A Crash Course in Logic : Introduction to Philosophy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Computing Truth Value.
Advertisements

Hypotheticals: The If/Then Form Hypothetical arguments are usually more obvious than categorical ones. A hypothetical argument has an “if/then” pattern.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 More Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking
 Assertions: unsupported declaration of a belief  Prejudice: a view without evidence for or against  Premises: explicit evidence that lead to a conclusion.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 2 THE LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS THE LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS.
2.2 Conditional Statements. Goals Identify statements which are conditional Identify the antecedent and consequent of a conditional statement Negate conditional.
Logic. what is an argument? People argue all the time ― that is, they have arguments.  It is not often, however, that in the course of having an argument.
BASIC CONCEPTS OF ARGUMENTS
DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
Basic Argumentation.
Chapter 1: Lecture Notes What Is an Argument? (and What is Not?)
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) December 23, 2005.
Logical Arguments. Strength 1.A useless argument is one in which the truth of the premisses has no effect at all on the truth of the conclusion. 2.A weak.
FALSE PREMISE.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument By David Kelsey.
Course Overview and Road Map Computability and Logic.
Determining Validity and Invalidity in Deductive Arguments PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 6, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
Argument Diagramming Part II PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 1, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
2.8 Methods of Proof PHIL 012 1/26/2001.
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic. Logic Main goal: use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid. This is useful for math.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) All dogs have two heads. 2. All tigers are dogs. ___________________________________ 3. All tigers have two.
Study Questions for Quiz 1 1. The Concept of Validity (20 points) a. You will be asked to give the two different definitions of validity given in the lecture.
Argument Diagramming Part I
Sentence (syntactically Independent grammatical unit) QuestionCommandStatement “This is a class in logic.” “I enjoy logic.” “Today is Friday.”
Mathematics for Comter I Lecture 2: Logic (1) Basic definitions Logical operators Translating English sentences.
Chapter 5: Indirect Rules : Logic & Proofs July 9, 2009 Karin Howe.
What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.
NEW FOUNDATIONS FOR IMPERATIVE LOGIC III: A General Definition of Argument Validity Peter B. M. Vranas University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Analyzing Arguments : Introduction to Philosophy June 1, 2009 Instructor: Karin Howe Carnegie Mellon University.
Text Table of Contents #4: What are the Reasons?.
Types of Arguments Inductive Argument: An argument in which the truth of the premises is supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. Strong.
Deductive reasoning.
2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary
Conditional Statements
Valid and Invalid Arguments
FALSE PREMISE.
Revisiting the Toulmin Model and its Greek Predecessors
What makes a Good Argument?
Inductive / Deductive reasoning
Saying the Same Thing.
Symbolization Review.
Chapter 1 The Foundations: Logic and Proof, Sets, and Functions
Truth Trees.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Logical Forms.
Distinguish valid from invalid arguments and sound from unsound
Propositional Logic.
Midterm Discussion.
Making Sense of Arguments
Logic Problems and Questions
Chapter 7: What is Argument?
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1b What is Philosophy? (part 2)
TRUTH TABLES.
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
Arguments in Sentential Logic
Arguments Sign In! Review Conclusions and Conclusion/Premises
Validity.
Introducing Arguments
Deductive vs Non-Deductive Arguments
Propositional Logic 1) Introduction Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Propositional Logic 5) And Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Introducing Natural Deduction
Validity and Soundness, Again
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
The conditional and the bi-conditional
Chapter 5: Indirect Rules
Presentation transcript:

A Crash Course in Logic 80-100: Introduction to Philosophy May 19, 2009 Instructor:Karin Howe Carnegie Mellon University

Some important definitions statement or proposition argument conclusion premises valid invalid sound unsound

Statement or proposition Working definition: a statement is a sentence that is either true or false. Examples: I like cats. Papa John's makes better pizza. If today is Tuesday, then tomorrow is Wednesday You may have either an apple or an orange for a snack.

Sentences that are not statements Shut the door! Is the door open? Ouch! Important Final Note! - Statements are true or false. It makes no sense to say “The statement (premise) is valid,” or “The statement (premise) is sound.” The terms valid and sound refer ONLY to arguments.

Arguments An argument is a set of statements, one of which (the conclusion) supposedly follows from the others (the premises). Arguments are attempts to prove the truth of a claim (the conclusion) on the basis of other claims (the premises). Arguments are attempts to convince you of something; namely to convince you to accept a conclusion based on your acceptance of the premises.

The Kangaroo Argument All kangaroos can fly. Jim is a kangaroo. _____________________ Therefore, Jim can fly.

Evaluating arguments All arguments have two different features that must be separately evaluated: form and content: The evaluation of the form of an FORM argument asks whether the conclusion follows from the premises. The evaluation of the content of CONTENT an argument asks whether all of the premises are true.

FORM: validity vs. invalidity A valid argument is one having the form such that it is impossible that all of its premises are true and its conclusion false. An invalid argument is one having the form such that it is possible that all of its premises are true, and yet the conclusion is false.

Recall the Kangaroo Argument All kangaroos can fly. Jim is a kangaroo. _____________________ Therefore, Jim can fly.

True Fact: 97% of all questions about validity can be answered by thinking about kangaroos. :-D

Content: soundness vs. unsoundness An argument is sound if and only if (iff): it is valid and has all true premises. An argument is unsound if and only if (iff): it is either invalid, or has one or more false premises. Quick Quiz: Kangaroo Argument -- sound or unsound?

Mapping Arguments A Quick How-to Guide

Steps 1 and 2: Finding Premise and Conclusion Indicators Premise Indicators: since however but (at the beginning of a sentence) and (at the beginning of a sentence) for Conclusion Indicators therefore thus hence so consequently it follows (that) which goes to show (that)

Identifying premises and conclusions Step 3: Identify the conclusion and subconclusion(s), if there are any Step 4: Identify the explicit premises

Step 5: Break the argument down into separate statements A word of caution: There are some statements you can, and should break, and others which you should not break! Statements you should break: Sentences that contain both a premise and a subconclusion or conclusion, joined by either a premise indicator or a conclusion indicator "And" statements (conjunctions) Statements you should never break: "Or" statements (disjunctions) "If then" statements (conditionals)

Step 6: Rewrite the statements Remove (or incorporate) parentheticals Remove any premise or conclusion indicators Standardize concepts Write statements in "standard form."

Rewriting statements in standard form If Marvin stays, then Nancy leaves The statement following the word 'if' (or its synonym 'provided that') is the antecedent; accordingly, the statement that follows the word 'if' is placed before the statement following the word 'then' (which is the consequent).

Conditionals are tricksy fellas… Necessary Conditions – P is a necessary condition for Q – Rewritten as: If Q, then P – Mnemonic: neceSSary conditions come second Sufficient Conditions P is a sufficient condition for Q Rewritten as: If P, then Q Mnemonic: suFFicient conditions come first "only if" P only if Q "unless" P unless Q Rewritten as: If not Q, then P

Some Examples 1. The Heat makes it to the playoffs only if the Hawks lose to the Cavs. 2. Your having a quiz average over 90 is a sufficient condition for being excused from the final. 3. The settlement of the west could only take place if the Indian barrier were removed. 4. Hannah could save her company if only the president would promote her. 5. Aquinas thought that the fact that the intellect is under the control of the will is a necessary condition for the existence of intellectual virtues. 6. “Now we shall have duck eggs, unless it is a drake.”

Step 7: Map the Argument Finally!! Let's practice! :-)

My Three Sons Man 1: Yes, I’m married and have three fine sons. Man 2: That’s wonderful! How old are they? Man 1: Well, the product of their ages is equal to 36. Man 2: Hmm. That doesn’t tell me enough. Give me another clue. Man 1: O.K. The sum of their ages is the number on that building across the street. Man 2: Ah ha! I’ve almost got the answer, but I still need another clue. Man 1: Very well. The oldest one has red hair. Man 2: I’ve got it!