Table 1 Comparison of perioperative patient characteristics by groups

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Atrial and Ventricular Hypertrophy. ECG Features and Common Causes.
Advertisements

© 2012 EuroIntervention. All rights reserved. EuroIntervention 2009;5: A comparison of patient characteristics and 30-day mortality outcomes after.
Fig.1 Complexity of the surgeries according to BAS. Histogram.
Figure 1 Percentage of patients with and without multivessel coronary artery disease having normal result, ischaemia (Isch) in one or more than one territory.
Two-dimensional echocardiogram from a patient with severe hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. There is a severe increase in left ventricular wall thickness, with.
Gary A. Bergeron, M.D., F.C.C.P., Nelson B. Schiller, M.D.  CHEST 
Fig. 1. Concentric left ventricular hypertrophy by echocardiography
Use of a Miniaturized Transesophageal Echocardiographic Probe in the Intensive Care Unit for Diagnosis and Treatment of a Hemodynamically Unstable Patient.
Postoperative Left Ventricular Mass Regression After Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis  Hiroshi Tomoeda, MD, Tomohiro Ueda, MD, Hideki Teshima,
Tissue Velocities and Myocardial Deformation in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis  Helle Gervig Carstensen, MD, PhD, Linnea Hornbech Larsen,
Tomislav Mihaljevic, MD, Edward R
Table 1 Cause of death for arrested organ donors
Fig. 3 Overall and disease-free survival of single-zone metastasis group according to the number of stations involved. No significant differences were.
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Fig. 1 Diagram of method C for bronchial closure
Table 1 Staging of resected tumours of the oesophagus
Fig. 4 The blood path conversion to VAD by relocating the tubing clamps. Stasis in the oxygenator is avoided by recirculating its volume, thus allowing.
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of mitral valve operated patientsaaAF, atrial fibrillation; LA, left atrium; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic.
Table 2 Laboratory and echocardiographic values before LVAD implantation in the two groups. From: Reversibility of fixed pulmonary hypertension in left.
Fig. 1 Log-rank test comparing survival in patients undergoing surgical repair with those treated with TEVAR. Black line: TEVAR; grey line: surgical repair.
Table 1 Hospital mortality
Cardiac Abnormalities in Children With Sickle Cell Anemia
Aortic valve replacement in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: Left ventricular ejection fraction matters  Victor Dayan, MD, PhD, Philippe Pibarot,
Fig. 1 Protocol for oral sildenafil administration for persistent postoperative pulmonary hypertension in paediatric patients. Each dose was given via.
Table 1 Baseline patient characteristics
Table 1 Recipient’s characteristics.
Fig. 3 Summary estimates of the relative risks for the different surgical techniques for late mortality. Comparing the two main techniques, EVR showed.
Table 1 The 5 stages of constructing a BET
Fig. 9. Visualization of aortic flow
by Alexander Kulik, Ian G. Burwash, Varun Kapila, Thierry G
Mechanical Complications of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Wenrui Ma, MD, Wei Zhang, MD, Wei Shi, MD, Ye Kong, MD, Xinyu Ma, MS 
Occult Cardiac Tamponade Detected by Transesophageal Echocardiography
Aortic Valve Reconstruction With Leaflet Replacement and Sinotubular Junction Fixation: Early and Midterm Results  Meong Gun Song, MD, Hyun Suk Yang,
Ventricular Septal Dysfunction After Surgical Closure of Multiple Ventricular Septal Defects  Hironori Matsuhisa, MD, Naoki Yoshimura, MD, PhD, Tomonori.
Effects of mitral valve replacement on regional left ventricular systolic strain  Marc R Moon, MD, Abe DeAnda, MD, George T Daughters, MS, Neil B Ingels,
Enhanced left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis is associated with improved long-term survival 
Orientation of tilting disc and bileaflet aortic valve substitutes for optimal hemodynamics  Joachim Laas, MD, Peter Kleine, MD, Michael J Hasenkam, MD,
Johannes Steiner et al. JACC 2017;70:
Ventricular septal rupture caused by myocardial bridging
Impact of the Improvement of Valve Area Achieved With Aortic Valve Replacement on the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients With Pure.
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Regional Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After Myectomy in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy  Jingjin Wang, PhD, Xin Sun, MD, Minghu Xiao, MD, Minghui Zhang,
Severe aortic insufficiency and normal systolic function: determining regional left ventricular wall stress by finite-element analysis  Brian P Cupps,
Postoperative Left Ventricular Mass Regression After Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis  Hiroshi Tomoeda, MD, Tomohiro Ueda, MD, Hideki Teshima,
Factors Affecting Survival After Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients With Prosthesis– Patient Mismatch  Abdulhameed Aziz, MD, Jennifer S. Lawton, MD,
James E. Lowe, G. Chad Hughes, Shankha S. Biswas 
Diastolic Aortic Root Motion in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
Septal reshaping for exclusion of anteroseptal dyskinetic or akinetic areas  Antonio M Calafiore, MD, Michele Di Mauro, MD, Gabriele Di Giammarco, MD,
Mitroflow Aortic Bioprosthesis 5-Year Follow-Up: North American Prospective Multicenter Study  Federico M. Asch, MD, David Heimansohn, MD, Daniel Doyle,
Aortic Elongation Induced Aortic Stenosis (AEAS)
Nihan Kayalar, MD, Hartzell V. Schaff, MD, Richard C
Factors affecting late survival after surgical remodeling of left ventricular aneurysms  Hooshang Bolooki, MD, Eduardo DeMarchena, MD, Stephen M Mallon,
  Variable WKY C WKY H WKY R WKY H+R SHR C SHR H SHR R SHR H+R
Sylvestre Maréchaux, Pierre-V
Effect of the prosthesis–patient mismatch on long-term clinical outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: A prospective observational.
Fixed left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in presumed hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: implications for therapy  Charles J Bruce, MB, Rick.
A new surgical technique for one-stage repair of interrupted aortic arch with valvular aortic stenosis  Masaaki Yamagishi, MD, Katsuji Fujiwara, MD, Yoshiaki.
Indexed Left Ventricular Dimensions Best Predict Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Valve Regurgitation  Morgan L. Brown,
Effect of Surgical Reconstruction on Flow Profiles in the Aorta Using Magnetic Resonance Blood Tagging  Mark A. Fogel, MD, Paul M. Weinberg, MD, Alison.
Left ventricular remodeling in patients with acute type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: Short- and mid-term outcomes  Yukui.
Regression of hypertrophy after Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve replacement  Steven S Khan, MD, Robert J Siegel, MD, Michele A DeRobertis,
Intracoronary air embolism detected by transoesophageal echocardiography for aortic valve replacement  D. Fuentes-García, J. Hernández-Palazón  British.
A) Measurement of the right atrial a) area and b) long axis for calculation of right atrial volume. c) Measurement of the left ventricular eccentricity.
Prosthesis–patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: Effect on survival,
Reversibility of Cardiac Dysfunction After Valve Replacement in Elderly Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis  Masafumi Natsuaki, MD, Tsuyoshi Itoh, MD,
Mechanism of higher incidence of ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients with inferior myocardial infarction: Quantitative analysis of left ventricular.
Henry F Tripp, MD, Robert M Stiegel, MD, Joseph P Coyle, MD 
Aaron H. Healy, MD, Antigoni Koliopoulou, MD, Stavros G
Influence of Prosthesis–Patient Mismatch on Diastolic Heart Failure After Aortic Valve Replacement  Shahab Nozohoor, MD, Johan Nilsson, MD, PhD, Carsten.
Presentation transcript:

Table 1 Comparison of perioperative patient characteristics by groups Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch?☆ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19(6):797-805. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00683-2 Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.Elsevier Science B.V.

Table 2 Comparison of primary (I) and secondary (II) endpoint variables by groups<sup>a</sup> Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch?☆ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19(6):797-805. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00683-2 Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.Elsevier Science B.V.

Fig. 1 LVMM<sub>index</sub>, left ventricular myocardial mass index; P<sub>T</sub>, P value for the factor time; P<sub>T+G</sub>, P value for interaction of the factors time and group. Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch?☆ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19(6):797-805. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00683-2 Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.Elsevier Science B.V.

Fig. 2 WT<sub>sys1</sub>, systolic wall thickness at position 1 (anterior, superior); WT<sub>sys2</sub>, systolic wall thickness at position 2 (anterior, median); WT<sub>sys3</sub>, systolic wall thickness at position 3 (anterior, inferior); WT<sub>sys4</sub>, systolic wall thickness at position 4 (apical); WT<sub>sys5</sub>, systolic wall thickness at position 5 (posterior, inferior); WT<sub>sys6</sub>, systolic wall thickness at position 6 (posterior); WT<sub>sys7</sub>, systolic wall thickness at position 7 (posterior and posterolateral). (Solid line), control T<sub>0</sub>; (semi-interrupted line), control T<sub>1</sub>; (interrupted line), control T<sub>2</sub>. Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch?☆ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19(6):797-805. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00683-2 Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.Elsevier Science B.V.

Fig. 3 WT<sub>dias1</sub>, diastolic wall thickness at position 1 (anterior, superior); WT<sub>dias2</sub>, diastolic wall thickness at position 2 (anterior, median); WT<sub>dias3</sub>, diastolic wall thickness at position 3 (anterior, inferior); WT<sub>dias4</sub>, diastolic wall thickness at position 4 (apical); WT<sub>dias5</sub>, diastolic wall thickness at position 5 (posterior, inferior and diaphragmal); WT<sub>dias6</sub>, diastolic wall thickness at position 6 (posterior); WT<sub>dias7</sub>, diastolic wall thickness at position 7 (posterior and posterolateral). (Solid line), control T<sub>0</sub>; (semi-interrupted line), control T<sub>1</sub>; (interrupted line), control T<sub>2</sub>. Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch?☆ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19(6):797-805. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00683-2 Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.Elsevier Science B.V.

Table 3 Logistic regression report Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch?☆ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19(6):797-805. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00683-2 Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.Elsevier Science B.V.