M977Z224 Charindech Santiwatthana

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture-1 Financial Decision Making and the Law of one Price
Advertisements

PowerPointPresentation by PowerPoint Presentation by Gail B. Wright Professor of Accounting Bryant University © Copyright 2007 Thomson South-Western, a.
Introduction to Research Methodology
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research Method Issues Marian Ford Erin Gonzales November 2, 2010.
Chapter 14 Assessing the Value of IT. Traditional Financial Approaches  ROI – Return on Investments Each area is considered an investment center ROI.
ICT6221 Chapter 14 Assessing the Value of IT Managing the Information Technology Resource Paula Goulding.
© , David Gadish, Ph.D.1 IS/IT Policy and Strategy CIS 590 Spring 2005 Week 9 Lecture Dr. David Gadish.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Creative Problem Solving and Decision Making Chapter 4 Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights.
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING ECONOMY WHAT IS ECONOMICS ? The study of: –How to allocate resources effficiently to satisfy unlimited human wants.
Chapter 9: Introduction to the t statistic
Portfolio Selection of IT Service Products – Case Study Antti Vikman
RESEARCH QUESTIONS, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
© 2004 Managing the Information Technology Resource, Jerry N. LuftmanChapter 14 - Slide 1 Chapter 14 Assessing the Value of IT Managing the Information.
Chapter Three Chapter Three.
Capital expenditure decisions: an introduction
INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING ECONOMY
Lecture 5 Buy or Lease 課程重點 再看一個投資方案的評估 Buy or lease –The financing decision –A lease is a debt –with tax –using a risk-adjusted discount rate –Risk considerations.
1 ECGD3110 Systems Engineering & Economy. 2 Lecture 1 Introduction to Engineering Economics.
Capital Budgeting The Capital Budgeting Decision Time Value of Money Methods of Capital Project Evaluation Cash Flows Capital Rationing The Value of a.
1 Copyright © 2008 Cengage Learning South-Western Heitger/Mowen/Hansen Capital Investment Decisions Chapter Twelve Fundamental Cornerstones of Managerial.
CORNERSTONES of Managerial Accounting 5e. © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part,
TOWARDS AN APPROACH TO MEASURE AND JUSTIFY INVESTMENTS IN A TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE.
A Fuzzy Multiple Level Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approach for Advertising Agency Selection Graduate Student: Eilinawati 研究生 : 謝有花 Advisor: Prof.
Chapter 3 Arbitrage and Financial Decision Making
1 A Maximizing Set and Minimizing Set Based Fuzzy MCDM Approach for the Evaluation and Selection of the Distribution Centers Advisor:Prof. Chu, Ta-Chung.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
@ 2012, Cengage Learning Capital Investment Analysis LO 4 – Factors That Complicate Capital Analysis.
Strategy: Analysis and Practice Slide 1/1 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005 Chapter 14. Risk, uncertainty and strategy.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 McGraw-Hill/Irwin BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Chapter 2.
Maximizing value and Minimizing base on Fuzzy TOPSIS model
Managerial Decision Modeling with Spreadsheets Chapter 1 Introduction to Managerial Decision Modeling.
Portfolio Management Unit – III Session No. 20 Topic: Tools for Formulating Capital Market Expectations Unit – III Session No. 20 Topic: Tools for Formulating.
A Fuzzy Multiple Level Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approach for Advertising Agency Selection Graduate Student: Eilinawati 研究生 : 謝有花 Advisor: Prof.
APPLYING FUZZY LINGUISTIC QUANTIFIER TO SELECT SUPPLY CHAIN PARTNERS AT DIFFERENT PHASES OF PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE Advisor: Prof. Chu, Ta Chung 朱大中 Student:
Copyright  2006 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Management Accounting: Information for managing and creating value 4e Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith.
CHAPTER 11 STRUCTURE AND CONTROLS WITH ORGANIZATIONS.
Chapter 11 Capital Budgeting Techniques: Certainty and Risk Lawrence J. Gitman Jeff Madura Introduction to Finance.
Chapter 12 Valuation: Cash –Flow- Based Approaches.
Research frame work on research topic “Application of a Fuzzy TOPSIS Method to the Evaluation and Selection of E-commerce Strategies” Advisor: Prof. Chu,
Chapter—7 Decision-Making.
Guide for Financial Analysis of Economic Development Projects City of Hampton Finance Committee.
Financial and Managerial Accounting Wild, Shaw, and Chiappetta Fourth Edition Wild, Shaw, and Chiappetta Fourth Edition McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011.
Corporate Finance MLI28C060 Lecture 7 Tuesday 18 October 2016 Capital budgeting: Introduction to project evaluation techniques.
Stages of Research and Development
A21 Business Studies (Investment Appraisal)
Introduction to Marketing Research
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Factors to consider System component costs Methods
Net Present Value Decision Rules IRR (Internal Rate of Return)
Designing the Marketing Channel
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
3 Research Design Formulation
THE FEASIBILTY STUDY LECTURE-5.
Long-Term (Capital Investment) Decisions
Performance Management and Appraisal
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
Chapter Three Research Design.
ENGINEERING ECONOMIC DECISION CHAPTER 1
ENGINEERING ECONOMICS
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research Method Issues
Costing and Finance P R Upadhyay.
Capital Budgeting and its Techniques
Managerial Accounting 2002e
Chapter 24: Capital Investment Decisions
Capital Investment Appraisal: Appraisal process and methods
Power Notes Chapter M9 Capital Investment Analysis Learning Objectives
The Capital Budgeting Decision
Project Management: A Managerial Approach 4/e
Accounting Discipline Overview
Presentation transcript:

M977Z224 Charindech Santiwatthana Research frame work on research topic “Project Manager Performance Evaluation Using a Fuzzy Weighted Average Model" 老師:朱大中 教授 Prof. Ta-Chung Chu M977Z224 Charindech Santiwatthana M97Q0211梁耀文

Introduction In the present economy that shaped up by globalization, the enable of accessibility to information and the increasing of competition, the intangible assets such as knowledge become the critical competitive advantage. In the technological competition era, while business tend to increase their investment, billions of dollar have been spend annually to many projects(Williams, 2005). Successful project consist of organization’s strategic objective, economic environment, well-developed working structure and projects tend to be failed when lacking of project management (PM) discipline and professional(William, 2005). Nidiffer and Dolan (2005) observed that people and process are the heart to successful project development, not tools or technology, that underscore the need of precisely select the manager of the project.

Introduction In Many research studies have defined the project managerial performance in to multidimensional concepts. Several research yield that the study of managerial performance have to consider of social aspect and technical aspect, both consist of qualitative such as leadership behavioral characteristic, attribute, managerial skills..etc. and quantitative such as time, cost, financial performance (NPV), discount cash flow (DCF)..etc. However, most studies focused to the project managerial performance model, not the evaluation. Project managerial evaluation has been a very difficult to make. The criteria that should considered to evaluate may have different important weights in the perspective of different decision maker. Therefore, fuzzy set application can be a very suitable approach.

Objectives This research has the following objective: Establish a fuzzy weight average model for making the evaluation of the project managerial performance. Study the relevant of the project managerial evaluation literature and determine the criteria needed for effective evaluation. Conduct the numerical example to show the computational procedure and the feasibility of the propose model. w

Limitations The limits of the research can be describe as follows: There is a huge amount of criteria that can be consider when trying to evaluate the outcome, so in this research will be limited the amount of criteria. We assume all the criteria are independent. We assume all the quantitative criteria are normally distributed. The model depend largely on the degree of precision judgment and evaluation of the decision –maker to scale the degree of importance weight of criteria and give the rating to each alternative versus each criteria.

Framework Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Literature review Chapter 3 : Fuzzy set theory Chapter 4 : Fuzzy weighted average arithmetic model Chapter 5 : Numerical example Chapter 6 : Conclusion