Gene-Environment Interaction & Correlation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gene-environment interaction models
Advertisements

Fitting Bivariate Models October 21, 2014 Elizabeth Prom-Wormley & Hermine Maes
Elizabeth Prom-Wormley & Hermine Maes
Univariate Model Fitting
Sex-limitation Models Brad Verhulst, Elizabeth Prom-Wormley (Sarah, Hermine, and most of the rest of the faculty that has contributed bits and pieces to.
The Inheritance of Complex Traits
Estimating “Heritability” using Genetic Data David Evans University of Queensland.
Path Analysis Danielle Dick Boulder Path Analysis Allows us to represent linear models for the relationships between variables in diagrammatic form.
Multivariate Genetic Analysis: Introduction(II) Frühling Rijsdijk & Shaun Purcell Wednesday March 6, 2002.
Bivariate Model: traits A and B measured in twins cbca.
Extended sibships Danielle Posthuma Kate Morley Files: \\danielle\ExtSibs.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900 Lecture 7: Interactions in Regression.
Biometrical Genetics Pak Sham & Shaun Purcell Twin Workshop, March 2002.
Heterogeneity II Danielle Dick, Tim York, Marleen de Moor, Dorret Boomsma Boulder Twin Workshop March 2010.
Gene x Environment Interactions Brad Verhulst (With lots of help from slides written by Hermine and Liz) September 30, 2014.
Introduction to Multivariate Genetic Analysis Kate Morley and Frühling Rijsdijk 21st Twin and Family Methodology Workshop, March 2008.
Path Analysis Frühling Rijsdijk. Biometrical Genetic Theory Aims of session:  Derivation of Predicted Var/Cov matrices Using: (1)Path Tracing Rules (2)Covariance.
Raw data analysis S. Purcell & M. C. Neale Twin Workshop, IBG Colorado, March 2002.
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PHENOTYPES Mice Fruit Flies In:Introduction to Quantitative Genetics Falconer & Mackay 1996.
Multiple Regression 2 Sociology 5811 Lecture 23 Copyright © 2005 by Evan Schofer Do not copy or distribute without permission.
Moderation & Mediation
Karri Silventoinen University of Helsinki Osaka University.
Continuously moderated effects of A,C, and E in the twin design Conor V Dolan & Sanja Franić (BioPsy VU) Boulder Twin Workshop March 4, 2014 Based on PPTs.
 Go to Faculty/marleen/Boulder2012/Moderating_cov  Copy all files to your own directory  Go to Faculty/sanja/Boulder2012/Moderating_covariances _IQ_SES.
PBG 650 Advanced Plant Breeding
The importance of the “Means Model” in Mx for modeling regression and association Dorret Boomsma, Nick Martin Boulder 2008.
Gene-Environment Interaction & Correlation Danielle Dick & Danielle Posthuma Leuven 2008.
Attention Problems – SNP association Dorret Boomsma Toos van Beijsterveldt Michel Nivard.
Mx modeling of methylation data: twin correlations [means, SD, correlation] ACE / ADE latent factor model regression [sex and age] genetic association.
Mx Practical TC20, 2007 Hermine H. Maes Nick Martin, Dorret Boomsma.
Continuous heterogeneity Danielle Dick & Sarah Medland Boulder Twin Workshop March 2006.
Introduction to Genetic Theory
Welcome  Log on using the username and password you received at registration  Copy the folder: F:/sarah/mon-morning To your H drive.
Introduction to Multivariate Genetic Analysis Danielle Posthuma & Meike Bartels.
Developmental Models/ Longitudinal Data Analysis Danielle Dick & Nathan Gillespie Boulder, March 2006.
March 7, 2012M. de Moor, Twin Workshop Boulder1 Copy files Go to Faculty\marleen\Boulder2012\Multivariate Copy all files to your own directory Go to Faculty\kees\Boulder2012\Multivariate.
Multivariate Genetic Analysis (Introduction) Frühling Rijsdijk Wednesday March 8, 2006.
Extended Pedigrees HGEN619 class 2007.
Gene-Environment Interaction
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci ;57(1): doi: /iovs Figure Legend:
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PHENOTYPES
Bivariate analysis HGEN619 class 2006.
PBG 650 Advanced Plant Breeding
Univariate Twin Analysis
Gene-environment interaction
Introduction to Multivariate Genetic Analysis
Heterogeneity HGEN619 class 2007.
Multiple Regression Analysis and Model Building
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PHENOTYPES
MRC SGDP Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience
Path Analysis Danielle Dick Boulder 2008
Can resemblance (e.g. correlations) between sib pairs, or DZ twins, be modeled as a function of DNA marker sharing at a particular chromosomal location?
Behavior Genetics The Study of Variation and Heredity
Genetics of qualitative and quantitative phenotypes
Univariate modeling Sarah Medland.
Continuously moderated effects of A,C, and E in the twin design
GxE and GxG interactions
Why general modeling framework?
Heterogeneity Danielle Dick, Hermine Maes,
Pak Sham & Shaun Purcell Twin Workshop, March 2002
Regression designs Y X1 Plant size Growth rate 1 10
From GLM to HLM Working with Continuous Outcomes
(Re)introduction to Mx Sarah Medland
Sarah Medland & Nathan Gillespie
Sarah Medland faculty/sarah/2018/Tuesday
\nathan\RaterBias.
BOULDER WORKSHOP STATISTICS REVIEWED: LIKELIHOOD MODELS
Multivariate Genetic Analysis: Introduction
Heritability of Subjective Well-Being in a Representative Sample
Rater Bias & Sibling Interaction Meike Bartels Boulder 2004
Presentation transcript:

Gene-Environment Interaction & Correlation Danielle Dick & Tim York VCU workshop, Fall 2010

Gene-Environment Interaction Genetic control of sensitivity to the environment Environmental control of gene expression Bottom line: nature of genetic effects differs among environments

Standard Univariate Model P = A + C + E Var(P) = a2+c2+e2 1.0 (MZ) / .5 (DZ) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 A1 C1 E1 A2 C2 E2 c c a a e e P1 P2

Contributions of Genetic, Shared Environment, Genotype x Environment Interaction Effects to Twin/Sib Resemblance Shared Environment Additive Genetic Effects Genotype x Shared Environment Interaction MZ Pairs 1 1 x 1 = 1 DZ Pairs/Full Sibs ½ 1 x ½ = ½

Contributions of Genetic, Shared Environment, Genotype x Shared Environment Interaction Effects to Twin/Sib Resemblance Shared Environment Additive Genetic Effects Genotype x Shared Environment Interaction MZ Pairs 1 1 x 1 = 1 DZ Pairs/Full Sibs ½ 1 x ½ = ½ In other words—if gene-(shared) environment interaction is not explicitly modeled, it will be subsumed into the A term in the classic twin model.

Contributions of Genetic, Unshared Environment, Genotype x Unshared Environment Interaction Effects to Twin/Sib Resemblance Unshared (Unique) Environment Additive Genetic Effects Genotype x Unshared Environment Interaction MZ Pairs 1 0 x 1 = 0 DZ Pairs/Full Sibs ½ 0 x ½ = 0 If gene-(unshared) environment interaction is not explicitly modeled, it will be subsumed into the E term in the classic twin model.

Ways to Model Gene-Environment Interaction in Twin Data Multiple Group Models (parallel to testing for sex effects using multiple groups)

Sex Effects Females Males

Sex Effects Females Males aF = aM ? cF = cM ? eF = eM ?

GxE Effects Urban Rural aU = aR ? cU = cR ? eU = eR ?

Practical: Using Multiple Group Models to test for GxE

Problem: Many environments of interest do not fall into groups Regional alcohol sales Parental warmth Parental monitoring Socioeconomic status Grouping these variables into high/low categories loses a lot of information

‘Definition variables’ in Mx General definition: Definition variables are variables that may vary per subject and that are not dependent variables In Mx: The specific value of the def var for a specific individual is read into a matrix in Mx when analyzing the data of that particular individual

‘Definition variables’ in Mx create dynamic var/cov structure Common uses: To model changes in variance components as function of some variable (e.g., age, SES, etc) As covariates/effects on the means (e.g. age and sex)

Standard model Means vector Covariance matrix

Model-fitting approach to GxE Twin 1 Twin 2 M M

Model-fitting approach to GxE a+XM c e a+XM c e m m Twin 1 Twin 1 Twin 2 Twin 2 M M

Individual specific moderators a+XM1 c e a+XM2 c e m m Twin 1 Twin 1 Twin 2 Twin 2 M M

E x E interactions A C E A C E c+YM1 c+YM2 a+XM1 a+XM2 e+ZM1 Twin 1 Twin 1 Twin 2 Twin 2 M M

Classic Twin Model: Var (T) = a2 + c2 + e2 Moderation Model: Var (T) = (a + βXM)2 + (c + βYM)2 + (e + βZM)2 Purcell 2002, Twin Research

Var (T) = (a + βXM)2 + (c + βYM)2 (e + βZM)2 Where M is the value of the moderator and Significance of βX indicates genetic moderation Significance of βY indicates common environmental moderation Significance of βZ indicates unique environmental moderation BM indicates a main effect of the moderator on the mean

Matrix Letters as Specified in Mx Script c+YM1 c+YM2 a+XM1 a+XM2 c+cM*D1 c+cM*D2 e+ZM1 e+ZM2 a +aM*D1 a+aM*D2 e+eM*D2 e+eM*D1 Mediation versus moderation If a variable mediates an effect, significant in the means model, M > 0 significant increase in a, c or e when M is fixed to 0 If a variable moderates an effect X>0, Y>0, or Z > 0 irrespective of M or any reduction in a, c or e. Twin 1 Twin 2 M M m m mu mu

Practical: Using Definition Variables to test for GxE

Additional Things to Consider Unstandardized versus standardized effects

Additional Things to Consider ENVIRONMENT 1 ENVIRONMENT 2   Unstandardized Variance Standardized Variance Genetic 60 0.60 0.30 Common environmental 35 0.35 70 Unique environmental 5 0.05 Total variance 100 200 Unstandardized versus standardized effects

‘Definition variables’ in Mx create dynamic var/cov structure Common uses: To model changes in variance components as function of some variable (e.g., age, SES, etc) As covariates/effects on the means (e.g. age and sex)

Definition variables used as covariates General model with age and sex as covariates: yi =  + 1(agei) + 2 (sexi) +  Where yi is the observed score of individual i,  is the intercept or grand mean, 1 is the regression weight of age, agei is the age of individual i, 2 is the deviation of males (if sex is coded 0= female; 1=male), sexi is the sex of individual i, and  is the residual that is not explained by the covariates (and can be decomposed further into ACE etc).

Allowing for a main effect of X Means vector Covariance matrix

Common uses of definition variables in the means model Incorporating covariates (sex, age, etc) Testing the effect of SNPs (association) In the context of GxE, controlling for rGE

Gene-environment Interaction Genetic control of sensitivity to the environment Environmental control of gene expression Gene-environment Correlation Genetic control of exposure to the environment Environmental control of gene frequency

This complicates interpretation of GxE effects If there is a correlation between the moderator (environment) of interest and the outcome, and you find a GxE effect, it’s not clear if: The environment is moderating the effects of genes or Trait-influencing genes are simply more likely to be present in that environment

Adding Covariates to Means Model m+MM1 m+MM2 Twin 1 Twin 2 M M

Matrix Letters as Specified in Mx Script c+YM1 c+YM2 a+XM1 a+XM2 c+cM*D1 c+cM*D2 e+ZM1 e+ZM2 a +aM*D1 a+aM*D2 e+eM*D2 e+eM*D1 Mediation versus moderation If a variable mediates an effect, significant in the means model, M > 0 significant increase in a, c or e when M is fixed to 0 If a variable moderates an effect X>0, Y>0, or Z > 0 irrespective of M or any reduction in a, c or e. Twin 1 Twin 2 M M m+MM2 m+MM1 mu+b*D2 mu+b*D1 Main effects and moderating effects

Ways to deal with rGE Limit study to moderators that aren’t correlated with outcome Pro: easy Con: not very satisfying Moderator in means model will remove from the covariance genetic effects shared by trait and moderator Pro: Any interaction detected will be moderation of the trait specific genetic effects Con: Will fail to detect GxE interaction if the moderated genetic component is shared by the outcome and moderator Explicitly model rGE using a bivariate framework Pro: explicitly models rGE Con: Power to detect BXU decreases with increasing rGE; difficulty converging

AS AU M T aM aS + βXSM aU + βXUM βXS indicates moderation of shared genetic effects BXU indicates moderation of unique genetic effects on trait of interest M T