GATHER reporting guidelines

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to write a study protocol Hanne-Merete Eriksen (based on Epiet 2004)
Advertisements

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Fieldwork assessment The difference between AS and A2 David Redfern
Protocol Development.
Exploring uncertainty in cost effectiveness analysis NICE International and HITAP copyright © 2013 Francis Ruiz NICE International (acknowledgements to:
Learning Objectives LO1 Understand the traditional approach to dealing with accounting uncertainty and going concern. LO2 Describe the main concepts of.
15 de Abril de A Meta-Analysis is a review in which bias has been reduced by the systematic identification, appraisal, synthesis and statistical.
Technical Writing II Acknowledgement: –This lecture notes are based on many on-line documents. –I would like to thank these authors who make the documents.
“But WHAT did they actually do?” Poor reporting of interventions: a remediable barrier to research translation Associate Professor Tammy
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Interpretation, Further Analysis and Dissemination Workshop Overview of Data Quality Issues in MICS.
Orion Project Proposal HTML Tutorial Website. Define.
PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews.
Reporting & Ethical Standards EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez.
Sina Keshavaarz M.D Public Health &Preventive Medicine Measuring level of performance & sustaining improvement.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Recent Developments of the OECD Business Tendency and Consumer Opinion Surveys Portal coi/coordination
Current and Future Applications of the Generic Statistical Business Process Model at Statistics Canada Laurie Reedman and Claude Julien May 5, 2010.
Update: Grocery Refrigeration Provisional Standard Protocol for Site Specific Savings RTF Meeting June 28,
Systematic reviews to support public policy: An overview Jeff Valentine University of Louisville AfrEA – NONIE – 3ie Cairo.
Improving the Quality of the HMRC Personal Wealth Statistics Rebecca Ambler and Abeda Malek - HMRC.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division UNECE and MDG-Monitoring: Database and regional indicators UNECE.
Outlining a Process Model for Editing With Quality Indicators Pauli Ollila (part 1) Outi Ahti-Miettinen (part 2) Statistics Finland.
Using Gender Statistics: a toolkit for training data users Overview Jessica Gardner UNECE Consultant
Matching Analyses to Decisions: Can we Ever Make Economic Evaluations Generalisable Across Jurisdictions? Mark Sculpher Mike Drummond Centre for Health.
Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,
Unit 11: Evaluating Epidemiologic Literature. Unit 11 Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize uniform guidelines used in preparing manuscripts for publication.
How official statistics is produced Alan Vask
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 28: Disseminating Evidence: Reporting Research Findings.
Folie 1 Sarajevo, October 2009 Stefan Friedrichs Managing Partner Public One // Governance Consulting Project Management in the Public Sector Monitoring.
OFFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 0 Office of Financial Management Office of Financial Management TALS Draft Conceptual Solution February 24, 2004.
Instrument Development and Psychometric Evaluation: Scientific Standards May 2012 Dynamic Tools to Measure Health Outcomes from the Patient Perspective.
1 Transnational Partner Search Toolkit Transnationality Contact Points Meeting 30 September Warsaw.
Yandell - Econ 216 Chap 1-1 Chapter 1 Introduction and Data Collection.
Country Workshop on The Philippine Data Revolution Roadmap for the Sustainable Development Goals EDSA Shangri-la, Mandaluyong City 5 October 2016 Gaye.
Division of HIV/AIDS Managing Questionnaire Development for a National HIV Surveillance Survey, Medical Monitoring Project Jennifer L Fagan, Health Scientist/Interview.
Metadata models to support the statistical cycle: IMDB
Statistics, Data, and Statistical Thinking
Writing a sound proposal
Document Development Cycle
Risk Communication in Medicines
How to write a study protocol
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 8. Routine monitoring.
Implementation of Clinical Guidelines Author: dr. Martin Rusnák
Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist
CensusInfo in the Context of the 2010 World Population and Housing Census Programme By Margaret Mbogoni, Ph.D. United Nations Statistics Division.
Chapter 20 Additional Assurance Services: Other Information
Gender Statistics Toolkit
STROBE Statement revision
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTIVITY
Chapter Eight: Quantitative Methods
Conclusions and Recommendations
Vital statistics and their sources
Principles and Recommendations - History
WHO/UNICEF Technical Briefing Seminar 22 September 2005 Helen Tata
Indicator structure and common elements for information flow
Chapter 20 Additional Assurance Services: Other Information
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Clinica urologica, università di Padova
Revised Art 12 reporting format
UNODC-UNECE Manual on Victimization Surveys: Content
Introduction Acknowledgments Identified need Project objective
LAMAS Working Group 29 June-1 July 2016
Point 6. Eurostat plans for Time Use Survey data processing and dissemination Working Group on Time Use Surveys 10 April 2013.
What are systematic reviews and why do we need them?
Metadata used throughout statistics production
RESULTS Methodological characteristics
Metadata on quality of statistical information
Data Analysis and Reporting
STEPS Site Report.
M & E Plans and Frameworks
Presentation transcript:

GATHER reporting guidelines Harry Campbell University of Edinburgh Harry.Campbell@ed.ac.uk

Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement

Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement Published 28 June 2016 Target audience – decision makers; researchers Defines best reporting practices for studies gathering data from multiple populations (in time or space) using multiple information systems Applies to all quantitative population-level estimates of heath indicators and indicators of health determinants for studies that synthesise information from multiple sources

Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement GATHER Working Group to define and promote good practice in reporting of global health estimates Generated list of possible reporting items 118 responses to survey on this list Consensus meeting to develop guidelines Further consultation with LMIC (130 country focal points for WHO mortality estimates)

Objectives and Funding Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement Objectives and Funding Define the populations, health indicators and time periods in the estimate State the sources of funding

Data Inputs (that are used in the estimate) Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement Data Inputs (that are used in the estimate) 3. Describe how data identified and accessed 4. Specify inclusion and exclusion criteria (and all ad-hoc exclusions) 5. Details of data sources and main characteristics Contact points, populations, data collection methods, years of data collection, age and sex range, diagnostic criteria, measurement method, sample size 6. Identify categories of data with biases

Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement Data Inputs (that are not generated in the study) 7. Describe and give sources of other data For all data 8. Provide all data/ meta-data in an extractable file format (or give details of group holding the rights to the data)

Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement Data analysis 9. Provide conceptual overview of the analysis 10. Provide detailed description of all steps in data analysis Cleaning, pre-processing, adjustments, weightings, models Describe how models evaluated and final model selected Provide evaluation of model performance, including any sensitivity analysis Describe sources of uncertainty and methods for calculating uncertainty intervals Describe how source code for analyses can be accessed

Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement Results and Discussion 15. Provide published results in an extractable file format 16. Report uncertainty intervals 17. Interpret results in the light of previous estimates and explain reasons for changes 18. Discuss limitations of the estimate, including data limitations and model assumptions

www.gather-statement.org

GATHER website [www.gather-statement.org] Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement GATHER website [www.gather-statement.org] Electronic version of 18 item checklist Minimum essential reporting items More detailed explanation of requirements for reporting Examples of good reporting Authors expected to make use of online appendices to provide full details and data

Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement GATHER future implications Data and code (at least key elements) to be made available online No requirement at present to give user support Hope that future funding of GBD studies will incorporate funding to cover this as part of study dissemination Anticipated that leading journals will require adherence to GATHER principles as prerequisite publication