Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
Advertisements

RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
Clean Water Act SAFE 210. History/Amendments Recent major amendments were enacted in 1972, 1977, and – Established the National Pollutant Discharge.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Lake Studies Impaired Waters Waters are classified as impaired when they fail to meet state water quality standards and have been placed on the federal.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
What prompted the 1972 Clean Water Act? At which specific water pollution problems was it aimed? “Death” of 4 of 5 Great Lakes Cayuhoga River Fire Santa.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
1 State Water Quality Assessments Under the Clean Water Act Charles Spooner Assessment and Watershed Protection Division Monitoring Branch National Water.
1 Module 1 Overview of the APDES Permitting Program Seattle, Washington April 24-25, 2012.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Water Policy in the US and the EU K H Reckhow and C Pahl-Wostl Part I: US Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Brent Mason, Mackenzie Consoer, Rebekah Perkins BBE 5543 November 8, 2011.
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
Impairments to Water Quality. Module Topics What is Water Quality? What are Pollutants? Types of Water  Stormwater  Wastewater  Process water.
Wireless Access Code: Rob Costello Deputy Attorney General Washington State Attorney General’s Office July 2012.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
A quantification of groundwater seepage during drought and its importance for water quality modeling in the St. Vrain watershed Hannah Chapin Thomas Gerber.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Integrated Watershed Management
Water Pollution: Pollutant Transport Mechanisms
Effluents Standards In Pakistan Environmental protection agency (EPA) is responsible for all aspects of the environment; regulation of sanitation and.
Economic Considerations
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Water Quality Standards Submittal & Review Process
U.S. Clean Water Act: Water Quality Standards Overview
Economic Considerations
Clean Water Act Sec Federal Enforcement
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Module 2 Overview of EPA, the Clean Water Act, and Water Quality Standards - What will we we learn in this Academy? - Who plays what roles in.
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
Water Pollution.
Water Pollution.
Total Maximum Daily Load Program
Clark Fork River Metals TMDL Development
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Phosphorus and Suspended Solids TMDL For the Lower Fox River/Green Bay Area of Concern – Putting the Pieces Together Bud Harris, P. Sager, D. Scheberle,
Lake Erie HABs Workshop
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Clean Water Act (CWA) Purpose
Water Pollution.
Armstrong Creek Watershed Dauphin County, Pennsylvania Siltation TMDL
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Water Pollution.
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Implementation of Water Quality Standards and the WQ Based Approach
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Presentation transcript:

Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering

Source of Class Materials Presentations and Handouts adapted from The U.S. EPA’s Water Quality Standards Academy November 27-December 1, 2006 Washington, DC

Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Strategy for achieving WQS 303(d) Process Based on the relationship between pollutant sources and the condition of a water body Describes an allowable pollutant load and allocates it among several sources

Pollutant Dredged spoil Solid waste Incinerator residue Filter backwash Sewage sludge Munitions Chemical wastes Biological materials Cellar dirt Sand (Some) radioactive materials Heat Wrecked or discarded equipment, Rock Industrial, municipal, and agricultural waste discharged into water

TMDLs Amount of specific pollutant a waterbody can receive and assimilate to still meet water quality standards States and tribes are required to develop TMDLs for waters on their 303(d) lists TMDLs are approved or disapproved by EPA IF disapproved, EPA develops the TMDL

TMDL Components Allowable pollutant load (cap) Allocation of cap among sources Margin of safety (MOS) TMDL = ΣSWLAi + ΣSLAi + MOS ΣSWLAi: Sum of waste load allocations (point sources) ΣSLAi: Sum of load allocations (nonpoint sources) MOS Extra measure of protection due to uncertainty Can be explicit (percentage) or implicit (safety factors and assumptions in modeling)

Components of TMDL Wasteload allocations (WLAs) assigned to each point source Load allocations (LAs) assigned to nonpoint sources WLAs and LAs established so predicted receiving water concentrations do not exceed water quality criteria Other Loads (Nonpoint Background) Reserve Capacity Point Source #1 #2 #3 #4

TMDL “Caps” For specific pollutants For pollutant indicators Sediment, nitrogen, phosphorus, temperature, copper, mercury, etc. For pollutant indicators Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) Not necessarily daily Weekly, monthly or yearly May vary seasonally

TMDL Allocations Each point source with individual NPDES permit receives a wasteload allocation (WLA) Point sources covered under general permits can also get a wasteload allocation (WLA) Individual sources, categories, subcategories of nonpoint sources are represented by a load allocation (LA) No EPA rules on how to allocate

NPS Source Category 2 (LA) NPS Source Category 1 (LA) TMDL Allocation Sub Watershed 1 MOS Reserve Capacity Sub Watershed 2 Natural Background Point Source 1 (WLA) NPS Source Category 2 (LA) NPS Source Category 1 (LA) Point Source 2 (WLA)

TMDL Pollutants Completed TMDL Review Recent TMDLs Pathogens 36% 25% Nutrients/BOD/Dissolved Oxygen/Algal 20% 14% Pesticides (incl. DDT) 11% 4% Turbidity/Sediment/TSS 9% pH 6% 2.7% Thermal modifications 5% Metals (not incl. Mercury) 12% PCBs 3% 1.0% Mercury 1.3% Conductivity/TDS/Chlorides <2% Chlorine <1% 1.2% Sulfates Unionized ammonia <0.5% 2.5% Noxious aquatic plants 0.1%

Load Calculations & Reductions 78% of TMDLs calculate existing load even though not required by regulations Reductions range from 0 to 100% Pathogen TMDLs most often require very high percent reductions 30% of TMDLs refine LA into more than one category Up to 18 subcategories (median = 3)

“319” Programs Available to states, territories and tribes 40% “state” match required (dollars and/or in-kind) EPA allocation formula population, farmland, water quality problems, etc In FY06, Congress appropriated $204 million Down from high of $238 in ’02

319 Grant Opportunities 104.6 Dollars (Millions) 21.9 18.2 17.5 Type of Activity

$100M “310” Funds Incremental Cannot use for on-the-ground BMP implementation until Watershed plan developed Show how BMPs fit into that plan “Waivable ceiling” of 20% of incremental funds can be used to develop watershed plans

Load Reduction Impact Trends Reductions allocations TMDL Review Only PS TMDL, PS reduced 2%* Only NPS TMDL, NPS reduced 38% PS/NPS, NPS load reduced 15%** PS/NPS, PS load reduced 1% PS/NPS, Both loads reduced 39% No allocations made; no load reductions required; or indeterminate 4%

Questions?