© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christopher Graham Garnet Education UK. I dont do rhetorical questions !
Advertisements

Mona AL-Kahtani. Measure the students proficiency in grammar ranging from inflection to syntax. Mona AL-Kahtani.
Introduction by Kristina Lauer.  Goals for the course:  Improve writing skills  Increase skills in English grammar  Practice pronunciation  Improve.
6 th semester Course Instructor: Kia Karavas.  What is educational evaluation? Why, what and how can we evaluate? How do we evaluate student learning?
Deep Learning ThroughLiteracy-Rich Instructional Strategies Sara Overby Coordinating Teacher for Secondary Literacy
Grammar-Translation Approach Direct Approach
Contribution of a Professional Development Program for Teachers’ Learning Mónica Baptista; Ana Maria Freire
DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF TRANSVERSAL KEY COMPETENCES IN THE DEGREE OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY M.D. Rivero-Pérez*, M.L. González-SanJosé, P. Muñíz,
(2) Using age-appropriate activities, students expand their ability to perform novice tasks and develop their ability to perform the tasks of the intermediate.
Preparing Our Students for College. Literacy in the New Millennium ~New technology inspires a new set of skills -reading purposefully -figure out meanings.
Nonfiction Texts for the NC Social Studies Adoption
Teacher(s): Time: The Course Organizer Student: Course Dates: This Course: Course Progress Graph Course Questions: is about Course Assessment: 1. How can.
Advanced Language Learners Levels V, VI, VII (2) Using age-appropriate activities, students master novice tasks, expand their ability to perform intermediate.
LESSON PLANNING What? Why? And How?. Goals of this session Participants will be able to identify and explain: 1.What is a lesson plan and how to develop.
L.HILL et  Spanish II is an in-depth course that will review and study many of the same topics presented in Spanish I but.
Instructional Design Course Evaluation Phase. Agenda The Evaluation Process Expert Review Small Group Review The Pilot Feedback and Revision Evaluation.
Knowledge is fixed and need only to transfer from teacher to students is based on constructive and transformation process through learning process Learning.
Table 2. Means, standard deviations, ranks, and grade for using teaching strategies by the sample Mohammad AbdelWahab H. Hamzeh et al. Teaching Strategies.
Table 3. shows the means, standard deviations, and the level of assessment for female teachers’ views about the causes of low achievement in Rhetoric Haifa.
Table 4. shows the means, standard deviations, and the level of assessment of the views of female students about their low achievement in Rhetoric on all.
Ms. Roshni Bakre Dr. Mona Ismail
THE INCIDENCE OF FLIPPED LEARNING IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE WRITING SKILL OF SENIOR ENGLISH LEARNING GROUPS AT JOHANNES KEPLER HIGH SCHOOL, YEAR.
TEFL (TEACHING OF ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE
Learning Model for English 2-8 grades
Oleh: Beni Setiawan, Wahyu Budi Sabtiawan
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Figure 3. Comparison of class performance
The Science of Nutrition
Assessment of the model
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING-I ACCT 2003
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
COMPETENCIES & STANDARDS
Sixth Grade Cluster 1 Mrs. Craig
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Teachers Response (N= 11)
Instructional materials
Table 8. Drawing result before game
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
student achievement scores
Table 2. A Sample Lesson on Teaching Prepositions
Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female
Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.
Number of questionnaires sent out
Table 5. Organizational Procedures
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
Behavioral strategies
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
t-test for Equality of Means
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
chemistry that are involved in peer group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Figure 2. MDS-T configuration for the thirteen (13) criteria (and their Place) in DPESS in Athens (NKUA) Chris P. Lamprou et al. Evaluating the effectiveness.
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)
Geometry and Mensuration
Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
The Role of the Syllabus and Its Relevance to EFL Teacher Development
Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender
Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 1. shows means and standard deviations for female teachers’ views about the causes of low achievement in Arabic grammar Assessment Level Standard Deviation Mean Paragraph S. Female Teacher First Domain Very high 0.72 4.53 Not at home with Arabic grammar 1 High 0.44 3.14 Inadequacy of exercises in Arabic grammar books. 2 0.45 3.13 Not interested in identifying the objectives of teaching Arabic grammar. 3 Medium 0.46 3.27 Some are not qualified to teach Arabic grammar. 4 0.41 3.10 Some are not briefed on the modern teaching methods in Arabic grammar. 5 Low 0.32 2.15 The teacher doesn’t realize the importance of Arabic grammar. 6 0.69 4.11 Teaching of Arabic grammar is not applicable. 7 4.02 The teacher always speak in the vernacular not in standard Arabic grammar. 8 Teaching methods Second domain 0.48 3.09 Boring teaching methods adopted. 0.97 4.14 No participation from female students’ part in analyzing the grammatical sentence. 0.77 4.45 Female teachers do not link Arabic grammar rules with other Arabic language fields. 0.28 3.04 Discouraging teaching methods adopted. Very low 0.19 1.75 No consideration for individual differences. 0.47 No variety of methodology in accordance with the grammatical topic. 0.39 3.42 Lack of grammatical applications in teaching methods adopted. Teaching aids Third domain 0.58 4.51 Teaching aids adopted do not achieve the objectives of teaching Arabic grammar. 0.61 4.77 Female teachers do not regard the teaching aids in teaching Arabic grammar. 0.54 4.48 Teaching aids adopted do not cover all facets of Arabic grammar. 0.92 4.07 Lack of motivation in teaching aids adopted. 0.86 4.03 Most of female teachers are not efficient in using teaching aids. Teaching aids adopted do not motivate students for interaction and participation. 0.81 4.18 Some teaching aids present incorrect information about Arabic grammar. Arabic grammar book Fourth domain 2.57 Arabic grammar books handle grammatical rules in an abstract way not practically. 2.01 No correlations between grammatical topics and other topics in the other books of Arabic language. 0.74 Level of Grammatical topics is higher than students’ level. 4.49 Arabic grammar book doesn’t reinforce skills of innovative thought. 0.71 4.46 Arabic grammar books handle inflection and syntax in uneasy way. 0.65 4.75 Variety of grammatical concepts in the one topic. 3.40 Boring exercises in Arab grammar books 0.49 Arabic grammar course is not interesting. 0.75 Grammar exercises do not address the everyday life of students. 9 0.59 4.55 The scarcity of using figures, graphics, and pictures in Arabic grammar books. 10 0.37 2.58 Teachers cancel a great deal of topics and exercises. 11 Student Fifth domain 0.93 4.92 Most female students are low achievers in Arabic grammar. 4.29 Female students take no account of the importance of Arabic grammar in mastering other fields of Arabic language. Low interaction between female teachers and students 4.13 The vernacular badly affects mastering the grammatical rule. 3.50 Grammatical rules are passively considered by most of female students. 4.80 Low marks assigned for Arabic grammar make female students less interested. 0.79 3.99 Most female students affected by mass media language that is full of many grammatical errors. 0.80 4.00 Inability of students to distinguish between syntax and conjugation. Evaluation Sixth domain 0.63 Questions formulated ambiguously as Arabic grammar is not easy. 0.31 2.70 Grammatical questions were not formulated gradually from easiness to difficulty. Most grammatical exams are written ones that do not assess the oral language among female students. 0.70 3.78 No independent marks for the Arabic language subject. 1.51 Marks obtained subjectively 0.38 No modern strategies adopted to assess the grammatical subject. 4.25 Grammatical questions do not consider the individual differences between students. 2.88 Grammatical questions are incomprehensive. 3.69 Most teachers focus only on inflection in Arabic grammar exams. 3.70 Inadequate time to answer Arabic grammar exams. Haifa Awwad Alhawamdeh et al. Causes of Female Undergraduate Students’ Low Achievement in Arabic Grammar and Rhetoric from the Perspective of Female Teachers and Female Students themselves at Najran University. American Journal of Educational Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 5, 383-391. doi:10.12691/education-4-5-4 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.