Table 1 Comparison of perioperative patient characteristics by groups

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Atrial and Ventricular Hypertrophy. ECG Features and Common Causes.

Advertisements

© 2012 EuroIntervention. All rights reserved. EuroIntervention 2009;5: A comparison of patient characteristics and 30-day mortality outcomes after.

Fig.1 Complexity of the surgeries according to BAS. Histogram.

Figure 1 Percentage of patients with and without multivessel coronary artery disease having normal result, ischaemia (Isch) in one or more than one territory.

Two-dimensional echocardiogram from a patient with severe hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. There is a severe increase in left ventricular wall thickness, with.

Gary A. Bergeron, M.D., F.C.C.P., Nelson B. Schiller, M.D. CHEST

Fig. 1. Concentric left ventricular hypertrophy by echocardiography

Use of a Miniaturized Transesophageal Echocardiographic Probe in the Intensive Care Unit for Diagnosis and Treatment of a Hemodynamically Unstable Patient.

Postoperative Left Ventricular Mass Regression After Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis Hiroshi Tomoeda, MD, Tomohiro Ueda, MD, Hideki Teshima,

Tissue Velocities and Myocardial Deformation in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Helle Gervig Carstensen, MD, PhD, Linnea Hornbech Larsen,

Tomislav Mihaljevic, MD, Edward R

Table 1 Cause of death for arrested organ donors

Fig. 3 Overall and disease-free survival of single-zone metastasis group according to the number of stations involved. No significant differences were.

Table 1 Patient characteristics

Fig. 1 Diagram of method C for bronchial closure

Table 1 Staging of resected tumours of the oesophagus

Fig. 4 The blood path conversion to VAD by relocating the tubing clamps. Stasis in the oxygenator is avoided by recirculating its volume, thus allowing.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of mitral valve operated patientsaaAF, atrial fibrillation; LA, left atrium; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic.

Table 2 Laboratory and echocardiographic values before LVAD implantation in the two groups. From: Reversibility of fixed pulmonary hypertension in left.

Fig. 1 Log-rank test comparing survival in patients undergoing surgical repair with those treated with TEVAR. Black line: TEVAR; grey line: surgical repair.

Table 1 Hospital mortality

Cardiac Abnormalities in Children With Sickle Cell Anemia

Aortic valve replacement in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: Left ventricular ejection fraction matters Victor Dayan, MD, PhD, Philippe Pibarot,

Fig. 1 Protocol for oral sildenafil administration for persistent postoperative pulmonary hypertension in paediatric patients. Each dose was given via.

Table 1 Baseline patient characteristics

Table 1 Recipient’s characteristics.

Fig. 3 Summary estimates of the relative risks for the different surgical techniques for late mortality. Comparing the two main techniques, EVR showed.

Table 1 The 5 stages of constructing a BET

Fig. 9. Visualization of aortic flow

by Alexander Kulik, Ian G. Burwash, Varun Kapila, Thierry G

Mechanical Complications of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Wenrui Ma, MD, Wei Zhang, MD, Wei Shi, MD, Ye Kong, MD, Xinyu Ma, MS

Occult Cardiac Tamponade Detected by Transesophageal Echocardiography

Aortic Valve Reconstruction With Leaflet Replacement and Sinotubular Junction Fixation: Early and Midterm Results Meong Gun Song, MD, Hyun Suk Yang,

Ventricular Septal Dysfunction After Surgical Closure of Multiple Ventricular Septal Defects Hironori Matsuhisa, MD, Naoki Yoshimura, MD, PhD, Tomonori.

Effects of mitral valve replacement on regional left ventricular systolic strain Marc R Moon, MD, Abe DeAnda, MD, George T Daughters, MS, Neil B Ingels,

Enhanced left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis is associated with improved long-term survival

Orientation of tilting disc and bileaflet aortic valve substitutes for optimal hemodynamics Joachim Laas, MD, Peter Kleine, MD, Michael J Hasenkam, MD,

Johannes Steiner et al. JACC 2017;70:

Ventricular septal rupture caused by myocardial bridging

Impact of the Improvement of Valve Area Achieved With Aortic Valve Replacement on the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients With Pure.

Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio

Regional Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After Myectomy in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Jingjin Wang, PhD, Xin Sun, MD, Minghu Xiao, MD, Minghui Zhang,

Severe aortic insufficiency and normal systolic function: determining regional left ventricular wall stress by finite-element analysis Brian P Cupps,

Postoperative Left Ventricular Mass Regression After Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis Hiroshi Tomoeda, MD, Tomohiro Ueda, MD, Hideki Teshima,

Factors Affecting Survival After Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients With Prosthesis– Patient Mismatch Abdulhameed Aziz, MD, Jennifer S. Lawton, MD,

James E. Lowe, G. Chad Hughes, Shankha S. Biswas

Diastolic Aortic Root Motion in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

Septal reshaping for exclusion of anteroseptal dyskinetic or akinetic areas Antonio M Calafiore, MD, Michele Di Mauro, MD, Gabriele Di Giammarco, MD,

Mitroflow Aortic Bioprosthesis 5-Year Follow-Up: North American Prospective Multicenter Study Federico M. Asch, MD, David Heimansohn, MD, Daniel Doyle,

Aortic Elongation Induced Aortic Stenosis (AEAS)

Nihan Kayalar, MD, Hartzell V. Schaff, MD, Richard C

Factors affecting late survival after surgical remodeling of left ventricular aneurysms Hooshang Bolooki, MD, Eduardo DeMarchena, MD, Stephen M Mallon,

Variable WKY C WKY H WKY R WKY H+R SHR C SHR H SHR R SHR H+R

Sylvestre Maréchaux, Pierre-V

Effect of the prosthesis–patient mismatch on long-term clinical outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: A prospective observational.

Fixed left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in presumed hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: implications for therapy Charles J Bruce, MB, Rick.

A new surgical technique for one-stage repair of interrupted aortic arch with valvular aortic stenosis Masaaki Yamagishi, MD, Katsuji Fujiwara, MD, Yoshiaki.

Indexed Left Ventricular Dimensions Best Predict Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Valve Regurgitation Morgan L. Brown,

Effect of Surgical Reconstruction on Flow Profiles in the Aorta Using Magnetic Resonance Blood Tagging Mark A. Fogel, MD, Paul M. Weinberg, MD, Alison.

Left ventricular remodeling in patients with acute type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: Short- and mid-term outcomes Yukui.

Regression of hypertrophy after Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve replacement Steven S Khan, MD, Robert J Siegel, MD, Michele A DeRobertis,

Intracoronary air embolism detected by transoesophageal echocardiography for aortic valve replacement D. Fuentes-García, J. Hernández-Palazón British.

A) Measurement of the right atrial a) area and b) long axis for calculation of right atrial volume. c) Measurement of the left ventricular eccentricity.

Prosthesis–patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: Effect on survival,

Reversibility of Cardiac Dysfunction After Valve Replacement in Elderly Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Masafumi Natsuaki, MD, Tsuyoshi Itoh, MD,

Mechanism of higher incidence of ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients with inferior myocardial infarction: Quantitative analysis of left ventricular.

Henry F Tripp, MD, Robert M Stiegel, MD, Joseph P Coyle, MD

Aaron H. Healy, MD, Antigoni Koliopoulou, MD, Stavros G

Influence of Prosthesis–Patient Mismatch on Diastolic Heart Failure After Aortic Valve Replacement Shahab Nozohoor, MD, Johan Nilsson, MD, PhD, Carsten.

Presentation transcript:

Table 1 Comparison of perioperative patient characteristics by groups Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch?☆ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19(6):797-805. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00683-2 Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.Elsevier Science B.V.

Table 2 Comparison of primary (I) and secondary (II) endpoint variables by groups<sup>a</sup> Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch?☆ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19(6):797-805. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00683-2 Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.Elsevier Science B.V.

Fig. 1 LVMM<sub>index</sub>, left ventricular myocardial mass index; P<sub>T</sub>, P value for the factor time; P<sub>T+G</sub>, P value for interaction of the factors time and group. Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch?☆ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19(6):797-805. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00683-2 Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.Elsevier Science B.V.

Fig. 2 WT<sub>sys1</sub>, systolic wall thickness at position 1 (anterior, superior); WT<sub>sys2</sub>, systolic wall thickness at position 2 (anterior, median); WT<sub>sys3</sub>, systolic wall thickness at position 3 (anterior, inferior); WT<sub>sys4</sub>, systolic wall thickness at position 4 (apical); WT<sub>sys5</sub>, systolic wall thickness at position 5 (posterior, inferior); WT<sub>sys6</sub>, systolic wall thickness at position 6 (posterior); WT<sub>sys7</sub>, systolic wall thickness at position 7 (posterior and posterolateral). (Solid line), control T<sub>0</sub>; (semi-interrupted line), control T<sub>1</sub>; (interrupted line), control T<sub>2</sub>. Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch?☆ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19(6):797-805. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00683-2 Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.Elsevier Science B.V.

Fig. 3 WT<sub>dias1</sub>, diastolic wall thickness at position 1 (anterior, superior); WT<sub>dias2</sub>, diastolic wall thickness at position 2 (anterior, median); WT<sub>dias3</sub>, diastolic wall thickness at position 3 (anterior, inferior); WT<sub>dias4</sub>, diastolic wall thickness at position 4 (apical); WT<sub>dias5</sub>, diastolic wall thickness at position 5 (posterior, inferior and diaphragmal); WT<sub>dias6</sub>, diastolic wall thickness at position 6 (posterior); WT<sub>dias7</sub>, diastolic wall thickness at position 7 (posterior and posterolateral). (Solid line), control T<sub>0</sub>; (semi-interrupted line), control T<sub>1</sub>; (interrupted line), control T<sub>2</sub>. Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch?☆ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19(6):797-805. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00683-2 Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.Elsevier Science B.V.

Table 3 Logistic regression report Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch?☆ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19(6):797-805. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00683-2 Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.Elsevier Science B.V.