Lessons Learned Through HBD: The Industry’s View

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 WORKSHOP 4: KEY COMMENTS FROM THE PANEL DISCUSSION The 3rd Kitasato University - Harvard School of Public Health Symposium Wednesday October 2nd - Thursday.
Advertisements

4 th Kitasato-Harvard Symposium: Summary and Conclusions Stephen Lagakos Harvard School of Public Health.
Harmonization - ICH Robert J. Temple, MD Deputy Center Director for Clinical Science FDA/Center for Drug Evaluation and Research SACHRP March 9, 2010.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs. Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions Julinda Mehilli,
Connecting South Carolina: The Gibbs/Hollings Cancer Center An NCCCP/NCI Designated Center Connection Anita L. Harrison, MPH Associate Director, Administration.
1 Cross Labeling Combination Products Bradley Merrill Thompson, MBA, JD, RAC Epstein Becker & Green PC.
Regulatory and Reimbursement Harmonization An Industry Perspective Adrian Griffin | April 2016.
Clinical Trials.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
2009 DIA US Annual Meeting GCP Session Advisory Committee Meeting
November 9, 2015 February 20, 2017 Using real world evidence – industry perspective Pma indication expansion Melissa hasenbank, phd Sr. Clinical Research.
Leveraging Bayesian Methodology to Increase the Trial Efficiency
CLI and Device Intervention Across the Pacific – An FDA View
Rachel Neubrander, PhD Division of Cardiovascular Devices
Essentials of Quality Control
Issues and Current Situations in the Development of Endovascular Treatment Devices for Pediatric Cardiology in the US – US Industry Dan Gutfinger, MD,
A capacity building programme for patient representatives
Clinical Review Process for New Drug Development and Application
Research Compliance and Institutional Review Boards
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Office of Medical Devices II,
Regulatory Basics: Europe and the CE Mark
Patricia M. Alt, Ph.D. Dept. of Health Science Towson University
Uncertainties, Concerns, and the Innovation Landscape: An Industry View Neal E Fearnot, PhD, FASA February 6, 2012.
OUS Data: What does the CE Mark Really Mean?
2009 DIA US Annual Meeting GCP Session Advisory Committee Meeting
FDA Pathway to Approval: Clinical Requirements for Renal Denervation
Clinicaltrials.gov Update
Jeff Shuren, MD, JD Center for Devices and Radiological Health U. S
Use of Prior Information (Clinical, Pre-clinical and Models) to Improve Efficiency and the Efficacy Estimates Roseann M. White, MA Director of Clinical.
ICH-GCP Avinash Kondawar M. Pharm Lead CRA
Appropriate Regulation of Adjunctive Devices: Embolic Protection
Industry Perspective: Expanded Access Programs
Renal Denervation Next Steps
Director, Asia Pacific Japan and U.S. Clinical Operations
Community Participation in Research
Balancing Pre and Postmarket Requirements Different Scenarios
Balancing Regulation and Innovation: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
How to Apply for and Receive Industry Funding for Investigator Sponsored Research Chuck Simonton MD, FACC, FSCAI Chief Medical Officer Abbott Vascular.
CMS and FDA The History and Horizon of Regulatory Coordination
The FDA Early Feasibility Study Pilot and the Innovation Pathway
EHR Integration Making Research Efficient
The Current PMA Requirements
Uncertainties, Concerns, and the Innovation Landscape: An Industry View Neal E Fearnot, PhD, FASA February 6, 2012.
First-in-Man, First In The USA: What’s The Difference?
Clinical Trials Medical Interventions
What Kind of Aspects can Physicians Look Forward To? US Physician View
Harmonized Assessment by Randomized Multicenter Study of OrbusNEich’s COMBO StEnt Japan-USA HARMONEE: Primary Report of A Randomized Trial of a Bioabsorbable.
Calcified Lesion and Device Intervention Across the Pacific: PMDA View
Regulatory Synergies in Device Innovation
Introduction of New Technology: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
FAVOR II Europe-Japan FAVOR II E-J
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Early Feasibility in the USA –An Academic View
Lessons Learned: Past Present and Future Japan-USA Regulatory Interactions Erica Takai, PhD US Food and Drug Administration
US Early Feasibility Studies (EFS)
Lessons Learned Through HBD: The Regulator’s View - US FDA
Bozeman Health Clinical Research
Erica Takai, PhD for Andrew Farb, M.D.
Progenitor Endothelial Cell Capturing with a Drug Eluting Stent
Lessons Learned Through HBD: The Regulator’s View - PMDA Perspective
New economies: Scenarios with a likelihood >50% and impact
Clinical Trials.
EDUCATE: A NESTcc Demonstration Project Regulatory Perspective
Translation Pathway for Coronary Stent Development- Clinical Endpoints
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
Effectiveness Marlene Haffner, MD MPH Haffner Associates, LLC
A New Approach to Clinical Trials
Clinical Research Services.  It is very important phase in medical science as it determines the safety and effectiveness of medications and treatment.
Drug-eluting coronary stent market overview
Presentation transcript:

Lessons Learned Through HBD: The Industry’s View Neal E. Fearnot, PhD HBD Japan FDA Town Hall February 20, 2017 Washington DC

Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below. Affiliation/Financial Relationship Company Cook Group Employee

What is Important to Industry? HBD industry wants to provide safe and effective products to patients more quickly, by better, faster, cheaper processes. The HBD process: What are the barriers? What are the opportunities? What potential POCs (“doing” projects) may help dissolve barriers and create opportunity?

Toward a Better Way HBD is for courageous, concerned industry, academics and regulators …industry courageous enough to ask questions about better regulatory paths, academics courageous enough to consider new approaches to evaluating products, and regulators courageous enough to consider alternate, less burdensome pathways providing the same safety and effectiveness.

Successes from each POC Medtronic’s Endeavor™ Drug Eluting Coronary Stent, evaluated in the US and Japan (ENDEAVOR trial), was one of the first POC opportunities for HBD. Abbott’s XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent, also evaluated in the US and Japan (SPIRIT III trial), was another early HBD POC. Cook’s Zilver® PTX® drug eluting peripheral stent was chosen March 2010 to participate in Collaborative Review Pilot Program and to serve as an HBD POC (exploring Japan/US single protocol clinical study). Terumo’s Misago self-expanding stent was chosen March 2010 to participate in Collaborative Review Pilot Program and to serve as an HBD POC. Orbus Neich’s Combo dual-therapy stent (endothelial progenitor cell capture on drug-eluting stent) - active, current POC. HBD POCs are landmark studies, generating globally transportable clinical data, supporting prompt approval of novel therapy in Japan and the US.

Breadth of HBD POCs Cardiovascular Systems’ Orbital Atherectomy System - active, current POC. TVA Medical’s Hemodialysis Access System - active, current POC. LVADS - INTERMACS represented partnered post-market POC. Infrastructure Comparison was an early and ongoing HBD focus, and yielded suggestions for improvements in both countries. GCP Comparison Study showed possibility of compliance with multiple GCP’s and, importantly, compliance with one GCP did not deny compliance with another GCP. STED Comparison examined comparable processes in each country. BIMO Comparison showed compatible inspection process and supported IMDRF initiative. Orphan Product Comparison found shared interest in providing products for small populations.

Lessons Learned: Myths Dispelled Regulatory agencies are locked into inflexible laws that may not fit with new technology. Regulators are not willing and able to explore alternate, new regulatory processes. Industry is not willing to risk asking, “Is there a better way?” because approval will be delayed. Academics focus on theoretical, not “practical” issues. If more than one government is involved, the process will be slower because regulators will share and promote concerns. While legitimate fears, HBD experience has shown these are truly myths.

Lessons Learned: How to Run a Simultaneous Japan/US Clinical Study Program A US/Japan parallel IDE/Shonin process includes: A single-protocol, multinational clinical study initiated simultaneously in Japan and US Compliance with JGCP and US GCP Coincident regulatory submission and review in both countries Regulator-to-regulator communication Near simultaneous marketing approval Complementary Post Approval Studies 13

Lessons Learned: Importance of Infrastructure Need premium clinical trial management and infrastructure (AE reporting, centralized monitoring and analysis) Infrastructure improvements to support clinical research: In Japan – Per patient/per site costs are high Need clarification of GCP requirements to REDUCE wasted unnecessary paperwork and procedures In US – Per site enrollment is low Need IRB and physician network reform to increase enrollment per site

Lessons Learned: Global Programs Global clinical study to answer fundamental S&E (or a combination of coordinated regional studies with same definitions, endpoints and statistics) Smaller studies designed for certain populations or practice patterns, or to obtain additional data on one detailed aspect of S&E Real World Evidence (RWE) may provide the best clinical evidence, pre-market and post-market

Lessons Learned: Thank you! By working together, HBD promotes: Faster Better Cheaper approval processes, and with the same assurance of safety and effectiveness. Thank you!