Statistical Downscaling of Precipitation Multimodel Ensemble Forecasts

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantification of Spatially Distributed Errors of Precipitation Rates and Types from the TRMM Precipitation Radar 2A25 (the latest successive V6 and V7)
Advertisements

RAINFALL PREDICTION USING STATISTICAL MULTI MODEL ENSEMBLE OVER SELECTED REGION IN INDONESIA INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON IMPLEMENTATION OF DIGITIZATION HISTORICAL.
Validation of the Ensemble Tropical Rainfall Potential (eTRaP) for Landfalling Tropical Cyclones Elizabeth E. Ebert Centre for Australian Weather and Climate.
Progress in Downscaling Climate Change Scenarios in Idaho Brandon C. Moore.
Introduction This project deals with conversion of Vector based Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) data into Raster based PMP data using different interpolation.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Geo479/579: Geostatistics Ch13. Block Kriging. Block Estimate  Requirements An estimate of the average value of a variable within a prescribed local.
Regional Climate Modeling in the Source Region of Yellow River with complex topography using the RegCM3: Model validation Pinhong Hui, Jianping Tang School.
Nynke Hofstra and Mark New Oxford University Centre for the Environment Trends in extremes in the ENSEMBLES daily gridded observational datasets for Europe.
Climate Forecasting Unit Second Ph’d training talk Prediction of climate extreme events at seasonal and decadal time scale Aida Pintó Biescas.
ANALYSIS OF ESTIMATED RAINFALL DATA USING SPATIAL INTERPOLATION. Preethi Raj GEOG 5650 (Environmental Applications of GIS)
$88.65 $ $22.05/A profit increase Improving Wheat Profits Eakly, OK Irrigated, Behind Cotton.
Development and evaluation of Passive Microwave SWE retrieval equations for mountainous area Naoki Mizukami.
Statistical Tools for Solar Resource Forecasting Vivek Vijay IIT Jodhpur Date: 16/12/2013.
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
Process of User-oriented interactive flooding-leading rain forecast system Chen Jing 1 Zhongwei Yan 2 Jiarui Han 3 Jiao Meiyan 4 1. Numerical Weather Prediction.
MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS (MOS) TEMPERATURE FORECAST VERIFICATION JJA 2011 Benjamin Campbell April 24,2012 EAS 4480.
Spatial Interpolation Chapter 13. Introduction Land surface in Chapter 13 Land surface in Chapter 13 Also a non-existing surface, but visualized as a.
1 Objective Drought Monitoring and Prediction Recent efforts at Climate Prediction Ct. Kingtse Mo & Jinho Yoon Climate Prediction Center.
Evaluation and simulation of global terrestrial latent heat flux by merging CMIP5 climate models and surface eddy covariance observations Yunjun Yao 1,
Huiling Yuan 1, Xiang Su 1, Yuejian Zhu 2, Yan Luo 2, 3, Yuan Wang 1 1. Key Laboratory of Mesoscale Severe Weather/Ministry of Education and School of.
D11 Summary: The need for downscaling of extremes: An evaluation of interannual variations in the NCEP reanalysis over European regions.
Predicted Rainfall Estimation in the Huaihe River Basin Based on TIGGE Fuyou Tian, Dan Qi, Jingyue Di, and Linna Zhao National Meteorological Center of.
1. Introduction 2. The model and experimental design 3. Space-time structure of systematic error 4. Space-time structure of forecast error 5. Error growth.
Feature-based (object-based) Verification Nathan M. Hitchens National Severe Storms Laboratory.
INSTITUTE OF METEOROLOGY AND WATER MANAGEMENT Hydrological applications of COSMO model Andrzej Mazur Institute of Meteorology and Water Management Centre.
DOWNSCALING GLOBAL MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood, Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of Washington,
VERIFICATION OF A DOWNSCALING SEQUENCE APPLIED TO MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR GLOBAL FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and.
Chapter 14 Introduction to Regression Analysis. Objectives Regression Analysis Uses of Regression Analysis Method of Least Squares Difference between.
QJ Wang and Andrew Schepen LAND AND WATER CBaM for post-processing seasonal climate forecasts.
Validation of Satellite Rainfall Estimates over the Mid-latitudes Chris Kidd University of Birmingham, UK.
March Outline: Introduction What is the Heat Wave? Objectives Identifying and comparing the current and future status of heat wave events over.
Correlation and Linear Regression
Assessment of high-resolution simulations of precipitation and temperature characteristics over western Canada using WRF model Asong. Z.E
Nathalie Voisin1 , Andrew W. Wood1 , Dennis P. Lettenmaier1 and Eric F
Tom Hopson, NCAR (among others) Satya Priya, World Bank
Spatial downscaling on gridded precipitation over India
Tom Hopson, NCAR (among others) Satya Priya, World Bank
Regression and Correlation
Systematic timing errors in km-scale NWP precipitation forecasts
Verifying Precipitation Events Using Composite Statistics
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
Errors in Satellite-based Precipitation Estimates Over Land
(Residuals and
Jennifer Boehnert Emily Riddle Tom Hopson
With special thanks to Prof. V. Moron (U
Shuhua Li and Andrew W. Robertson
Predictability of 2-m temperature
Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Verification of multi-model ensemble forecasts using the TIGGE dataset
Application of satellite-based rainfall and medium range meteorological forecast in real-time flood forecasting in the Upper Mahanadi River basin Trushnamayee.
Application of Geostatistical Analyst in Spatial Interpolation
Y. Xue1, C. Wen1, X. Yang2 , D. Behringer1, A. Kumar1,
Analysis of NASA GPM Early 30-minute Run in Comparison to Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed Rain Data Adolfo Herrera April Arizona Space Grant.
University of Washington Center for Science in the Earth System
N. Voisin, J.C. Schaake and D.P. Lettenmaier
INSTITUTE OF METEOROLOGY AND WATER MANAGEMENT
Deterministic (HRES) and ensemble (ENS) verification scores
Xiefei Zhi, Yongqing Bai, Chunze Lin, Haixia Qi, Wen Chen
Numerical Weather Prediction Center (NWPC), Beijing, China
National Meteorological Center, CMA, Beijing, China.
Page 11.
Evaluation of the TRMM Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) and its utility in hydrologic prediction in La Plata Basin Dennis P. Lettenmaier and.
Update of NMC/CMA Global Ensemble Prediction System
How can an improved model yield higher RMS errors?
INSTYTUT METEOROLOGII I GOSPODARKI WODNEJ
Verifying Ensemble Forecasts
Facultad de Ingeniería, Centro de Cálculo
Short Range Ensemble Prediction System Verification over Greece
Adam J. O’Shay and T. N. Krishnamurti FSU Meteorology 8 February 2001
Presentation transcript:

Statistical Downscaling of Precipitation Multimodel Ensemble Forecasts Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology Statistical Downscaling of Precipitation Multimodel Ensemble Forecasts Xiefei Zhi Yanan Wang Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology zhi@nuist.edu.cn 2018/7/30

Outline Introduction Data and methods Comparative study of interpolation approaches Downscaling of single model forecasts Downscaling of multimodel ensemble forecasts Conclusions

Introduction High resolution precipitation forecast is of importance for the regional hydrological model, water resource analysis and management etc. The downscaling of information from larger-scale models toward higher resolution is generally carried out using statistical or dynamical methods (Huth 2002; Druyan et al. 2002; Kanamitsu et al. 2007). Krishnamurti et al. (2009) combines the multimodel superensemble and statistical downscaling to conduct the precipitation forecast.

Data Multimodel ensemble forecast data Observed Data The 24h-168h forecast data of the precipitation are taken from ECMWF, JMA, NCEP and UKMO models in the TIGGE archive for the period from June 1 to August 27, 2007. The spatial resolution is 1.25°×1.25° Observed Data TRMM /3B42RT precipitation data were used as the “observed data” for the period from June 1 to August 27, 2007. The spatial resolution is 0.25°×0.25°.

Methods Interpolation:TIGGE forecast data were interpolated on a 0.25°×0.25 ° grid for research purposes. Multimodel ensemble:Multimodel ensemble of the interpolated forecasts of single models were conducted. a. Bias-removed Ensemble Mean b. Superensemble

Correction of the interpolated forecasts: In the regression equation below, a denotes the ratio of the observed (zi) to the modeled rains (xi) for different intensities of rain, and b denotes the intercept that conveys underestimates (or overestimates) for the overall model forecast rain depending on its positive or negative values, in other words the slope coefficient a is a measure of the multiplicative bias if the systematic bias b is removed. Evaluation of the forecast errors Root-mean-square error (RMSE) Anomaly correlation coefficients (ACC) ETS(Equitable Threat Score (ETS) and TS

Comparative study of different spatial interpolation approaches Bilinear Spline Ordinary Kriging (OK ) Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW )

ECMWF interpolated 24h-Forecast of the precipitation Linear 11.45 Spline 11.77 OK 11.68 IDW 11.26 Linear 0.51 Spline 0.49 OK 0.50 IDW 0.52

Downscaling for single models The mean RMSE of the interpolated (triangle) and downscaling (square) 24-168h forecast of the precipitation from ECMWF, JMA, NCEP and UKMO over the area (15.125-49.125°N、90.125-140.125°E).

riangle The ACC between the interpolated (triangle) , downscaling (square) 1-7 day forecasts and the observed data.

Multimodel ensemble forecasts of single models The mean RMSE of the interpolation, bias-removed ensemble mean (BREM) and superensemble (SUP) and the bias-removed ECMWF forecasts 24h-forecast of the precipitation from ECMWF, JMA, NCEP and UKMO over the area (15.125-49.125°N、90.125-140.125°E) for the period from June 1 to August 27, 2007.

The mean RMSE (a) and ACC (b) of the interpolated, bias-removed ensemble mean (BREM) and superensemble (SUP) forecast of the precipitation from ECMWF, JMA, NCEP and UKMO over the area (15.125-49.125°N、90.125-140.125°E) .

Downscaling of multimodel ensemble forecasts The mean RMSE and ACC of the downscaling of single models and multimodel ensemble downscaling 24h-forecast of the precipitation from ECMWF, JMA, NCEP and UKMO over the area (15.125-49.125°N、90.125-140.125°E) for the period from June 1 to August 27, 2007.

Forecast lead time(days) The mean RMSE (left panel) and ACC (right panel) of the single model downscaling and multimodel ensemble downscaling 1-7 day forecast of the precipitation from ECMWF, JMA, NCEP and UKMO over the area (15.125-49.125°N、90.125-140.125°E) .

precipitation from ECMWF and Superensemble. 24h ECWMF 48h ECWMF 72h ECWMF 96h ECWMF 24h SUP 48hSUP 72h SUP 96h SUP The mean improvement (%) of the 24-168h downscaling forecast error of the precipitation from ECMWF and Superensemble.

120h ECWMF 144h ECWMF 168h ECWMF 120h SUP 144h SUP 168h SUP

The mean precipitation over the Wangjiaba region(110. 125-120. 125E,30 The mean precipitation over the Wangjiaba region(110.125-120.125E,30.125-35.125N)for the period from June 1 to August 27, 2007 RMSE EC-LS 4.06 EC-D 3.98 SUP-D 3.17 The mean precipitation over the southwest region (90.125-100.125E,15.125-30.125N) for the period from June 1 to August 27, 2007. RMSE EC-LS 5.14 EC-D 4.68 SUP-D 3.93

The ETS of single model downscaling and superensemble downscaling 24h-forecast of the precipitation for 0.1 mm/day (upper panel) and 10mm/day (bottom) during the period from June 1 to August 27, 2007.

for different precipitation threshold. The averaged ETS score over research area (values15.125-49.875°N、90.125-140.125°E) for different precipitation threshold.

Conclusions Statistical downscaling may significantly improve the forecast skill of single models. After the downscaling, the root-mean-square errors (RMSE) of the forecasts are significantly reduced, and the Anomaly Correlation Coefficients (ACC) between the forecasts and the TRMM data become larger. Multimodel ensemble downscaling has better performance than the single model downscaling.

Thank you for your attention!