ALPS SPS BPM Read-out Electronics RF Front-end – revised

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EKT 441 MICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS
Advertisements

Chapter 13 Transmission Lines
M.Gasior, CERN-AB-BIBase-Band Tune (BBQ) Measurement System 1 Base-Band Tune (BBQ) Measurement System Marek Gasior Beam Instrumentation Group, CERN.
Fiber-Optic Communications
Mid-Semester Design Review High Frequency Radio with BPSK Modulation.
Microwave Engineering/Active Microwave Devices 9-13 September Semiconductor Microwave Devices Major Applications Substrate Material Frequency Limitation.
Agenda Introduction Overview of RF Design Process Case Study: RF Front-End  Low-Noise Amplifier (LNA)  Duplexer  Power Amplifier Measurement for Design.
KFPA LO Modifications (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review January 30, 2009 G. Anderson.
Polarimetric Solid State Radar Design for CASA Student Test Bed
BI day 2011 T Bogey CERN BE/BI. Overview to the TTpos system Proposed technical solution Performance of the system Lab test Beam test Planning for 2012.
1 C. Simon CLIC Instrumentation workshop BPM C. Simon on behalf of the Saclay’s group CLIC Instrumentation workshop 2 nd - 3 rd June.
IP-BPM status Siwon Jang KNU. Contents The electronics repair status –Repair work status –Electronics RF test (by using Oscilloscope) –Electronics shipment.
1 Microwave Semiconductor Devices Major Applications Substrate Material Frequency Limitation Device Transmitters AmplifiersSi, GaAs, InP< 300 GHzIMPATT.
The beam-based alignment and feedback systems, essential operations of the future colliders, use high resolution Beam Position Monitors (BPM). In the framework.
Amplifiers Amplifier Parameters Gain = Po/Pi in dB = 10 log (Po/Pi)
FONT Hardware Processing electronics and current beam tests Stephen Molloy Queen Mary, University of London.
BI day /12/00 1 PIPOS Project (TT2 & TT10) (Beam performances) G. Vismara  Present situation  Proposals  Beam parameters  Technical solution.
Collimator BPM electronics – Results from the lab, SPS and LHC
Beam Line BPM Filter Module Nathan Eddy May 31, 2005.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme and First Results Stephen Molloy, QMUL 2 nd Mini-Workshop for Nano-Project at ATF.
Andreas Jansson, "Quadrupole Pick-ups", LHC BI-Review, November 19-20, Quadrupole Pick-ups  What is a quadrupole pick-up?  PS pick-ups and experimental.
1 Cold L-Band Cavity BPM: Design Status July 2006 Gennady Romanov Linda Valerio Manfred Wendt Fermilab July 21, 2006.
A New Stripline BPM Design for the ILC IR Fast Feedback (?!) – For discussion: A metal/ceramic brazed BPM pickup – 9/19/2007ILC IR Engineering Design Workshop,
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
ATF DR BPM Upgrade Janice Nelson, Doug McCormick, Justin May, Andrei Seryi, Tonee Smith, Mark Woodley.
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
Peak temperature rise specification for accelerating structures: a review and discussion CLIC meeting
FBCT experience at Desy Presenter: Matthias Werner, DESY At CERN Workshop: „Improving the accuracy of the BCT measurements in the LHC“ January 2011.
Booster bpm’s Jim Crisp 3/29/06. Plate width and linearity with the response linearized along the axis 60 and 20 degree plates become nonlinear in the.
The LHC Beam Position System Ad-hoc Working Group on LHC Experiment-Machine Parameter and Signal Exchange 26 th March 2002 Rhodri Jones (SL/BI)
CLIC Beam instrumentation work shop, CERN, 2 nd & 3 rd of June 2009, Lars Søby BPM overview CLIC instrumentation work shop 2-3 June BPM overview.
1CEA/ Saclay/ SACM CARE/SRF/WP11 Development of a new Beam Position Monitor for FLASH, XFEL and ILC Cryomodules Claire Simon, Michel Luong, Stéphane Chel,
CLIC Workshop 18 th -22 nd January 2016, CERN 1 Alfonso Benot Morell Manfred Wendt.
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme Stephen Molloy, QMUL Nano-Project Mini-Workshop at ATF.
RG58 coaxial cable model in CST CABLE STUDIO S. Caniggia.
Macom RF switches radiation-test results
Stochastic cooling system: Start-up and project modes
Beam Secondary Shower Acquisition System: Front-End RF Design
EUROTeV Diagnostics WP5
RF components Design for the Internet Over TV Band Adaptor
Communication 40 GHz Anurag Nigam.
(4) Filters.
Alternative BPM Processing Scheme – May08 Demo
Spectral methods for measurement of longitudinal beam profile
Status of Interlock BPM
Pulse Processing and Shaping
CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
Status of the MOPOS BI TB – 26th June 2014.
PIN DIODE.
SPS BPM system renovation
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Electronics: Demod + 4Q FE
    BEAM POSITION MONITORS USING A RE-ENTRANT CAVITY C. Simon1, S. Chel1, M. Luong1, P. Contrepois1, P. Girardot1, N. Baboi2 and N. Rouvière3.
CLIC DR EXTRACTION KICKER DESIGN, MANUFACTURE AND EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
Proton Beam Diagnostics
Limits on damping times
Beam Current Monitoring with ICT and BPM Electronics
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
SPS-DQW HOM Measurements
Status of CTC activities for the Damping rings
Phase reference RF work
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Head-Tail Monitor for CC Diagnostics
Near Field Probe Configuration
HL-LHC HEL BPM.
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Presentation transcript:

ALPS SPS BPM Read-out Electronics RF Front-end – revised Manfred Wendt

SPS Beam Conditions ions protons bunch length (4σ) 1.65 ns (14 GeV/c* [FT] or 26 GeV/c*) 4 ns (450 GeV/c*, LHC) 5 ns (400 GeV/c*, FT) bunch intensities >2e9 (min) 5e9 (typ) 2e10 (max) 1.5e10 (max, 5 ns trains) 2.6e11 (max, 25 ns trains) 3.5e11 (max, 50 ns trains) beam formatting SB MB trains: up to 6 bunches(?) 50 & 100 ns spacing 5 ns: 6…2000 bunches 25 ns: 1…12 batches (up to 288 bunches) or 4 batches, each 80 bunches 50 ns: up to 6 batches (up to 144 bunches) * beam momentum given for protons, for ions: 5 GeV/c/u (injection), 177 GeV/c/u (extraction)

BPM Requirements …as relevant for the RF front-end design: TbT and single batch measurement capability No SB measurement capability required BPM operation in TbT and closed-orbit mode under all beam conditions and bunch intensities Resolution: For nominal beam intensities (>2e10 p/bunch): <400 μm in TbT mode <100 μm in closed-orbit mode (40 turns, ~1 ms) For low beam intensities (~2e9 p/bunch): <1 mm in TbT mode <400 μm in closed-orbit mode (40 turns, ~1 ms) Accuracy <0.5 mm RMS (including alignment errors)

BPM Design ”Boundaries” BPM pickups (”shoe-box” style) stay unchanged 103x hor. shoebox, 94x vert. shoebox, 19x stripline BPM pickups total number of read-out channels: 212 (?) Omit long coaxial cables New ALPS BPM system is based on in-tunnel front-end electronics SPS Tunnel environment Radiation tolerant components! Keep conceptual design of the RF front-end prototype Based on logarithmic RF amplifiers (for dynamic range compression) Successful operation in the AWAKE beam-line BUT: Needs modifications to fully cover all SPS beam conditions Tight time schedule and tight budget!

”Shoe-box” Pickup Signal Analysis Single bunch 1e10 protons, 450 GeV “pencil” beam σ = 1.5 ns, 3 ns, 5 ns 1 ns results also available 5 mm beam offset Horizontal for BPMH Vertical for BPMV 50 Ω port BPMV Wakefield simulation DC…2 GHz ~850K mesh cells Accuracy -40 dB Perfect 50 Ω ports! Time domain analysis 2-port S-parameters 50 Ω port BPMH

Single Bunch Response operation frequency

”Shoe-box” BPM Position Sensitivity Transfer response is almost the same for hor. and vert. BPM f < 500 MHz horizontal: ~0.2 dB/mm ~2.3 % change in voltage signal vertical: ~0.4 dB/mm ~4.7 % change in voltage signal independent of the bunch length

”Shoe-box” BPM Electrical Analysis Horizontal pickup Vertical pickup Measurement (VNA) Simulation (CST)

”Shoe-box” BPM Source Impedance transmission-line effect of the feedthrough BPM equivalent circuit (up to ~500 MHz) 50 Ω matching network (~100…300 MHz) ∠S11 measured ∠S11 equivalent circuit Because the original idea of a single terminated BPF did not materialize! unmatched matched

Fun with Filters 0.56 pF 3.4 pF 1.13 μH 187 nH BPM pickup source signal 228 pF 2.78 nH Ideal single terminated 3rd-order Gauss BPF f0 = 200 MHz, BW = 10 MHz No losses due to resistive impedance matching elements!!! BUT: impossible to implement as distributed elements filter network! SB response hor. ”shoe-box” with ideal Gauss BPF, bunch: 1e10, 5 ns

Gaussian Band-pass Filter (BPF) 3rd-order Gaussian Not too complicated! f0 = 200 MHz, BW = 10 MHz Compromise for the SB response ”Hairpin” design Rather compact (nodd)xf0 SPB ”reasonable” strip-line dimensions strip-line PCB tolerances, costs BUT: 2 dB insertion loss! (no free lunch!)

3rd- order Gaussian BPF Response spurious pass-bands (SPB) impulse response DC…1 GHz 200 MHz pass-band optimization (|S21| lin.)

Gerber Files and Manufacturing Quote Thanks to the help of Oskar Bjorkqvist

ALPS RF Frond-end Layout (1 Ch.) BPM Absorbtive LP X-bar switch 3…50 m coaxial cable Log Amps 6 dB coupler Hairpin BPF 20 dB coupler diode limiter high sensitivity range: -45…-5dBm CAL signal 20 dB coupler medium sensitivity range: -25…15dBm low sensitivity range: -5…35dBm

ADL5519 Logarithmic Amplifier Dual LogAmp ADL5519 2-ch LogAmp Rare! Broadband However, not required… Integrated OpAmps Dynamic range 62 dB at 3 dB error 50 dB at 0.5 dB error 40 dB at ~0.1 dB error -45…-5 dBm intensity range (3.56…356 mVpp) ~ 50dBm sensitivity ~2mVpp (0.5 dB error)

ADL5519 Performance @ 100 MHz

RF Front-end PU Signal Simulations No SPICE or IBIS model of the log amp Simplistic model used, tweaked to match the ADL5519 characteristics Included RF loss effects of materials Here with 5m long RG58 between pickup and FE Absorptive low-pass filter Here simulated with 400 MHz pole

SB: 5ns, 2e9 HI MID LO

MB: 6 bunches, 5ns spacing: 1.5ns, 1e10 HI MID LO Saturation!

MB: 50 bunches, 5ns spacing: 1.5ns, 2e10 HI MID LO Saturation!

MB: 12 bunches, 25ns spacing: 1.5ns, 2e11 HI MID LO Saturation!

MB: 6 bunches, 50ns spacing: 1.5ns, 4e11 HI MID LO Saturation! ~600 Vpp signal level at the pickup!!! reduced to ~120 Vpp at the absorptive LPF

CAL Signal Simulations Calibration scheme based on 25 ns pulses utilizes a 200 MHz, BW 40 MHz broadband Gaussian BPF to improve the CAL signal energy efficiency in the pass-band GaAs step attenuator schema 31 dB / 0,5 dB steps for beam / bunch intensity 2x 8 dB / 0.25 dB steps for beam displacement

SB CAL Signal, 0 dB ATT HI MID LO

SB CAL Signal, 0 dB ATT HI MID LO

Last Slide Radiation test of new semiconductor components All new components are pHEMT GaAs technology, still need to be qualified! Evaluation boards available! A few design details need to be finished Include anti-aliasing LPF to the outputs Add level shifters to control the step attenuators Check Guerilla alternative for Mini-Circuits CAL RF amp Lower noise, lower power consumption, power off capability Check DC power consumption Check voltage and power on critical components avoid overheating of components! Verify stripline pickup signal levels Verify design choices ~20 dB overlapping log amp ranges no linear pre-amplifier for high sensitivity range