If You Build It – They May Not Come!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transport.tamu.edu TAMU Mode Split Survey October 2011.
Advertisements

Core Campus Parking Analysis Executive Facilities Committee: Discussion FEB
Transportation Demand Management: Transport Canada Initiatives Canadian TDM Summit, November RDIMS
Markham Centre TDM and Land Development Case Study ACT Canada – TDM Summit October 21, 2008.
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE (TDMI) – GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PRESENT AND FUTURE European Conference on Mobility Management.
LOGO 1 Sustainable Transportation Research and Practical Needs for Asian Countries Pawinee IAMTRAKUL, Thammasat University 24 November 2009 Asian Institute.
UCSF Child Care Status Report
SOM LRDP Discussion Historic trends and projection of growth in size of clinical and research faculty (assumptions need to be challenged and data validated)
Parking and Transportation Services Presentation December 2, 2008.
Transportation Services Update Faculty Senate - December 11, 2014.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
Bikes are the answer! Meeting transportation, financial and Climate Action Plan goals with bicycle programs.
Less Traffic, Better Places Rethinking Parking Policy Patrick Siegman Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates.
Basic Social Marketing Principles and Process. Outline Social marketing process: Identify goals Segment and target Develop the “4 p’s” –Product, price,
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Reacting to Trends Rising gas prices! Decreasing public funding for transportation. TDM becoming more needed in new development. Modified tax benefit.
Beyond the Environment: Socio- Economic Sustainability & Meaningful Community Input in Land Use Decisions Sarah Muller March 7 th, 2008.
OSU Transportation Services Faculty Senate Update December 11, 2014.
Transport.tamu.edu The mode of transportation I use to get to campus the majority of the time is: Drive alone3826 (49 %) Carpool526 (7 %) Ride Transit2277.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
UC San Diego Transit and Shuttle Funding Issues Fall Quarter 2009.
UCSD Student Center: The Center of a Green Campus ENVS 664 Ta-You Huang Oct 16 th, 2012.
Urban Sprawl Government notices problems in the 1980s –Urban sprawl –Car ownership rising (1960: 113/ : 422/1000) –Little housing for low income.
Alameda County Transportation Services – CCBA Panel Reducing Our Carbon Footprint from Transportation Phillip Kobernick, Alameda County General Services.
Alternative Growth Futures Studio University of Colorado at Denver Sponsors: Custer Heritage Committee San Isabel Foundation Sonoran Institute.
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
NAROPA UNIVERSITY Strategic Plan As Voted On By Naropa’s Board of Trustees “Deliver Distinction With Excellence” September 19, 2008.
San Diego Trolley. Current Current/future expansion Propose extension.
UCLA TRANSPORTATION Getting to Campus. Sustainable Transportation UC Goals – Carbon-Neutrality in Operations by 2025 – Sustainability Practices by 2020.
TDM - Vancouver Experiences Strategic Transportation Planning, Sustainability Group TDM - Vancouver Experience October 21 st ACT TDM Summit 2008 Jo Yee.
Energy Information Administration 25th Anniversary of the 1973 Oil Embargo 25th Anniversary of the 1973 Oil Embargo Energy Trends Since the First Major.
From Here to There: Transportation Demand Strategies to Support the Grounds Plan at the University of Virginia Presented by Chris Conklin, P.E.
Long-Range Planning for a Green Transportation Program: The UCLA Experience Presented to: UC/CSU/CCC Sustainability Conference July/August 2008 Renee A.
Key Trends Shaping Transportation System Management Operations Timothy Papandreou CIO, Director Office of Innovation San Francisco Municipal Transportation.
2012 AITPM Conference Parking Supply Restriction and Mode Shift at QEII Medical Centre: A Case Study Jacob Martin, Senior Transport Planner Cardno.
If You Build It – They May Not Come! Sam Corbett, UC San Diego 2008 Sustainability Conference August 2, 2008 How to advance sustainable transportation.
CAMPUS MASTER PLAN Campus Master Plan Update Presentation to Boulder Campus Planning Commission February 10, 2011 Campus Master Plan Update Presentation.
Economic Framework. Charlotte Metro Area 36th most populated Metropolitan Area in U.S. (2005) Mecklenburg County accounts for about 50% of Metro population.
The Gauteng Economic Indaba Transport and Logistics Mr Piet Sebola Group Executive Strategic Asset Development Date: 09 th June 2016.
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
Sustainability Programs
The BART System Map.
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
Staten Island Commute Data
Downtown Davis Nishi Property.
Parking and Transportation Master Plan Executive Summary
Planning and Parking Forum
ODOT Flexible Funds Program Overview
Important Conversations
Kings County Commute Data
Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO October 19, 2017.
Sustainable Transportation in Campus Planning and Capital Projects
TAMU Mode Split Survey October 2011.
Key features of Key features of 2015 Growth in GDP and energy.
UC Systemwide Update UC Office of the President
Cañada College Sustainability Plan Past… Process/Structure…Goals..
Transportation Services’ Role in the Campus Master Plan
Important Conversations: Business and Campus Permit Follow up
RPPP Policy and Procedures Update
VISION: “The University District will be the subject of joint efforts to preserve and maintain a vital, safe, and attractive community that will be a premiere.
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
Strategic Planning Parking Topics to Review Over the Next Year(s)
A Vision for the District: Perspectives from the City
SDSC Summer Institute Getting Here 5 San Diego Supercomputer Center
Cañada College Sustainability Plan Past… Process/Structure…Goals..
Drive alone 3826 (49 %) Carpool 526 (7 %) Ride Transit 2277 (29 %)
Transportation Advisory Staff Committee (TASC)
Performance Measurement
Downtown Parking Update Parking Advisory Committee
Presentation transcript:

If You Build It – They May Not Come! How to advance sustainable transportation AND save your campus $50 million Sam Corbett, UC San Diego 2008 Sustainability Conference August 2, 2008

Background on UC Growth Trends Related to Transportation As a system, we are expecting to increase student enrollment by 22% by 2020 – an increase of approximately 48,000 FTE students. As student enrollments increase, commensurate staff and faculty increases will also occur. Many campuses have a LRDP goal of housing up to 50% of students on campus.

Background on UC Growth Trends Related to Transportation From a transportation perspective, we are actively pursuing more sustainable transportation practices. At UC San Diego, we had plans to build 13 parking structures to add 11,500 parking spaces by 2020. However, only 3 of these parking structures were built and we’re currently pursuing transportation demand management approaches instead of building more parking structures.

UC San Diego Campus Buildout LRT Station Options

UC San Diego Parking and Transportation Study Study evaluated future parking demand accounting for population growth, impacts upon parking supply, and projected campus mode splits. Campus parking goal is not to exceed parking occupancy standard of 95% - parking occupancy is currently 80% during peak periods. Key finding: additional parking structures are not necessary if transportation demand management techniques are aggressively pursued to meet transportation needs of future campus population.

UCSD Population and Parking Utilization (1995-96 to 2006-07)

Parking Occupancy by Neighborhood

Influencing Factors upon Parking Demand Price of gas – oil prices have more than doubled in the past 4 years and will likely continue to increase. Cost of parking – UC San Diego parking permit prices have increased by 61-66% since 2000-01 which has kept demand flat. Availability of alternative transportation – UCSD’s very strong commitment to alternative transportation has reduced drive alone rates from 66% in 2001 to 49% in 2008; this trend is likely to continue.

U.S. Average Retail Gasoline Price, Regular Grade (Per Gallon)

UCSD Commute Mode Split (1996 – 2008)

University Costs to Accommodate Campus Commuters

Parking Structure Costs Total Spaces Net Spaces Cost per Net Space La Jolla Medical Center $30 M 1000 $29,130 University Center $27.1 M 800 $33,875 Revelle $50.3 M 1700 1273 $39,530 School of Medicine $33.1 M 1100 785 $42,205 Muir $55.5 M 1800 1276 $43,455

Projected Monthly Parking Permit Fees (2012-13) Structure Reserved Permit Faculty Permit Staff Permit Student Permit Approx. % Increase (07/08 – 12/13) No Structures $210 $112 $96 $73 21% UCSDMC-LJ $217 $116 $101 $76 25% University Center $239 $128 $111 $84 37% School of Medicine $249 $133 $115 $88 43% Revelle $275 $148 $127 58% Muir $284 $150 $131 $99 63%

UC San Diego’s TDM Initiatives to Meet Transportation Needs Policy Measure Expected Reduction in Parking Demand Expand and market alternative transportation options to include carpooling, vanpooling and public transit 2,500 – 3,000 spaces Encourage bicycling and improve conditions for bicycling and other non-motorized transportation 200 – 300 spaces Restrict parking for resident freshmen 1,000 spaces Total 3,700 – 4,300 spaces

Lessons Learned Let the prices do the planning – increasing costs of driving/parking are naturally leading people to more sustainable transportation options. Go green – sustainability and fiscal responsibility are integrally connected and often complement each other. Communication is key – extensive campus outreach was critical to getting unanimous vote from our advisory committee to not build additional parking structures. Be creative – in the carbon-constrained world in which we live, we must question assumptions and constantly find new and better ways of doing our business and serving our customers.

Back to the Future…

QUESTIONS? This concludes the American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems Program.