Educator Effectiveness

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Advertisements

Educator Effectiveness System November 5, Agenda – Town Hall Meeting Community Builder/Video (OPTIONAL) Today, we will be presenting an overview.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness Educator Effectiveness.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Summative Conferences.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness 1.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness June 26,
State of the District Performance and Curriculum November 17, 2014.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Educator Effectiveness PSLA May 3, 2013.
Building Common Assessments APRIL 2, Session Targets  This session will address: ◦The key factors to consider when developing common assessments.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013.
Educator Effectiveness ACT 82 Overview 1. ACT 82 Within Act 82, new requirements for Educator Effectiveness have been defined for teachers, principals,
Educator Effectiveness Update June THE MISSION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF UPPER DUBLIN IS TO PROVIDE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT IN WHICH ALL STUDENTS ARE.
ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Measuring Principal.
Differentiated Supervision
Measuring Educator Effectiveness Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013.
Session Materials  Wiki
Measuring Educator Effectiveness
PENNSYLVANIA’S EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM Dr. John White, Director of SAS EVAAS, presenting on behalf of Dr. Kristen Lewald, PVAAS Statewide Director.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Correlation Data.
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education CIU 20 Principal.
Non Teaching Professionals ½ Day Training. Act 82 of 2012 Passed on June 30, 2012 Defined Three Groups of Educators ◦ Teaching Professionals  Began
FEBRUARY 17, 2014 PVAAS-Teacher Specific Data and Roster Verification.
Non-Teaching Professionals’ Effectiveness Dr. Patricia DiRienzo October 1, 2014.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
Getting Engaged in Evaluation: How to Develop an Evidence-based Offense for Your Evaluation Presented by Ellen Holmes, NBCT
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness December 2012 revision 1.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness December 2012 revision 1.
CAIU 15 October 14,  Introductions ◦ Name, District, School(s), Years as a coach  Announcements ◦ Schedule of network meetings for this year ◦
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Introduction to Peer Observations.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness Educator Effectiveness:
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Act 82 Boot Camp Day 1 July 29 th, 2015 Angela Kirby-Wehr, Educator Effectiveness.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Measuring Principal.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
One Team. One Vision. Unlimited Success Gerald Oehler Old Court Middle School
March 31, Provide an overview of the newly implemented school rating system (School Performance Profile) Provide an overview of the newly implemented.
Educator Effectiveness Digging into Domain 4. Educator Effectiveness in PA  PDE has been working since 2010 to develop an educator effectiveness model.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Differentiated Teacher Supervision and Evaluation Models
What it means for New Teachers
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
A guide for holders of initial and transitional certificates
SLO Scoring and Updates
Educator Effectiveness Evaluation Overview
Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Ongoing Lead Evaluator
Baldwin FLEXIBLE CLERICAL AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING and DIFFERENTIATED SUPERVISION.
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Personal Growth and Professional Development
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Introduction to Core Professionalism
WEBINAR TITLE SAS Review DATE and TIME December 20, 9:30-10:30 am
Presentation transcript:

Educator Effectiveness Palmyra Area School District 2013-14

Session Goals What is PDE’s plan for Educator Effectiveness? How will PASD address PDE’s plan? How is the Danielson Framework structured? What evidence can be collected to address the various domains / components of the rubric? What are my personal goals to increase the effectiveness of my teaching?

Non Teaching Professional Employee Effectiveness System in Act 82 of 2012 Effective 2014-2015 SY Observation/Evidence Danielson Framework Domains Planning and Preparation Educational Environment Delivery of Service Professional Development Student Performance of All Students in the School Building in which the Nonteaching Professional Employee is Employed District Designed Measures and Examinations Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests Industry Certification Examinations Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local Requirements

Principal Effectiveness System in Act 82 of 2012 Effective 2014-2015 SY Observation/ Evidence Domains Strategic/Cultural Leadership Systems Leadership Leadership for Learning Professional and Community Leadership Building Level Data Indicators of Academic Achievement Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, All Students Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, Subgroups Academic Growth PVAAS Other Academic Indicators Credit for Advanced Achievement Correlation Data Based on Teacher Level Measures PVAAS Elective Data/SLOs District Designed Measures and Examinations Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests Industry Certification Examinations Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local Requirements

PASD’s Process of Differentiated Supervision & Evaluation

Best Practices for Teacher Evaluation Defensible definition of teaching Differentiation of evaluative process Evidence-driven process Role of teacher learning Transparency

Danielson Framework Various versions from 1996 – 2013 4 Domains: Planning & Preparation Classroom Environment Instruction Professional Responsibilities Components for Each Domain (5-6 each for a total of 22)

PASD’s Observation Process

Observation Process (con’t)

Pre-Observation

Pre-Observation

Lesson Observation Document (Evidence Collection – Off Stage #1 & #4)

Lesson Observation Document (Evidence Collection – On Stage #2 & #3)

Observation Rubric

Observation Summary (Post-Conference)

Walk-Through Follow-Up

Considerations Do I understand the components/domains of the rubric? Do I know what type of evidence is appropriate? How can I prepare for the observation mode of the differentiated supervision cycle?