LECTURE DAY 3 Timo Laukkanen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PRESENTERS NDENGA D.L,ASSOCIATED BATTERY MANUFACTURERS,NAIROBI AND KILONZI F.M,MOI UNIVERSITY,ELDORET. APPLICATION OF PINCH TECHNOLOGY IN MINIMISATION.
Advertisements

Integer Optimization Basic Concepts Integer Linear Program(ILP): A linear program except that some or all of the decision variables must have integer.
Tier III: Optimization Design Problems Derek McCormack Section 1: Sample Problems.
Heat Exchanger Network Retrofit
Chapter 9 S,S&L T&S Section 3.5 Terry Ring University of Utah
Institute of Chemical Engineering page 1 Achema 2012 Thermal Process Engineering Energy optimization of industrial sites.
MODULE 12: “Heat and Mass Exchange Networks Optimization”
CHEN 4460 – Process Synthesis, Simulation and Optimization Dr. Mario Richard Eden Department of Chemical Engineering Auburn University Lab Lecture No.
Heat and Power Integration CHEN 4460 – Process Synthesis, Simulation and Optimization Dr. Mario Richard Eden Department of Chemical Engineering Auburn.
CIIEM 2007  Energetic Installations  Badajoz, June 2007 Robust Optimization in Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis João MIRANDA (1), Miguel CASQUILHO.
Thermo-economic modelling and optimization of fuel cell systems Francesca Palazzi, Julien Godat, Dr François Marechal Laboratory for Industrial Energy.
Heat and Power Integration CHEN 4460 – Process Synthesis, Simulation and Optimization Dr. Mario Richard Eden Department of Chemical Engineering Auburn.
CS541 Advanced Networking 1 Introduction to Optimization Neil Tang 2/23/2009.
Process Simulation and Integration of Methanol Production
Modeling and Solution Strategies of MINLPs as MPCCs for Chemical Process Optimization L. T. Biegler Joint work with Alex Dowling, Ravi Kamath, Ignacio.
Heat exchanger network synthesis PAULI HILTUNEN LUCAS BÄCKMAN ENE SPECIAL COURSE IN ENERGY FOR COMMUNITIES P.
Heat Exchange Network Optimization by Thermal Pinch Analysis
Green Engineering Process Integration: Three key components:
Process Integration and Intensification Klemeš / Varbanov / Wan Alwi / Manan ISBN: © 2014 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Abbildungsübersicht.
8 - Heat & Power Integration1 Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis, Part III Ref: Seider, Seader and Lewin (2004), Chapter 10.
Flow rates : Known Obtain : heat capacities (Cp) heat of vaporization/condensation Estimate : vapor loads in the column (design) Obtain heat loads of all.
1 Anantharaman & Gundersen, PSE/ESCAPE ’06 Developments in the Sequential Framework for Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis of industrial size problems Rahul.
Chapter 15 - Heat Exchange Networks
Heat Exchanger Network Design one aspect of process integration J. M. Shaw Instructor CHE 465 I would happily credit the authors who provided the example.
Pinch technology series
6 - Intro HEN Synthesis1 Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis Part I: Introduction Ref: Seider, Seader and Lewin (2004), Chapter 10.
Summary for TEP 4215 E&P/PI T. Gundersen Reactor System (R)  Endothermic vs. Exothermic Reactions  Equilibrium vs. Kinetics  Temperature Dependence.
Heat Integration Chapt. 10. Costs Heat Exchanger Purchase Cost – C P =K(Area) 0.6 Annual Cost –C A =i m [ΣC p,i + ΣC P,A,j ]+sF s +(cw)F cw i m =return.
Part 6 Synthesis of Heat Exchanger Networks. 6.1 Sequential Synthesis Minimum Utility Cost.
Pinch Technology: 기본 이론. Identify Opportunities by Inspection Process Unit 10 C 100 C 150 C 30 C SteamCooling Water FeedProduct An opportunity for heat.
Integer Programming Key characteristic of an Integer Program (IP) or Mixed Integer Linear Program (MILP): One or more of the decision variable must be.
Area Target Section Stream Population j k Cold Streams Hot Streams H T QjQj enthalpy interval.
Heat Integration Chapter 9 S,S&L T&S Section 3.5 Terry Ring University of Utah.
Linear Programming Chapter 1 Introduction.
Pinch Technology. Pinch technology 개요 Pinch technology systematic methodology for energy saving in processes and total sites Energy target Cross pinch.
Process design and integration Timo Laukkanen. The main objectives of this course To learn how to use tools that can be used to design heat recovery systems.
Lecture 5 Multiobjective optimization GAMS-Nimbus integration SUMMARY Timo Laukkanen.
Pinch Technology and optimization of the use of utilities – part two Maurizio Fermeglia
Hierarchy of Decisions HEAT EXCHANGER NETWORK (HEN)
LECTURE DAY 2 Timo Laukkanen. What was important in Lecture 1 Process Integration/Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis (HENS) is an important step in process.
) Recherche & Innovation Multi-Objectives, Multi-Period Optimization of district networks Using Evolutionary Algorithms and MILP: Daily thermal storage.
Ene Process Integration, Simulation and Optimization P
Ene Process Integration, Simulation and Optimization P
Pinch Technology and optimization of the use of utilities – part two
COURSE ARRANGEMENTS Fall 2017
Synthesis of Heat Exchanger Networks
6.5 Stochastic Prog. and Benders’ decomposition
Process design and integration
Euler’s network theorem
Multiobjective optimization GAMS-Nimbus integration SUMMARY
Hierarchy of Decisions
Pinch Technology and optimization of the use of utilities – part one
MODULE 12: “Heat and Mass Exchange Networks Optimization”
T H enthalpy interval Hot Streams Cold Streams Section Stream j
Process design, process integration and energy system optimization
Sieder, Chapter 11 Terry Ring University of Utah
CH EN 5253 – Process Design II
SOME RESULTS IN GRAPH THEORY
Pinch Technology and optimization of the use of utilities – part one
Heat Exchange Networks
Simulation Project & Reports
LECTURE DAY 2 Timo Laukkanen.
Integer Programming (정수계획법)
Synthesis of Heat Exchanger Networks
Tier III: Optimization Design Problems
Hierarchy of Decisions
Synthesis of Heat Exchanger Networks
6.5 Stochastic Prog. and Benders’ decomposition
CH EN 5253 – Process Design II
Communication Networks
Presentation transcript:

LECTURE DAY 3 Timo Laukkanen

What was important in Lecture 2 Problem Table Algorithm (PTA) Heat Cascade Grand Composite Curve (GCC) Pinch violations Stream grid Maximum Energy Recovery (MER) Network Targeting for minimum number of Units

What is important in Lecture 3 A LP (linear programming) transshipment model for minimizing utility consumption A MILP (Mixed Integer Linear Programming) extended transhipment model for minimizing the number of units

Different optimization model types

Global and Local Optima

Convex, Concave and Non-Convex functions

Optimization with a mathematical model

Sequential Heat Exchanger Synthesis Problem Data (streams, cost) DT min value Optimization of utilities consumption LP-transshipment model Minimization of number of units MILP-transshipment model Optimization of network cost NLP-superstructure Result OK? NO, new DTmin value YES, STOP

Sequential Heat Exchanger Synthesis LP Model: Minimum Utility Consumption (Transshipment Model)

Temperature Intervals   Tsupply (°C) Ttarget (°C) m cp (kW/K) H1 400 120 1.0 H2 250 2.0 C1 160 1.5 C2 100 1.3 ∆Tmin = 50°C Hot Utility: Steam at 450°C Cold Utility: Water at 20°C Find the starting temperatures of all streams (and utilities) Keep one column for hot temperatures and one for cold Add ∆Tmin to get hot, substract to get cold

Hot Utility: Steam at 450°C Cold Utility: Water at 20°C TI 1 TI 2 TI 3   Tsupply (°C) Ttarget (°C) m cp (kW/K) H1 400 120 1.0 H2 250 2.0 C1 160 1.5 C2 100 1.3 ∆Tmin = 50°C Hot Utility: Steam at 450°C Cold Utility: Water at 20°C   450 400 TI 1 350 TI 2 250 200 TI 3 210 160 TI 4 150 100 TI 5 70 20 H1 250 H2 C1 C2 120 120

H1 H2 C1 C2 ∆Tmin = 50°C Hot Utility: Steam at 450°C   Tsupply (°C) Ttarget (°C) m cp (kW/K) H1 400 120 1.0 H2 250 2.0 C1 160 1.5 C2 100 1.3 ∆Tmin = 50°C Hot Utility: Steam at 450°C Cold Utility: Water at 20°C   450 400 H1 H2 C1 C2 TI 1 75 350 TI 2 150 225 65 250 200 TI 3 40 80 60 52 210 160 TI 4 120 78 100 TI 5 30 70 20 H1 250 H2 C1 C2 120 120

Qs TI 1 75 C1 225 R1 60 150 TI 2 H1 R2 65 40 80 TI 3 52 H2 C2 78 120 60 R3 60 TI 4 30 R4 TI 5 Qw

R1 + 75 = Qs R2 + 225 + 65 = R1 + 150 R3 + 60 + 52 = R2 + 40 + 80 R4 + 78 = R3 + 60 + 120 Qw = R4 + 30 + 60

R1 + 75 = Qs R2 + 225 + 65 = R1 + 150 R3 + 60 + 52 = R2 + 40 + 80 R4 + 78 = R3 + 60 + 120 Qw = R4 + 30 + 60 Min Z = Qs + Qw s.t. R1 – Qs = 75 R2 - R1 = -140 R3 - R2 = 8 R4 - R3 = 102 Qw - R4 = 90 Qs, Qw, R1, R2, R3, R4 ≥ 0

General Formulation index Sets Parameters Variables

Interval k hot process cold process hot utility cold utility

Sequential Heat Exchanger Synthesis Extended LP Transshipment Model

Qs TI 1 75 C1 225 R1 60 150 TI 2 H1 R2 65 40 80 TI 3 52 H2 C2 78 120 60 R3 60 TI 4 30 R4 TI 5 Qw

C1 Q112 Q113 H1 R12 Q122 Q123 C2 Q124 R13 R14

Energy Balances

Sequential Heat Exchanger Synthesis MILP Transshipment Model Minimum number of units

Simplifactions Hot utilities treated as hot streams Cold utilities treated as cold streams Divide the problem at the pinch Energy balance for temperature intervals:

If, then Either, or