André Lubeck; Dr. Gihad Mohamad; Dr. Fonseca, Fernando Soares; PhD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R1.3 RESP1.3 RESPONSE OF CIVIL ENGIONEEONSE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING PROJECT 1.3 RESPONSE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING PROJECT 1.3 RESPONSE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING PROJECT.
Advertisements

1 Class #25.1 Civil Engineering Materials – CIVE 2110 Definitions Material Properties Concrete Compressive Strength, f’ c Fall 2010 Dr. Gupta Dr. Pickett.
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
Ma.Carlota Fermín Jorge Matheus
Design of Machine Elements
High Temperature Composites Rutgers University Federal Aviation Administration Advanced Materials Flammability Atlantic City, NJ October 24, 2001.
Engineering materials lecture #14
The National Crash Analysis Center The George Washington University Un-Constrained Models Comparison For Elastic Roof – Production Roof – Strong Pillars.
Materials Engineering – Day 2
Mixed-Mode Fatigue Disbond on Metal-to-Metal Interfaces Motivation Adhesive bonding provides a promising alternative to riveted connections, providing.
Lecture #19 Failure & Fracture
Joints and Shear Fractures
A new assessment method for masonry arch bridges (SMART) Clive Melbourne, Adrienn Tomor School of Computing, Science and Engineering, University of.
ENGR 225 Section
COLUMNS.
COLUMNS. COLUMNS Introduction According to ACI Code 2.1, a structural element with a ratio of height-to least lateral dimension exceeding three used.
1. By Dr. Attaullah Shah Swedish College of Engineering and Technology Wah Cantt. CE-401 Reinforced Concrete Design-II.
WORKSHEET 2 FAILURE, STRESS AND STRAIN
Concrete Technology Properties of Hardened Concrete Lecture 17 Eng: Eyad Haddad.
Feng Xiong PhD Professor of Civil Engineering Sichuan University Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis for Precast Short Column Connections Under Cyclic Loading.
Mechanical Behavior of Recycled PET Fiber Reinforced Concrete Matrix (Paper Code: 15FR ) Dr. C. Marthong and Dr. D. K. Sarma National Institute.
SHEAR IN BEAMS. SHEAR IN BEAMS Introduction Loads applied to beams produce bending moments, shearing forces, as shown, and in some cases torques. Beams.
Reinforced Concrete Design
Load Resistance – The Structural Properties of Materials Chapter 4.
BIOSYST-MeBioS Turgor BIOSYST-MeBioS Objective To investigate the influence of turgor on micromechanical properties of apple parenchyma To investigate.
Dynamic Behaviour of Unsaturated CH soil under Cyclic Loading in Unconsolidated Undrained Conditions 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering,
FUNDAMENTALS OF METAL FORMING
Welding Design 1998/MJ1/MatJoin2/1 Design. Lesson Objectives When you finish this lesson you will understand: Mechanical and Physical Properties (structure.
Chapter 5 Construction Mortar.
Comparison of strength behavior of unidirectional HMC and HSC composite subjected to biaxial loading J. Krystek, R. Kottner, L. Bek 19 th Conference on.
Recycled Concrete Aggregates ET 493 INSTRUCTOR: CRIS KOUTSOUGERAS ADVISOR: MOHAMED ZEIDAN BY: CHASE CHARRIER AND GARRETT TREGRE.
Mechanical Properties of Materials
Engineering I – Statics. Test the Strength of Structural Members To design a structure, an engineer must be able to determine the strengths of the structural.
PHF110: Basic Physics and Materials Dr Mark A. E. Jepson Room: S227
1 MFGT 104 Materials and Quality Compression, Shear, Flexural, Impact Testing Professor Joe Greene CSU, CHICO.
University of Sydney – BDes Design Studies 1A - Structures Modes of Failure Mike Rosenman 2000 Modes of Failure solids held together by bonds between their.
EGM 5653 Advanced Mechanics of Materials
Haseeb Ullah Khan Jatoi Department of Chemical Engineering UET Lahore.
Mechanical properties of dental biomaterials 2
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Importance of Intrinsic Damage Properties to Bone Fragility: A Finite Element.
5. FERROCEMENT.
Lab #3: Strat Columns: Draw to scale Lab #3: Strat Columns: Draw to scale Includes: (left to right) Age (era and period) Name of unit Thickness of unit.
Elasto - plastic behavior of beam-to- column connections with fillets of steel bridge frame piers.
PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS ENF 150 Chapter 10: Properties of Materials.
Dr. Younis M. ALSHKANE and Dr. Serwan Kh. RAFIQ
Post and Lintel University Simón Bolívar English 2 Francis Martínez
How to make Buildings ductile for Good Seismic Performance?
Presenter Name and Institution
Material Testing under Tension
Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
Lecturer: Dr. Frederick Owusu-Nimo
Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Beams Under Bending
Dr. Omar S.M.J.Ali PhD Orthodontic
Plain & Reinforced Concrete-1 CE3601
Contents Introduction Identification of the knowledge gap
Poisons Ratio Poisons ratio = . w0 w Usually poisons ratio ranges from
Compressive behavior of CNT in polymer matrix with Weak interface
Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
( BDA 3033 ) CHAPTER 6 Theories of Elastic Failures
Tutorial in Mechanical Properties
Determination of Fracture Toughness
Earthquake resistant buildings
3 Torsion.
( BDA 3033 ) CHAPTER 6 Theories of Elastic Failures
Factors Controlling Behavior of Materials
Applied Technology High School (ATHS)
Dr S.Sreenath PhD, MSc Engg, MSc (ICM), MBA
Mechanical properties of metals Stress and Strain in metals
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
Tutorial.
Presentation transcript:

André Lubeck; Dr. Gihad Mohamad; Dr. Fonseca, Fernando Soares; PhD. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AND FAILURE MODE OF AXIALLY LOADED HOLLOW CONCRETE BLOCK MASONRY Please use this slide as your Title Slide. Ensure that your presentation file is saved with your three-digit paper ID number. André Lubeck; Dr. Gihad Mohamad; Dr. Fonseca, Fernando Soares; PhD.

Introduction Masonry is a complex structural material that behaves differently from the blocks and mortar. Especially, mortar changes the behavior in function of stress level and confinement applied. Previous studies have shown that mortar has a great influence on the failure mode of masonry. 13th Canadian Masonry Symposium June 4th - June 7th, 2017 – Halifax, NS

Introduction While idealizing the masonry system and deciding what materials to used, the performance of each component cannot be evaluated separately, given the physical and mechanical interaction that occurs between them. In this context, it is necessary to evaluate the mortar strength influence on the masonry failure mode and to determine in what circumstances mortar joint crushing occurs. This research was conducted to evaluate the mortar strength influence on the prism strength/block strength efficiency ratio and on the failure mode of hollow concrete block masonry under axial compression. 13th Canadian Masonry Symposium June 4th - June 7th, 2017 – Halifax, NS

Methodology Two-blocks high prisms were constructed. Only one type of concrete block were used and two types of mortar having different compressive strengths were tested. For each prism group, six samples were constructed. The thickness of the mortar joints was 1±0.3 cm. A high-speed camera, capable of shooting 24-frames-per- second, was used to record the test. 13th Canadian Masonry Symposium June 4th - June 7th, 2017 – Halifax, NS

Methodology Concrete block geometry. Shooting of a concrete block prism during compressive test. Prism image during test. 13th Canadian Masonry Symposium June 4th - June 7th, 2017 – Halifax, NS

Block properties 13th Canadian Masonry Symposium June 4th - June 7th, 2017 – Halifax, NS

Mortar properties The amount of water added was adjusted to obtain the required consistence of 230 ±10mm. The compressive and bending tensile strengths were determined using prismatic samples of 4 x 4 x 16cm according to Brazilian standard NBR 13279 (2010). Indirect tensile strength was obtained using cylindrical samples of 5 cm x 10 cm (diameter x height), according to NBR 7222 (2011). The mortar strength-block strength ratio was 0.14 for the weaker mortar and 0.98 for the stronger mortar. 13th Canadian Masonry Symposium June 4th - June 7th, 2017 – Halifax, NS

Results and discussion 13th Canadian Masonry Symposium June 4th - June 7th, 2017 – Halifax, NS

Results and discussion The stress at the onset of failure using net area, σpi,net, was the stress when either joint crushing or the first crack in blocks was observed. The σpi/fp ratio was be used as a measure of prism ductility. The lower this ratio, the more ductile was the failure. In some cases, the stress at the onset of failure could not be determined because failure was abrupt. The prism strength/block strength ratio (fp/fb) is a measure of the efficiency of the prism. 13th Canadian Masonry Symposium June 4th - June 7th, 2017 – Halifax, NS

Stress-strain curves Axial stress versus strain curve for the prisms. 13th Canadian Masonry Symposium June 4th - June 7th, 2017 – Halifax, NS

Results and discussion Prisms constructed with weaker mortar experienced larger deformation than that of the prisms with stronger mortar. For the prisms with the stronger mortar fp,net was 15.2 MPa and the efficiency ratio 0.72. In turn, for prisms with the weaker mortar fp,net was 14.0 MPa and the efficiency factor of 0.67. The failure mode was completely different for the two types of prisms. Prisms with stronger mortar had conical-break post-failure cracking. In turn, prisms with weaker mortar experienced joint crushing at stress levels between 30 and 50% of the prism strength. 13th Canadian Masonry Symposium June 4th - June 7th, 2017 – Halifax, NS

Failure mode – Strong Mortar Prisms Cracking pattern of prisms S5 and S6 (strong mortar) 13th Canadian Masonry Symposium June 4th - June 7th, 2017 – Halifax, NS

Failure mode – Weak Mortar Prisms Failure sequence of the prism W1 (weak mortar) The rupture started with the mortar joint crushing and after that, vertical cracks appeared on the blocks. The mortar crushing started at a stress of 2.8 MPa (s/fp = 0,26). 13th Canadian Masonry Symposium June 4th - June 7th, 2017 – Halifax, NS

Failure mode – Weak Mortar Prisms Failure sequence of the prism W6 (weak mortar) The mortar crushing started at a stress of 2.7 MPa (s/fp = 0,23). 13th Canadian Masonry Symposium June 4th - June 7th, 2017 – Halifax, NS

Failure mode – Weak Mortar Prisms Aspect of the mortar joint of prism W6 after the failure The block-mortar bond was completely broken and the mortar porous structure completely destroyed in prisms with weaker mortar. 13th Canadian Masonry Symposium June 4th - June 7th, 2017 – Halifax, NS

Conclusions The difference between the strength of prisms constructed with the stronger mortar and that of the prisms constructed with the weaker mortar prisms was less than 8%. Mortar controls the prisms failure mode. Prisms with stronger mortar behaved as a homogeneous material, with a conical-break cracking pattern. In contrast, prisms with weaker mortar experienced mortar crushing and complete degradation of the bond between the mortar and blocks. This behavior was observed at stresses close to 50% of the strength. The measurement of the compressive strength of prism is not a reliable parameter without analysis of the failure mode; the compressive strength of prisms built with strong and weak mortars were similar. However, the failure mode of the prisms with weak mortar start by crushing at the half of the final strength observed at machine test. 13th Canadian Masonry Symposium June 4th - June 7th, 2017 – Halifax, NS