 3 and 2) at 10 m spatial resolution along with the built-in cloud mask (in red) are shown in subplots (a) and (d); shifts estimated from band 4 and 2 images using phase correlation are shown in (b) and (e); cloud masks (in magenta) derived from the multi-spectral misregistration using a threshold of 0.2 pixels for shifts are shown in subplots (c) and (f). IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Conclusions Phase correlation proved to be a robust approach that allowed us to identify 100’s and 1000’s of control points on Landsat-8/Sentinel-2A images acquired more than 100 days apart. Misregistration of up to 1.6 pixels at 30 m resolution between multi- temporal Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A images, and 1.2 pixels (same orbits) and 2.8 pixels (adjacent orbits) at 10 m resolution between multi-temporal Sentinel-2A images were observed. The Random Forest regression used for constructing the mapping function showed best results, yielding an average RMSE error of 0.07 ± 0.02 pixels at 30 m, and 0.09 ± 0.05 at 10 m Sentinel-2A multi-spectral misregistration: shifts of more than 1.1 pixels can be observed for moving targets such as airplanes sub-pixels shifts of 0.2 to 0.8 pixels are observed for clouds, and can be used for cloud detection as one of the criteria IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA Thank You! IGARSS 2017, July 23-28, 2017, Fort Worth, Texas, USA