Outline for today’s class

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outline QUIZ at start of next Tuesday class - postponed Prepare for discussion for next class Key questions about institutions Variables, IVs, and DVs.
Advertisements

PROCESSES of Institutional Influence Interdependent cooperation Rule-following behavior Coercion Managing capacity problems Positive incentives Uses of.
States and International Environmental Regimes. Today: Examine IR theories that focus on states as units of analysis in explaining cooperation Are these.
Tuesday’s deal between US/China US: 26-28% reduction from 2005 levels by 2025 China: stop growth of emissions by 2030 plus 20% renewables Are these real.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall International Business Environments and Operations, 13/e Part Two Comparative Environmental.
Course Evaluations Please fill out the course evaluation for this course – I value your feedback on the course and future students will benefit from the.
Final Exam Take home format Cite appropriately!! Remember, no plagiarism!!!! Plagiarizing is the only way (and a SURE way) to fail on your final exam,
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education International Business Environments and Operations Global Edition Part Two Comparative Environmental Frameworks 3-1.
Outline for today’s class Relative effectiveness paper assignment Readings – takehome messages Negotiation theory How to analyze and graph data.
International Negotiation : Theory &Practice Tran Thi Xuan Anh 082SIS40 INTERNATIONAL NEGOTIATIONS STRATEGY.
Negotiation Practice. –Start at minute 19:10 Variation in negotiation practice Agreements reached or not No forest agreement; no nitrogen-fixing agreement.
1 Chapter Organizations and Organization Theory Organization Theory and Design Twelfth Edition Richard L. Daft.
Overview Evaluating effectiveness Pollution agreements: an example
American and Texas Government: Policy and Politics, 10/e By Neal Tannahill 2010, 2008, 2006 Pearson Education, Inc.
Copyright © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Strategic Management: Text and Cases, 4e 9 Strategic Control and.
Chapter 2 Proper Behaviors in International Business Negotiation The golden six steps to make your negotiation fruitful!
Introduction In the past three decades, protecting the global environment has emerged as one of the major challenges in international relations. Governments.
Chapter 9 Negotiation “You often get not what you deserve, but what you negotiate.” ~ John Marrioti.
“You often get not what you deserve, but what you negotiate.”
Organizational Behavior (MGT-502)
The Study of Organizations
Coalitions, Multiple Parties and Teams
Outline QUIZ at start of this Thursday’s class
International Regimes
Problem Structure: Human Rights and the Environment
Lecture 3: Causality, Causal Thinking, and Testing Theory
Theorizing Policy Making
PS 420/520 International Organization
Outline for today’s class
Lecture 3.1 THEORIES Realism
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
Unit 40 International Marketing Unit 40 International Marketing Aim The aim of this unit is to introduce students to a variety of methods organizations.
Relationships in Negotiation
Outline Institutional effects and terminology
BPA 301 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
MGT 380 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
MHA 620 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
SRV 340 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
MGT 380 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
SRV 340 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
SRV 340 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
MGT 380 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Project Team Building, Conflict, and Negotiation
PS 420/520 International Organization
Outline QUIZ at start of next Tuesday’s class
Midterm Eval of Teaching
The Management of International Organizational Behavior
Lecture 3: Causality, Causal Thinking, and Testing Theory
Chapter 6 HEALTHCARE MARKETING. Chapter 6 HEALTHCARE MARKETING.
Problem Structure: Human Rights and the Environment
Final Paper Guidance.
World Politics Under a system of Anarchy
Project Team Building, Conflict, and Negotiation
Outline “International institutions” readings takehomes
AP U.S. Government & Politics Public Policy
Who Can, Will, and Should Protect Nature?
Competitive Rivalry and Competitive Dynamics
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
Last week’s Character Dare
Thinking Critically Questions Chapter Five
Relative effectiveness points
Situation & Environmental Analysis
Final Exam Take home format
Theories of International Relations
SYSTEM TESTING AND DEPLOYMENT
Chapter 17 Promotional Concepts and Strategies
Chapter 10 The Media and Cyberpolitics
The Management of International Organizational Behavior
Effectiveness of International Institutions: What IS it
Chapter One The Nature of Strategic Management
Presentation transcript:

Outline for today’s class Relative effectiveness discussion paper Negotiation theory & practice Why states take the positions they do. Role of NGOs in international environmental treaties

Treaty 1 – overarching thoughts Good strategy: look at analysis of similar treaty in chapters in any of the many books I have put on reserve in the library for the course. Imitate that analysis. Polar bears: use 1973 treaty and research question is WHICH countries were influenced – some were and some weren’t and want to use evidence to make convincing claim about which.

Start at minute 19:10

Negotiation Theory Sprinz and Vaahtoranta Betsill and Corell show: Positions states take in negotiations (the DV) are determined by two IVs: the costs states face to take action to protect the environment (abatement costs) and the benefits they receive if the environment is protected (ecological vulnerability) Betsill and Corell show: Need to clarify research question – WHAT is influence? Evidence of NGO influence Use of process tracing AND counterfactuals Building on work of prior others

Why States Take Positions They Do in Int’l Negotiations Ecological Yes Vulnerability No Low Abatement Pusher Bystander Costs High Intermediate Dragger Sprinz and Vaahtoranta, 1994.

NGO influence in negotiations (Betsill and Corell, 2007) Distinction of power vs. influence Power as resources vs. power as influence over outcomes Definition of NGO influence based in counterfactuals “Influence occurs when one actor intentionally communicates to another so as to alter the latter’s behavior from what would have occurred otherwise" (Betsill and Corell, 2007, 31).

NGO elements Activities Access Resources: financial; informational Focus of NGOs on process or outcome Notice elements of process tracing

Potential influences of NGOs Agenda setting -- what gets talked about; drawing attention to an issue. Issue framing -- how it gets talked about: biosafety can be framed as health or trade issue (B&C, 36) Positions of key states Procedural issues -- how decisions to be made in the future Substantive issues -- actual decisions in the agreement text

Factors that condition NGO influence NGO coordination Rules of access, Stage of the negotiations Political stakes Institutional overlap Competition from other NGOs Alliances with key states Level of contention (B&C, 2007, ch. 2).

Why do negotiations succeed? Type of problem Structural and contextual factors Concern about the issue and costs Scientific influence Actors involved Institutional design factors