The Children’s Aid Society of Brant

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by: Tracy Ellis, General Magistrate, 13th Judicial Circuit
Advertisements

Effective Casework Practice (Foster Care) Ongoing assessment of childs needs and interventions Ongoing assessment and implementation of services/supports.
Day 2 – Residential Redesign Working Sessions Results and World Café Process.
Lake County Employment Services Welfare-to-Work Process Flow
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Quality Parenting for Children in Foster Care Act Nancy C. Detert Common Sense and Compassion Independent Living Act July 31, 2013.
MHSA Full Service Partnership (FSP) For YOUTH (Ages 0-15) and TAY (Transition-Age Youth) (Ages 16-25) Santa Clara County Mental Health Board System Planning.
Kinship Care – Client Complexity Preliminary Research Findings ACWA Presenters: Marita Scott & Lynne McCrae.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
 Johnny was born on February 14, 1994  Resides with his mother, father, and two year old sister  Mother works as a full time nurse  Father is self.
Return to Parent (Reunification) AdoptionPLC Fit and Willing Relative APPLA
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Allianceforchildwelfare.org Adoptions.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
Youth Empowerment Services (YES) A Medicaid Waiver Program for Children with Severe Emotional Disturbances Clinical Eligibility Determination Texas Department.
Family Search & Engagement Creating Lifetime Connections Linda Librizzi, LCSW Mardi Louisell, MA, MSW.
ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH Children’s Behavioral Health.
Educating Children and Youth Experiencing Homelessness January, 2013 CESA 10.
DRAFT ENHANCED FOSTER HOME (EFH) Eckerd Youth Alternative Teen Foster Home Initiative Teen Foster Homes are challenging on several different levels. Teens.
WEBINAR, AUGUST 9, 2011 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Quality Service Review Ratings on the Quick.
DCFS School Readiness Planning Initiative Insure that all young children in the system start school ready to learn –Physically –Socially –Emotionally.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
Background Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide a coordinated and comprehensive array of community-based services and supports to families.
Profiles Dr Diana Birch Youth Support. Introduction ► Profiles’ - provides a detailed description of the individuals and families who have been referred.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Strictly adhere to the FTC model and all of ACS’s requirements for General Preventive services Maintain caseload of 45 families Conduct 2 face-to-face.
Association of Childrens Welfare Agencies Conference 2006 Improving Care Through Accreditation- The Role of the NSW Children’s Guardian.
PL THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING FAMILIES ACT WASHINGTON STATE'S RESPONSE TO THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING.
Kamala H. Shugar Assistant Attorney in Charge Oregon Department of Justice Child Advocacy Section.
ACWA Conference 2010 Barnardos Find-a-Family Working Together – Promoting Positive Relationships to Enhance Permanency Lisa Velickovich and Laura Ritchie.
Comparing Year 9 and Year 10 May, Background Assessment and Action Record Interviews (AAR’s) are completed annually with all children and youth.
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant Preliminary Findings Crown Ward Review 2011 February 28-March 10, 2011.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
Ongoing Assessment/Permanency FSFN CM 123_OAP_FSFN_PPT_July 2012 PPT 1.
Coalition for Educational Equity for Foster Youth
PSESD Board of Directors
Session Outcomes Overview of Project STAY OUT
PCWC 2016 Presenter: Daniel Kikulwe
Texas Health and Human Services
Department of Juvenile Justice
CHILD WELL BEING; PERMANENCY; PERMANENCY OPTIONS
“exploring the possibilities of your future”
2015 Annual Report February 9, 2016 Presenters:
Comprehensive Academic Assessment & Other Forms
STRONG FAMILIES SELF- SUFFICENT STABLE RELIANT SUPPORTIVE.
Kinship 101: Information for Relatives and “Suitable Others”
Quality Case Practice Improvement
Foster Care Managed Care Program
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
Adoption Assistance Adoption Assistance came about as an effort to increase the adoptive placements of children/youth that were considered “hard to place”
Child Protective Services Update
Understanding APD Services
Mental Health Services
MHSA Full Service Partnership (FSP) For YOUTH (Ages 0-15) and TAY (Transition-Age Youth) (Ages 16-25) Santa Clara County Mental Health Board System Planning.
Ongoing Assessment and Permanency
Open Adoption Agreements
Mental Health Services
Presentation to the Senate Finance Committee August 18, 2010
Psychotropic Medication Use by Children in Texas Foster Care:
Legislative update 83rd Legislature
The Transition Planning Process
Beaver County Single Point of Accountability
Regional Center of Orange County 2011 Performance Contract
FFTA Conversations on Family First Prevention Services Act
Aims To introduce the Residential Support Programme model used in Liverpool To discuss some outcomes of the programme.
Program Training.
Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facility- PRTF
Presentation transcript:

The Children’s Aid Society of Brant Preliminary Findings Crown Ward Review 2011 February 28-March 10, 2011

2011 Crown Ward Review 132 Crown wards reviewed 136 Crown wards reviewed in 2010 121 Crown wards reviewed in 2009 132 Crown wards reviewed in 2008 24 Crown wards reviewed for the first time 108 Crown wards previously reviewed 2 cases of adoption probation 2 cases of adoption probation in 2010 9 cases of adoption probation in 2009

Reasons for Admission 2011 2010 Caregiver Capacity 72 (54.5%) 72 (52.9%) Caregiver Substance Abuse 27 (20.5%) 28 (20.6%) Parents Mental Health 5 (3.8%) 3 (2.2%) Abandonment/Separation 22 (16.7%) 23 (16.9%) Harm by Commission 19 (14.4%) 21 (15.4%) Harm by Omission 12 (9.1%) 12 (8.8%) Emotional Harm 7(5.3%) 8 (5.9%) Previous admissions to care 67 (50.8%) 73 (53.7%)

Child Profile by Age Age at time of review: 2011 2010 0 - 9 years 15 (11.4%) 13 (9.6%) 10 - 12 years 20 (14.9%) 26 (19.1%) 13 - 17 years 97 (73.5%) 97 (71.3%) Average age at time of review – 14.1 years Average age at time of review in 2010 – 14.0 years Average age at time of review in 2009– 14.0 years 2009 provincial average is 14.1 years at time of review Average age at time of Crown wardship years – 8.4 years Average age at time of Crown wardship in 2010 - 8.6 years Average age at time of Crown wardship in 2009 - 8.7 years 2009 provincial average is 8.2 years at time of Crown wardship

Permanency Plans 2011 2010 Long term foster care 82 (62.1%) 75 (55.1%) 2011 2010 Long term foster care 82 (62.1%) 75 (55.1%) Independence 27 (20.5%) 30 (22.1%) Long term group care 5 (3.8%) 3 (2.2%) Adult Services 3 (2.3%) 3 (2.2%) Adoption 5 (3.8%) 12 (8.8%) Return home 0 (0%) 1 (0.7%) Not clear 10 (7.6%) 12 (8.8%)

Children With Diagnosed Identified Needs 97 (73.5%) children identified with special needs 101 (74.3%) children identified with special needs in 2010 2009 provincial average of children with special needs is 83% 58 (43.9%) children were taking psychotropic medication 60 (44.1%) were taking psychotropic medication in 2010 2009 provincial average is 49%. 36 (27.3%) children were involved in therapy 43 (31.6%) were involved in therapy in 2010 2009 provincial average of children receiving therapy is 41% 14 (10.6%) children were identified as high risk, and of these : none required follow up 5(3.7%) of children were identified as high risk in 2010 2009 provincial average is 9% of children identified as high risk

Children with Identified Needs 2011 2009 Prov.% ADD/ADHD 35 (27%) 25% Psychiatric Diagnosis 16 (12%) 15% Learning Disability 6 (5%) 8% Developmental Delay 2 (2%) 7% Neurological Disorder 1 (1%) Emotional Difficulty 7 (5%) FASD 5 (4%) Medical Condition 4 (3%) Multiple Disabilities 4 (3%) Physical disability 0 (%)

Behavioural Issues 53 (40.2%) children with behavioural issues 54 (39.7%) children with behavioural issues in 2010 2009 provincial average for children with behavioural difficulties is 43%. 2009Prov % Aggressive/Assaultive Behaviour 37 (28%) 34% Substance Abuse 2 (1.5%) 3% Inappropriate sexual behaviour 3 (2%) 3% Self Harming Behaviours 1 (0.8%) Frequent Running Behavior 6 (5%) Suicidal Ideation – Current 2 (1.5%) Suicidal Ideation - Historical 1 (0.8%) Involvement in Prostitution 0 (0%) Other 1 (0.8%) History YCJA activity 12 (9.1%) 2010 – 12 (8.8%) 2009 provincial average is 8% of Crown wards had a history of YCJA involvement

Serious Occurrences in Previous 12 Months 32 files reported serious occurrences since the last review 27 cases with reports on file 5 Recommendation to File Serious Occurrence Report

Educational Placements 129 (97.7%) children were enrolled in a school program The 2009 provincial average is 96% of children attending school. 61 in elementary school including kindergarten 68 in secondary school 47 (35.6%) had been reviewed by an IPRC Committee The 2009 provincial average is 52% of children reviewed by an IPRC 25 (18.9%) children experienced suspensions The 2009 provincial average is 17% of children suspended in the previous 12 months 115 (89.1%) were making some progress (89.9% in 2010) The 2009 provincial average of children who were making progress was 91%.

History of Verified Abuse 16 (12.1%) of the children experienced physical or sexual abuse prior to coming into care 0 (0%) of the children were abused while living in a resource The 2009 provincial average is 4% of children abused while living in a resource. Previous history of verified abuse (while at home or in care) is 12.1 % The 2009 provincial average is 24%

Services to Aboriginal Children 40 (30.3%)children had Native heritage 2009 Provincial average is 22% of children with Native heritage 34 (85%)children had status 2009 Provincial average is 60% of children who had status 5 children were non status and 1 child’s eligibility was yet to be determined 37 (92.5%) children were participating or had opportunities to participate in cultural and/or spiritual practices 2009 provincial average is 82% of children participating in cultural/spiritual practices 21 (52.5%) children were residing in a Native placement 2009 provincial average is 22% placed in a Native home

Services to Aboriginal Children 27 (67.5%) cases where First Nations were involved in planning and in 11 (27.5%) attempts were made 2009 provincial average is First Nations involvement in planning in 15% of the cases and attempts were made in 15% 11 children were placed in their home community (27.5%) 2009 provincial average is 8% of children placed in home community 9 children maintained contact with home community (22.5%) 2009 provincial average is 22% of children maintaining contact

Placement 100 (75.8%) children placed in CAS operated care 40 (30%) in specialized foster care 32 (24%) in regular foster care 27 (20%) in kinship foster care 1 (1%) in treatment foster care 2(1.5%) with a Community Caregiver 3 (2.3%) in a parental home 100 (73.5%) children in CAS operated care in 2010 2009 provincial average is 49% of children in CAS operated care

Placement 19 (14.4%) children in OPR 6 (5%) children in foster homes 8 (6%) children in staffed homes 5 (4%) children in parent model homes 22 (16.2%) were in OPR placements in 2010 2009 provincial average is 31% of children in OPR 6 (5%) children were living independently 12 (9%) living independently in 2010 1 child was placed in Children’s mental health and 1 child was in YCJ 114 (86.4%) children/youth were living in family settings 115 (84.6%) living in family settings in 2010

Frequency of Placement Change 1 placement change every 25.7 months 1 placement change every 23.6 months in 2010 2009 provincial average is a placement change every 27 months 71 children (53.8%) experienced placement continuity since Crown wardship 70 children (51.5%) experienced placement continuity in 2010 The provincial average is 43% of children who had one placement since Crown wardship. Average number of placements since Crown wardship – 2.7 2010 Average number of placements since Crown Wardship – 2.7

Frequency of Caseworker Change 1 caseworker every 17.1 months 1 caseworker every 16.4 months in 2010 2009 provincial average is 21.1 months on average.

Caseworkers Since Crown Wardship 1 caseworker since Crown wardship - 12 2 caseworkers since Crown wardship – 30 3 or more caseworkers since Crown wardship – 90 Average number of caseworkers since Crown wardship –4.0 2010 Average number of caseworkers since Crown wardship – 4.0

Average Caseworker Contact 12.9 visits over the past 12 months 12.6 visits in 2010 The 2009 provincial average is 11.9 visits.

Access 104 (78.8%) had court ordered access 24 (18.2%) had orders of no access 4 (3.0%) had court orders silent as to access 54 mothers only exercised access in (40.9%) cases 11 fathers only exercised access in (8.3%) cases 32 both parents exercised access in (24.2%) cases 91 extended family exercised access in (68.9%) cases sibling access occurred in 114 cases (86.4%) 100 Crown Wards (75.8%) had siblings in care

Overall Summary 132 files reviewed 110 files were in full compliance 36 directives were issued in 20 cases 2 cases not in compliance and no directives issued overall legislative compliance rating –83.3% Brant overall compliance in 2010 – 69.9% 2009 provincial average compliance is 66%

Compliance with Standards Cases where applicable Cases in Compliance Level of Compliance 2011 Level of Compliance 2010 7 day visit 30 29 96.7% 96.8% 30 day visit 100% 93.3% Minimum 3 month visit 132 129 97.7% 95.6% Private visit 100.0% Child’s family history 128 97.0% 98.5% Annual medical exam 94.0% Annual dental 126 95.5% 97.8%

Compliance with Standards Cases where applicable Cases in Compliance Level of Compliance 2011 Level of Compliance 2010 Review POC 113 107 94.7% 92.9% 30 day review replacement 31 30 96.8% 85.2% Review of plan by Supervisor 112 106 94.6% 90.3% POC address specific needs 132 128 97.0% 92.6% Annual school report 131 100.0% Discussion of rights POC residential resources 23 AAR 129 97.7% 90.4%

DIRECTIVES Directives were issued 1 – 7 day visit 3 - Minimum 3 month visit 3 - Private visit 4 - Child’s social history 2 - Annual medical exam 3 - Annual dental exam 6 - Review of plan of care 1 - Review within 30 days if child moves 6 - Review of plan by supervisor 4 – Plan of Care address specific needs 3 - AAR

Recommendations 62 cases did not require service recommendations 134 recommendations were issued in 70 cases 54 to enhance the planning documentation including the social history (14); the plan of care (25) and the recording (15); 29 to file pertinent reports including, school report (10) medical and dental report (4); clinical report (7);Resource report (2); Incident/Investigation report(1), and serious occurrence report (5) 25 to consider additional assessment or support for children and youth including to consider counselling (1); psychiatric or psychological assessment (12); educational or vocational support (6); group support (1), and to prepare for independence (5) 17 to reassess children’s needs including Review permanency planning (12); to review access arrangements (5) 1 to determine eligibility for native status and 1 to apply to Criminal Injuries Compensation 6 Other 1 to review rights

Areas that Require Attention Continued attention to ensure the timely completion of the planning process, including the AAR, the social history and the plan of care; Continued efforts to address continuity of care and caseworker continuity; Continue to ensure development of detailed, measurable goals and tasks in all developmental dimensions of plans of care; Consider updated assessments of children’s needs to assist in planning; Review Serious Occurrence reporting guidelines, and Documentation to reflect exploration of all permanency options, for enduring relationships and post care support.

Highlights of the Review Substantial increase in the overall level of compliance ; The majority of children (75.8%) were placed in CAS operated care ; Effective placement resources and behavioural management supports for an older age, increasingly high risk population of children and youth; The majority of children (53.8%) experienced placement continuity since Crown wardship; The majority of children (86.4%) were placed in family settings; Caseworker contact with children was above the provincial average; :

Highlights of the Review Access was well managed and beneficial with children maintaining connections to their siblings, parents, and extended family; Academic achievement was a focus of children's planning with the majority of children (89.1%) making progress; The society made active efforts to place children in Native homes, connect them to their culture and communities and engage the First Nations in case planning, and The society's response to the majority of the directives and recommendations from the 2009 Crown Ward Review was evident in the case file.