Process Models

A Generic Process Model A software process framework

Process Flow

Identifying a Task Set Each software engineering action can be represented by a number of different task sets—each a collection of software engineering work tasks, related work products, quality assurance points, and project milestones. A task set defines the actual work to be done to accomplish the objectives of a software engineering action. A list of the task to be accomplished A list of the work products to be produced A list of the quality assurance filters to be applied

Process Patterns A process pattern describes a process-related problem that is encountered during software engineering work, identifies the environment in which the problem has been encountered, and suggests one or more proven solutions to the problem. Stated in more general terms, a process pattern provides you with a template [Amb98]—a consistent method for describing problem solutions within the context of the software process.

Process Pattern Types Stage patterns—defines a problem associated with a framework activity for the process. Task patterns—defines a problem associated with a software engineering action or work task and relevant to successful software engineering practice Phase patterns—define the sequence of framework activities that occur with the process, even when the overall flow of activities is iterative in nature.

Process Assessment and Improvement A number of different approaches to software process assessment and improvement have been proposed over the past few decades: Standard CMMI Assessment Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) — provides a five step process assessment model that incorporates five phases: initiating, diagnosing, establishing, acting and learning. CMM-Based Appraisal for Internal Process Improvement (CBA IPI)—provides a diagnostic technique for assessing the relative maturity of a software organization; uses the SEI CMM as the basis for the assessment [Dun01]

SPICE—The SPICE (ISO/IEC15504) standard defines a set of requirements for software process assessment. The intent of the standard is to assist organizations in developing an objective evaluation of the efficacy of any defined software process. [ISO08] ISO 9001:2000 for Software—a generic standard that applies to any organization that wants to improve the overall quality of the products, systems, or services that it provides. Therefore, the standard is directly applicable to software organizations and companies. [Ant06]

Prescriptive Process Models Prescriptive process models advocate an orderly approach to software engineering That leads to a few questions … If prescriptive process models strive for structure and order, are they inappropriate for a software world that thrives on change? Yet, if we reject traditional process models (and the order they imply) and replace them with something less structured, do we make it impossible to achieve coordination and coherence in software work?

The Waterfall Model The waterfall model, sometimes called the classic life cycle, suggests a systematic, sequential approach to software development that begins with customer specification of requirements and progresses through planning, modeling, construction, and deployment, culminating in ongoing support of the completed software

The V-Model A variation in the representation of the waterfall model is called the V-model. V-model depicts the relationship of quality assurance actions to the actions associated with communication, modeling, and early construction activities. In reality, there is no fundamental difference between the classic life cycle and the V-model. The V-model provides a way of visualizing how verification and validation actions are applied to earlier engineering work.

The Incremental Model The incremental model combines elements of linear and parallel process flows. The incremental model applies linear sequences in a staggered fashion as calendar time progresses. Each linear sequence produces deliverable “increments” of the software [McD93] in a manner that is similar to the increments produced by an evolutionary process flow. The incremental process model focuses on the delivery of an operational product with each increment. Early increments are stripped-down versions of the final product.

Evolutionary Models: Prototyping Evolutionary models are iterative. They are characterized in a manner that enables you to develop increasingly more complete versions of the software. communication Quick plan Modeling Quick design Construction of prototype Deployment delivery & feedback The prototype can serve as “the first system.” Although some prototypes are built as “throwaways,” others are evolutionary in the sense that the prototype slowly evolves into the actual system. Users get a feel for the actual system, and developers get to build something immediately. Construction of prototype

Evolutionary Models: The Spiral Boehm [Boe01a] describes the model in the following manner: “The spiral development model is a risk-driven process model generator that is used to guide multi-stakeholder concurrent engineering of software intensive systems. It has two main distinguishing features. One is a cyclic approach for incrementally growing a system’s degree of definition and implementation while decreasing its degree of risk. The other is a set of anchor point milestones for ensuring stakeholder commitment to feasible and mutually satisfactory system solutions.” Unlike other process models that end when software is delivered, the spiral model can be adapted to apply throughout the life of the computer software.

Evolutionary Models: Concurrent Figure provides a schematic representation of one software engineering activity within the modeling activity using a concurrent modeling approach. The activity—modeling—may be in any one of the states noted at any given time. Similarly, other activities, actions, or tasks (e.g., communication or construction) can be represented in an analogous manner. All software engineering activities exist concurrently but reside in different states.

Still Other Process Models Component based development—the process to apply when reuse is a development objective Formal methods—emphasizes the mathematical specification of requirements AOSD—provides a process and methodological approach for defining, specifying, designing, and constructing aspects Unified Process—a “use-case driven, architecture-centric, iterative and incremental” software process closely aligned with the Unified Modeling Language (UML)

The Unified Process (UP) Unified Process is an attempt to draw on the best features and characteristics of traditional software process models, but characterize them in a way that implements many of the best principles of agile software development. The Unified Process recognizes the importance of customer communication and streamlined methods for describing the customer’s view of a system. It emphasizes the important role of software architecture and “helps the architect focus on the right goals, such as understandability, reliance to future changes, and reuse” [Jac99]. It suggests a process flow that is iterative and incremental, providing the evolutionary feel that is essential in modern software development.

UP Phases

UP Work Products

Personal Software Process (PSP) Planning. This activity isolates requirements and develops both size and resource estimates. In addition, a defect estimate (the number of defects projected for the work) is made. All metrics are recorded on worksheets or templates. Finally, development tasks are identified and a project schedule is created. High-level design. External specifications for each component to be constructed are developed and a component design is created. Prototypes are built when uncertainty exists. All issues are recorded and tracked.

High-level design review High-level design review. Formal verification methods are applied to uncover errors in the design. Metrics are maintained for all important tasks and work results. Development. The component level design is refined and reviewed. Code is generated, reviewed, compiled, and tested. Metrics are maintained for all important tasks and work results. Postmortem. Using the measures and metrics collected (this is a substantial amount of data that should be analyzed statistically), the effectiveness of the process is determined. Measures and metrics should provide guidance for modifying the process to improve its effectiveness.

Team Software Process (TSP) The goal of TSP is to build a “self directed” project team that organizes itself to produce high-quality software. Humphrey [Hum98] defines the following objectives for TSP: Build self-directed teams that plan and track their work, establish goals, and own their processes and plans. These can be pure software teams or integrated product teams (IPT) of three to about 20 engineers. Show managers how to coach and motivate their teams and how to help them sustain peak performance.

Team Software Process (TSP) Accelerate software process improvement by making CMM Level 5 behavior normal and expected. The Capability Maturity Model (CMM), a measure of the effectiveness of a software process, is discussed in Chapter 30. Provide improvement guidance to high-maturity organizations. Facilitate university teaching of industrial-grade team skills. TSP defines the following framework activities: project launch, high-level design, implementation, integration and test, and postmortem.

THANKS…