Evaluation of Early Markers of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alcohol and pregnancy AER, fourth peer review. Why is it harmful?  The child gets the same blood alcohol concentration as the mother  The Placenta can’t.
Advertisements

Obstetric Ultrasound Scanning Technique
Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring
Obstetric Ultrasound Felipe Moretti, MD Griff Jones, MD, FRCS
Streissguth et al.(1994) Seattle Longitudinal study started in 1974 to examined long term effects of PAE At this point there was little evidence that alcohol.
Principles and Applications of Ultrasound to Obstetrics Honor M. Wolfe.
Fetal Biophysical Profile in high risk pregnancy
Cara Pessel, MD et al American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2013.
IN THE NAME OF GOD. CRITICALLY APPRAISED TOPIC If there is a Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidies with low FPR at first trimester? If we can.
The Early Gestation Scan. Embryonic/fetal growth 1 st trimester Crown rump lengthbest index of gestational lengthCrown rump lengthbest index of gestational.
PREGNANCY Emily Hodgson.
Introduction  Preterm birth is the leading cause of perinatal death.  Handicap in children and the vast majority of mortality and morbidity relates.
Problems in Birth Registration What is the National Standard? Why is the data so important? Joanne M. Wesley Office of the State Registrar.
FLAME Lecture: 56 Steller
Fetal Assessment Fred Hill, MA, RRT. Ultrasound Ultrasound.
IN THE NAME OF GOD. BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE B.P.P  In 1980 Manning and colleagues introduced BPP for evaluation of the fetus.  BPP is a noninvasive test.
Dr. Saeed Mahmoud MRCOG,MRCPI,MIOG,MBSSCP Assistant professor & consultant Obstetric & gynecology department Collage of medicine King Saud University.
ASSESSMENT OF FETAL WELLBEING Max Brinsmead MB BS PhD May 2015.
報 告 者 王瓊琦. postpartum depression : identification of women at risk.
The State of Ohio Universal Prenatal Booking David S. McKenna, MD, RDMS Maternal-Fetal Medicine Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton OH.
LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN PRENATALLY EXPOSED TO DRUGS AND/OR ALCOHOL; IMPACT OF AIDS.
“BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE”
Period of the Fetus Lasts from the ninth week post-conception until the end of pregnancy (approximately 38 weeks)
MATERIAL & METHODS SECTION PREPARATION (IN THE HEALTH RESEARCH PROPOSAL) DR. HAYFAA A. WAHBI ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, CHAIR OF EBHC & KT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE.
Fetal assessment.
FETAL MOVEMENT FLAME LECTURE: 57 STELLER
Fetal Wellbeing Dr Hsu Chong NIHR Clinical Lecturer in Obstetrics & Gynaecology Warwick Medical School.
An Ounce of Prevention  2000, 2005, 2011 The Curators of the University of Missouri Chapter 3 Alcohol.
Definition & Risk Factors of FGR FGR, also called IUGR is the term used to describe a fetus that has not reached its growth potential because of genetic.
In the Name of God. All women should be assessed at booking for risk factors for a SGA fetus/neonate to identify those who require increased surveillance.
Prenatal Assessment - Prof. Gonen ניטור טרום לידתי פרופ' רון גונן.
Antenatal Assessment of Fetal Well-being
UOG Journal Club: July 2016 Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of preterm birth: a prospective cohort study J Min, HA Watson, NL Hezelgrave,
Informatics Core Report Collaborative Initiative on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Andrew D. Arenson 7 January 2009.
צום יום הכיפורים בנשים הרות ובמהלך טיפולי פריון
UOG Journal Club: August 2017
Collaborative Initiative on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (CIFASD) Progress Reports June 2005 Presented CIFASD Steering Committee Meeting Santa Barbara,
UOG Journal Club: July 2016 Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of preterm birth: a prospective cohort study J Min, HA Watson, NL Hezelgrave,
Facial Imaging in FASD and Related Disabilities
Progress Report September 1, July 31, 2008
Building a State System in Ohio for Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
Ukraine Clinical Study: U01
UOG Journal Club: January 2016
Intro Until recently, couples had to choose between taking the risk or considering other options Over the past three decades, prenatal diagnosis-the.
UOG Journal Club: March 2016
Yolk sac diameter as a predictor of pregnancy outcome
Progress Report Moscow Region Infant Study
OBSTETRIC ULTRASOUND TECHNIQUES FETAL AGE ESTIMATION
Inonu University, Turgut Ozal Medical Centre
Progress Report Moscow Region Infant Study
CIFASD Progress Ukraine Clinical Project February 1-2, 2011
CIFASD Progress Ukraine Clinical Project February 1-2, 2011
Informed Consent, Image Recording and
Infant Assessment in FASD: Ukraine Exposure Sample
Dysmorphology Core: Progress Report February 1, 2011
GASTROSCHISIS: A NEW FETAL WEIGHT FORMULA TO PREDICT BIRTH WEIGHT
Prenatal Ultrasonographic Markers of FASD in Ukraine
IMPAACT 2010 Screening Visits
Evaluation of Early Markers of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure
Intrauterine growth restriction: A new concept in antenatal management
Antepartum Assessment and Care
3D Facial Imaging Project
Prenatal Ultrasound & Early Detection of FASD
Antepartum Assessment and Care
Fetal Assessment Assistant Professor, Consultant
Collaborative Initiative on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (CIFASD)
FASD 101 Susan Elsworth.
Antepartum Fetal Surveillance
UOG Journal Club: April 2017
UOG Journal Club: October 2018
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of Early Markers of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure An Update DC 1.17.08 Andrew D Hull MD

Rationale for Study Most FASD cases identified late because of failure to meet milestones Early detection of FASD allows early intervention Earlier interventions – more effective Prenatal detection would allow earliest interventions possible

Previous Prenatal Studies Limited number of studies: Alcohol related impairment of frontal cortex and cerebellar development (Wass, 2001) Alcohol related poor head growth and cerebellar diameter (Handmaker, 2006)

Aims To develop and evaluate ultrasound markers of prenatal alcohol exposure To compare these markers in 2nd and 3rd trimester scans

Methods Prospective pilot study- 2004 - Ongoing Collaborative Initiative on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder Consortium Ukraine 2 sites 6,745 pregnant women screened by TWEAK and AUDIT Questionnaires Inclusion criteria: Gestational age: 10-40 wks Alcohol exposed group (1-2 drinks x 10 per month) Control group

Sonography Routine serial ultrasound exams Studies at ~24 & ~34 wks compared Routine biometry Specific brain measurements

Transverse Cerebellar Diameter (TCD) Brain Measurements Occipital Frontal Diameter (OFD) Transverse Cerebellar Diameter (TCD)

Caval Calvarial Distance (CCD) Frontothalamic Distance (FTD) Brain measurements Caval Calvarial Distance (CCD) Frontothalamic Distance (FTD)

Orbital Measurements Outer Orbital Diameter (OOD) Intra Orbital Diameter (IOD) Orbital Diameter (OD) OOD OD IOD OOD

Results N 2nd Trimester 3rd Alcohol-exposed 84 47 Control 82 31 Total 166 78

Maternal Demographics Characteristic Exposed (n=84) Controls (n=82) p-value Maternal age 26.2 ± 5.7 24.7 ± 4.1 NS Marital Status: Single (%) 10.7 1.2 0.017 Low Socio-economic Status (%) 51.2 31.7 0.006 Vitamin Use (%) 64.3 89.0 0.001 Smoking (%) 50.6 2.5

Alcohol Consumption Pattern Among Alcohol-Exposed & Comparison Subjects (Signs of Risk Drinking) No Alcohol p-value % Tolerance ≥ 6 67.1 1.4 <0.001 AUDIT ≥ 6 27.4 0.0 TWEAK ≥ 6 69.6 * AUDIT & TWEAK are alcohol screening questionnaires

Alcohol Consumption Pattern Among Alcohol-Exposed & Comparison Subjects (Absolute Ounces of Alcohol) Absolute Ounces of Alcohol (AA) Alcohol Exposed No Alcohol p-value Mean±s.d Periconceptional period: AA per day 1.07±1.4 0.02±0.2 <0.001 AA per drinking day 5.01±4.6 2.96±4.8 0.399 Pregnancy: 0.14±0.3 0.0004±0.002 2.23 ±3.6 0.20±0.00 0.442

2nd Trimester * * = P < 0.05

2nd Trimester * * * = P < 0.05

3nd Trimester * * = P < 0.05

3rd Trimester * * = P < 0.05 *

Conclusions Alcohol exposed fetuses have: Reduced frontothalamic distance in both 2nd and 3rd trimesters Reduced caval calvarial distance in 2nd trimester Reduced BPD and orbital diameter in 3rd trimester

Correlation of US findings with Dysmorphology data Pregnant Women: Alcohol-exposed (n=84) moderate/heavy alcohol exposure Comparison (n=82) no/minimal alcohol exposure Newborn Children: FASD (3 FAS & 18 Deferred) No FASD (n=122)

Statistical Analysis Prenatal ultrasound measures compared among: FASD vs. no FASD Fetal growth measures expressed as gestational age-specific percentiles ANOVA, ANCOVA (adjustment for smoking, vitamin use)

Fetal Growth Measures (2nd trimester) FASD vs. No FASD FASD (n=21) No FASD (n=121) p-value Mean±sd Estimated fetal wt % 27.6±4.2 35.0±1.8 0.105 Biparietal diameter % 47.0±7.1 56.1±2.9 0.236 Head circumference % 28.5±4.4 41.9±1.8 0.006 Abdominal circumference % 27.2±7.6 43.3±3.2 0.053 Femur length % 47.0±5.4 62.5±2.2 0.010 * All models adjusted for smoking

Fetal Growth Measures (3rd trimester) FASD vs. No FASD FASD (n=21) No FASD (n=120) p-value Mean±sd Estimated fetal wt % 24.2±4.0 33.4±2.3 0.054 Biparietal diameter % 48.9±7.0 66.7±4.2 0.033 Head circumference % 33.9±5.6 53.8±3.3 0.003 Abdominal circumference % 47.3±6.3 54.2±3.5 0.350 Femur length % 30.9±6.3 51.9±3.6 0.005 * All models adjusted for smoking

Fetal Brain Measures (3rd trimester) FASD vs. No FASD p-value* Mean±s.e. Transverse Cerebella Diameter (mm) 40.8±0.4 41.9±0.5 0.178 Occipital Frontal Diameter (mm) 107.4±2.5 107.8±1.5 0.888 Caval-Calvarial Distance (mm) 41.6±1.0 43.3±0.6 0.127 Frontothalamic Distance (mm) 63.9±1.2 66.3±0.7 0.080 Outer Orbital Diameter (mm) 54.0±0.9 55.5±0.6 0.180 Interorbital Distance (mm) 14.9±0.6 15.6±0.3 0.301 Orbital Diameter (mm) 16.8±0.4 16.9±0.3 0.880 * Adjusted for gestational age & smoking in pregnancy

Reminder Previously demonstrated significant differences between alcohol exposure groups on selected somatic and brain growth measures in second and third trimester ultrasounds Femur length percentile (2nd trimester only) Caval-calvarial distance (2nd trimester only) BPD percentile Frontothalamic distance Orbital distance (3rd trimester only)

Summary Significant differences on selected somatic and brain growth measures on ultrasound between infants with some structural features of FAS and those without on newborn physical exam: Head circumference percentile BPD percentile (3rd trimester) Abdominal circumference percentile (2nd trimester) Femur length percentile Frontothalamic distance (3rd trimester)

Conclusion First demonstration on prenatal ultrasound that measures of growth and frontal brain are correlated with structural features of FASD on a newborn physical examination Specific Prenatal ultrasound measures may have some utility in early identification of fetuses with FASD

Next Steps Further correlation of prenatal ultrasound findings with postnatal assessment of: Dysmorphology CNS imaging Neurodevelopment Evaluation of predictive value of morphologic sonographic markers

Next Steps (2) Addition of Measures of Fetal Behavior Correlation of Morphology with Fetal Behavior Measures Development of screening triage tool combining best set of measures at specific gestational ages Test tool in practice

Measures of Fetal Behavior Biophysical Profile Spontaneous “startles” Evoked startles

Biophysical Profile (BPP) Component Notes Score Fetal Movement > 3 body or limb movements 0/2 Fetal Tone One active flexion/extension of limb or opening and closing of hand Fetal Breathing Movements > 1 episode (incl hiccups) Amniotic Fluid Volume 2x2 cm pocket

BPP Technique Record elements as part of routine scanning Do for each subject at 22, 28 and 36 week scans Maximum time for BPP 30 minutes Record time taken for 8/8 or total score and elements completed by 30 mins

BPP (normal circumstances) Periodicity of most fetal activity varies according to fetal state 1F (quiet sleep) average time to 8/8 26mins 2F (REM) 3-5 mins 4F (active state) 3-5 mins Usually do BPP for up to 30 mins

BPP (normal circumstances) 1.7% 6/8 – equivocal 0.52% 4/8 – abnormal 0.18% 2/8 – abnormal 0.06% 0/8 - abnormal

Utility of BPP No randomized trials Original study by Manning almost 80% reduction in perinatal mortality Perinatal Mortality Associated with BPP scores 8/8 - 1.86/1000 * 6/8 - 9.76/1000 4/8 - 26.3/1000 2/8 – 94/1000 0/8 – 285.7/1000 * If BPP 8/8 0.8/1000 within 7 days

Alcohol and BPP No studies addressing effects in humans If give Moms at 37 weeks a couple of glasses of wine and measure BPP - breathing movements cease but other movement unchanged In sheep chronically fed alcohol – the suppressive effect on breathing disappears with multiple exposures

What will be effects in humans? Don’t know!

Startle Responses Protocol – observe fetus during routine imaging at 22, 28, 36 weeks Record spontaneous startles (30 min) Generalized sudden movement starting in limbs lasting 1 second After observation period wait for 2 minutes of inactivity then: Attempt evoked startle - 2sec FAS – if startle response within 4.5 sec +ve, if not -ve

Natural History of Startles Spontaneous Start at 8 weeks Decrease in frequency with increasing gestational age Evoked Can evoke a response from 24 weeks

Alcohol and Startles Spontaneous Evoked Seems to increase number of spontaneous startles at all gestational ages Evoked Seems to reduce likelihood for an evoked startle

BPP & Startles Never been looked at together Never been looked at systematically Never been correlated with anatomy Never been correlated with outcome

Research Plan Continue to accrue cases Total of 300 subjects (including previous subjects) 75 per arm per year 2 years Morphology and brain measurements as before Add in fetal neurobehavioral measures at 22,28 and 36 weeks (approx)

Research Plan (2) Physical exam for all newborns FAS, not FAS, deferred – local ped FAS, not FAS, deferred – dysmorph Deferred reexamined later – and FASD diagnosis based on further exam….. Bayley at 6/12 and 12/12

What next? Evaluate ultrasound data further – structural abnormalities Collaborations within Consortium Sulik project - Mice vs Man Foroud project – additional US measures Coles project fetal heart rate vs postnatal heart rate BPP, startles, habituation and postnatal responses New imaging techniques Corpus callosum evaluation Brain volumes Remote manipulation of locally acquired volumes Facial dysmorphology in utero?

Thank You